Yaghi, Shadi

Background and Objectives: Cervical artery dissection (CeAD) is a leading cause of ischemic stroke in younger adults, yet sex-specific variations in its clinical presentation, imaging characteristics, and outcomes remain underexplored. We aimed to evaluate these differences using data from a large, multicenter registry. Methods: We analyzed data from the STOP-CAD registry, which includes patients with radiologically confirmed non-traumatic CeAD enrolled between 2015 and 2021 across multiple centers. Clinical and imaging characteristics were compared between men and women using multivariable logistic regression. Outcomes assessed included ischemic stroke recurrence at 180 days, excellent functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] 0–1) at 90 days, symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH), and mortality. Results: Among 4,023 patients with CeAD, 1,783 (44.6%) were women. Compared to men, women were younger (median age: 42 vs 50 years), more likely to have a history of migraine (26.9% vs 8.3%) and connective tissue disorders (14.3% vs 5.8%), and presented more frequently with non-ischemic symptoms such as headache, neck pain, or tinnitus (adjusted OR [aOR] 2.0; 95% CI, 1.8–2.3; p<0.001). Women had significantly higher odds of vertebral artery dissection (OR, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.2-1.5; p<0.001), multivessel involvement (OR, 2.1; 95% CI, 1.7-2.5; p<0.001), and pseudoaneurysm formation (OR, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.1-1.6; p=0.003). Despite these differences, there was no significant sex-based difference in key clinical outcomes: excellent functional recovery at 90 days (OR 0.94; 95% CI 0.76-1.15 p=0.542), ischemic stroke recurrence at 180 days (OR 0.56 CI 0.23-1.3 p=0.213), or mortality (OR 0.83; 95% CI 0.47-1.48, p=0.529). Conclusion: In this large international cohort, we observed women with CeAD were younger, more likely to present with non-ischemic symptoms with distinct imaging features. These underscore the need for heightened clinical suspicion of CeAD in women presenting with atypical symptoms, even in the absence of ischemic deficits or conventional vascular risk factors, and suggest that sex-specific phenotyping may enhance diagnostic accuracy and early management.

Background: Patients with cervical artery dissection (CAD) have a higher prevalence of cerebral aneurysms, likely due to underlying vasculopathies. Understanding risk factors and outcomes in this population may inform screening and management strategies. Methods: We conducted a post-hoc analysis of the STOP-CAD study, a multicenter international registry of patients with non-major trauma-related CAD across 63 centers. Cerebral aneurysms were identified based on medical history and intracranial vascular imaging obtained for dissection diagnosis. We compared demographic, clinical, laboratory, and imaging characteristics between patients with and without aneurysms. Variables with p<0.05 in univariate analysis were entered into a multivariable binary logistic regression to identify independent predictors. Clinical outcomes including ischemic stroke and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage at follow-up were compared between both groups. Results: Out of 4023 patients included in the STOP-CAD study, 116 (2.9%) had at least one incidental cerebral aneurysm. In adjusted binary logistic regression, patients with cerebral aneurysm were more likely to have a history of migraine (aOR 1.78 95% CI 1.15-2.75, p=0.009), history of hypertension (aOR 1.65 95% CI 1.12-2.43, p = 0.010), known connective tissue disorder (aOR 3.47 95% CI 1.71-7.03), history of dissection (aOR 2.63 95% CI 1.31-5.28, p = 0.007), and a dissecting aneurysm at the site of the dissection (aOR 1.94 95% CI 1.25-3.01, p = 0.003). At follow-up, the presence of a cerebral aneurysm was not associated with ischemic stroke (7.8% vs. 5.6% p>0.1), but with a trend towards increased odds of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (3.4% vs. 1.2%, p = 0.062). Conclusions: Patients with CAD and concurrent incidental cerebral aneurysm were more likely to have a history of migraine headaches and markers of underlying vasculopathy and had a non-significantly increased risk of intracranial hemorrhage at follow-up. Further studies are needed to identify best practices for surveillance and risk stratification in this subgroup.

Background and Objectives: Pregnancy and the postpartum period increase the risk of cervical artery dissection (CEAD), a notable cause of stroke in young women. We aimed to describe the clinical presentation, imaging findings, and outcomes of CEAD occurring during pregnancy or shortly after delivery. Methods: We analyzed data from the STOP-CAD registry, a large international multicenter study of patients treated with antithrombotic therapy for non-traumatic CEAD between 2015 and 2021. This sub-study focused on women who were pregnant or within 12 weeks postpartum at the time of symptom onset. We assessed baseline clinical features, imaging results, acute stroke treatments, and functional outcomes. Results: Among 1,783 women in the registry, 62 (3.5%) had pregnancy-associated CEAD, with a median age of 34 years (IQR, 30-38). One-third had a history of migraine (33.9%), one-fifth had hypertension (21.0%), while other vascular risk factors were rare. Recent minor neck trauma was reported in 17.7%. Ischemic stroke symptoms occurred in 25 (40.3%) patients, and 23 (37.1%) had acute infarcts on imaging. However, most (59.7%) presented with non-ischemic symptoms. Vertebral artery dissections were more common than carotid dissections (62.9% vs. 48.4%), and 33.9% had multivessel involvement. Among patients presenting with ischemic stroke symptoms, 4 received thrombolysis and 7 underwent thrombectomy. Remarkably, 92% had excellent functional recovery (modified Rankin Score 0–1) at 90 days, and there were no stroke recurrences at 180 days. Conclusion: Pregnancy- and postpartum-associated CEAD is uncommon and associated with ischemic stroke in nearly half of patients. A history of migraine and hypertension may be potential risk factors. Despite the severity of presentation, most patients had favorable outcomes with timely treatment.

Background: High-grade intracranial atherosclerosis (ICAS) is associated with an elevated risk of recurrent ischemic stroke, particularly in patients with severe stenosis (70–99%). Identifying predictors of early recurrence can inform risk stratification and guide treatment strategies. Methods: The Biomarkers and Recurrence Risk in Symptomatic Intracranial Arterial Stenosis (BIORISK-ICAS) study is a multicenter, international, retrospective cohort analysis pooling data from 35 comprehensive stroke centers. We included hospitalized adult patients with symptomatic ICAS, defined as 50–99% stenosis of an intracranial artery (intracranial vertebral, basilar, distal ICA, or M1 MCA), confirmed by vascular imaging and associated with a qualifying ischemic event. Patients with only high-grade stenosis (70-99%) were included in this analysis. The primary outcome was to determine predictors of recurrent ischemic stroke in the territory of the symptomatic artery within 90 days of the index event. Baseline demographic, clinical, and imaging characteristics were recorded. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression with stepwise selection (p < 0.1) was used to identify independent predictors of recurrence; model discrimination was assessed using Harrell’s C-statistics. Results: Among 2,050 patients, 1,476 had high-grade (70-99%) symptomatic ICAS. The mean age was 67 ± 12.5 years, and 767 (55%) were male. Most patients were non-Hispanic (90.1%), taking dual antiplatelet therapy (77.8%), and statins (94.5%). Recurrent stroke occurred in 160 patients (10.8%) within 90 days. In multivariable Cox model, independent predictors of recurrence included atrial fibrillation (HR 2.05; 95% CI, 1.26–3.33; p = 0.004), hyperlipidemia (HR 1.57; 95% CI, 1.10–2.24; p = 0.014), diabetes mellitus (HR 1.36; 95% CI, 0.98–1.88; p = 0.064), and home use of dual antiplatelet therapy (HR 1.60; 95% CI, 1.01–2.54; p = 0.043)(Harrell’s C-statistic=0.62). In patients who underwent perfusion(n=402), mistmatch >10seconds were associated with increased recurrence (HR 1.80; 95% CI 0.95-3.38, p=0.07) and atrial fibrillation (HR 2.06: 95% CI 0.03-4.60, p=0.78) though did not reach statistical significance. Conclusion: In this population, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, atrial fibrillation, and prior use of dual antiplatelet therapy were associated with increased risk of 90-day recurrent ischemic stroke. Perfusion imaging may help identify high-risk patients who could benefit from intensified secondary prevention.

Background: Although the embolic stroke of undetermined source (ESUS) construct was proposed as a unifying concept for embolic-appearing strokes without an identified cause, it includes patients with diverse and often unrecognized underlying mechanisms. This study investigates the differential rate of recurrent stroke according to the completeness of neurodiagnostic testing in a diverse multicenter cohort. Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of a multicenter observational cohort study (n=27 sites). Patients with ESUS were categorized into three groups: (1) established mechanism after further work up (ESUS-E), (2) patients who underwent a comprehensive diagnostic workup without an identified etiology (ESUS 2.0), and (3) no advanced workup (ESUS-NAW). The primary outcome of recurrent ischemic stroke was assessed by comparing ESUS 2.0 to both ESUS-E and ESUS-NAW groups using adjusted Cox proportional hazards models. Results: Of the 2,281 patients included, 694 (30%) were classified as ESUS-E, 344 (15%) as ESUS 2.0, and 1,443 (55%) as ESUS-NAW. The ESUS 2.0 group had a significantly lower annualized recurrence rate (1.98 per 100 person-years) compared to both the ESUS-NAW group (7.7 per 100 person-years; aHR 0.27, 95% CI: 0.11–0.62; p=0.002) and the ESUS-E group (6.10 per 100 person-years; aHR = 0.35; 95% CI 0.15–0.85, p=0.020). Within the ESUS-E group, cancer (aHR 5.33; 95% CI: 2.09–13.63; p < 0.001) and non-stenosing atherosclerotic disease or arch atheroma (aHR 3.40; 95% CI: 1.18–9.83; p = 0.023) were associated with significantly increased risk of recurrence when compared to ESUS 2.0. Conclusion: These findings demonstrate a lower risk of recurrent stroke in patients classified as ESUS 2.0, diverging from the 5–6% annual recurrence rates observed in prior ESUS trials. These findings suggest that patients who receive comprehensive diagnostic evaluation without identification of a specific etiology have a lower risk of recurrent stroke, an important consideration for the design of future ESUS studies.