Perry, William

BACKGROUND: Hemorrhoids are common and relief anchors on symptom improvement. Despite several available treatment options, the optimal patient-reported outcome measure for contemporary clinical trials is not established. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to systematically assess patient-reported outcome measures that measure hemorrhoid symptom severity and/or health-related quality of life. DATA SOURCES: A systematic review was performed using PubMed and Embase (1980-2025). STUDY SELECTION: Prospective development/validation studies evaluating patient-reported outcome measures relevant to hemorrhoidal disease. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Patient-reported outcome measures were evaluated on key measurement properties of reliability, internal consistency, construct validity, and responsiveness according to COSMIN v2.0 criteria. RESULTS: Of the 1,266 total studies reviewed, nine patient-reported outcome measures were identified: seven measure symptom severity and six measure health-related quality-of-life. Three demonstrated reliability, internal consistency, construct validity, and responsiveness. The Patient Reported Outcome Measure-Haemorrhoidal Impact And Satisfaction Score comprehensively measures symptom severity, health-related quality-of-life, and treatment satisfaction. The Hemorrhoidal Disease Symptom Score classifies patients with high or low symptom load, and when used in combination with Short Health Scale-Hemorrhoidal Disease, also measures impact on health-related quality of life. LIMITATIONS: Preference toward specific measures may differ between clinical trials and clinical practice. CONCLUSIONS: We identify two viable patient-reported outcome measures for use in future clinical trials that evaluate hemorrhoid interventions.

Introduction: Crohn’s disease (CD) remains associated with long-term morbidity despite biologic therapies. Surgery, historically considered a last-resort option, is increasingly integrated into disease management earlier. This review examines the evolving role of surgery in the biologic era. Methods: A focused narrative review of randomized controlled trials, meta-analyses, observational studies, and international guidelines addressing contemporary surgical strategies in CD was performed. Results: The LIR!C trial demonstrated that early ileocecal resection provides durable remission and improves long-term outcomes compared with biologic therapy in selected patients. The PISA II trial supported an early combined surgical and medical approach for perianal fistulizing disease. Preoperative optimization, including nutritional support and adjustment of immunosuppressive therapy, has become a cornerstone of perioperative management. Laparoscopic surgery remains the preferred approach whenever feasible, while robotic surgery is emerging as a promising platform that is expected to play an increasingly important role in the surgical management of CD. Postoperative recurrence remains a major challenge, prompting the development of innovative surgical strategies. Although the Kono-S anastomosis initially showed promising reductions in recurrence, recent prospective studies failed to confirm superiority over conventional techniques. Similarly, extended mesenteric excision did not demonstrate improved outcomes despite increasing evidence implicating the mesentery in CD pathogenesis. Strictureplasty remains an effective option for selected fibrotic small-bowel strictures. Conclusions: Surgery remains central to multidisciplinary CD management and offers the potential to modify disease when performed early in selected patients. The impact of innovative surgical strategies on postoperative recurrence remains uncertain, and ongoing trials are expected to further help with surgical decision-making.