Ailawadhi, Sikander

Abstract Background: Current tumor profiling analytics provide some insight into the various molecular abnormalities and their individual consequences on oncogenic signaling. However, these analyses are limited by their lack of integration where the combined effect of individual mutations, gene copy number variations and chromosomal aberrations are not consolidated to create the global molecular architecture that supports neoplastic growth, particularly in the context of drug resistance. Consequentially, identities of the preferential oncogenic pathway(s) tumor cells employ to oppose the effects of targeted therapies remain cryptic and unactionable. Here we present a simulation-based method, which not only replicates the molecular architecture of ibrutinib-resistant Waldenstroms Macroglobulinemia (WM, for which ibrutinib is the only FDA-approved agent) in silico, but also predicts cell sensitivity towards existing drugs, which we validated experimentally for potential clinical translation. Materials: We used the newly established human WM cell line, RPCI-WM1/IR, as a surrogate model of ibrutinib-refractory WM. Genomic data including whole exome sequencing (WES) and copy number analysis (CNA) was utilized for the creation of an avatar of RPCI-WM1/IR, which through simulation identified the salient and prominently dysregulated cellular pathways. Importantly, illustrating these pathways highlights common convergence points on increased proliferation and viability. These convergence points were then directly and indirectly targeted by simulated testing of a library of FDA approved drugs and those impacting these dysregulated pathways were nominated. Importantly, this simulation avatar approach not only looks for agents acting on the specific gene mutation, but also predicts the convergence points to be attacked. The personalized simulation avatar technology is a comprehensive functional proteomics representation of the WM physiology network. A standardized library of equations models all the biological reactions such as enzymatic reactions, allosteric binding and protein modulation by phosphorylation, de-phosphorylation, ubiquitination, acetylation, prenylation and others. Results: Several genomic aberrations were used to create the RPCI-WM1/IR simulation avatar. Functional activity (based on mutation or copy number alteration) of several ibrutinib targets or transcription factors associated with BTK activity such as FYN, SP1, BMX and FRK were predicted to be lost. Increased expression of CAV1, which also inhibits BTK mediated signaling, was increased. An increase in CSNK2B, which activates PU.1- a transcriptional target of BTK, was also observed. Of note, no CXCR4 mutations, which have been shown to impact ibrutinib response, were observed. Next, the cytotoxic potential of over 150 FDA approved drug (and some in experimental stages) were simulated individually and in combination on the RPCI-WM1/IR avatar. In silico modeling predicted aberrant activity of aurora kinase A (AURKA) and its associated signaling partners, which could be disrupted with the (AURKA) inhibitor, tozasertib. AURKA activation was predicted as upregulated due to alterations in several genes: RASA1 loss and SOS1 increase --> increased ERK --> increased ETS1 --> increased AURKA. High beta-catenin signaling (high CTNNB1 and FZD1/4 and low AXIN1 and GSK3B) was also shown to increase AURKA. The simulation predictions were experimentally validated in vitro where AURKA inhibition with tozasertib significantly inhibited proliferation of RPCI-WM1/IR cells (IC50~14nM) as well as inducing apoptosis (48hr, 20nM treatment) and cell-cycle arrest. Conclusions: Our data demonstrates the potential of in silico modeling in predicting novel drug targets, allowing guidance in 1.) Delineating operational oncogenic circuits in an ibrutinib-resistant state by reanimation of the molecular architecture in silico, 2.) Calculating the impact of individual genomic abnormalities and their collective influence on maintaining tumor survival and 3.) Performing a rapid in-silico drug-sensitivity screen directed by the pathway analyses, which can be validated experimentally using standard assays. This novel approach holds tremendous potential in creating highly personalized therapies for ibrutinib-refractory WM patients based on unique genetic signatures. Disclosures Vali: Cellworks Group, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Kumar:Cellworks Group, Inc.: Employment. Singh:Cellworks Group, Inc.: Employment. Abbasi:Cellworks Group, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership.

Abstract Background: Ixazomib is an experimental, orally bioavailable, proteasome inhibitor that has demonstrated anti-tumor activity in relapsed multiple myeloma (MM). In the dose escalation studies, ixazomib was tolerated up to a dose of 5.5 mg given every week as a single agent, while a dose of 4 mg was utilized in the combination studies with lenalidomide. We undertook this study to examine the efficacy and tolerability of the two doses of ixazomib in combination with dexamethasone in patients with relapsed MM. Patients and methods: This was a randomized phase 2 study of two doses of ixazomib (4mg; Arm A or 5.5 mg; Arm B) given weekly for three weeks with a week off along with weekly dexamethasone (40 mg) in patients with relapsed MM, who are proteasome inhibitor na•ve (including bortezomib) or have received less than 6 cycles of therapy with bortezomib and had a PR or better with no progression at the time of discontinuation. The primary objective was to determine the confirmed overall response rate (>=PR); secondary objectives included progression free and overall survival. A total of 71 patients were accrued from February 2013 to April 2015; one patient was ineligible. Results: Baseline characteristics were similar in the two arms; median age across the study was 70 years (46-84); 53% were male. Median number of prior therapies was 4 (range 2-6); 90% of the patients had prior IMiDs, 70% had prior transplant and 29% had prior bortezomib. At a median follow up of 10 months, 17 (49%) and 19 (54%) of patients had disease progression in arms A and B respectively with 12 (34%) patients in each arm still continuing on treatment. All patients in each arm were evaluable for response; the overall response rates were 31% in arm A (95%CI: 17-49) and 51% (95%CI: 34-69) in Arm B. The depth of response, event free survival and overall survival are outlined in Table 1. Among the patients with no prior bortezomib exposure the response rates were 38% for Arm A and 52% for Arm B. The treatment was well tolerated with 2 patients in each arm discontinuing treatment for adverse events; there were no on study deaths. A grade 3 or higher AE that was at least possibly related to treatment was seen in 21% and 54% in Arms A and B respectively; with 15% and 37% hematologic and 6% and 29% non-hematologic AEs. The most common attributable toxicities encountered included fatigue, thrombocytopenia, diarrhea and nausea with more grade 3 toxicities among Arm B. Peripheral neuropathy, possibly related to ixazomib, was seen in 55% (only grade 1 or 2) in arm A and 43% (2 patients with grade 3) in Arm B. Toxicities led to dose reduction of ixazomib in 17% and 43% of patients in Arm A and B respectively; the median number of cycles administered were 5 (1-24) and 5 (1-22) respectively. Conclusions: Ixazomib in combination with dexamethasone was well tolerated with significant anti-myeloma activity in this group of patients with relapsed MM. Deep responses including stringent CR were observed. The higher dose of ixazomib appears to be associated with a higher response rate but with higher rate of adverse events requiring dose reductions. Table 1. Treatment outcome in all patients Arm B (4 mg) (N=35) Arm C (5.5 mg) (N=35) Response Rate 31% (95%CI: 17-49) 51% (95%CI: 34-69) No. of Responders 11 18 sCR 0 1 CR 1 0 VGPR 7 8 PR 3 9 MR 5 1 Median Overall Survival1 NA NA 6 Months 100% 100% Median Event Free Survival1,2 8.4 mos (95%CI: 4.3-13.2) 8.2 mos (95%CI: 3.8-16.3) %Event Free at 6 Months 60% (95%CI: 45-81) 60% (95%CI: 45-81) Median Duration of Response1 16.7 mos (95%CI: 9.3-22.0) 16.3 mos (95%CI: 7.0-20.1) Median Time to Response 1.1 mos (range: 0.8-3.6) 1.0 mos (range: 0.8-7.5) CI: confidence interval; mo: month; NA: not attained 1Kaplan Meier 2Event-free survival time is defined as the time from registration to the first of disease progression, death due to any cause, or subsequent treatment for multiple myeloma. Disclosures Kumar: Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Sanofi: Consultancy, Research Funding; Skyline: Consultancy, Honoraria; Onyx: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy.

Abstract Background: The clinical impact of ibrutinib is irrefutable and has been hailed as a revolutionary treatment for several cancers, including mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). Despite high response rates noted with ibrutinib therapy in MCL (ORR, 68%), complete responses are low and durability of remission is suboptimal in MCL vs. CLL or Waldenstrom macroglobulinemia (WM) patients (Cheah et al Ann Oncol 2015). This relative lack of efficacy may be due to MCL cells having a higher proliferation rate and being less indolent in nature than CLL or WM cells. Tumor cells with a high proliferation index rely on optimally functioning protein metabolism/homeostasis systems. In MCL, this observation has been fortuitously exploited with the use of bortezomib, a 20S proteasome inhibitor. Indeed the ubiquitin proteasome system is a validated target and consists of several individual components whose function in MCL has yet to be mapped out. We have recently reported that inhibition of the 19S proteasomal deubiquitinating enzymes (DUBs), USP14 and UCHL5; with the small molecule inhibitor b-AP15 is lethal to drug-resistant WM tumor cells. This intriguing observation, prompted us to define the role of USP14/UCHL5 and their inhibition in a diverse panel of B-cell lymphoma cell lines, including MCL models as well as ibrutinib-resistant MCL cells. Materials: b-AP15 (and its clinical grade analog, VLX1570) was obtained from Vivolux AB and bortezomib from Sellekchem. Human NHL (DLBCL, MCL, Burkitt), Hodgkin lymphoma (HL), multiple myeloma (MM) cell lines as well as established drug-resistant subclones were used in drug-sensitivity screening experiments (total n=25). Results: USP14 and UCHL5 mRNA expression was queried in the CCLE database (Broad-Novartis) and showed highest expression in plasma cell and B-lymphoid tumor cell types. This was also observed at the protein level, wherein analysis of The Human Protein Atlas database revealed moderate to high intensity staining for USP14 and UCHL5 localizing to the cytoplasmic/membranous and nuclear compartments in high-grade NHL tissues. Next, we examined B-lymphoid tumor cell sensitivity to pharmacologic inhibition of USP14/UCHL5 with either b-AP15 or VLX1570 (72hr fluorescein diacetate hydrolysis assay or CellTiter Glo). We observed that MCL cells, including those resistant to ibrutinib (Jeko/IR cell line) were highly sensitive to VLX1570 (median IC50 12 - 25nM). In contrast, MM cells were not as sensitive (IC50's ranging between 58 - 90nM). Nine DLBCL cell lines exposed to equivalent time/concentrations of b-AP15 showed a median IC50 of 311nM (range, 70 - 910nM) and 3 HL models exhibited an IC50 of 531nM (range, 420 - 783nM). No difference in sensitivity to VLX1570 was noted between ABC-type vs. GCB-type DLBCL models. These functional results aligned with prior genomic inquiry where USP14 and UCHL5 gene expression was noted to be higher in MCL cell lines compared to DLBCL and non-hematologic cancer models analyzed (FDR=0.0019, p=0.001), suggesting their more central role in maintaining MCL tumor viability. Indeed MCL tumor survival (particularly ibrutinib-resistant cells) appears linked to USP14/UCHL5 function as treatment of Jeko/IR cells with VLX1570 (250nM, 12hrs) caused marked apoptosis (71.8% annexin-V+ staining) and cleavage of PARP-1. Moreover, the combination of ibrutinib and VLX1570 synergistically induced MCL cell death (median CI: 0.3). Mechanistic studies demonstrated that VLX1570 modulates several proteins critical for MCL survival including cyclin-D1, Myc and CXCR4/CD184. Reduction in cyclin-D1 was also noted to coincide with cell cycle arrest of VLX1570-treated MCL cells. Altogether, these findings suggest that VLX1570 modulates critical cellular signaling pathways utilized by MCL tumor cells, particularly those that are involved in resistance to ibrutinib. Conclusions: MCL remains a challenging malignancy to treat with no effective treatments for ibrutinib-relapsed disease. Our data supports the role of the proteasome-associated DUBs, USP14 and UCHL5, as critical factors involved in ibrutinib-resistant MCL tumor survival. VLX1570 is a potentially effective agent for the treatment of ibrutinib-resistant MCL. Disclosures Gullbo: Vivolux AB: Other: Shareholder. Linder:Vivolux AB: Other: Shareholder.

Abstract Background: Dexamethasone (dex) is an integral part of various anti-myeloma regimens both in the frontline and relapsed/refractory (RR) setting. Several clinical trials have shown that dex adds to the efficacy of novel therapeutic agents for multiple myeloma (MM). Yet, a substantial number of patients are intolerant to even the standard of care low-dose dex (40 mg weekly), especially in heavily pre-treated RRMM, possibly due to cumulative steroid toxicities and thus, require dex dose adjustments. There is a concern of compromising the efficacy of anti-MM regimens by adjusting the dex dose lower. We describe the frequency of dex dose adjustment, characteristics of patients who required it and its effect on patient outcomes in a large prospective clinical trial of pomalidomide (pom) and dex in RRMM (MC0789). Methods: We utilized data from the Pom-dex trial (MC0789), which treated RRMM patients in different cohorts of pom (2 vs. 4 mg; 21 vs 28 days cycle) with fixed dose dex (40 mg orally weekly). Patients were divided into 2 subgroups, with any dose adjustment/elimination of dex vs. not. Continuous and categorical variables were compared between the two groups using two-sample t-test/Wilcoxon rank sum test or Chi-squared test, respectively. Logistic regression and Cox regression models were used to find the univariate and stepwise multivariate predictors of response to treatment and overall mortality, respectively. Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate overall survival (OS) at 1, 3, and 5 years. All statistical tests were two-sided with the alpha level set at 0.05 for statistical significance. Results: Results from the MC0789 clinical trial have been reported previously. Almost half of all treated patients in this trial had dex dose adjusted (n=175/343; 51%). The median number of cycles for the first dose adjustment in this group was 3 (range 1-62), with 46.5% of patients (n=82) having multiple dose adjustments and majority (58.3%, n=102) within the first 3 cycles of treatment. Patients in the dose adjustment group were significantly older (mean 65 vs 60 years; p=0.0001). Males, Whites and patients diagnosed before 2006 or with normal cytogenetics also had a higher incidence of dex dose adjustment, though this was not statistically significant. Patients with dex dose adjustment had a longer duration of treatment (mean 339 days) as compared to the non-adjusted cohort (mean 123.65 days) (95% CI 160.13, 270.58; p <0.0001). Dex dose adjustment was associated with a higher probability of responding in the clinical trial after a univariate (p<0.001) as well as multivariate (p<0.001) analysis. Patients with dex dose adjustment also had a significantly better OS at 1, 3 and 5 years by univariate (p<0.001) and multivariate (p<0.001) analysis. (Figure 1) The only other significant factor was lesser number of prior regimens (3 or less), associated with a higher probability of response (p=0.002) and survival (p<0.001). Conclusion: Our analysis established that in these heavily pre-treated RRMM patients, appropriate dose adjustment of dex did not compromise their response rates; patients remained on treatment significantly longer and had an improved survival. Majority of patients (58.3%) requiring dex dose adjustment had it instituted early during treatment (<3 cycles), suggesting that early disease progression was less likely to determine dex dose continuation or adjustment. Appropriate dex adjustments should be judiciously employed as they may ensure longer treatment duration with novel anti-MM therapeutic agents, conferring superior response and survival in this difficult to treat MM subgroup. This also paves the path to further optimize dex dose in various anti-MM regimens, especially in these patients who are more likely to be intolerant to it. Disclosures Kumar: Skyline, Noxxon: Honoraria; Celgene, Millennium, Onyx, Janssen, Noxxon, Sanofi, BMS, Skyline: Consultancy; Celgene, Millennium, Onyx, Novartis, Janssen, Sanofi: Research Funding.

Abstract Dexamethasone is a powerful anti-inflammatory, immunosuppressive agent widely used in the treatment of MM with pleiotropic effects on both the tumor, and host immune cells. We report on a completely novel approach to immune modulation using an agent with almost directly opposite effects to glucocorticoids on innate immune cells. LCL161 is an IAP antagonist targeting the cellular inhibitor of apoptosis proteins cIAP1 and -2 (cIAP1/2) that in a phase I study in solid tumors was well tolerated with a cytokine release syndrome as the dose limiting toxicity. We previously reported that loss of cIAP1/2 in MM cells results in the stabilization of NIK and activation of the non-canonical NFkB pathway, a pathway we found frequently activated by a promiscuous array of mutations in multiple myeloma (MM). As expected, we found that LCL161 has no direct anti-tumor activity against MM cells in vitro and ex vivo. However, the non-canonical NFkB pathway is also a key activator of the innate immune response. Remarkably, we found that in vivo LCL161 has dramatic, apoptosis-independent activity associated with marked phagocytosisagainst MM that develops spontaneously in an immunocompetent genetically engineered mouse model of MM (Vk*MYC). Cyclophosphamide (Cy), which has been shown to induce an acute secretory activating phenotype in tumor-associated macrophages, markedly potentiated the anti-tumor effects of LCL161. We show that phagocytes (depleted by liposomal clodronate), but not adaptive immune cells, are required for the anti-tumor effect. Consistently we show that LCL161 activates dendritic cells and macrophages in vitro, and in vivo, and upregulates production of inflammatory cytokines. A phase 2 clinical trial of LCL161 was conducted in 24 patients with relapsed MM previously exposed to both IMiDs and PIs, but less than 5 prior lines of therapy. Patients received LCL161 1200mg po weekly, with Cy 500mg po weekly added for progressive disease or lack of response. Single agent LCL161 was well-tolerated, with grade 3 or 4 non-hematologic toxicity in four patients, and following the addition of cyclophosphamide in 9 patients. No patients responded to single agent LCL161, and the best response was stable disease in 6/24. In 21 patients, Cy was added after a median of 2 cycles, in whom the best response was stable disease or better in 18/21 (p<0.001 compared to LCL161 alone), and a PR or better (including 1 VGPR and 1 CR) in 5/21 (p<0.001 compared to LCL161 alone). Six months following the initiation of Cy, 35% of patients remain event-free. Two patients had stable disease for more than nine months after stopping treatment. One, relapsing after VDT-PACE, HDM200, RVd x 3 years with t(11;14) and del17p, received only three months of LCL161, the last month in combination with Cy. He then achieved a PR, reconstitution of his uninvolved IgG to normal levels for the first time in more than 3 years and still has not progressed one year after stopping therapy. Similar changes in serum and bone marrow inflammatory cytokines and gene expression were observed in patients following treatment with LCL161 to those observed in the mice. We conclude that LCL161 is able to modulate the tumor microenvironment to exert long-term disease control in combination with Cy, and deserves further study in combination with agents that more directly depend on phagocytic cell activity (e.g., monoclonal antibodies, inhibitors of "Don't eat me" signals). Disclosures Bergsagel: Novartis: Research Funding; Constellation Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Incyte: Consultancy; Jannsen: Consultancy; Mundipharma: Consultancy. Off Label Use: Use of LCL161 to treat multiple myeloma. Kumar:Celgene: Research Funding; Millenium/Takeda: Research Funding; Onyx: Research Funding; AbbVie: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding; Celgene, Millenium, Sanofi, Skyline, BMS, Onyx, Noxxon,: Other: Consultant, no compensation,; Skyline, Noxxon: Honoraria. Stewart:Oncospire Genomics: Research Funding.

Abstract Background: Lenalidomide (Len) is clinically active in CLL patients (pts). Robust anti-leukemic immune response from Len is truncated by dysfunctional immune system in CLL and anti-apoptotic bcl-2 protein. We hypothesized that therapeutic downregulation of Bcl-2 may help enhance the killing potential of immune effector cells that are activated by Len. AT-101 is a novel, orally active BH3-mimetic that binds to antiapoptotic Bcl-2 family proteins (Bcl-2, Mcl-1 and Bcl-xL) and induces CLL cell death ex vivo (Masood et al British Journal of Haematology 2012). Encouraging efficacy and safety results of AT-101 alone or in combination with rituximab in CLL have been reported in Phase I/II studies. We have previously demonstrated that bcl-2 downregulation in CLL cells enhanced the killing potential of Len-activated immune cells. Conversely, pretreatment of CLL cells with Len enhanced AT-101 cytotoxicity in an immune cell independent manner (Masood et al British Journal of Haematology 2012). These preclinical findings formed the basis of a phase I/II clinical trial testing the combination of AT-101 and lenalidomide in relapsed B-CLL patients. Methods: The phase I portion of this study (NCT 01003769) utilizes a standard cohort of three design to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of the combination regimen. The MTD is defined as the dose level below the lowest dose that induces dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) in at least one-third of patients. Following the MTD determination, the phase 2 portion will assess the efficacy of this combination using a one-stage design with an interim analysis. Key inclusion criteria include adult CLL pts with relapsed disease who have received 1-4 prior lines of treatment (Rx) (phase I) or 1-2 lines of Rx (phase II), last dose > 4 weeks from enrollment, ECOG performance status 0-2, good renal/liver function, acceptable blood counts. Patients with known hypersensitivity to thalidomide/Len or prior use of gossypol/AT-101 were excluded. Cycle 1 Rx includes Len alone and cycles 2-12 includes Len and AT-101. Starting doses of Len and AT-101 are 5mg oral daily on days 1-21 and 40 mg oral twice daily (b.i.d) on days 1-3 of a 28-day cycle. Planned dose escalation is shown in Table 1. Three pts will be treated at each dose level and observed during the first cycle of the combination Rx. Dose limiting toxicity is defined as grade 4 anemia unrelated to disease, thrombocytopenia-grade 4 or grade 3 with bleeding/requiring platelets, ANC <500 for >14 days, febrile neutropenia , Grade 3/4 non-hematologic toxicity. Dose from Phase II will be based on MTD from phase I. Peripheral blood and bone marrow will be collected and analyzed for immune cellular microenvironment and effect of Len and AT-101 on molecular targets. Optional lymph node biopsy will be done at baseline and if tumor-flare reaction occurs. This study is expected to accrue a maximum of 26 pts in phase I and 34 pts in phase II, overall maximum sample size of 60 pts. Five pts in phase I have been accrued to date. Table 1 (* starting dose level) Table 1. (* starting dose level) Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract Background: I-131-CLR1404 is a novel radioiodinated therapeutic that exploits the selective uptake and retention of phospholipid ethers (PLEs) by malignant cells. Based on initial preclinical and clinical experience and the exquisite radiosensitivity of MM, I-131-CLR1404 is being examined in RRMM in an open-label, dose escalation Phase 1 trial (NCT02278315) evaluating up to 5 cohorts and a maximum of 37.5 mCi/m2. Methods: The primary objective is to determine safety and tolerability of I-131-CLR1404 with and without dexamethasone (dex) in RRMM. Secondary objectives are to determine the recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D) and therapeutic activity in RRMM. Eligibility criteria include progressive, relapsed/refractory MM, and at least one previous exposure to proteasome inhibitor (PI) and immunomodulatory (IMiD) drugs. Prior autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) and external beam radiation therapy are allowed (≤ 20% of total marrow irradiated). There is no limit to the number of prior therapies. I-131-CLR1404 is administered intravenously as a single 30 minute infusion on day 1 with 40 mg dex orally weekly for 12 weeks. Dose-escalation uses a minimally modified, standard 3+3 schema with dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) assessed through day 85 post-infusion. Adverse events (AEs) are graded by NCI-CTCAE v4.03; responses are assessed by the International Myeloma Working Group Uniform Response Criteria. Results: Ten patients have been enrolled in the study with data presented as of 30 Jun 2016 for 8 patients. Accrual is ongoing in the additional cohorts. Five patients were enrolled to cohort 1 (12.5 mCi/m2 + dex); 4 were evaluable and 1 patient was taken off study for rapid disease progression. Five patients have been enrolled to cohort 2 (18.75 mCi/m2 + dex), with data presented on 3 enrolled prior to data cutoff. The median age was 68.5 (range 55-85) and included 5 males and 3 females. All patients were standard risk (karyotyping) and median bone marrow plasma cell involvement was 25% (range 4-50%). Median number of prior therapies was 4 (range 2-12) (Table 1). Four of 8 patients previously underwent ASCT and 25% were previously treated with radiation therapy. Hematologic AEs (grade 3+) and non-hematologic AEs (grade 2+) potentially related to study drug are shown in Table 1. No difference in the toxicity profile was noted for patients with previous radiation therapy. Two serious adverse events (SAEs) have been reported, both in patients treated with 18.75 mCi/m2 I-131-CLR1404. One patient was hospitalized for a seizure (Day 62), assessed as unrelated to study drug and another patient was hospitalized for a grade 1 upper GI bleed in the setting of grade 4 thrombocytopenia (Day 23). This is believed to be the result of rapidly progressive disease, however relationship to I-131-CLR1404 could not be ruled out. Stable disease was achieved in 100% of evaluable patients (n=7). One subject in cohort 1 demonstrated a > 30% reduction in serum m-protein. Figure 1 provides a summary of percent change in serum free light chain assay (FLC) from baseline. Three patients had a reduction in FLC > 50%, 2 in cohort 1 and 1, to date, in cohort 2. Three patients had a stable FLC response through at least 22 days following treatment and 1 subject was unresponsive with regard to FLC. Median follow-up is 6.8 months (range 1.2-14.2). Patients did not receive subsequent systemic therapy for a median of 3.5 months (range 0.6-4.7). Furthermore, 1 subject in cohort 2 maintains stable disease and has not initiated subsequent treatment. Median progression free survival (PFS) is 3 months and included 4 patients with stable disease at the end of the 85 day study follow-up. In patients with progression after I-131-CLR1404, treatment included daratumumab (n=4), ASCT (n=1), and bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dex (VRD) (n=1). Conclusions: I-131-CLR1404 represents a unique, first in class targeted radiotherapeutic for MM. Preliminary data from this trial show an acceptable and expected safety profile with an efficacy signal in the initial 2 of a potential 5 cohorts. All evaluable patients, despite extensive previous therapy and refractoriness to new therapies, achieved disease stabilization. The study is ongoing to determine the RP2D and long term efficacy. Disclosures Ailawadhi: Pharmacyclics: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Amgen Inc: Consultancy; Takeda Oncology: Consultancy. Oliver:Cellectar Biosciences: Employment.

Abstract Background: Outcomes in multiple myeloma (MM) have improved significantly over the years but disparities in outcomes exist among MM patients (pts) belonging to different racial subgroups. Previous studies have explored healthcare access and utilization disparities for pts of different races as potential causes, but genomic differences, which could alter disease biology and clinical behavior, have not been studied. We utilized the MMRF CoMMpass database, which prospectively captures clinical and molecular characteristics of MM patients to explore race-based differences at the genomic level. Methods: The publically available CoMMpass trial database (data release version IA8) was utilized. Pts with race category of White (total n=698) and non-White (total n=223, comprising 129 Blacks, 19 Asians and 45 others) were analyzed for genomics including cytogenetics (fluorescent in situ hybridization; FISH), tumor diploidy (conventional karyotyping), gene expression profiling (GEP), gene copy number variations (CNV), gene single nucleotide variations (SNV) and genomic translocations analysis focused on genes from the FoundationOne Heme panel¨ (402 genes). GEP was considered significantly different between categories for more than or equal to a 2-fold change for a given gene (p<0.05). Categorical variables for FISH probes and diploidy status were compared by Chi-square or Fischer exact test, wherever applicable. Results: GEP clustering analysis uncovered 67 genes differentially expressed between Whites vs. non-Whites (Fig 1A). Baseline cytogenetics aberrations between both race cohorts showed statistically insignificant differences. Multiple cytogenetic abnormalities were seen most commonly in both race groups (~31%) with the distribution of others (in descending order) as such: Del13 > No abnormalities > t(11;14) > 1q amplification > Del17p or p53 > t(4;14) > Del1p > t(14;16) > t(14;20). Aneuploidy status showed insignificant differences between race groups with ~34% of patients from both groups having no aneuploidy. SNV data was present for 90% of Whites and 57% of non-Whites. Overall, 84% of genes had>1 SNV (84%), 2% translocations only and 14% had neither SNVs or translocations. SNVs were classified as Non-specific Non-Synonymous coding (NNSCs), Splice-site (SS) or Tier 1 (T1, codon deletion, insertion, frame-shift, etc.). A total of 880 NNSCs SNVs were observed: 670 in Whites across 227 genes, 210 in non-Whites across 120 genes. In whites, 57% of NNSC SNVs consisted of transition-type mutations and 43% as transversions. In non-Whites, transition mutations comprised 64% of all NNSC SNVs and transversions in the remaining 36%. A total of 38 SS SNVs were observed, 30 in Whites and 8 in non-Whites observed in 25 and 6 genes, respectively. In Whites, 57% of SS SNVs were transition type and remaining 43% were transversion. In non-Whites, an equal % of SS transition and transversion mutations were noted. A total of 240 T1 SNVs were noted; 182 in Whites seen in 82 genes; 58 in non-Whites seen 6 genes. In both Whites and non-Whites, frameshifts (41% in Whites, 47% in non-Whites) and stop-gained (46% in Whites, 45% in non-Whites) SNVs were most common. A total of 17 genes with>10 distinct SNVs were identified in Whites; 5 genes in non-Whites and 4 genes commonly seen in both cohorts (Fig 1B). In Whites, 17 genes were found to have translocations (intrachromosomal TRAF3 and PIK3R2 most common); in non-Whites, 5 genes had translocations (intrachromosomal CIC and EMSY most common). CNV analysis demonstrated 21 genes that were significantly altered with either copy number gain or loss between Whites vs. non-Whites (Fig 1C). Conclusions: We present the first race-based comprehensive genomic analysis utilizing the public interface of the CoMMpass trial. We discovered genomic differences between Whites and non-Whites at several levels including GEP, SNV and CNV, but not at the level of cytogenetics, which are in fact the most commonly performed clinical genomic analysis. Correlation of these variations with MM pt outcomes would be invaluable in understanding disease biology and hopefully mitigating some of the outcome disparities by pt race. As the database grows and becomes more enriched, separate analyses for Blacks, Asians and Hispanics would be attempted. Acknowledgments: We would like to thank the MMRF, Ms. Mary Derome and Dr. Jonathan Keats for providing scientific overview and technical support. Disclosures Fonseca: Millennium, a Takeda Company: Consultancy; Millennium, a Takeda Company: Consultancy; AMGEN: Consultancy; AMGEN: Consultancy; Patent: Patents & Royalties: Prognostication of MM based on genetic categorization of FISH of the disease; Patent: Patents & Royalties: Prognostication of MM based on genetic categorization of FISH of the disease; Patent Pending: Patents & Royalties: The use of calcium isotopes as biomarkers for bone metabolisms; Patent Pending: Patents & Royalties: The use of calcium isotopes as biomarkers for bone metabolisms; Celgene: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Bayer: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Sanofi: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Millennium, a Takeda Company: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; AMGEN: Consultancy; Bayer: Consultancy; Patent: Patents & Royalties: Prognostication of MM based on genetic categorization of FISH of the disease; Novartis: Consultancy; Patent Pending: Patents & Royalties: The use of calcium isotopes as biomarkers for bone metabolisms; Sanofi: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Millennium, a Takeda Company: Consultancy; AMGEN: Consultancy; Patent: Patents & Royalties: Prognostication of MM based on genetic categorization of FISH of the disease; Patent Pending: Patents & Royalties: The use of calcium isotopes as biomarkers for bone metabolisms. Ailawadhi:Takeda Oncology: Consultancy; Amgen Inc: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy.

Abstract Introduction. In comparison toCLL, single agent clinical efficacy of venetoclax (a Bcl-2 inhibitor; Bcl-2i) in multiple myeloma (MM) has been modest (ORR of ~12%; Kumar et al ASCO 2016). Clinical experience to date unequivocally directs towards a combination strategy in MM for venetoclax. Our prior work has demonstrated that interaction between tumor and stromal cells upregulates phospho-Bcl-2 (pBcl-2, more stable than Bcl-2) which undermines activity of Bcl-2i. We also noted that this can be overcome using agents such as lenalidomide, which can impair the protective effect of stromal cells. Our goal in this investigation was to determine if the antitumor effect of lenalidomide/dexamethasone (Ld) regimen can be further optimized through leveraging the Bcl-2 targeting properties of venetoclax thereby sensitizing MM cells to enhanced lethality. Given the known effects of Ld on activating host immune effector cells, we hypothesized that immune mediated cytotoxicity (engaged by Ld) can be further enhanced through concurrent treatment with venetoclax. Data presented here provides preclinical rationale and proof-of-principle for clinical development of Bcl-2i in combination with Ld. Methodology. Malignant plasma cell cancer models (MM1.S, BCWM.1, KMS11) and stromal cell line (HS5) were used. Bcl-2 and pBcl-2 were determined by flow cytometry. Drug cytotoxicity was determined by MTS assay and/orAnnexin-V/PI staining. SCID mice were used for xenograft studies. Bcl-2 inhibitors (venetoclax; Bcl-2 specific inhibitor, AT-101; pan Bcl-2 inhibitor) as well asLd were purchased from commercial sources. Results. Tumor cell lines were treated with Bcl-2i for 24hrs and showed significant loss of viability (51 - 68%) and induction of apoptosis (~40%) in vitro. To replicate microenvironment conditions, we co-cultured tumor and stromal cells for 48hrs followed by treatment with Bcl-2i (1uM). Under these conditions, we noted a significant reduction in apoptosis (~50%) in Bcl-2i-treated cells indicating the protective effect of the stroma (Fig.1a). Under similar settings, we examined Bcl-2 species in tumor cells +/- stromal cells. The ratio of pBcl-2:Bcl-2 in tumor cells without stromal contact was 0.7, whereas, the ratio increased to 1.8 when tumor and stromal cells were cocultured suggesting increased pBcl-2 as a protective mechanism (Fig.1b,c). We then investigated the potential of Ld (1uM) +/- Bcl-2i to downregulate pBcl-2:Bcl-2 and whether this correlated with increased tumor lethality. While solo Bcl-2i treatment of tumor + stromal cells downregulated pBcl-2 and Bcl-2 (ratio 1.5), a marked reduction was noted in Ld + Bcl-2i treated tumor cells (ratio of 0.3). And this correlated with enhanced tumor cell apoptosis; analogous to that observed in tumor cells without stroma (Fig.1a and c). As these experiments indicated the triple combination to overcome protective effects of the stroma through decreasing bioavailability of pBcl-2 in vitro, we next validated these observations in a xenograft model. MM1.S cells were subcutaneously implanted in SCID mice with local tumor growth monitored by caliper measurement and systemic dissemination measured by Human-Ig lambda levels. DMSO-treated mice demonstrated tumors averaging ~410mm3 by Day 24 post-tumor implantation, whereas mice treated with Bcl-2i (35mg/kg QD, oral gavage) or Ld alone (Len 10mg/kg QD; Dex 0.5mg/kg QD, IP injection) showed tumors ~330mm3. In Ld + Bcl-2i- treated mice, tumor size was ~250mm3- significantly lower than DMSO (p<0.001) or Bcl-2i orLd group mice (p<0.054) (Fig.1d). A similar trend was seen when systemic Human-Ig-lambda was measured (Fig.1e). Notably, mice tolerated the triple combination treatment well; with no significant weight loss or other toxicities noted. Conclusions. Regulation of the Bcl-2 pathway is an important approach for controlling tumor cell proliferation; most recently validated with the approval of venetoclax for treatment of CLL. Herein we demonstrateLd as an attractive partner regimen to enhance the effects of not only Bcl-2i but also that ofLd in MM. Ongoing work is investigating the combination ofLd + venetoclax and preliminary in vitro results in venetoclax-insensitive MM cells (IC50 >5uM) show significant apoptosis induction with combination therapy (Fig.1f). Altogether our studies provide the rationale for clinical evaluation of this combination platform (Len/Dex + Bcl-2i). Disclosures Ailawadhi: Pharmacyclics: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Amgen Inc: Consultancy; Takeda Oncology: Consultancy.

Abstract Background: The incidence of secondary Acute Lymphoblastic leukemia (sALL) after a preceding first primary solid organ malignancy (1M) is not well defined. We undertook a Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER)-based analysis to describe the occurrence of sALL among adult patients with a history of common 1M's. We also evaluated differences in sALL survival on the basis of age, the site and extent of 1M, and for evidence of any underlying racial/ethnic disparity. Methods: The SEER-18 database (1973-2011) was interrogated for the current study. All confirmed cases of ALL (ICD-O-3 codes: 9811, 9812, 9814-18, 9826-28, 9835-37) in adult patients (age ≥18 years) were identified. De novo ALL vs. sALL was determined by using the SEER variable ‘First Malignant Primary Indicator'. 1M prior to the diagnosis of ALL was identified by merging all SEER databases together by patient ID number. Those with 1M stage of ‘in situ'; sALL cases reported <2 months after the diagnosis of 1M; and those with “unknown” information on 1M (n=471) were excluded. Standard race/ethnicity categories were used. Latency interval (time from diagnosis of 1M to sALL) was calculated for all patients. Overall survival (OS) was calculated as the interval from diagnosis to death, or censored at date of last contact, December 31st 2011, or 5 years after diagnosis, whichever came first. A proportional hazards Cox regression model was performed to evaluate the impact of sALL and latency on OS, adjusting for age at diagnosis, race/ethnicity, marital status, birthplace, SEER registry site, and year of diagnosis. All statistical tests were two-sided and utilized the SAS software (v9.4) with a two-sided significance level of 0.05. Results: A total of n=8,398 adult patients with primary ALL (1ALL) and n=414 with sALL were identified. Patient characteristics were significantly different between 1ALL & sALL (Table). Males comprised 49.8% of sALL patients as compared to 58% with 1ALL. Age at diagnosis of ALL was also significantly different, with 55.5% of sALL patients being ≥65 years as compared to 51.4% of 1ALL observed in the 18-44 years age group. Non-Whites comprised 27.3% of sALL and 40.4% of 1ALL, with Hispanics having the most differential distribution of 13.3% and 24.6%, respectively in the two groups. Distribution of sALL patients by latency from 1M is shown in Table. The majority of sALL patients had a diagnosis of local/regional (rather than advanced stage) 1M (Table). sALL patients had a significantly inferior OS when compared to 1ALL (HR 1.211, 95%CI 1.079-1.359) (Median OS 14 months vs. 18 months, Figure). sALL cases with longer latency interval (>5 year) appeared to have better median OS compared to shorter latency intervals, but this difference was not statistically significant (p=0.53). Conclusion: We have performed the largest population-based analysis identifying sALL after 1M, demonstrating that sALL patients are older and have significantly worse OS than 1ALL. We noted a lower relative incidence of sALL in Hispanics as compared with 1ALL, while the converse was true for Whites. Although detailed treatment data (specifically with respect to chemotherapeutic agents) is not available in SEER, it is possible that treatment for local/regional 1M - presumably adjuvant in nature - may be associated with the risk of sALL. Further analyses are required and are ongoing to confirm the relative incidence after specific 1M's, and the impact of both specific treatment modalities and the era of treatment for 1M on risk of developing sALL. Figure 1 Figure 1. Figure 2 Figure 2. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.