Graham, Rondell P.

BACKGROUNDThe cytologic features of undifferentiated pancreatic carcinoma with osteoclastic giant cells (UOC) are rarely described.METHODSCytologic and clinicopathologic characteristics in 15 UOC fine‐needle aspiration (FNA) specimens were analyzed.RESULTSFNA specimens were obtained from 6 men and 8 women with a mean age of 65 years who had UOCs (head, n = 7; body, n = 3; and tail, n = 4) with a mean radiologic size 7.3 cm, and some had a cystic component (n = 9). Three cell types (osteoclastic giant cells, pleomorphic tumor giant cells, and spindled/histiocytoid cells) were observed in 12 of 15 specimens (80%); and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) was present in 11 specimens. FNA diagnoses were UOC (n = 6), PDAC (n = 5), poorly differentiated carcinoma (n = 2), “suspicious for neoplasm” (n = 1), and “negative” (n = 1). Five of 5 specimens with osteoclastic giant cells were positive for cluster of differentiation 68 (CD68) (a glycoprotein that binds to low‐density lipoprotein). Pleomorphic tumor giant cells and spindled/histiocytoid cells were positive for pancytokeratin (6 of 7 specimens), CAM5.2 (2 of 3 specimens), and epithelial membrane antigen (2 of 2 specimens). INI‐1 protein expression was retained in 3 of 3 specimens. The Ki‐67 labeling index was assessed in 3 specimens and was 12%, 18%, and 40%; 4 of 12 resected UOCs were pure, and 8 were mixed with PDAC. One resection specimen had intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm, and 2 had mucinous cystic neoplasms. The median overall survival (OS) of patients who had UOCs identified on FNA was 8 months (6 died [OS, 8 months; range, 2‐22 months], and 8 remained alive [OS, 3 months; range, 1‐27 months]), which was similar to the survival of 74 patients who had PDACs identified on FNA (OS, 15 months; P = .279) but worse than that of the 27 patients with UOCs who did not undergo FNA (OS, 92 months; P = .0135).CONCLUSIONSThe 3 classical UOC cell types are identifiable on FNA, making cytologic diagnosis possible if considered in the differential. A PDAC component is often also observed. The survival advantage of UOC over pure PDAC appears to be negated by FNA and requires further investigation. Cancer Cytopathol 2017;125:563–75. © 2017 American Cancer Society.

179 Background: GISTs arise from interstitial cells of Cajal anywhere within the gastrointestinal tract, but those of the esophagus and GEJ are exceedingly rare ( < 1% of cases). Our aim was to characterize clinicopathological features and outcomes of esophageal and GEJ GISTs and compare survival with a population-based registry (SEER). Methods: 28 cases were identified using the Mayo Clinic Cancer Registry from 1997 to 2016, and 378 cases from the SEER 18 registry from 2000 to 2013. Mayo cases were re-reviewed by Mayo pathologists. We analyzed patient characteristics, tumor location, TNM staging, mitotic index, molecular diagnostics, IHC staining, and histomorphology. JMP software was used to calculate time to recurrence (TTR) and overall survival (OS) utilizing Kaplan-Meier and log-rank. Results: At Mayo, 60% of tumors arose in the distal esophagus. Mean tumor size was 5.73 cm. 42% of cases were low grade. None had nodal involvement. Five cases were metastatic at diagnosis, all to the liver. 86.7% had spindle cell morphology. IHC staining was positive for KIT in 92%, followed by CD34 (52%), DOG-1 (24%), and actin (16%). Mutational analysis was done on 10 cases and KIT mutation was found in 8 cases; 2 were wild-type. Two-thirds of patients underwent surgery, mostly esophagectomy. 14 patients received adjuvant imatinib. Median time to diagnosis from symptom onset was 2 months; median time to surgery from diagnosis was 1 month. Of 10 patients with complete follow-up, 2 had recurrences: 1at the anastomotic site and 1 in the liver. Median TTR from surgery was 36.5 months. Median follow-up time was 31.5 months. Median OS from diagnosis for the Mayo cohort was 129.5 months (95% CI 55.7-x). SEER cohort median OS was 81 months (95% CI 63-101), and females had superior OS compared to males (HR 0.67; 95% CI 0.48-0.93, p = 0.016). Conclusions: Patients undergoing surgical resection for esophageal and GEJ GISTs had a favorable prognosis, but recurrences occurred. The superior OS seen in the Mayo cohort suggests early resection and adjuvant imatinib may improve outcomes.

AimsMassive gastric polyposis is a rare entity that is often associated with juvenile polyposis syndrome (JPS). The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinicopathological features of 22 patients with abundant gastric juvenile‐type or hyperplastic‐like polyps.Methods and resultsThe study included 12 males and 10 females with a median age of 48 years (range: 13–79 years). Fourteen (64%) patients carried a diagnosis of JPS, and three had prior gastrointestinal adenocarcinomas. Patients without known JPS presented at an older median age (60 years versus 40 years; P = 0.0068). Clinical symptoms included nausea, vomiting, and abdominal pain; 23% of patients were asymptomatic. Eighteen cases showed complete or near‐complete carpeting of the gastric mucosa by innumerable polyps, ranging from a few millimetres to ~100 mm. Most polyps formed long, bulbous projections and had characteristic histological features, including a smooth outer contour, prominent stromal oedema, and widely spaced, often cystically dilated glands lined by foveolar epithelium; some polyps had less stroma and more hyperplastic foveolar epithelium. All had normal underlying or adjacent mucosa. Four (18%) cases harboured adenocarcinoma, and seven (32%) others showed dysplasia. SMAD4 immunohistochemical staining showed patchy loss in polyps from 19 of 20 cases tested. Five of six (84%) patients tested had a germline SMAD4 mutation.ConclusionsMassive gastric juvenile‐type polyposis can occur in patients with and without known JPS, and may mimic different conditions, such as other polyposis syndromes and Ménétrier disease. Pathologists play an important role in disease classification, as some patients lack a family or personal history of JPS, have few if any colonic polyps, and may not harbour diagnostic germline mutations.

AimsBiphenotypic sinonasal sarcoma (SNS) is a locally aggressive tumour that occurs in the sinonasal region. PAX3–MAML3 has recently been identified as a recurrent fusion gene event in this entity; however, a subset of tumours harbour alternative PAX3 rearrangement without the involvement of MAML3. In this study we sought to characterize the molecular profile of a large series of cases, with a special emphasis on tumours with alternative fusions.Methods and resultsForty‐four examples of SNS were screened by fluorescence in‐situ hybridization and reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction to better characterize its molecular profile and identify potential novel fusion genes. Twenty‐four were positive for PAX3–MAML3 (55%), 15 showed rearrangements of PAX3 without MAML3 involvement (34%), one showed rearrangement of MAML3 without PAX3 involvement, and four were negative for the involvement of either gene (9%). Among 15 cases with PAX3 involvement only, three were found to harbour PAX3–FOXO1. Two of these cases arose in the nasal cavities of female patients (aged 31 and 47 years), and one showed bilateral involvement of the nasal cavities of a 35‐year‐old male. A fourth case involved the skull base of a 47‐year‐old male, and was positive for PAX3–NCOA1. Patients with fusion‐negative tumours were slightly older.ConclusionMore than half of the SNSs in this series were positive for PAX3–MAML3. However, a subset of tumours may harbour alternative PAX3 fusion genes or show no involvement of PAX3. Except for a possible weak association between age and molecular profile, the overall morphological and immunophenotypic features of all cases seem to be similar. Because of the rarity of these tumours, the impact of the molecular profile on the clinical course of these tumours remains to be determined.

AimsFibrolamellar carcinoma is characterized by a recurrent DNAJB1–PRKACA chimeric transcript. The functional properties of the fusion are unknown, but are believed to include PRKACA up‐regulation. PRKCA is a subunit of protein kinase A. The downstream targets of protein kinase A are unknown, but may include interactions with fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) pathways. In addition, inhibitors for FGFR proteins have been developed recently.Methods and resultsNineteen histologically confirmed fibrolamellar carcinomas were studied. All showed the characteristic DNAJB1–PRKACA transcript by reverse transcription–polymerase chain reaction (RT–PCR). Immunohistochemistry for FGFR1 was negative in 19 of 19 cases using a monoclonal antibody, while a polyclonal antibody showed no expression (n = 11) or weak and focal expression (n = 8). RNAin‐situ hybridization was 2+ in two cases, 1+ in four cases and negative in four cases. FGFR1 fluorescence in‐situ hybridization (FISH) revealed polysomy of chromosome 8 in 17 of 19 cases. Break‐apart FISH for FGFR2 was negative for rearrangements in 12 of 12 informative cases.ConclusionsFibrolamellar carcinomas show polysomy of chromosome 8 and the FGFR1 locus, and only modest mRNA expression and weak or absent expression at the protein level. FGFR2 rearrangement was not detected. These data reduce the likelihood that FGFR inhibitors will be effective in the treatment of most fibrolamellar carcinomas.

Abstract Background: Pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP) is a rare abdominal malignancy. We hypothesized that next generation exomic sequencing would identify recurrent mutations that may have prognostic or therapeutic implications. Methods and Materials: Ten patients were selected based on availability of tissue and adequate follow-up. Mutations were tested for in 236 cancer-related genes in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) slides using next-generation exomic sequencing (Foundation Medicine, Cambridge, MA). Immunohistochemistry (IHC) was used to detect MCL1 expression. Results: Detectable mutations were found in 80% of patients. Seventy percent harbored a KRAS mutation, most commonly involving codon 12 (G12D in four cases, and one case each of G12V, G12A and A59T). Four GNAS mutations (R201H/R201C substitutions) were also detected. MCL1 and JUN were concurrently amplified in three patients. One patient with MCL1 and JUN amplification had concurrent amplification of MYC and NFKBIA. ZNF703 was amplified in one patient. Patients with MCL1 amplification were also found to express MCL1 by IHC, but MCL1 expression was also detected in some patients without amplification. Conclusions: We are first to report MCL1 and JUN co-amplification in PMP. Expression of MCL1 may not be completely dependent upon amplification. The prognostic and therapeutic implications of these recurrent mutational events are the subject of ongoing investigation. Citation Information: Mol Cancer Ther 2013;12(11 Suppl):A135. Citation Format: Aaron S. Mansfield, Terence Sio, Travis E. Grotz, Rondell P. Graham, Julian R. Molina, Florencia G. Que, Robert C. Miller. Concurrent MCL1 and JUN amplification in pseudomyxoma peritonei. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR-NCI-EORTC International Conference: Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics; 2013 Oct 19-23; Boston, MA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Ther 2013;12(11 Suppl):Abstract nr A135.