Crestanello, J.

Abstract Aims Significant secondary tricuspid regurgitation (STR) is associated with worse morbidity and mortality. To-date, evidence on isolated tricuspid valve surgery in STR remains controversial with uncertainty regarding management strategies. We aimed to investigate sex differences in the association of isolated tricuspid valve surgical repair/replacement (TVR) with outcomes of mortality and heart failure (HF) hospitalizations in STR. Methods and results Patients with severe STR without significant aortic valve or organic mitral valve disease, congenital heart disease, pacemakers, previous valve intervention, malignancy, or end-stage kidney/liver disease were identified. Isolated TVR was studied as a time-dependent covariate in association with mortality and HF hospitalizations. Among 2,857 patients (median age 76 years; 62% women), 143 underwent isolated TVR (58% repair; 42% replacement; 64% with low TRI-SCORE risk category) at median 56 days. Over median 1.6 (IQR 0.2-5.2) years, 1,771 patients died and 1,259 had HF hospitalization. When adjusting to age, comorbidities, left/right ventricular function, pulmonary hypertension, hemoglobin level, and dyspnea, isolated TVR was associated with lower mortality in females (HR 0.54 95% CI 0.35-0.83) but not males (HR 1.29 95% CI 0.90-1.83), p-interaction<0.01; this remained the case when restricting to groups with normal left/right ventricular function. Isolated TVR was associated with HF hospitalization without interaction with sex (HR 0.68 95% CI 0.46-0.998), p-interaction=0.51. Conclusion Isolated TVR for STR was associated with decreased HF hospitalizations in both females and males but improved survival only in females. Future studies are needed to understand differences in the natural history of TR between sexes and stratify outcomes after TR intervention by sex.

Abstract Background While tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is predominantly functional, it can arise from various cardiac conditions. This study aimed to evaluate whether the benefits of tricuspid valve intervention, compared to conservative management, differ based on the underlying etiology. Methods In the TRIGISTRY international cohort, which includes consecutive patients with severe isolated functional TR across 33 centers in 10 countries, we compared mortality rates at 2 years between patients who underwent a tricuspid valve intervention (surgical or transcatheter) versus conservative management according to TR etiology. Patients were classified into three groups: (1) Isolated TR (ITR), defined as left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) >60%, systolic pulmonary artery pressure (sPAP) <50 mmHg, and no prior left-heart intervention (LHI); (2) LHI-TR, comprising patients with a history of LHI; and (3) Undetermined TR (UTR), which included those who did not meet the criteria for ITR or LHI, as well as those with missing sPAP data. Given previous findings indicating that intervention provided no survival benefit for patients with a high TRI-SCORE, the present analysis was restricted to individuals with low to intermediate TRI-SCORE (≤5). Survival outcomes between groups were compared using restricted mean survival time (RMST). Results A total of 1,552 patients (72±13 years; 56% female) with severe functional TR and a low (48%) or intermediate (52%) TRI-SCORE were included. Of these, 772 (50%) underwent an intervention, while 780 (50%) were conservatively managed. TR was classified as ITR in 201 patients (13%), LHI in 395 (25%), and UTR in 956 (62%). Overall, patients with ITR exhibited the lowest comorbidity burden, whereas those with UTR had the highest. After adjusting for comorbidities and TRI-SCORE, a survival benefit of a tricuspid valve intervention was observed in patients with ITR (survival estimate: 0.17, 95% CI [0.009, 0.32], P=0.039) and, to a lesser extent, in patients with UTR (survival estimate: 0.09, 95% CI [0.0, 0.184], P=0.048), but not in those with prior LHI (survival estimate: 0.06, 95% CI [-0.08, 0.2], P=0.4). Similar results were found when excluding patients with moderate or greater residual TR after intervention. Conclusion In TRIGISTRY, patients with ITR appeared to derive the greatest benefit from tricuspid valve intervention, followed to a lesser extent by those with UTR, while no benefit was observed in patients with prior LHI. However, the potential influence of unaccounted confounders cannot be excluded, and further studies are needed to better identify patients’ subsets that may derive the most benefit from a tricuspid valve intervention.