Kudva, Yogish C.

Abstract INTRODUCTION Cognition is reduced at low and high glucose, reflecting cognitive vulnerability to glucose (CVG) fluctuations. The impact of glucose fluctuations on the aging brain remains unclear. We examined whether CVG is associated with plasma biomarkers of Alzheimer's disease (AD) pathology and neurodegeneration. METHODS Participants included N = 114 adults with type 1 diabetes assessed for processing speed and sustained attention using ecological momentary assessment (EMA) combined with continuous glucose monitoring (CGM). We characterized associations between CVG and amyloid beta (Aβ) 42/40, phosphorylated tau (p‐tau) 181 and 217, neurofilament light chain, and glial fibrillary acidic protein. RESULTS CVG was associated with all plasma biomarkers, except Aβ 42/40. CVG for sustained attention exhibited strong associations with p‐tau biomarkers that persisted across covariate specifications. DISCUSSION CVG may be a useful digital phenotype of AD. It remains unclear whether CVG contributes to versus arises from neurodegeneration. We consider possible mechanisms linking cognitive vulnerability and long‐term glucose variability to the development of neuropathology. Highlights Cognitive vulnerability to glucose (CVG) may be a useful digital phenotype of neurodegeneration. We used cognitive ecological momentary assessment and continuous glucose monitoring to investigate CVG's associations with plasma biomarkers. Associations of CVG for sustained attention and phosphorylated tau 181 remained significant across covariates. We discuss possible mechanisms relating glucose variability, cognition, and neurodegeneration.

OBJECTIVE To evaluate a regimen of inhaled Technosphere insulin (TI) plus insulin degludec in adults with type 1 diabetes, who prestudy were predominately using either an automated insulin delivery (AID) system or multiple daily insulin injections (MDI) with continuous glucose monitoring. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS At 19 sites, adults with type 1 diabetes were randomly assigned to TI plus insulin degludec (N = 62) or usual care (UC) with continuation of prestudy insulin delivery method (N = 61) for 17 weeks. RESULTS Prestudy, AID was used by 48% and MDI by 45%. Mean ± SD HbA1c was 7.57% ± 0.97% at baseline and 7.62% ± 1.06% at 17 weeks in the TI group and 7.59% ± 0.80% and 7.54% ± 0.77%, respectively, in the UC group (adjusted difference 0.11%, 95% CI −0.10 to 0.33, P value for noninferiority = 0.01). HbA1c improved from baseline to 17 weeks by >0.5% (5.5 mmol/mol) in 12 (21%) in the TI group and in 3 (5%) in the UC group and worsened by >0.5% (5.5 mmol/mol) in 15 (26%) in the TI group and in 2 (3%) in the UC group. The most common TI side effect was a brief cough; eight participants discontinued TI due to side effects. CONCLUSIONS In adults with type 1 diabetes, HbA1c after 17 weeks with a regimen of TI and degludec was noninferior to UC, which consisted predominately of either AID or MDI. TI should be considered an option for people with type 1 diabetes, particularly those who are motivated to further reduce postprandial hyperglycemia.

Background: Serum C-peptide concentration is often utilized for diagnostic, prognostic, or therapeutic assessment in diabetes mellitus. However, there are limited clinical data regarding diagnostic and predictive value of C-peptide measured during hospitalizations for hyperglycemia. Materials and Methods: Adults admitted to Mayo Clinic inpatient facilities due to an acute hyperglycemic emergency between January 2017 and November 2022 were included in our study. Predictive capacity of C-peptide for discontinuation of therapeutic insulin was examined in the entire cohort and the subgroup of non-autoimmune non-pancreatitis diabetes (NANP-DM). Results: We included 187 patients (63 women) in our study. During hospitalization, patients with type 1 diabetes antibodies displayed diminished serum C-peptide concentration ( P = 0.014), correlating inversely with subsequent hemoglobin A1c% [ r = (−0.22), P = 0.005]. Initial C-peptide concentrations did not differ between patients requiring insulin therapy during follow-up and those who did not ( P = 0.16). C-peptide concentrations showed limited predictive capacity for achieving glycemic control. Subgroup analyses in NANP-DM exhibited similar limited capacity for anticipating therapeutic insulin needs and achieving glycemic controls. Discussion: C-peptide concentration did not exhibit a robust predictive capability for future need of insulin therapy and achieving glycemic control, limiting its utility in clinical practice within inpatient settings.

OBJECTIVE To compare postprandial glucose excursions following a bolus with inhaled technosphere insulin (TI) or subcutaneous rapid-acting analog (RAA) insulin. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS A meal challenge was completed by 122 adults with type 1 diabetes who were using multiple daily injections (MDI), a nonautomated pump, or automated insulin delivery (AID) and who were randomized to bolus with their usual RAA insulin (n = 61) or TI (n = 61). RESULTS The primary outcome, the treatment group difference in area under the curve for glucose >180 mg/dL over 2 h, was less with TI versus RAA (adjusted difference −12 mg/dL, 95% CI −22 to −2, P = 0.02). With TI, the glucose excursion was smaller (P = 0.01), peak glucose lower (P = 0.01), and time to peak glucose shorter (P = 0.006). Blood glucose <70 mg/dL occurred in one participant in each group. CONCLUSIONS Postmeal glucose excursion was smaller with TI than with RAA insulin in a cohort that included both AID and MDI users.