Lennon, Ryan J.

Background— The impact of changing demographics on causes of long-term death after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remains incompletely defined. Methods and Results— We evaluated trends in cause-specific long-term mortality after index PCI performed at a single center from 1991 to 2008. Deaths were ascertained by scheduled prospective surveillance. Cause was determined via telephone interviews, medical records, autopsy reports, and death certificates. Competing-risks analysis of cause-specific mortality was performed using 3 time periods of PCI (1991–1996, 1997–2002, and 2003–2008). Final follow-up was December 31, 2012. A total of 19 077 patients survived index PCI hospitalization, of whom 6988 subsequently died (37%, 4.48 per 100 person-years). Cause was determined in 6857 (98.1%). Across 3 time periods, there was a 33% decline in cardiac deaths at 5 years after PCI (incidence: 9.8%, 7.4%, and 6.6%) but a 57% increase in noncardiac deaths (7.1%, 8.5%, and 11.2%). Only 36.8% of deaths in the recent era were cardiac. Similar trends were observed regardless of age, extent of coronary disease, or PCI indication. After adjustment for baseline variables, there was a 50% temporal decline in cardiac mortality but no change in noncardiac mortality. The decline in cardiac mortality was driven by fewer deaths from myocardial infarction/sudden death ( P <0.001) but not heart failure ( P =0.85). The increase in noncardiac mortality was primarily attributable to cancer and chronic diseases ( P <0.001). Conclusions— This study found a marked temporal switch from predominantly cardiac to predominantly noncardiac causes of death after PCI over 2 decades. The decline in cardiac mortality was independent of changes in baseline clinical characteristics. These findings have implications for patient care and clinical trial design.

BackgroundWe sought to determine the utility of a magnetic navigation system (MNS) in treating a variety of coronary artery lesions including those that could not be revascularized with standard percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). MNS may add value in the treatment of tortuous arteries and bifurcation lesions; however its widespread adoption has lagged because of cost and a lack of clear advantage over conventional PCI. We performed a retrospective analysis to determine whether MNS improved procedural success for highly complex lesions.Methods and ResultsOne hundred and forty‐eight patients underwent treatment with MNS at Mayo Clinic, Rochester. Clinical data, angiographic and procedural characteristics, lesion crossing success and outcomes were reviewed. Overall 133 patients underwent successful revascularization with 87% (143) of 164 lesions crossed using MNS alone. Another six lesions required a combination of MNS and conventional devices resulting in overall success of 91% (149/164). Eighteen complex lesions had previously failed PCI and 12 (67%) were successfully treated with MNS. Success after failed PCI was higher (88%) when a frequent user operated MNS, but occasional users also noted incremental success (30%). Twenty‐five chronic total occlusions were included amongst these 164 lesions, with observed antegrade MNS lesion crossing rates of 78% for regular and 14% for occasional users.ConclusionsMNS is a useful adjunct to performance of PCI. This specialized technology has a clear learning curve and can facilitate treatment of highly complex lesions. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Background— Sex-specific differences affect the evaluation, treatment, and prognosis of coronary artery disease. We tested the hypothesis that long-term outcomes of fractional flow reserve (FFR)–guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are different between women and men. Methods and Results— Consecutive 1090 patients, referred for PCI and undergoing FFR measurements at the Mayo Clinic between October 2002 and December 2009, were included in this registry study. Clinical events were compared between the sexes during a median follow-up of 50.9 months. Of all patients, women had higher FFR adjusted by visual coronary stenosis than men ( P =0.03). The Kaplan–Meier percent of major adverse cardiac events at 5 years was 35% in women and 38% in men ( P =0.54). Interestingly, in patients undergoing PCI with an FFR <0.75, the incidence of death or myocardial infarction was significantly higher in women than in men (hazard ratio, 2.16; 95% confidence interval, 1.04–4.51; P =0.04). Moreover, compared with patients with FFR >0.80, deferral of PCI for those with FFR between 0.75 and 0.80 was associated with an increased rate of major adverse cardiac events, particularly death or myocardial infarction in women (hazard ratio, 3.25; 95% confidence interval, 1.56–6.74; P =0.002) and revascularization in men (hazard ratio, 2.66; 95% confidence interval, 1.66–4.54; P <0.001). Conclusions— Long-term outcome differs between women and men undergoing FFR-guided PCI. Our data suggest that the sex-based treatment strategy is necessary to further optimize prognosis of patients with coronary artery disease.

Objectives: To determine the prevalence and relationship of frailty and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) among residents of long-term care [nursing homes (NH) and assisted living (AL)] facilities. Methods: Residents of NH and AL facilities in La Crosse County, Wisconsin, were recruited 1/2009-6/2010 and assessed for frailty (gait speed, unintended weight loss, grip strength), comorbidity (Charlson index), and HRQOL [Short Form (SF)-36]. Results: Among 137 participants, 85% were frail. Frail residents were older, had more comorbidities (2.0 vs. 0, p < .001) and lower mean SF-36 Physical Component Score (PCS, 32 vs. 48, p < .001). Following adjustments for age, sex, and comorbidities, compared to nonfrail residents, frail residents had lower SF-36 PCS (mean difference −14.7, 95% CI. −19.3,−10.1, p < .001). Frailty, comorbidity, and HRQOL did not differ between NH and AL facilities. Discussion: Frail residents had lower HRQOL, suggesting that preventing frailty may lead to better HRQOL among residents of long-term care facilities.

ObjectivesThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the left main (LM) coronary artery anatomy using three‐dimensional (3D) quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) software as compared to intravascular ultrasound (IVUS).BackgroundPercutaneous intervention of the LM coronary artery is becoming more common in selected patients with LM coronary artery disease (CAD). Quantification of LM CAD by conventional angiography can be difficult. IVUS is considered the gold standard to evaluate LM anatomy and severity of CAD but entails additional steps, catheters, and expertise. Our objective was to compare a novel quantitative angiographic analysis system with IVUS for LM anatomy.MethodsFifty five patients underwent both coronary angiography and IVUS of the LM. LM measurements were analyzed with 3D QCA (IC‐PRO, Paieon, Israel) software using IVUS as the reference standard. The measurements included proximal, middle, distal minimal luminal diameter (MLD) and area. Additionally, lesion MLD, minimal luminal area were recorded by both systems. Bland–Altman plots were used to investigate agreement between the two imaging systems.ResultsOf the 55 patients in our cohort, average age was 66 ± 11 years (25% female). By Bland‐Altman analysis there was very good agreement between 3D QCA and IVUS for measures of MLD and minimal lumen area (MLA). However, there was poor concordance in the estimation of plaque burden between the two methods.ConclusionsOur data demonstrate that 3D QCA software has fair agreement when compared with IVUS for imaging of LM MLD and MLA. These results suggest that 3D QCA could potentially be helpful to guide intervention of the LM. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Background— High sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) has been identified as a predictor of adverse cardiovascular outcomes. Whether hsCRP is a useful biomarker for risk stratification in contemporary percutaneous coronary intervention remains unknown. Methods and Results— We conducted a prospective study among 513 patients undergoing non-emergency percutaneous coronary intervention and examined the relationship between pre- and postprocedural hsCRP levels and outcomes. The patients were divided according to the median preprocedural hsCRP level (0.3 mg/dL). Patients with high hsCRP had significantly more adverse clinical characteristics. Preprocedural hsCRP level was an independent predictor of periprocedural myocardial infarction (odds ratio per doubling of hsCRP 1.15 [95% confidence interval, 1.01–1.31]; P =0.038). Unadjusted mortality (29.7% versus 9.9%; P <0.001) and the combined end point of death or myocardial infarction (36.5% versus 16.0%, P <0.001) during a follow-up of 5 years were markedly greater in patients with high preprocedural hsCRP. Similar relationships existed for postprocedural hsCRP. However, after multivariable adjustment, neither preprocedural hsCRP levels (hazard ratio per doubling 0.96 [0.92, 1.00]; P =0.066) nor postprocedural hsCRP levels (hazard ratio 0.98 [0.94, 1.02]; P =0.27) were significantly associated with mortality. Conclusions— High hsCRP is associated with a greater independent risk of periprocedural myocardial infarction, as defined by the universal definition, but is not an independent determinant of mortality after percutaneous coronary intervention. Our findings suggest that routine measurement of hsCRP in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention in contemporary practice is unlikely to be beneficial.

Background— The clinical efficacy of alcohol septal ablation for obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) has been demonstrated, but the long-term effects of the procedure remain uncertain. This study examined the survival of patients after septal ablation performed in a tertiary HCM referral center. Methods and Results— We examined 177 patients (mean age, 64 years; 68% women) who underwent septal ablation at our institution. Over a follow-up of 5.7 years, survival free of all mortality was no different than the expected survival for a comparable general population, and similar to that of age- and sex-matched patients who underwent isolated surgical myectomy (8-year survival estimate, 79% versus 79%; P =0.64). For the end point of documented sudden cardiac death or unknown cause of death, the incidence per 100 person-year follow-up was 1.31 (95% confidence interval, 0.60–2.38). Residual left ventricular outflow tract gradient after ablation was an independent predictor of long-term survival free of any death. Conclusions— In this nonrandomized study of carefully selected patients undergoing septal ablation by experienced operators in a tertiary referral HCM center, long-term survival was favorable and similar to that of an age- and sex-matched general population, and to patients undergoing surgical myectomy, as well, without an increased risk of sudden cardiac death.

Background— Coronary stents, drug-eluting stents in particular, have been linked to coronary epicardial endothelial dysfunction after implantation. However, less is known about their impact on coronary microvascular function and their long-term effects on the vasculature. Methods and Results— We evaluated 71 patients (mean age, 53.0±10.1 years) with chest pain and angiographically nonsignificant coronary artery disease 17.1±17.1 months after left anterior descending coronary artery stenting. Seventy-one age- and sex-matched patients (mean age, 53.0±10.3 years) with chest pain but no prior coronary intervention served as controls. Coronary blood flow in response to the endothelium-dependent vasodilator acetylcholine as well as the microvascular (endothelium-independent) coronary flow reserve in response to intracoronary adenosine were evaluated. Quantitative coronary angiography was used to study epicardial diameter changes to acetylcholine. Microcirculatory function was not significantly different between the stenting and control groups (median [interquartile range] coronary flow reserve, 2.9 [2.5–3.4] versus 3.0 [2.4–3.4] mL/min, P =0.24; change of coronary blood flow, 34.9% [−34.4% to 90.0%] versus 54.7% [−5.6% to 104.6%], P =0.18). Both groups exhibited epicardial endothelial dysfunction (−23.0% [−47.4% to −7.6%] versus −20.0% [−40.0% to 0.0%], P =0.4). Results did not differ between patients with drug-eluting stents (n=46) and patients with bare-metal stents (n=24). Conclusions— This study demonstrates that in patients with coronary arteries in which a stent has been placed, coronary microcirculatory and epicardial vascular function are not significantly different from that of an age- and sex-matched population with similar symptoms but nonsignificant coronary artery disease.