Reid, Joel M.

Purpose Pazopanib, an oral multikinase angiogenesis inhibitor, prolongs progression-free survival in adults with soft tissue sarcoma (STS). A phase I pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic study of two formulations of pazopanib was performed in children with STS or other refractory solid tumors. Patients and Methods Pazopanib (tablet formulation) was administered once daily in 28-day cycles at four dose levels (275 to 600 mg/m 2 ) using the rolling-six design. Dose determination for a powder suspension was initiated at 50% of the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) for the intact tablet. Ten patients with STS underwent dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) scanning at baseline and 15 ± 2 days after initiation of pazopanib at the tablet MTD. Results Fifty-three patients were enrolled; 51 were eligible (26 males; median age, 12.9 years; range, 3.8 to 23.9 years). Hematologic and nonhematologic toxicities were generally mild, with dose-limiting lipase, amylase, and ALT elevation, proteinuria, and hypertension. One patient with occult brain metastasis had grade 4 intracranial hemorrhage. The MTD was 450 mg/m 2 for tablet and 160 mg/m 2 for suspension. Steady-state trough concentrations were reached by day 15 and did not seem to be dose dependent. One patient each with hepatoblastoma or desmoplastic small round cell tumor achieved a partial response; eight patients had stable disease for ≥ six cycles, seven of whom had sarcoma. All patients with evaluable DCE-MRI (n = 8) experienced decreases in tumor blood volume and permeability (P < .01). Placental growth factor increased, whereas endoglin and soluble vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 decreased (P < .01; n = 41). Conclusion Pazopanib is well tolerated in children, with evidence of antiangiogenic effect and potential clinical benefit in pediatric sarcoma.

Abstract Purpose: This phase I study was conducted to identify the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of alvocidib when combined with vorinostat in patients with relapsed, refractory, or poor prognosis acute leukemia, or refractory anemia with excess blasts-2. Secondary objectives included investigating the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic effects of the combination. Experimental Design: Patients received vorinostat (200 mg orally, three times a day, for 14 days) on a 21-day cycle, combined with 2 different alvocidib administration schedules: a 1-hour intravenous infusion, daily × 5; or a 30-minute loading infusion followed by a 4-hour maintenance infusion, weekly × 2. The alvocidib dose was escalated using a standard 3+3 design. Results: Twenty-eight patients were enrolled and treated. The alvocidib MTD was 20 mg/m2 (30-minute loading infusion) followed by 20 mg/m2 (4-hour maintenance infusion) on days one and eight, in combination with vorinostat. The most frequently encountered toxicities were cytopenias, fatigue, hyperglycemia, hypokalemia, hypophosphatemia, and QT prolongation. Dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) were cardiac arrhythmia-atrial fibrillation and QT prolongation. No objective responses were achieved although 13 of 26 evaluable patients exhibited stable disease. Alvocidib seemed to alter vorinostat pharmacokinetics, whereas alvocidib pharmacokinetics were unaffected by vorinostat. Ex vivo exposure of leukemia cells to plasma obtained from patients after alvocidib treatment blocked vorinostat-mediated p21CIP1 induction and downregulated Mcl-1 and p-RNA Pol II for some specimens, although parallel in vivo bone marrow responses were infrequent. Conclusions: Alvocidib combined with vorinostat is well tolerated. Although disease stabilization occurred in some heavily pretreated patients, objective responses were not obtained with these schedules. Clin Cancer Res; 19(7); 1873–83. ©2013 AACR.

AbstractSulindac is a prescription‐based non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drug (NSAID) that continues to be actively investigated as a candidate cancer chemoprevention agent. To further current understanding of sulindac bioavailability, metabolism, and disposition, we developed a population pharmacokinetic model for the parent compound and its active metabolites, sulindac sulfide, and exisulind. This analysis was based on data from 24 healthy subjects who participated in a bioequivalence study comparing two formulations of sulindac. The complex disposition of sulindac and its metabolites was described by a seven‐compartment model featuring enterohepatic recirculation and is the first reported population pharmacokinetic model for sulindac. The derived model was used to explore effects of clinical variables on sulindac pharmacokinetics and revealed that body weight, creatinine clearance, and gender were significantly correlated with pharmacokinetic parameters. Moreover, the model quantifies the relative bioavailability of the sulindac formulations and illustrates the utility of population pharmacokinetics in bioequivalence assessment. This novel population pharmacokinetic model provides new insights regarding the factors that may affect the pharmacokinetics of sulindac and the exisulind and sulindac sulfide metabolites in generally healthy subjects, which have implications for future chemoprevention trial design for this widely available agent.

Abstract Purpose: A phase I, dose-finding study of vorinostat in combination with temozolomide (TMZ) was conducted to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), safety, and pharmacokinetics in patients with high-grade glioma (HGG). Experimental Design: This phase I, dose-finding, investigational study was conducted in two parts. Part 1 was a dose-escalation study of vorinostat in combination with TMZ 150 mg/m2/day for 5 days every 28 days. Part 2 was a dose-escalation study of vorinostat in combination with TMZ 150 mg/m2/day for 5 days of the first cycle and 200 mg/m2/day for 5 days of the subsequent 28-day cycles. Results: In part 1, the MTD of vorinostat administered on days 1 to 7 and 15 to 21 of every 28-day cycle, in combination with TMZ, was 500 mg daily. Dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) included grade 3 anorexia, grade 3 ALT, and grade 5 hemorrhage in the setting of grade 4 thrombocytopenia. In part 2, the MTD of vorinostat on days 1 to 7 and 15 to 21 of every 28-day cycle, combined with TMZ, was 400 mg daily. No DLTs were encountered, but vorinostat dosing could not be escalated further due to thrombocytopenia. The most common serious adverse events were fatigue, lymphopenia, thrombocytopenia, and thromboembolic events. There were no apparent pharmacokinetic interactions between vorinostat and TMZ. Vorinostat treatment resulted in hyperacetylation of histones H3 and H4 in peripheral mononuclear cells. Conclusion: Vorinostat in combination with temozolomide is well tolerated in patients with HGG. A phase I/II trial of vorinostat with radiotherapy and concomitant TMZ in newly diagnosed glioblastoma is underway. Clin Cancer Res; 18(21); 6032–9. ©2012 AACR.

Abstract Background: In tamoxifen (TAM) treated patients, both CYP2D6 metabolism and low steady state concentrations of endoxifen (END), the active metabolite of TAM, have been associated with a higher risk of recurrence (Madlensky L, Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2011; 89(5):718-25). END drug development is ongoing at Mayo and NCI, and our previous data demonstrated that 1) END had high oral bioavailability in mice and yielded plasma concentrations and total exposure 20-fold greater as compared to an equivalent oral dose of TAM (MM Ames et al, Cancer Res 2011;70(8 Suppl 1):Abstract nr 3603) and 2) END is superior to TAM in both HER2 (Reinicke AACR 2011) and aromatase expressing (Goetz, SABC 2011) MCF-7 xenograft models. While subcutaneous (SQ) TAM is used by most researchers to study and develop models of TAM resistance, little is known about 1) whether murine and human TAM pharmacokinetics are comparable and 2) whether the route of administration affects concentrations of the active metabolites. Therefore, we conducted murine pharmacokinetic studies evaluating both the oral and SQ administration of TAM and END. Results: Following administration of TAM, concentrations of the active metabolites (END and 4-hydroxy TAM [4HT]) were therapeutic (Cmax- END 35.9 nM, 4HT 62.8 nM) only after a 0.5 mg oral dose of TAM. In contrast, following all doses of SQ TAM, concentrations of the active metabolites (END and 4HT) were sub-therapeutic (Cmax- END 5.2 nM; 4HT 18.7 nM). In contrast to humans, the Cmax of N-desmethyl TAM, the most abundant human TAM metabolite, was &lt; 16.5 nM in mice after oral and SQ TAM. SQ administration of END and TAM resulted in substantially greater bioavailability of the parent drug compared with oral dosing. Following administration of 0.25-5 mg oral END and 0.0625-0.625 mg subcutaneous END, the increase in AUC was greater than dose proportional and active concentrations (&gt;80 nM) were detected in plasma at every dose and both dosing routes. Comparable END and TAM plasma concentrations were achieved with a 0.0625 mg SQ END and a 0.5 mg SQ TAM, respectively. Conclusions: Our data strongly suggest that SQ dosing of TAM results in non-therapeutic concentrations of the active hydroxylated metabolites, and may be a simple pharmacokinetic factor influencing response and resistance in a murine in vivo xenograft model. Given the nonlinear pharmacokinetics and differences in metabolism, the dose and route of END must be carefully selected for comparative studies with TAM. These data support the ongoing human studies designed to bypass the need for TAM metabolism by the direct administration of END. Supported by the Mayo Comprehensive Cancer Center Grant (CA15083) and the Mayo Clinic Breast Cancer SPORE (CA 116201; MMA, JMR, MPG). Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 103rd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2012 Mar 31-Apr 4; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2012;72(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 3781. doi:1538-7445.AM2012-3781

Abstract Batracylin (NSC 320846, BAT) is a heterocyclic arylamine and topoisomerase II inhibitor shown to be active in murine tumor models, but with demonstrated species differences in toxicity associated with metabolism to N-acetylbatracylin (NBAT) by N-acetyltransferase (NAT). BAT is a preferential substrate of human NAT2. Accordingly, production of NBAT should be subject to population variability as a function of NAT2 polymorphisms. A phase I clinical trial of BAT in patients with advanced cancer and slow acetylator NAT2 phenotypes to reduce the risk of NBAT-related toxicity found a dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of cystitis/hemorrhagic cystitis. In subsequent in vitro and in vivo preclinical studies to elucidate metabolic pathways that might contribute to BAT toxicity, we found oxidative metabolites and thiol conjugates of BAT and NBAT (MM Ames et al, Cancer Res 2011;71(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 1303). Since these data are consistent with metabolic activation of BAT to potentially toxic metabolites, we assessed formation of reactive intermediates as measured by covalent binding (CB) to protein and DNA or by formation of glutathione conjugates. Radiolabeled BAT and NBAT were incubated with 3-MC-induced rat (r), human (h) and dog (d) liver microsomes (LM), as well as with recombinant human cytochromes P450 (CYPs) with or without added DNA. NADPH-dependent BAT protein and DNA CB were detected in all microsomal preparations (see table below). NADPH-dependent NBAT protein CB was detected in all microsomal preparations except hCYP1B1. NADPH-dependent NBAT DNA CB was detected in all microsomal preparations except 3MC-rLM. We also detected a glutathione conjugate of mono-hydroxy BAT by lc/ms/ms analysis when BAT was incubated with hLM in the presence of glutathione and NADPH. Thus, CYP-catalyzed oxidation of BAT yields reactive metabolites that that bind protein and DNA and may contribute to drug-related DLT. Supported in part by NCI Contract N01-CM-52206. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 103rd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2012 Mar 31-Apr 4; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2012;72(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 3769. doi:1538-7445.AM2012-3769

Abstract Purpose: Aflibercept is a novel decoy receptor that efficiently neutralizes circulating VEGF. A pediatric phase I trial was conducted to define the dose-limiting toxicities (DLT), maximum tolerated dose (MTD), and pharmacokinetics (PK) of aflibercept. Experimental Design: Cohorts of three to six children with refractory solid tumors received aflibercept intravenously over 60 minutes every 14 days, at 2.0, 2.5, or 3.0 mg/kg/dose. PK sampling and analysis of peripheral blood biomarkers were conducted with the initial dose. Results: Twenty-one eligible patients were enrolled; 18 were fully evaluable for toxicity. One of six patients receiving 2.0 mg/kg/dose developed dose-limiting intratumoral hemorrhage and two of six receiving 3.0 mg/kg/dose developed either dose-limiting tumor pain or tissue necrosis. None of the six patients receiving 2.5 mg/kg/dose developed DLTs, defining this as the MTD. The most common non-DLTs were hypertension and fatigue. Three patients with hepatocellular carcinoma, hepatoblastoma and clear cell sarcoma had stable disease for &gt;13 weeks. At the MTD, the ratio of free-to-bound aflibercept serum concentration was 2.10 on day 8 but only 0.44 by day 15. A rapid decrease in VEGF (P &lt; 0.05) and increase in placental growth factor (PlGF; P &lt; 0.05) from baseline was observed in response to aflibercept by day 2. Conclusions: The aflibercept MTD in children of 2.5 mg/kg/dose every 14 days is lower than the adult recommended dose of 4.0 mg/kg. This dose achieves, but does not sustain, free aflibercept concentrations in excess of bound. Tumor pain and hemorrhage may be evidence of antitumor activity but were dose-limiting. Clin Cancer Res; 18(18); 5081–9. ©2012 AACR.

Abstract Background: In estrogen receptor positive (ER+) breast cancer human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) expression is associated with resistance to tamoxifen (Tam). Endoxifen is the most abundant active metabolite of Tam, resulting in part from cytochrome P450 2D6 (CYP2D6) metabolism. While Tam has been extensively used to model proliferative ER/HER2 cross-talk, there are no published data regarding endoxifen's effect on ER/HER2 nongenomic nor ER genomic signaling. Methods: Using ER+ cells (MCF7) and ER+/HER2+ cells (MCF7-HER2, BT474) we compared the effects of Tam and endoxifen on proliferation using crystal violet assays, Erk1/2 phosphorylation by western blotting, and E2-stimulated ER-regulated gene expression of amphiregulin (AREG), c-Myc (MYC) and progesterone receptor (PGR) by real-time RT-PCR assays. To examine the anti-proliferative affects of endoxifen compared to Tam in vivo we performed E2-stimulated MCF7-HER2 xenograft studies in athymic nude mice. Endoxifen doses of 25 (low) and 75 mg/kg (high) were used based on our prior pharmacokinetic studies showing achievable steady state levels of 100 nM and 1 uM, respectively. Z-Endoxifen HCl was synthesized by NCI. Results: Endoxifen, unlike Tam, potently inhibits growth in both ER+ and ER+/HER2+ breast cancer cell lines at concentrations observed in human CYP2D6 intermediate and extensive metabolizers (&gt;40 nM). Tam (10-1000 nM) stimulates phosphorylation of Erk1/2 in stark contrast to endoxifen at similar doses. Endoxifen (100-1000 nM) significantly decreases E2-stimulated transcription of ER-regulated genes in MCF7-HER2 cells; AREG 2-3 fold, MYC 1-2 fold, and PGR 2-4 fold. Conversely, Tam (10-1000 nM) maintains or stimulates transcription; AREG 2-3 fold, MYC 0.5-2.5 fold, and PGR 0-3 fold. After 7 weeks of treatment of MCF7-HER2 xenografts, both high (p=0.001) and low dose endoxifen (p=0.01) resulted in greater antitumor activity than Tam, with high dose superior to low dose endoxifen (p=0.024). MCF7-HER2 xenografts that progressed on Tam to 200% growth at 7 weeks were randomized to either continued Tam or endoxifen. Four weeks after randomization endoxifen was superior to Tam (p&lt;0.0001) with tumor size decreased by ≥ 20%. No significant toxicity was observed.Conclusions: We have demonstrated in both ER+ and ER+/HER2+ breast cancer cell lines that in contrast to Tam, endoxifen potently inhibits growth (both in vitro and in vivo), does not activate Erk1/2 signaling, and inhibits E2-stimulated transcription of ER-regulated genes. Endoxifen exhibited potent antitumor activity in MCF7-HER2 xenografts refractory to Tam. These data support the ongoing NCI sponsored phase I studies of Z-endoxifen at Mayo Clinic and NCI. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 102nd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2011 Apr 2-6; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2011;71(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 2283. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2011-2283