García, Joaquín J.

Perineural tumor spread in prostate cancer is emerging as a mechanism to explain select cases of neurological dysfunction and as a cause of morbidity and tumor recurrence. Perineural spread has been shown to extend from the prostate bed to the lumbosacral plexus and then distally to the sciatic nerve or proximally to the sacral and lumbar nerves and even intradurally. The authors present a case of a bilateral neoplastic lumbosacral plexopathy that can be explained anatomically as an extension of the same process: from one lumbosacral plexus to the contralateral one utilizing the dural sac as a bridge between the opposite sacral nerve roots. Their theory is supported by sequential progression of symptoms and findings on clinical examinations as well as high-resolution imaging (MRI and PET/CT scans). The neoplastic nature of the process was confirmed by a sciatic nerve fascicular biopsy. The authors believe that transmedian dural spread allows continuity of a neoplastic process from one side of the body to the other.

AimsThe pathogenesis of intraosseous mucoepidermoid carcinoma (IMEC) remains unknown. Coexistence with odontogenic cysts (ODC) has been reported in 32–48% of IMEC. Furthermore, prosoplastic mucous cells are often seen in the epithelial lining of ODCs. MECT1–MAML2 fusion transcripts have been identified in >66% of salivary gland MEC cases. The aim of this study was to investigate the presence of MAML2 rearrangement in ODCs featuring mucous prosoplasia.Methods and resultsTen cases of ODC with a mucous cell component and three cases of IMEC were evaluated using fluorescence in‐situ hybridization. All cases occurred in the mandible. The ODCs exhibited a M:F ratio of 4:1 (mean age 49.2 years), while all IMECs occurred in women (mean age 68.3 years). All three IMECs demonstrated MAML2 rearrangement, in 26–61% of tumour cells. Successful hybridization was observed in nine of 10 cases of ODC. In two of these nine, there was MAML2 rearrangement in 12% and 24% of the lining epithelial cells, while three of the nine showed rearrangement in 7–8% of cells; the remaining four cases were negative.ConclusionsWe identified MAML2 rearrangements in five of nine ODCs lined by mucus‐secreting cells. This suggests that at least a subset of ODCs with mucous prosoplasia are characterized by molecular events considered diagnostic for intraosseous and extraosseous MEC.

Objective This study explored posterior nasopharyngeal augmentation with an acellular dermal matrix sheeting. Design Evaluation of the persistence and safety of a submucosal implant of rolled acellular dermis over a 3-month period in a piglet model. Setting Institute Hills Facility, part of the Mayo Clinic Rochester health care facility. Participants Fifteen 5-week-old domestic piglets of unspecified gender. Interventions Twelve piglets were implanted at age 5 weeks with a rolled sheet of acellular dermal matrix (Strattice). Implants were inserted in a submucosal pocket in the soft palate. Three piglets underwent sham operations, with creation of submucosal pockets without implantation. After a 3-month observation period, the palates were harvested for evaluation. Results Grossly, persistence of bulk at the surgical site in 5 of the 12 implanted piglets was noted at 3 months. Histologically, no persistence of the dermal matrix could be observed. Incorporation and/or resorption of the dermal matrix occurred with minimal to no host inflammatory response. Conclusion This experiment demonstrated the safety of a rolled acellular dermal implant in a submucosal location in a pig model, without surgical complication, host inflammatory reaction, or rejection. Minimal, if any, bulk of the implant persisted in the implanted location after 3 months. Although acellular dermal matrix sheeting appears to be safe and well-tolerated, it does not offer a long-term treatment option for posterior pharyngeal augmentation.

AbstractMucinous ovarian carcinomas (MCs) typically do not respond to current conventional therapy. We have previously demonstrated amplification of HER2 in 6 of 33 (18.2%) mucinous ovarian carcinomas (MCs) and presented anecdotal evidence of response with HER2‐targeted treatment in a small series of women with recurrent HER2‐amplified (HER2+) MC. Here, we explore HER2 amplification and KRAS mutation status in an independent cohort of 189 MCs and 199 mucinous borderline ovarian tumours (MBOTs) and their association to clinicopathological features. HER2 status was assessed by immunohistochemistry (IHC), FISH, and CISH, and interpreted per ASCO/CAP guidelines, with intratumoural heterogeneity assessment on full sections, where available. KRAS mutation testing was performed with Sanger sequencing. Stage and grade were associated with recurrence on both univariate and multivariate analysis (p < 0.001). Assessment of HER2 status revealed overexpression/amplification of HER2 in 29/154 (18.8%) MCs and 11/176 (6.2%) MBOTs. There was excellent agreement between IHC, FISH, and CISH assessment of HER2 status (perfect concordance of HER2 0 or 1+ IHC with non‐amplified status, and 3+ IHC with amplified status). KRAS mutations were seen in 31/71 (43.6%) MCs and 26/33 (78.8%) MBOTs, and were near mutually exclusive of HER2 amplification. In the 189 MC cases, a total of 54 recurrences and 59 deaths (53 of progressive disease) were observed. Within MCs, either HER2 amplification/overexpression or KRAS mutation was associated with decreased likelihood of disease recurrence (p = 0.019) or death (p = 0.0041) when compared to cases with neither feature. Intratumoural heterogeneity was noted in 26% of HER2‐overexpressing cases. These data support the stratification of MCs for the testing of new treatments, with HER2‐targeted therapy as a viable option for HER2+ advanced or recurrent disease. Further research is required to delineate the molecular and clinical features of the ∼34% of MC cases with neither HER2 amplification nor KRAS mutations.

Abstract There is considerable clinical interest in the role that human papillomavirus (HPV) plays in the development of oropharyngeal cancers. A variety of assays are currently available to stratify patients based on HPV status prior to treatment. The most frequently utilized are PCR and In Situ hybridization (ISH) to detect the presence of HPV DNA sequences. The increasing clinical interest in determining HPV patient status relates to compelling evidence that a subset of patients with HPV positive tumors have better clinical outcomes. Evidence also suggests that patients with HPV positive tumors should be further divided into groupings based on levels of viral activity and that this may represent additional clinical information necessary to develop appropriate treatment plans. The most frequently applied assay to identify HPV activity in a patient sample is to detect the over-expression of the surrogate protein marker p16 by Immunohistochemisty (IHC), which has been shown to increase expression in response to HPV active infections in oropharyngeal cancer. An alternative technique to quantitatively detect the presence and level of transcriptional activity of HPV in tissue samples is to measure the expression of oncogenes E6 and E7. We have analyzed the fresh frozen tissue samples corresponding to matched tumor, normal and metastatic patient tissues using a quantitative PCR (qPCR) approach to determine the expression of HPV oncogenes and p16 gene expression. We observed that there are three groups of oropharyngeal tumors when grouped by HPV16 E6 and E7 gene expression. The first are the most rare and are tumors that contain no HPV sequences or expression of the E6 and E7 ocogenes. The second are tumors that contain HPV DNA sequences but very low expression of E6 or E7 and the third are tumors that contain HPV DNA sequence and robust expression of E6 and E7. Additionally, we found variable correlation between HPV16 E6 and E7 expression and p16 gene expression, suggesting that factors other than HPV oncogene expression may influence the expression of p16. Our results would indicate that the best assays for quantifying the activity of an HPV infection in oropharyngeal cancers would be those optimized to accurately measure either E6 and E7 transcripts or their protein products directly out of paraffin-embedded tissues. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 102nd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2011 Apr 2-6; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2011;71(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 3859. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2011-3859