Redfield, Margaret M.

Introduction: Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) may have different characteristics by age groups. Aim Compare clinical and echocardiographic characteristics in patients with HFpEF enrolled in the PARAGON-HF echocardiography substudy by age groups. Methods: Echocardiography was performed in 1097 patients in PARAGON-HF (Prospective Comparison of ARNI with ARB Global Outcomes in HF with Preserved Ejection Fraction), where patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) >=45% were enrolled. Clinical and echocardiographic characteristics were compared in patients who were <65, 65-74, and >75 years of age. Results: Younger patients were more likely to be male, obese, have prior myocardial infarction (MI) and diabetes, but less likely to have atrial fibrillation (AF, Table 1). Older patients had smaller left ventricular (LV) dimension indices, more likely to have concentric hypertrophy or remodeling, higher LVEF and better global longitudinal strain, and more likely to have left atrial enlargement and echocardiographic evidence of higher LV filling pressure (Table 1). Echocardiographic measures of pulmonary pressure and right ventricular function were similar across age groups. After adjusting for sex, race, region, history of MI, diabetes, AF, and body mass index, every 10 years of increase in age was associated with 5.1 mL/m 2 decrease in LV end-diastolic volume index (95% confidence interval [CI] 3.9 - 6.5, p < 0.001), 0.4% increase in absolute global longitudinal strain (95% CI 0.1% - 0.7%, p = 0.017), and 1.07 increase in E/e’ septal ratio (95% CI 0.42 - 1.73, p = 0.001). Conclusions: Compared with younger patients, older patients with HFpEF were more likely to be female with AF, have better systolic function and higher LV filling pressure. These findings demonstrated the heterogeneity in cardiac structure and function in HFpEF by age and may have implications for treatment and future clinical trial recruitment.

Abstract Background Transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy (ATTR-CM) is an increasingly recognized cause of heart failure (1,2). 99mTc- pyrophosphate cardiac scintigraphy (PYP) enables accurate, noninvasive diagnosis of ATTR-CM when coupled with appropriate clinical and laboratory evaluations to rule out light chain amyloidosis (3,4). High sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) is routinely assessed for diagnostic purposes when ATTR-CM is suspected in clinical practice. Purpose To investigate the diagnostic performance of hs-cTnT in patients undergoing PYP for suspected ATTR-CM. Methods Observational study of patients undergoing PYP at a United States (US) cardiac amyloidosis referral center from 2013 to September 2022 and with at least one hs-cTnT value available within 1 year. 3-hour planar imaging followed by single photon-emission computed tomography with computed tomography was performed. Final diagnoses of ATTR-CM were validated using all clinical information. The lowest reportable clinical value for hs-cTnT in the US is &lt;6 ng/L (limit of quantitation). Results A total of 1572 patients underwent PYP and had a hs-cTnT value available within the study period. Of these, ATTR-CM was diagnosed in 475 patients (30%). Median (IQR) hs-cTnT was 48 (31-67) ng/L in patients with ATTR-CM and 26 (13-48) ng/L in those without. The area under the curve of hs-cTnT for the diagnosis of ATTR-CM was 0.69 (0.67-0.72). Among patients with a very low hs-cTnT value, i.e. &lt;6 ng/L (n=100, 6.4% of the overall cohort), 7 (7%) patients had a final ATTR-CM diagnosis while 93 (93%) did not. Therefore, a threshold of &lt;6 ng/L demonstrated a negative predictive value (NPV) of 93% (IQR 88, 98) and a sensitivity of 99% (97, 100) for ruling out ATTR-CM. The highest NPV was achieved with a threshold of 12 ng/L; 269 (17%) patients had hs-cTnT below this value and, of those, only 16 (6%) had a final diagnosis of ATTR-CM. This resulted in a NPV of 94% (91, 97) and a sensitivity of 97% (95, 98) for ruling out ATTR-CM. When considering progressively increasing hs-cTnT values as potential thresholds to aid in the prediction of ATTR-CM (Figure), we observed a progressive increase in specificity (above 90% for hs-cTnT values &gt; 95 ng/L), but the positive predictive value (PPV) remained low (below 50%). Conclusions Among patients undergoing PYP for suspected ATTR-CM at a US referral center, a very low hs-cTnT value was present in a minority of patients but demonstrated good performance in ruling out ATTR-CM. The highest NPV (94%) was achieved with a threshold of &lt; 12 ng/L. Higher hs-cTnT values showed a good specificity, but PPV remained low. Therefore, while a very low hs-cTnT might be of help in identifying those at low risk of ATTR-CM, the ubiquitous presence of increased hs-cTnT in many of these patients suggests the need for a multiparametric diagnostic approach to make the diagnosis.hs-cTnT in patients undergoing PYP scan

Introduction: Prognostic markers and biological pathways linked to detrimental clinical outcomes in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) remain incompletely defined. Goal: To identify serum proteins associated with risk for HF hospitalization (HFH) and cardiovascular (CV) death in patients with HFpEF, including proteins with differential associations with clinical outcomes in HFpEF compared to HFrEF. Methods: We measured serum levels of 4123 unique proteins in 1117 patients with HFpEF in the PARAGON-HF trial using a modified aptamer proteomic assay. Baseline protein concentrations significantly associated with total HFH and CV death were identified by recurrent events regression, accounting for multiple testing, adjusted for age, sex, treatment, and anticoagulant use, and compared to 2515 patients with HFrEF from the PARADIGM-HF and ATMOSPHERE trials. Results: We identified 288 proteins to be robustly associated with the risk of HFH and CV death (335 events over an average of 2.7 years of follow-up) in a HFpEF trial population. Proteins most strongly related to HFpEF outcomes included B2M, TIMP1, SERPINA4, and SVEP1 ( Figure ). Protein-outcome associations in patients with HFpEF did not markedly differ compared to HFrEF. Just 3 proteins (APOE, RTF1, and VWF) were differentially associated with outcomes between the HF subtypes (FDR <0.05). A proteomic risk score derived in HFpEF patients was not superior to a previous proteomic score derived in HFrEF nor to clinical risk factors, NT-proBNP, or high-sensitivity cardiac troponin. Conclusions: Numerous serum proteins linked to metabolic, coagulation, and extracellular matrix regulatory pathways were associated with worse HFpEF prognosis. SVEP1, a cell adhesion protein recently identified as a HFrEF prognosis biomarker, also strongly predicted risk in HFpEF. Our results demonstrate substantial similarities in serum proteomic risk markers across the EF spectrum.

BACKGROUND: The rate of stroke in patients with heart failure (HF) and preserved ejection fraction but without atrial fibrillation (AF), is uncertain as is whether it is possible to reliably predict the risk of stroke in these patients. METHODS: We validated a previously developed simple risk model for stroke among patients enrolled in the I-Preserve trial (Irbesartan in Heart Failure With Preserved Systolic Function) and PARAGON-HF trial (Efficacy and Safety of LCZ696 Compared to Valsartan, on Morbidity and Mortality in Heart Failure Patients With Preserved Ejection Fraction). The risk model consisted of 3 variables: history of previous stroke, insulin-treated diabetes, and plasma N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide level. RESULTS: Of the 8924 patients included in the pooled trial dataset, 5126 patients did not have AF at baseline. Among patients without AF, 190 (3.7%) experienced a stroke over a median follow-up of 3.6 years (rate 10.5 per 1000 patient-years). The risk for stroke increased with increasing risk score: second tertile hazard ratio, 1.78 (95% CI, 1.17–2.71); third tertile hazard ratio, 3.03 (95% CI, 2.06–4.47), with the first tertile as reference. For patients in the third tertile, the occurrence rate of stroke was 17.7 per 1000 patient-years, similar to that in patients with AF not receiving anticoagulation (20.7 per 1000 patient-years), and those with AF who were receiving anticoagulation (14.5 per 1000 patient-years). Model discrimination was good with a C index of 0.81 (0.68–0.91) and a simple score could be created from the model. CONCLUSIONS: A simple risk model can detect a subset of HF and preserved ejection fraction patients without AF who have a higher risk for stroke. The balance of risk-to-benefit in these individuals may justify the use of prophylactic anticoagulation, but this hypothesis needs to be prospectively evaluated. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifiers: NCT00095238 and NCT01920711.

Abstract Aims Ancillary analyses from clinical trials have suggested reduced efficacy for neurohormonal antagonists among patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and higher ranges of ejection fraction (EF). Methods and results A total of 621 patients with HFpEF were grouped into those with low-normal left ventricular EF (LVEF) (HFpEF&lt;65%, n = 319, 50% ≤ LVEF &lt;65%) or HFpEF≥65% (n = 302, LVEF ≥65%), and compared with 149 age-matched controls undergoing comprehensive echocardiography and invasive cardiopulmonary exercise testing. A sensitivity analysis was performed in a second non-invasive community-based cohort of patients with HFpEF (n = 244) and healthy controls without cardiovascular disease (n = 617). Patients with HFpEF≥65% had smaller left ventricular (LV) end-diastolic volume than HFpEF&lt;65%, but LV systolic function assessed by preload recruitable stroke work and stroke work/end-diastolic volume was similarly impaired. Patients with HFpEF≥65% displayed an end-diastolic pressure–volume relationship (EDPVR) that was shifted leftward, with increased LV diastolic stiffness constant β, in both invasive and community-based cohorts. Cardiac filling pressures and pulmonary artery pressures at rest and during exercise were similarly abnormal in all EF subgroups. While patients HFpEF≥57% displayed leftward shifted EDPVR, those with HFpEF&lt;57% had a rightward shifted EDPVR more typical of heart failure with reduced EF. Conclusion Most pathophysiologic differences in patients with HFpEF and higher EF are related to smaller heart size, increased LV diastolic stiffness, and leftward shift in the EDPVR. These findings may help to explain the absence of efficacy for neurohormonal antagonists in this group and raise a new hypothesis, that interventions to stimulate eccentric LV remodelling and enhance diastolic capacitance may be beneficial for patients with HFpEF and EF in the higher range.

Importance Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), defined as HF with an EF of 50% or higher at diagnosis, affects approximately 3 million people in the US and up to 32 million people worldwide. Patients with HFpEF are hospitalized approximately 1.4 times per year and have an annual mortality rate of approximately 15%. Observations Risk factors for HFpEF include older age, hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia, and obesity. Approximately 65% of patients with HFpEF present with dyspnea and physical examination, chest radiographic, echocardiographic, or invasive hemodynamic evidence of HF with overt congestion (volume overload) at rest. Approximately 35% of patients with HFpEF present with “unexplained” dyspnea on exertion, meaning they do not have clear physical, radiographic, or echocardiographic signs of HF. These patients have elevated atrial pressures with exercise as measured with invasive hemodynamic stress testing or estimated with Doppler echocardiography stress testing. In unselected patients presenting with unexplained dyspnea, the H2FPEF score incorporating clinical (age, hypertension, obesity, atrial fibrillation status) and resting Doppler echocardiographic (estimated pulmonary artery systolic pressure or left atrial pressure) variables can assist with diagnosis (H2FPEF score range, 0-9; score &amp;gt;5 indicates more than 95% probability of HFpEF). Specific causes of the clinical syndrome of HF with normal EF other than HFpEF should be identified and treated, such as valvular, infiltrative, or pericardial disease. First-line pharmacologic therapy consists of sodium-glucose cotransporter type 2 inhibitors, such as dapagliflozin or empagliflozin, which reduced HF hospitalization or cardiovascular death by approximately 20% compared with placebo in randomized clinical trials. Compared with usual care, exercise training and diet-induced weight loss produced clinically meaningful increases in functional capacity and quality of life in randomized clinical trials. Diuretics (typically loop diuretics, such as furosemide or torsemide) should be prescribed to patients with overt congestion to improve symptoms. Education in HF self-care (eg, adherence to medications and dietary restrictions, monitoring of symptoms and vital signs) can help avoid HF decompensation. Conclusions and Relevance Approximately 3 million people in the US have HFpEF. First-line therapy consists of sodium-glucose cotransporter type 2 inhibitors, exercise, HF self-care, loop diuretics as needed to maintain euvolemia, and weight loss for patients with obesity and HFpEF.

Importance Reduced heart rate during exercise is common and associated with impaired aerobic capacity in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), but it remains unknown if restoring exertional heart rate through atrial pacing would be beneficial. Objective To determine if implanting and programming a pacemaker for rate-adaptive atrial pacing would improve exercise performance in patients with HFpEF and chronotropic incompetence. Design, Setting, and Participants Single-center, double-blind, randomized, crossover trial testing the effects of rate-adaptive atrial pacing in patients with symptomatic HFpEF and chronotropic incompetence at a tertiary referral center (Mayo Clinic) in Rochester, Minnesota. Patients were recruited between 2014 and 2022 with 16-week follow-up (last date of follow-up, May 9, 2022). Cardiac output during exercise was measured by the acetylene rebreathe technique. Interventions A total of 32 patients were recruited; of these, 29 underwent pacemaker implantation and were randomized to atrial rate responsive pacing or no pacing first for 4 weeks, followed by a 4-week washout period and then crossover for an additional 4 weeks. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary end point was oxygen consumption (V̇ o 2 ) at anaerobic threshold (V̇ o 2,AT ); secondary end points were peak V̇ o 2 , ventilatory efficiency (V̇ e /V̇ co 2 slope), patient-reported health status by the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Overall Summary Score (KCCQ-OSS), and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels. Results Of the 29 patients randomized, the mean age was 66 years (SD, 9.7) and 13 (45%) were women. In the absence of pacing, peak V̇ o 2 and V̇ o 2 at anaerobic threshold (V̇ o 2,AT ) were both correlated with peak exercise heart rate ( r = 0.46-0.51, P &amp;lt; .02 for both). Pacing increased heart rate during low-level and peak exercise (16/min [95% CI, 10 to 23], P &amp;lt; .001; 14/min [95% CI, 7 to 21], P &amp;lt; .001), but there was no significant change in V̇ o 2,AT (pacing off, 10.4 [SD, 2.9] mL/kg/min; pacing on, 10.7 [SD, 2.6] mL/kg/min; absolute difference, 0.3 [95% CI, −0.5 to 1.0] mL/kg/min; P = .46), peak V̇ o 2 , minute ventilation (V̇ e) /carbon dioxide production (V̇ co 2 ) slope, KCCQ-OSS, or NT-proBNP level. Despite the increase in heart rate, atrial pacing had no significant effect on cardiac output with exercise, owing to a decrease in stroke volume (−24 mL [95% CI, −43 to −5 mL]; P = .02). Adverse events judged to be related to the pacemaker device were observed in 6 of 29 participants (21%). Conclusions and Relevance In patients with HFpEF and chronotropic incompetence, implantation of a pacemaker to enhance exercise heart rate did not result in an improvement in exercise capacity and was associated with increased adverse events. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02145351

ImportanceTransthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy (ATTR-CM) is a form of heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Technetium Tc 99m pyrophosphate scintigraphy (PYP) enables ATTR-CM diagnosis. It is unclear which patients with HFpEF have sufficient risk of ATTR-CM to warrant PYP.ObjectiveTo derive and validate a simple ATTR-CM score to predict increased risk of ATTR-CM in patients with HFpEF.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsRetrospective cohort study of 666 patients with HF (ejection fraction ≥ 40%) and suspected ATTR-CM referred for PYP at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, from May 10, 2013, through August 31, 2020. These data were analyzed September 2020 through December 2020. A logistic regression model predictive of ATTR-CM was derived and converted to a point-based ATTR-CM risk score. The score was further validated in a community ATTR-CM epidemiology study of older patients with HFpEF with increased left ventricular wall thickness ([WT] ≥ 12 mm) and in an external (Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois) HFpEF cohort referred for PYP. Race was self-reported by the participants. In all cohorts, both case patients and control patients were definitively ascertained by PYP scanning and specialist evaluation.Main Outcomes and MeasuresPerformance of the derived ATTR-CM score in all cohorts (referral validation, community validation, and external validation) and prevalence of a high-risk ATTR-CM score in 4 multinational HFpEF clinical trials.ResultsParticipant cohorts included were referral derivation (n = 416; 13 participants [3%] were Black and 380 participants [94%] were White; ATTR-CM prevalence = 45%), referral validation (n = 250; 12 participants [5%]were Black and 228 participants [93%] were White; ATTR-CM prevalence = 48% ), community validation (n = 286; 5 participants [2%] were Black and 275 participants [96%] were White; ATTR-CM prevalence = 6% ), and external validation (n = 66; 23 participants [37%] were Black and 36 participants [58%] were White; ATTR-CM prevalence = 39%). Score variables included age, male sex, hypertension diagnosis, relative WT more than 0.57, posterior WT of 12 mm or more, and ejection fraction less than 60% (score range −1 to 10). Discrimination (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC] 0.89; 95% CI, 0.86-0.92; P &amp;lt; .001) and calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow; χ2 = 4.6; P = .46) were strong. Discrimination (AUC ≥ 0.84; P &amp;lt; .001 for all) and calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow χ2 = 2.8; P = .84; Hosmer-Lemeshow χ2 = 4.4; P = .35; Hosmer-Lemeshow χ2 = 2.5; P = .78 in referral, community, and external validation cohorts, respectively) were maintained in all validation cohorts. Precision-recall curves and predictive value vs prevalence plots indicated clinically useful classification performance for a score of 6 or more (positive predictive value ≥25%) in clinically relevant ATTR-CM prevalence (≥10% of patients with HFpEF) scenarios. In the HFpEF clinical trials, 11% to 35% of male and 0% to 6% of female patients had a high-risk (≥6) ATTR-CM score.Conclusions and RelevanceA simple 6 variable clinical score may be used to guide use of PYP and increase recognition of ATTR-CM among patients with HFpEF in the community. Further validation in larger and more diverse populations is needed.