Rizza, Stacey A.

Objective: Our study aimed to assess the impact of pharmacogenomic panel testing in people with HIV (PWH). Design: Prospective, observational intervention assessment Methods: One hundred PWH were provided a comprehensive pharmacogenomic panel during routine care visits within the HIV specialty clinic of a large academic medical center. The panel determined the presence of specific genetic variants that could predict response or toxicity to commonly prescribed antiretroviral therapy (ART) and non-ART medications. An HIV specialty pharmacist reviewed the results with participants and the care team. The pharmacist (1) recommended clinically actionable interventions based on the participants’ current drug therapy, (2) assessed for genetic explanations for prior medication failures, adverse effects, or intolerances, and (3) advised on potential future clinically actionable care interventions based on individual genetic phenotypes. Results: Ninety-six participants (median age 53 years, 74% white, 84% men, 89% viral load <50 copies/ml) completed panel testing, yielding 682 clinically relevant pharmacogenomic results (133 major, 549 mild–moderate). Ninety participants (89 on ART) completed follow-up visits with 65 (72%) receiving clinical recommendations based on current medication profiles. Of the 105 clinical recommendations, 70% advised additional monitoring for efficacy or toxicity, and 10% advised alteration of drug therapy. Panel results offered explanation for prior ART inefficacy in one participant and ART intolerance in 29%. Genetic explanation for non-ART toxicity was seen in 21% of participants, with genetic contributors to inefficacy of non-ART therapy identified in 39% of participants. Conclusion: Preliminary data in a small cohort of PWH demonstrates benefit of routine pharmacogenomic panel testing.

Combination anti-retroviral therapy has drastically improved solid organ transplantation outcomes in persons living with HIV. DAA therapy has led to the successful eradication of HCV. While recent data have suggested improvement in outcomes in HIV/HCV-coinfected liver transplant recipients, temporal trends in patient survival within pre- and post-DAA eras are yet to be elucidated. The UNOS database was utilized to identify deceased donor liver transplant recipients between 1 January 2000 and 30 September 2020 and stratify them by HIV and HCV infection status. A total of 85,730 patients met the inclusion criteria. One-year and five-year patient survival improved (93% and 80%, respectively) for all transplants performed post-2015. For HIV/HCV-coinfected recipients, survival improved significantly from 78% (pre-2015) to 92% (post-2015). Multivariate regression analyses identified advanced recipient age, Black race, diabetes mellitus and decompensated cirrhosis as risk factors associated with higher one-year mortality. Liver transplant outcomes in HIV/HCV-coinfected liver transplant recipients have significantly improved over the last quinquennium in the setting of the highly effective combination of ART and DAA therapy. The presence of HIV, HCV, HIV/HCV-coinfection and active HCV viremia at the time of transplant do not cause higher mortality risk in liver transplant recipients in the current era.

Abstract The burden of senescent cells (SnCs), which do not divide but are metabolically active and resistant to death by apoptosis, is increased in older adults and those with chronic diseases. These individuals are also at the greatest risk for morbidity and mortality from SARS‐CoV‐2 infection. SARS‐CoV‐2 complications include cytokine storm and multiorgan failure mediated by the same factors as often produced by SnCs through their senescence‐associated secretory phenotype (SASP). The SASP can be amplified by infection‐related pathogen‐associated molecular profile factors. Senolytic agents, such as Fisetin, selectively eliminate SnCs and delay, prevent, or alleviate multiple disorders in aged experimental animals and animal models of human chronic diseases, including obesity, diabetes, and respiratory diseases. Senolytics are now in clinical trials for multiple conditions linked to SnCs, including frailty; obesity/diabetes; osteoporosis; and cardiovascular, kidney, and lung diseases, which are also risk factors for SARS‐CoV‐2 morbidity and mortality. A clinical trial is underway to test if senolytics decrease SARS‐CoV‐2 progression and morbidity in hospitalized older adults. We describe here a National Institutes of Health‐funded, multicenter, placebo‐controlled clinical trial of Fisetin for older adult skilled nursing facility (SNF) residents who have been, or become, SARS‐CoV‐2 rtPCR‐positive, including the rationale for targeting fundamental aging mechanisms in such patients. We consider logistic challenges of conducting trials in long‐term care settings in the SARS‐CoV‐2 era, including restricted access, consent procedures, methods for obtaining biospecimens and clinical data, staffing, investigational product administration issues, and potential solutions for these challenges. We propose developing a national network of SNFs engaged in interventional clinical trials.

Surface disinfection is part of a larger mitigation strategy to prevent the spread of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) virus causing coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19). Research evaluating the time, nature, and extent of surface disinfection of replication-competent viruses is needed. We evaluated the efficacy of two disinfectants against a replication-competent SARS-CoV-2 surrogate on three common public surfaces. Vesicular stomatitis virus expressing green fluorescent protein (VSV-GFP) was our replication-competent SARS-CoV-2 surrogate. Disinfection occurred using Super Sani-Cloth Germicidal Disposable Wipes and Oxivir Tb spray per manufacturer instructions to test the efficacy at reducing the presence, viability, and later replication of VSV-GFP on stainless steel, laminate wood, and porcelain surfaces using standardized methods after recovery and toxicity testing. During the main trials, we placed 100 µL spots of VSV-GFP at viral titers of 108, 107, and 106 PFU/mL on each surface prior to disinfection. Trials were completed in triplicate and post-disinfection measurements on each surface were compared to the measurements of non-disinfected surfaces. Disinfectants were considered efficacious when ≥3-log10 reduction in the number of infectious VSV-GFP virus units was observed on a given surface during all trials. Both disinfectants produced a ≥3.23-log10 reduction in infectious VSV-GFP virus unit numbers, with all trials showing no viable, replication-competent VSV-GFP present on any tested surface. The two disinfectants eliminated the presence, viability, and later replication of VSV-GFP, our SARS-CoV-2 surrogate, on all surfaces. This information suggests that, if following manufacturer instructions, overcleaning surfaces with multiple disinfectant solutions may be unnecessary.

Abstract Background Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) outcomes have significantly improved at the expense of other age-related diseases including chronic kidney disease. Early reports of people living with HIV (PLWH) undergoing deceased-donor kidney transplantation (DDKT) showed poor outcomes, but these have notably improved after introduction of antiretrovirals. Despite years of experience, the optimal induction immunosuppression (IIS) in PLWH remains subject of debate. Large-scale studies describing the current ISS practices in PLWH undergoing DDKT are lacking. Here, we describe the U.S. national trends of IIS used in PLWH undergoing DDKT from 2000 to 2018 using the United Network of Organ Sharing (UNOS) database. Methods We analyzed the UNOS database to determine the selection of IIS in PLWH undergoing first-time DDKT between 1/1/2000 and 12/31/2018. Cases with unknown HIV status at the time of transplant were excluded. Age, sex and demographics were analyzed. The regimen used for IIS was compared based on HIV serostatus and the change in induction regimen was trended over time. Results A total of 139,650 cases underwent DDKT during the study period. Among these, 1,384 were identified as HIV-positive. PLWH were significantly younger than HIV-negative (49±10 years vs. 51.6 ± 15.3 years; p&lt; 0.001) (Table 1). A greater proportion of men was seen in the PLWH group compared to HIV-negative persons (76.2% vs. 60.4%; p&lt; 0.0001). In the HIV-negative group, 12.1% undergoing DDKT did not receive IIS compared to 16.4% in PLWH (p&lt; 0.0001). Medications that have significantly increased in use with years in PLWH included rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin (rATG), steroids, and basiliximab (3.54, 3.25, 2.28, respectively; p&lt; 0.001). On our trend analysis (Figure 1), the percentage of PLWH receiving any IIS is increasing by 4.04% each year (p&lt; 0.001). Table 1 Figure 1 Conclusion Our study suggests that IIS is an increasing practice in PLWH undergoing DDKT, predominantly using rATG, steroids, and basiliximab. Understanding the current practices might lead to further studies to determine the long-term outcomes after different induction regimens in PLWH. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Background: Persistent inflammation and incomplete immune recovery among persons with HIV (PHIV) are associated with increased disease risk. We hypothesized that the angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) losartan would reduce inflammation by mitigating nuclear factor (NF)κB responses and promote T-cell recovery via inhibition of transforming growth factor-beta (TGFβ)-mediated fibrosis. Methods: Losartan (100 mg) versus placebo over 12 months was investigated in a randomized (1 : 1) placebo-controlled trial, among PHIV age at least 50 years, receiving antiretroviral therapy (ART), with HIV RNA less than 200 copies/ml and CD4+ cell count 600 cells/μl or less. Inflammation, fibrosis and myocardial biomarkers were measured in blood using ELISA, electrochemiluminescence and immunoturbidimetric methods, and T-cell and monocyte phenotypes were assessed with flow cytometry among a subset of participants. Changes over follow-up in (log-2 transformed) biomarkers and cell phenotypes (untransformed) were compared between losartan and placebo arms using linear mixed models. Results: Among 108 PHIV (n = 52 to losartan; n = 56 to placebo), 97% had a month 12 visit. Median age was 57 years and baseline CD4+ cell count was 408 cells/μl. Losartan treatment was not associated with an improvement in interleukin-6 levels, or other blood measures of inflammation, immune activation, fibrosis activity or myocardial function. CD4+ and CD8+ T cells also did not differ by treatment group. Losartan reduced SBP and DBP by 6 and 5 mmHg, respectively. Conclusion: Among older PHIV with viral suppression, losartan did not improve blood measures of inflammation nor T-cell immune recovery. Losartan treatment is unlikely to reduce inflammation associated comorbidities to a clinically meaningful degree, beyond the benefits from lowering blood pressure. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02049307.

AbstractBackgroundAscertaining involvement of left ventricular assist device (LVAD) in a patient presenting with bloodstream infection (BSI) can be challenging, frequently leading to use of chronic antimicrobial suppressive (CAS) therapy. We aimed to assess the efficacy of CAS therapy to prevent relapse of BSI from LVAD and non-LVAD sources.MethodsWe retrospectively screened adults receiving LVAD support from 2010 through 2018, to identify cases of BSI. Bloodstream infection events were classified into LVAD-related, LVAD-associated, and non-LVAD BSIs.ResultsA total of 121 episodes of BSI were identified in 80 patients. Of these, 35 cases in the LVAD-related, 14 in the LVAD-associated, and 46 in the non-LVAD BSI groups completed the recommended initial course of therapy and were evaluated for CAS therapy. Chronic antimicrobial suppressive therapy was prescribed in most of the LVAD-related BSI cases (32 of 35, 91.4%) and 12 (37.5%) experienced relapse. Chronic antimicrobial suppressive therapy was not prescribed in a majority of non-LVAD BSI cases (33, 58.9%), and most (31, 93.9%) did not experience relapse. Chronic antimicrobial suppressive therapy was prescribed in 9 of 14 (64.2%) cases of LVAD-associated BSI and none experienced relapse. Of the 5 cases in this group that were managed without CAS, 2 had relapse.ConclusionsPatients presenting with LVAD-related BSI are at high risk of relapse. Consequently, CAS therapy may be a reasonable approach in the management of these cases. In contrast, routine use of CAS therapy may be unnecessary for non-LVAD BSIs.

Abstract Background Post-operative management of patients undergoing cardiac transplantation with an infected left ventricular assist device (LVAD) is unclear. Methods We retrospectively screened all adults with an LVAD who underwent cardiac transplantation at our institution from 2010 through 2018. We selected all cases of LVAD-specific and LVAD-related infections who were receiving antimicrobial therapy as initial treatment course or chronic suppression at the time of cardiac transplantation. Non-LVAD infections, superficial driveline-infection, or concurrent use of right ventricular assist device or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation device were excluded. Results A total of 54 cases met study criteria with 18/54 (33.6%) classified as LVAD- specific or related infections and 36/54 (66.6%) as non-infected. Cases of LVAD-infection had a higher median Charlson Comorbidity Index score at the time of transplantation compared to non-infected cases (P=.005). Of the 18 cases of infection, 13/18 (72.2%) were classified as LVAD-specific and 5/18 (27.8%) as LVAD-related. A total of 9/13 (69.2%) cases had proven LVAD-specific infections. Antimicrobial therapy was extended post-transplant to treat preceding LVAD-specific infection in all nine cases (9/13, 69.2%) with a median duration of 14 days (IQR 14-28). Following LVAD removal, antimicrobial treatment was not continued for preceding LVAD-related infections. Conclusions Patients with an LVAD-specific infection were treated with two weeks of pathogen-directed therapy post heart transplant without any relapses. For those without LVAD-specific infection or uncomplicated LVAD-related bacteremia who had completed antimicrobial therapy pre-transplant, antibiotics were discontinued after standard peri-operative prophylaxis and no relapses were observed.