Ailawadhi, Sikander

7078 Background: Lisaftoclax is a novel, oral, highly selective, potent BCL-2 inhibitor in development. In an ibrutinib-resistant patient-derived WM xenograft/preclinical model, lisaftoclax + ibrutinib has a strong synergistic effect. This report provides updated efficacy and safety data of lisaftoclax-based therapies (including combinations with ibrutinib) in pts with WM. Methods: In this global, open-label, phase 1b/2 multicenter study, pts with WM were enrolled in 3 arms: Arm A (lisaftoclax) included BTKi-resistant/intolerant pts; Arm B (lisaftoclax + ibrutinib), treatment-naïve pts; and Arm C (lisaftoclax + rituximab), BTKi-naïve relapsed/refractory pts. Lisaftoclax was escalated from 400 to 1,200 mg using a modified toxicity probability interval design. A 3-day ramp-up was used for pts at high risk of tumor lysis syndrome (TLS). Objectives were efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics (PK) assessments (responses assessed per IWWM criteria). Results: As of January 25, 2024, 46 pts were enrolled and treated at doses of up to 1,000 (Arm A), 1,200 (Arm B), and 800 mg (Arm C; Table). The median (range) treatment duration was 11 (1-28; Arm A), 23.5 (1-34; B), and 11.5 (5-33; C) months. Objective response rates (PR, VGFR, CR) were: 41.7% (Arm A), 90.9% (B), and 37.5% (C). In Arm A, pts with wild-type CXCR4 (n = 7) had better overall response to lisaftoclax than the CXCR4mut group (n = 3). No significant difference was observed between pts with/without CXCR4mut in Arms B and C. In Arm B, 1 DLT (grade 3 clinical TLS due to preexisting renal impairment) was reported at 1,200 mg; 1 grade 3 laboratory TLS, primarily attributed to dehydration and concomitant symptomatic therapies, occurred at 1,000 mg; abnormal electrolytes resolved after 1 day of drug interruption, without recurrence. Grade ≥ 3 lisaftoclax-related AEs included neutropenia (15.2%), thrombocytopenia (4.3%), decreased leukocytes (4.3%), TLS (4.3%), anemia (2.2%), weight loss (2.2%), and septic shock (2.2%). Ventricular arrhythmia was not observed. One pt required dose reduction because of neutropenia. The MTD was not reached. Lisaftoclax + ibrutinib showed a PK exposure comparable to lisaftoclax or ibrutinib alone, indicating no potential drug-drug interactions. Conclusions: Lisaftoclax alone and combined with ibrutinib or rituximab was well tolerated and demonstrated measurable effects in pts with naïve or BTKi-treatment-failed WM. (CT.gov: NCT04260217; Internal ID: APG2575WU101) *Co-first authors: ML and SA. Clinical trial information: NCT04260217 . [Table: see text]

e23310 Background: Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CAR T) is FDA-approved in pts with triple-class exposed (TCE) relapsed/refractory (RR) MM after four or more prior lines of therapy (LOTs). Real-world access to CAR T remains challenging due to manufacturing capacity, financial barriers, and pt fitness. Pts with certain pre-existing comorbidities (e.g., central nervous system disease, heart disease, secondary malignancies) are commonly excluded from clinical trials, including those investigating CAR T. The objective of this study was to identify the factors associated with the use of CAR T in pts with TCE RRMM to better understand the unmet need in this population. Methods: We conducted an observational cohort study using Medicare fee-for-service data; each pt in the CAR T intention-to-treat (ITT) population between 2021 and 2023 was matched to three non-CAR T pts, without replacement. Pts were eligible if they had an initial MM diagnosis, were continuously enrolled, were TCE, and did not receive treatment in a clinical trial. The index date was the ITT date. Baseline characteristics included age, sex, race/ethnicity, census region, three comorbidity indexes (Charlson, Elixhauser, CMS hierarchical condition categories [HCCs]), a claims-based frailty index (CFI), and dual enrollment in Medicare and Medicaid (as a proxy to social economic status [SES]). Logistic regression was used to derive odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) comparing the characteristics of CAR T vs non-CAR T pts. Results: Seventy-three ITT CAR T pts (nine underwent apheresis but did not receive CAR T) were matched to 219 non-CAR T pts by LOT and index year. Matched pts were treated with varied standard regimens (daratumumab-containing: 63%). Median prior LOTs were similar in the two cohorts (8; range 2–13). Median time from MM diagnosis to index date was 44.6 and 51.9 months for CAR T and non-CAR T pts, respectively. Compared with non-CAR T pts, pts in the CAR T population were younger (aged < 75 years: 59% CAR T vs 36% non-CAR T), less frail (mean CFI: 0.18 vs 0.20) and had higher SES (without dual enrollment in Medicare and Medicaid: 96% vs 81%), but were similar in terms of sex, region, and race/ethnicity. Variation in individual comorbidity prevalence was observed between CAR T and non-CAR T pts. In a multivariable regression analysis, factors strongly associated with lower odds of CAR T use included age ≥75 years (OR 0.29; 95% CI 0.16–0.53), comorbidities (lung/other severe cancers [OR 0.39; 95% CI 0.20–0.74] and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [OR 0.32; 95% CI 0.10–0.99] defined by HCCs), and SES (OR 0.09; 95% CI 0.02–0.37). Conclusions: Older age, certain comorbidities, and lower SES are associated with lower odds of receiving CAR T in real-world pts with TCE RRMM, demonstrating an unmet need for more accessible and effective treatment options with acceptable safety profiles for these pts.

e23309 Background: BCMA-directed T-cell–engaging therapies have been introduced into clinical practice for the treatment of TCE RRMM. While efficacious, such treatments are associated with safety considerations such as cytokine release syndrome (CRS), immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), and serious infections. These treatments also vary in reported efficacy, administration processes, and hospitalization requirements. The aim of this study is to quantify patient preferences and tradeoffs regarding these attributes. Methods: A discrete choice experiment (DCE) was designed to elicit preference weights corresponding to seven attributes related to efficacy (objective response rate [ORR], overall survival [OS]), safety (all-grade CRS, all-grade ICANS, serious infections) and treatment procedures (treatment administration, hospitalization requirements). Attribute levels were based on plausible ranges of potential values. Patients in the United States (US) with a physician-confirmed diagnosis of TCE RRMM were recruited. Pre-test interviews with patients were conducted and the final survey deployed online in 2023. A random-parameters logit model was used to estimate preference weights. Conditional relative importance (CRI) was calculated to rank the relative importance of each attribute. The minimum acceptable benefit (MAB) and maximum acceptable risk (MAR) were calculated to estimate the tradeoffs between efficacy and safety attributes. Results: The sample included 200 respondents (mean [standard deviation] age: 61 [6.4] years; 43% female; 46% White; 10% African American). A total of 197 participants reported having responded to prior treatment, of whom 195 had relapsed or become refractory. In the DCE, a 24-month increase in OS was found to be the most important attribute, with a CRI of 32.0%. Next most important were avoiding a 60% risk of serious infection (CRI 17.3%), avoiding 14-day hospitalization requirements (CRI 15.0%), and a 38% increase in ORR (CRI 13.7%). A treatment that could be started immediately and administered weekly or up to every 4 weeks was preferred over a CAR T-like procedure with a waiting period. Fewer initial hospitalization days was significantly preferred over more hospitalization days. The MABs for OS when the risk of serious infection was increased from 20% to 60%, CRS from 40% to 95%, and ICANS from 3% to 20% were 24.2, 17.1, and 18.0 months, respectively. When OS was increased from 12 to 36 months, the estimated MARs for serious infections, CRS, and ICANS were > 60%, > 95%, and > 20%, respectively. Conclusions: This study highlights US patient preferences regarding treatment attributes for TCE RRMM. Treatment benefits and risks and the mutual tradeoffs considered by patients should be evaluated when developing and selecting therapeutic approaches.

Abstract There has been an increase in volume as well as an improvement in overall survival (OS) after hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) for hematologic disorders. It is unknown if these changes have affected racial/ethnic minorities equally. In this observational study from the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research of 79 904 autologous (auto) and 65 662 allogeneic (allo) HCTs, we examined the volume and rates of change of autoHCT and alloHCT over time and trends in OS in 4 racial/ethnic groups: non-Hispanic Whites (NHWs), non-Hispanic African Americans (NHAAs), and Hispanics across 5 2-year cohorts from 2009 to 2018. Rates of change were compared using Poisson model. Adjusted and unadjusted Cox proportional hazards models examined trends in mortality in the 4 racial/ethnic groups over 5 study time periods. The rates of increase in volume were significantly higher for Hispanics and NHAAs vs NHW for both autoHCT and alloHCT. Adjusted overall mortality after autoHCT was comparable across all racial/ethnic groups. NHAA adults (hazard ratio [HR] 1.13; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.04-1.22; P = .004) and pediatric patients (HR 1.62; 95% CI 1.3-2.03; P &lt; .001) had a higher risk of mortality after alloHCT than NHWs. Improvement in OS over time was seen in all 4 groups after both autoHCT and alloHCT. Our study shows the rate of change for the use of autoHCT and alloHCT is higher in NHAAs and Hispanics than in NHWs. Survival after autoHCT and alloHCT improved over time; however, NHAAs have worse OS after alloHCT, which has persisted. Continued efforts are needed to mitigate disparities for patients requiring alloHCT.

Abstract Three classes of BCMA-directed therapy (BDT) exist: antibody drug-conjugates (ADCs), CAR-T, and T-cell engagers (TCEs), each with distinct strengths and weaknesses. To aid clinicians in selecting between BDTs, we reviewed myeloma patients treated at Mayo Clinic with commercial or investigational BDT between 2018–2023. We identified 339 individuals (1-exposure = 297, 2-exposures = 38, 3-exposures = 4) who received 385 BDTs (ADC = 59, TCE = 134, CAR-T = 192), with median follow-up of 21-months. ADC recipients were older, with more lines of therapy (LOT), and penta-refractory disease. Compared to ADCs, CAR-T (aHR = 0.29, 95%CI = 0.20–0.43) and TCEs (aHR = 0.62, 95%CI = 0.43–0.91) had better progression-free survival (PFS) on analysis adjusted for age, the presence of extramedullary (EMD), penta-refractory disease, multi-hit high-risk cytogenetics, prior BDT, and the number of LOT in the preceding 1-year. Likewise, compared to ADCs, CAR-T (aHR = 0.28, 95%CI = 0.18–0.44) and TCEs (aHR = 0.60, 95%CI = 0.39–0.93) had superior overall survival. Prior BDT exposure negatively impacted all classes but was most striking in CAR-T, ORR 86% vs. 50% and median PFS 13-months vs. 3-months. Of relapses, 54% were extramedullary in nature, and a quarter of these cases had no history of EMD. CAR-T demonstrates superior efficacy and where feasible, should be the initial BDT. However, for patients with prior BDT or rapidly progressive disease, an alternative approach may be preferable.

Abstract Multiple myeloma (MM) therapeutics have evolved tremendously in recent years, with significant improvement in patient outcomes. As newer treatment options are developed, stem cell transplant (SCT) remains an important modality that provides excellent disease control and delays the progression of disease. Over the years, SCT use has increased overall in the U.S., but two distinct gaps remain, including suboptimal use overall, and racial-ethnic disparities. We evaluated the National Cancer Database (NCDB) to study what sociodemographic factors might play a role within a given racial-ethnic group leading to disparate SCT utilization, such that targeted approaches can be developed to optimize SCT use for all. In nearly 112,000 cases belonging to mutually exclusive categories of non-Hispanic Whites (NHW), non-Hispanic Blacks (NHB), Hispanics, non-Hispanic Asians (NHA), and others, we found certain factors including age, comorbidity index, payor type, facility type (academic vs. community) and facility volume to be uniformly associated with SCT use for all the racial-ethnic groups, while gender was not significant for any of the groups. There were several other factors which had a differential impact on SCT utilization among the various race-ethnicity groups studied, including year of diagnosis (significant for NHW, NHB and Hispanics), income level (significant for NHW and Hispanics), literacy level (significant for NHW and NHB), and geographic location of the treatment facility (significant for NHW and NHA). The suboptimal SCT utilization overall in the U.S., suggests that there may be room for improvement for all, even including the majority NHW, while we continue to work on factors that lead to disparities for the traditionally underserved populations. This study helps identify sociodemographic factors that may play a role specifically in each group and paves the way to devise targeted solutions such that resource utilization and impact can be maximized.

Multi-agent regimens incorporating immunomodulatory (IMiD®) agents such as thalidomide, lenalidomide, and pomalidomide have become the preferred standard of care for the treatment of patients with multiple myeloma (MM), resulting in improved survival outcomes. Currently, there are three IMiD agents approved for the treatment of MM: thalidomide, lenalidomide, and pomalidomide. Lenalidomide is commonly used to treat patients with newly diagnosed MM and as maintenance therapy following stem cell transplant or after disease relapse. Pomalidomide, the focus of this review, is approved in patients with relapsed/refractory MM (RRMM). Despite survival benefits, IMiD agents each have different safety profiles requiring consideration both prior to starting therapy and during treatment. Adverse event (AE) management is essential, not only to ensure treatment adherence and thus ensure optimal efficacy but also to maintain patient quality of life. Here, we discuss AEs associated with pomalidomide and present five clinically relevant hypothetical case studies in patients with RRMM to provide scenario-driven guidance regarding treatment selection and AE prevention and management in the clinical setting. Lastly, as new treatment approaches continue to be explored in MM, we also discuss novel cereblon E3 ligase modulator (CELMoD™) agents including iberdomide (CC-220) and mezigdomide (CC-92480).

Aim: Improved management of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) has resulted in a growing population of CLL survivors; these patients have a higher risk of developing second primary malignancies (SPMs) versus the general population. This retrospective cohort study aims to assess the timing, frequency, incidence and types of SPMs in treated and untreated patients with CLL in the USA, using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Medicare database, which links a nationally representative cancer registry with Medicare claims data. Patients & methods: Patients aged ≥66 years with newly diagnosed CLL between 1 January 2010 and 31 December 2016, who were enrolled in Parts A and B of Medicare for ≥12 months pre-diagnosis of CLL were selected from the database. Patients were assessed for ≥36 months until the end of continuous enrollment in Medicare Parts A, B and D, a switch to a health maintenance organization, death, or end of the study period (December 2019). Results: Of 3053 patients included in the analyses, 620 (20.3%) were treated and 2433 (79.7%) were untreated within 36 months of diagnosis. Overall, 638 (20.9%) patients developed a SPM, 26.8% of patients in the treated cohort and 19.4% of patients in the untreated cohort. The most common SPMs for both cohorts were squamous cell carcinoma and acute myeloid leukemia. Among the 166 treated patients who developed a SPM, a greater proportion developed their first SPM after treatment initiation versus those who developed their first SPM prior to treatment initiation (p < 0.001). A significantly lower percentage of patients who received targeted therapy developed a SPM (p < 0.05) versus patients treated with anti-CD20 + chemotherapy. Conclusion: Findings indicate that treatment type and timing can affect SPM development in patients with CLL. Combined with previous findings, this can help inform best practices in monitoring for SPM in patients with CLL.

SummaryThis phase II study evaluated time‐limited (24 cycles) treatment with ibrutinib and ixazomib in newly diagnosed (NDWM; n = 9) and relapsed/refractory (RRWM; n = 12) Waldenström macroglobulinaemia (WM). The overall response rate (ORR) was 76.2% (n = 16) in 21 evaluable patients with no patient achieving a complete response (CR). The median duration of treatment was 15.6 months, and after a median follow‐up time of 25.7 months, the median progression‐free survival (PFS) was 22.9 months. While the primary end‐point was not met (CR rate at any time) and 28.5% discontinued treatment due to toxicity, ibrutinib plus ixazomib led to a clinically meaningful ORR and PFS. Combined Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) and proteasome inhibition merits further evaluation in WM.