Lowe, Val

Abstract INTRODUCTION Centiloid (CL) scaling standardizes amyloid positron emission tomography (PET) quantification across tracers and platforms; however, variability across software implementations may affect diagnostic classification. This study evaluated inter‐software variability and diagnostic performance across five platforms using identical 1 8 F‐florbetapir datasets. METHODS Retrospectively, 192 patients undergoing 1 8 F‐florbetapir PET/computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were analyzed. CL values were generated using four US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) ‐cleared platforms and an in‐house Centiloid standard pipeline. Agreement was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficient, with bias and limits of agreement evaluated by linear modeling and Bland–Altman analysis. Diagnostic performance was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis and classification against visual interpretation. RESULTS Agreement was excellent (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] 0.969; 95%CI 0.961–0.975). Some platforms produced systematically higher CL values versus others slightly lower. LoA reached ± 30 CL. Diagnostic accuracy was high (area under the curve [AUC]: 0.949–0.975), with sensitivity 0.923–0.968 and specificity 0.667–0.806. DISCUSSION Despite excellent agreement, systematic differences persist and may affect classification near thresholds, supporting consistent use of a single processing pipeline.

Abstract INTRODUCTION Alzheimer's disease neuropathologic change (ADNC) classification identifies not/low and intermediate/high levels of neuropathology. Our goal was to assess how frequently a positive amyloid positron emission tomography (PET) scan indicates not/low ADNC and whether this autopsy finding can occur >10 years after a positive amyloid PET. METHODS Participants with positive amyloid PET scans were categorized by levels of ADNC at autopsy, grouped by time from initial positive amyloid PET to time of death (<5 years, 5 to <10 years, or 10+ years). RESULTS Among those with a positive amyloid PET scan, the majority had intermediate/high ADNC at autopsy (234/259, 90%). In the group with 10+ years between a positive amyloid PET and death ( n = 39) not/low ADNC occurred in 3/39 (8%). DISCUSSION Not/low ADNC is uncommon among those with positive amyloid PET scans. After 10+ years, it is possible but rare for a positive amyloid PET scan to represent an indolent state of neuropathology.