Shen, Win K.

Introduction: Drug challenge testing is performed to unmask Type-1 Brugada pattern. The safety and prevalence of its complications during the test are unclear. We aimed to assess the relation of complications in patients with positive and negative results by a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hypothesis: The prevalence of arrhythmic complications is higher in patients with positive drug challenge testing. Methods: We comprehensively searched the databases of MEDLINE and EMBASE from inception to June 2020. Included studies were cohort studies that reported ventricular arrhythmia that required interventions (VAI) (sustained ventricular tachycardia [VT], polymorphic VT, ventricular fibrillation, appropriate implantable cardioverter defibrillator [ICD] shock, or sudden cardiac arrest) and ventricular arrhythmias that did not required interventions (VANI) (premature ventricular complexes and non-sustained VT) during drug challenge testing. Data were combined using the random-effects model. Results: Thirteen studies involving 2,688 patients (62.7% positive) were included. The overall prevalence of VAI and VANI were 3.7% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.8-5.7) and 0.5% (95% CI: 0.1-0.9), respectively. VAI were more common in positive when compared to negative test result patients (1.5% [95% CI: 0.6-2.4] and 0%, respectively) but the prevalence of VANI were similar (2.7% [95% CI: 0.8-4.6] and 2.6% [95% CI: 0.8-4.6], respectively). VAI in positive result patients were more common with flecainide followed by pilsicainide and ajmaline (2.4% [95% CI: -4.3 to 9.2], 2.2% [95% CI: 0.5-4.0], and 1.5% [95% CI: 0.6 to 2.4], respectively). Most of patients with VAI during drug challenge testing underwent ICD implantation (94%). VAI during drug challenge testing in positive result patients carries an increased risk of VAI during 8.6 ± 4.9 years follow-up (odds ratio 3.73, 95% CI: 1.77-7.86, p=0.001). Conclusions: VAI were more common in patients with positive drug challenge testing, more often occurring with positive flecainide challenge, and carries an increased risk of VAI over long-term follow-up in patients with positive drug challenge testing.

Abstract Atrial fibrillation is a common clinical manifestation in hospitalized patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19). Medications used to treat atrial fibrillation, such as antiarrhythmic drugs and anticoagulants, may have significant drug interactions with emerging COVID‐19 treatments. Common unintended nontherapeutic target effects of COVID‐19 treatment include potassium channel blockade, cytochrome P 450 isoenzyme inhibition or activation, and P‐glycoprotein inhibition. Drug‐drug interactions with antiarrhythmic drugs and anticoagulants in these patients may lead to significant bradycardia, ventricular arrhythmias, or severe bleeding. It is important for clinicians to be aware of these interactions, drug metabolism changes, and clinical consequences when choosing antiarrhythmic drugs and anticoagulants for COVID‐19 patients with atrial fibrillation. The objective of this review is to provide a practical guide for clinicians who are managing COVID‐19 patients with concomitant atrial fibrillation.

AbstractThe present study investigated the impact of 12 weeks of pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) therapy on peripheral vascular function, blood pressure (BP), and nitric oxide in hypertensive individuals. Thirty hypertensive individuals (SBP > 130 mm Hg and/or MAP > 100 mm Hg) were assigned to either PEMF group (n = 15) or control group (n = 15). During pre‐assessment, participants underwent measures of flow‐mediated dilation (FMD), BP, and blood draw for nitric oxide (NO). Subsequently, they received PEMF therapy 3x/day for 12 weeks and, at conclusion, returned to the laboratory for post‐assessment. Fifteen participants from the PEMF group and 11 participants from the control group successfully completed the study protocol. After therapy, the PEMF group demonstrated significant improvements in FMD and FMDNOR (normalized to hyperemia), but the control group did not (P = .05 and P = .04, respectively). Moreover, SBP, DBP, and MAP were reduced, but the control group did not (P = .04, .04, and .03, respectively). There were no significant alterations in NO in both groups (P > .05). Twelve weeks of PEMF therapy may improve BP and vascular function in hypertensive individuals. Additional studies are needed to identify the mechanisms by which PEMF affects endothelial function.

The failing ventricular myocardium is characterized by reduction of high-energy phosphates and reduced activity of the phosphotransfer enzymes creatine kinase (CK) and adenylate kinase (AK), which are responsible for transfer of high-energy phosphoryls from sites of production to sites of utilization, thereby compromising excitation-contraction coupling. In humans with chronic atrial fibrillation (AF) unassociated with congestive heart failure (CHF), impairment of atrial myofibrillar energetics linked to oxidative modification of myofibrillar CK has been observed. However, the bioenergetic status of the failing atrial myocardium and its potential contribution to atrial electrical instability in CHF have not been determined. Dogs with ( n = 6) and without ( n = 6) rapid pacing-induced CHF underwent echocardiography (conscious) and electrophysiological (under anesthesia) studies. CHF dogs had more pronounced mitral regurgitation, higher atrial pressure, larger atrial area, and increased atrial fibrosis. An enhanced propensity to sustain AF was observed in CHF, despite significant increases in atrial effective refractory period and wavelength. Profound deficits in atrial bioenergetics were present with reduced activities of the phosphotransfer enzymes CK and AK, depletion of high-energy phosphates (ATP and creatine phosphate), and reduction of cellular energetic potential (ATP-to-ADP and creatine phosphate-to-Cr ratios). AF duration correlated with left atrial area ( r = 0.73, P = 0.01) and inversely with atrial ATP concentration ( r = −0.75, P = 0.005), CK activity ( r = −0.57, P = 0.054), and AK activity ( r = −0.64, P = 0.02). Atrial levels of malondialdehyde, a marker of oxidative stress, were significantly increased in CHF. Myocardial bioenergetic deficits are a conserved feature of dysfunctional atrial and ventricular myocardium in CHF and may constitute a component of the substrate for AF in CHF.

BackgroundRecent studies have shown that magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of patients with pacemakers can be safely performed under careful monitoring, but they excluded patients with recently implanted devices. Patients with recent implants may be at a greater risk for complications during MRI imaging due to lack of lead and wound maturity.MethodsWe implemented a clinical protocol for MRI imaging of patients with implanted cardiac devices, and prospectively collected data. For this study, we retrospectively analyzed two groups of patients: those with recently implanted (≤42 days) and nonrecently implanted (>42 days) leads at the time of MRI scanning. All devices were interrogated before and after scanning, and were reprogrammed during the scan as per protocol.ResultsOf the 219 scans (in 171 patients), eight included patients with recently implanted (range: 7–36 days) and 211 with only nonrecently implanted pacemaker leads. During the scan, there were no complications in the early or late group. In one patient imaged 79 days postimplant, frequent premature ventricular complexes were noted during the scan, requiring no action. No patient reported pain during or immediately after the procedure. No clinically significant changes in function were seen at subsequent follow up (average 104 days post‐MRI). Compared to patients with nonrecently implanted leads, there was no difference in any parameter between the two groups.ConclusionsWith a strong clinical indication and with careful monitoring, MRI imaging is feasible in patients with recently implanted pacemakers, although experience is limited.

Background —Previous studies of atrial flutter have found linear block at the crista terminalis; this was thought to predispose the patient to the arrhythmia. More recent observations, however, have demonstrated crista conduction. We sought to characterize the posterior boundary of atrial flutter. Methods and Results —Patients with counterclockwise flutter (n=20), clockwise flutter (n=3), or both (n=5) were studied using two 20-pole catheters. Biplane fluoroscopy determined catheter positions. During counterclockwise flutter, craniocaudal activation occurred along the entire lateral and posterior right atrial walls. Septal activation proceeded caudocranially. In all patients, a line of block was seen in the posteromedial (sinus venosa) right atrium; this was manifested by the presence of double potentials where the upward and downward activations collided. Anatomic location was confirmed by intracardiac echocardiography in 9 patients. In patients with clockwise flutter, the line of block and double potentials were seen in the same location during counterclockwise flutter, but the activation sequence around the line of block was reversed. Pacing near the site of double potentials during sinus rhythm excluded a fixed line of block, and premature atrial complexes demonstrated functional block with manifest double potentials. In 2 patients, posterior ectopy organized to subsequently initiate isthmus-dependent atrial flutter. Conclusions —(1) A functional line of block is seen at the posteromedial (sinus venosa region) right atrium during counterclockwise and clockwise atrial flutter. (2) All lateral wall right atrial activation can be uniform during flutter, without linear block or double potentials in the region of the crista terminalis. (3) Activation at the site of posteromedial right atrial functional block can organize to subsequently initiate isthmus-dependent atrial flutter.

Background— The primary aim and central hypothesis of the study are that a designated syncope unit in the emergency department improves diagnostic yield and reduces hospital admission for patients with syncope who are at intermediate risk for an adverse cardiovascular outcome. Methods and Results— In this prospective, randomized, single-center study, patients were randomly allocated to 2 treatment arms: syncope unit evaluation and standard care. The 2 groups were compared with χ 2 test for independence of categorical variables. Wilcoxon rank sum test was used for continuous variables. Survival was estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method. One hundred three consecutive patients (53 women; mean age 64±17 years) entered the study. Fifty-one patients were randomized to the syncope unit. For the syncope unit and standard care patients, the presumptive diagnosis was established in 34 (67%) and 5 (10%) patients ( P <0.001), respectively, hospital admission was required for 22 (43%) and 51 (98%) patients ( P <0.001), and total patient-hospital days were reduced from 140 to 64. Actuarial survival was 97% and 90% ( P =0.30), and survival free from recurrent syncope was 88% and 89% ( P =0.72) at 2 years for the syncope unit and standard care groups, respectively. Conclusions— The novel syncope unit designed for this study significantly improved diagnostic yield in the emergency department and reduced hospital admission and total length of hospital stay without affecting recurrent syncope and all-cause mortality among intermediate-risk patients. Observations from the present study provide benchmark data for improving patient care and effectively utilizing healthcare resources.

Background— We postulated that the variability of the phase shift between blood pressure and heart rate fluctuation near the frequency of 0.10 Hz might be useful in assessing autonomic circulatory control. Methods and Results— We tested this hypothesis in 4 groups of subjects: 28 young, healthy individuals; 13 elderly healthy individuals; 25 patients with coronary heart disease; and 19 patients with a planned or implanted cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD recipients). Data from 5 minutes of free breathing and at 2 different, controlled breathing frequencies (0.10 and 0.33 Hz) were used. Clear differences ( P <0.001) in variability of phase were evident between the ICD recipients and all other groups. Furthermore, at a breathing frequency of 0.10 Hz, differences in baroreflex sensitivity ( P <0.01) also became evident, even though these differences were not apparent at the 0.33-Hz breathing frequency. Conclusions— The frequency of 0.10 Hz represents a useful and potentially important one for controlled breathing, at which differences in blood pressure–RR interactions become evident. These interactions, whether computed as a variability of phase to define stability of the blood pressure–heart rate interaction or defined as the baroreflex sensitivity to define the gain in heart rate response to blood pressure changes, are significantly different in patients at risk for sudden arrhythmic death. In young versus older healthy individuals, only baroreflex gain is different, with the variability of phase being similar in both groups. These measurements of short-term circulatory control might help in risk stratification for sudden cardiac death.