Leiferman, Kristin M.

ImportanceDirect immunofluorescence (DIF) testing has been an important ancillary tool for the diagnosis of various inflammatory mucocutaneous conditions for more than 50 years. Current DIF test panels are based on historical clinical descriptions; few studies have rigorously addressed preanalytical, analytical, and/or postanalytical aspects, and even fewer have been replicated or validated. Recent unresolved key issues include whether DIF testing and test panels should be triaged or truncated based on clinical indication or histopathologic findings.ObjectiveTo assess levels of consensus regarding practical aspects of DIF testing among immunodermatology testing specialists in the US.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsUsing modified Delphi methods with a priori characterized criteria, a survey containing 54 statements pertaining to DIF testing was created and distributed to assess consensus. Statements not initially reaching consensus were discussed in 2 live virtual sessions, which were supplemented by relevant literature review and free-text survey comments. These statements were then reassessed in a second survey. Immunodermatology testing specialists in US academic institution–based and independent laboratories were invited based on serving as immunodermatology laboratory medical directors, authoring pertinent literature, or delivering relevant talks at major conferences or by referral. The first survey was conducted from January to February 2024, and the second survey was conducted from March to April 2024.Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe primary measured outcome was degree of consensus for various DIF testing practice, including DIF testing triage by histopathology/dermatopathology findings and DIF testing panel tailored truncations by clinical indication.ResultsA total of 23 respondents to the survey invitation had a mean (SD) of 18.5 (11.1) years and median (range) of 20.0 (1.5-46.0) years in immunodermatology laboratory practice. Consensus was achieved for 46 of 54 statements (85.2%) in the initial survey and for an additional 4 statements in the second survey (50 of 54 [92.6%]). Strong consensus was found against tailored truncation of DIF panel based on the clinical indication in the first survey round. The general acceptability of triaging specimens for DIF testing based on histopathology findings remained without consensus after both surveys.Conclusions and RelevanceOverall, participating US specialists in immunodermatology laboratory testing agreed on many practical aspects of DIF testing, including matters not queried previously. The findings also revealed areas of continued controversy and identified issues for prioritized future study.

Abstract Human eosinophils contain several distinctive proteins including eosinophil granule MBP and the membrane-associated CLC protein (lysophospholipase). Human basophils also contain these proteins, indicating biochemical similarities between eosinophils and basophils. To determine whether MBP or CLC protein is present in connective tissue mast cells, we studied human lung and cutaneous mast cells by immunofluorescence by utilizing specific antibodies to CLC and MBP. Cytocentrifuge slides of enriched lung mast cells and mast cells in sections of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded cutaneous tissue from urticaria pigmentosa lesions were stained for CLC and MBP. Neither pulmonary nor cutaneous mast cells stained for CLC protein or MBP. In contrast, lung and cutaneous eosinophils in the same preparations showed bright staining for both proteins. The failure to find CLC protein and MBP in mast cells provides additional evidence of dissimilarity between mast cells and basophils, and an immunochemical means to distinguish between them.

Abstract Eosinophilia and eosinophil activation are recurrent features in various reactive states and certain hematologic malignancies. In patients with hypereosinophilia (HE), HE‐induced organ damage is often encountered and may lead to the diagnosis of a hypereosinophilic syndrome (HES). A number of known mechanisms and etiologies contribute to the development of HE and HES. Based on these etiologies and the origin of eosinophils, HE and HES are divided into primary forms where eosinophils are clonal cells, reactive forms where an underlying reactive or neoplastic condition is detected and eosinophils are considered to be “non‐clonal” cells, and idiopathic HE and HES in which neither a clonal nor a reactive underlying pathology is detected. Since 2012, this classification and the related criteria have been widely accepted and regarded as standard. However, during the past few years, new developments in the field and an increasing number of markers and targets have created a need to update these criteria and the classification of HE and HES. To address this challenge, a Working Conference on eosinophil disorders was organized in 2021. In this conference, a panel of experts representing the relevant fields, including allergy, dermatology, hematology, immunology, laboratory medicine, and pathology, met and discussed new markers and concepts as well as refinements in definitions, criteria and classifications of HE and HES. The outcomes of this conference are presented in this article and should assist in the diagnosis and management of patients with HE and HES in daily practice and in the preparation and conduct of clinical trials.

Abstract Eosinophil-derived neurotoxin (EDN) and eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) are generally regarded as eosinophil-specific proteins. We tested whether EDN and ECP are present in mature neutrophils. By indirect immunofluorescence, both eosinophils and neutrophils stained with antibodies to EDN and ECP. Lysates of purified (<0.1% eosinophil contamination) neutrophils contained EDN, 112 ± 4 ng/106 cells, and ECP, 163 ± 2 ng/106 cells, whereas eosinophil major basic protein (MBP) was not detectable. Electron microscopic examination of immunogold-labeled buffy coat cells stained with EDN antibody showed that EDN is localized to neutrophil granules. Finally, EDN mRNA was detected in lysates of highly purified neutrophils (0.001% eosinophil contamination) by the reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction. We conclude that proteins that are either identical to or immunologically cross-reactive with EDN and ECP are present in neutrophils and that EDN is synthesized and localized to neutrophil granules. Thus, caution must be exercised in interpreting the presence of EDN and ECP as specific markers of eosinophil-associated inflammation in human disease.

Abstract Macrophage inflammatory protein (MIP-1α), a member of the CC chemokine subfamily, has been shown to attract T cells and monocytes in vitro and to be expressed at sites of inflammation. Although the in vitro activities of MIP-1α have been well documented, the in vivo biological activities of MIP-1α in humans have not been studied. To address this, we challenged human subjects by intradermal injection with up to 1000 pmol of MIP-1α and performed biopsies 2, 10, and 24 h later. Although no acute cutaneous or systemic reactions were noted, endothelial cell activation, as indicated by the expression of E-selectin, was observed. In agreement with its in vitro activity, monocyte, lymphocyte, and, to a lesser degree, eosinophil infiltration was observed, peaking at 10–24 h. Surprisingly, in contrast to its reported lack of in vitro neutrophil-stimulating activity, a rapid infiltration of neutrophils was observed in vivo. This neutrophil infiltration occurred as early as 2 h, preceding the appearance of other cells, and peaked at 10 h. Interestingly, we found that neutrophils in whole blood, but not after isolation, expressed CCR1 on their cell surface. This CCR1 was thought to be functional as assessed by neutrophil CD11b up-regulation following whole-blood MIP-1α stimulation. These studies substantiate the biological effects of MIP-1α on monocytes and lymphocytes and uncover the previously unrecognized activity of MIP-1α to induce neutrophil infiltration and endothelial cell activation, underscoring the need to evaluate chemokines in vivo in humans.

Abstract Migration of eosinophils through the basement membrane barrier is an important step for their infiltration into tissues. To investigate the mechanism of transmigration, we used a chamber fitted with a Matrigel membrane as a model of the basement membrane. In this model, eosinophils treated with cytokines or chemotactic factors alone did not transmigrate from the upper to the lower chamber. However, platelet-activating factor (PAF) strongly induced transmigration of eosinophils stimulated by interleukin (IL)-5, indicating that both a cytokine and a chemotactic factor are required for eosinophil migration through Matrigel. Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and IL-3 also stimulated eosinophil transmigration in the presence of PAF. Of seven eosinophil chemotactic factors tested, leukotriene B4, C5a, RANTES, macrophage inflammatory protein-1α, and IL-8 did not induce significant eosinophil transmigration. Only PAF and eotaxin induced transmigration of eosinophils through Matrigel in the presence of IL-5; PAF was more potent than eotaxin at the optimal concentration. In contrast, PAF, eotaxin, and RANTES all potently induced migration of eosinophils through bare membrane in the absence of IL-5. Finally, eosinophil migration through Matrigel was markedly reduced by a combination of anti-CD18 and anti-CD29 monoclonal antibodies, suggesting that it is mediated by β1- and β2-integrin adhesion molecules. Our findings demonstrate that eosinophil transmigration through a basement membrane model requires both a specific chemoattractant, such as PAF, and an eosinophil-activating cytokine, such as IL-5. This synergistic effect is likely important in the tissue accumulation of activated eosinophils in allergic and other eosinophil-associated diseases.

Abstract In general, inflammatory cells cross basement membranes by producing proteinases. To investigate the role of proteinases in eosinophil basement membrane migration, we studied peripheral blood eosinophils in Matrigel®-coated chemotaxis chambers. Electron microscopy showed degradation of the Matrigel® layer when eosinophils, added to the upper chamber, transmigrated the membrane in the presence of both platelet-activating factor (PAF) in the lower chamber and interleukin (IL)-5 in both chambers. In the absence of either or both PAF and IL-5, no changes occurred in the Matrigel® layer. Matrigel® transmigration of eosinophils induced by PAF and IL-5 was inhibited by 1,10-phenanthroline, batimastat, 3,4-dichloroisocoumarin, chymostatin, and a neutralizing antibody for the matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-9, indicating that serine proteinase(s) and MMP, specifically MMP-9, were involved in the transmigration of eosinophils through Matrigel®. In contrast, eosinophil migration through a bare membrane was not affected by batimastat. Using gelatin zymography and immunoblotting, MMP-9 was detected in the migration upper chamber supernatant of the eosinophil transmigration assay and in the conditioned medium of eosinophils. Release of MMP-9 by eosinophils was increased by IL-5, PAF, or both, but the substrate-degrading activity of MMP-9 was increased only in the presence of both IL-5 and PAF, indicating that the releasing and activating mechanisms of MMP-9 are involved in eosinophil basement membrane migration. This study implicates MMP-9 in basement membrane migration of eosinophils and suggests its involvement in inflammatory diseases where tissue eosinophilia plays a role.

Abstract Eosinophil granule proteins are deposited in cutaneous lesions in many human diseases, but how these proteins contribute to pathophysiology is obscure. We injected eosinophil cationic protein (ECP or RNase 3), eosinophil-derived neurotoxin (EDN or RNase 2), eosinophil peroxidase (EPO), and major basic protein-1 (MBP1) intradermally into guinea pig and rabbit skin. ECP and EDN each induced distinct skin lesions at ≥2.5 μM that began at 2 days, peaking at ∼7 days and persisting up to 6 wk. These lesions were ulcerated (ECP) or crusted (EDN) with marked cellular infiltration. EPO and MBP1 (10 μM) each produced perceptible induration and erythema with moderate cellular infiltration resolving within 2 wk. ECP and EDN localized to dermal cells within 2 days, whereas EPO and MBP1 remained extracellular. Overall, cellular localization and RNase activity of ECP and EDN were critical for lesion formation; differential glycosylation, net cationic charge, or RNase activity alone did not account for lesion formation. Ulcerated lesions from patients with the hypereosinophilic syndrome showed ECP and EDN deposition comparable to that in guinea pig skin. In conclusion, ECP and EDN disrupt skin integrity and cause inflammation. Their presence in ulcerative skin lesions may explain certain findings in human eosinophil-associated diseases.

Pregnancy-associated plasma protein A (PAPP-A) is an IGF-binding protein-4 (IGFBP-4) metalloproteinase that cleaves inhibitory IGFBP-4 to amplify local IGF-I bioavailability in vitro. Thus it has functional implications in injury/repair responses. In this study we determined PAPP-A expression in healing human skin. Wounds were induced with a scalpel on the forearms of three normal subjects and were allowed to heal by first intention. Biopsies obtained on d 0, 2, 8, and 14 were processed for immunohistochemical detection of PAPP-A, IGF-I, and IGFBP-4. In uninjured skin (d 0), strong staining for PAPP-A was present in the epidermis, sweat and sebaceous gland epithelial cells, hair follicles, and blood vessels; no PAPP-A was detected in dermal fibroblasts or with mature collagen bundles. IGF-I localized strongly to epithelial cells of skin glands was weak to moderate in epidermis and blood vessels, and was absent in dermal cells. Weak focal staining for IGFBP-4 was found within uninjured epidermis. During wound healing, PAPP-A expression was induced in dermal granulation tissue within and adjacent to the injury. PAPP-A was present in dermis on d 2 and was increased in intensity and extent on d 8 and 14. PAPP-A expression also increased in the epidermis. PAPP-A expression in cells of granulation tissue colocalized with α-smooth actin staining of myofibroblasts and new blood vessels as well as with CD68 staining of macrophages and was associated with the compact, newly synthesized collagen of the healing wound. IGF-I staining was enhanced in the epidermis localized to the area of the incision and in granulation tissue associated with lymphoid cells. IGFBP-4 staining of the epidermis remained unchanged during wound healing, but was induced in the fibroblastic cells of granulation tissue over time. These data demonstrate localized and regulated expression of PAPP-A in human skin and suggest that PAPP-A may play an important role in an integrated IGF system in wound healing and tissue remodeling in vivo.