Sanyal, Arun J.

Background: Following the adoption of new nomenclature for steatotic liver disease, we aimed to build consensus on the use of International Classification of Diseases codes and recommendations for future research and advocacy. Methods: Through a two-stage Delphi process, a core group (n = 20) reviewed draft statements and recommendations (n = 6), indicating levels of agreement. Following revisions, this process was repeated with a large expert panel (n = 243) from 73 countries. Results: Consensus ranged from 88.8% to 96.9% (mean = 92.3%). Conclusions: This global consensus statement provides guidance on harmonizing the International Classification of Diseases coding for steatotic liver disease and future directions to advance the field.

Diagnosing and managing metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) remains a major challenge in primary care due to lack of agreement on diagnostic tools, difficulty in identifying symptoms and determining their cause, absence of approved pharmacological treatments, and limited awareness of the disease. However, prompt diagnosis and management are critical to preventing MASLD from progressing to more severe forms of liver disease. This highlights the need to raise awareness and improve understanding of MASLD among both patients and physicians. The patient perspective is invaluable to advancing our knowledge of this disease and how to manage it, as their perspectives have led to the growing recognition that patients experience subtle symptoms and that patient-reported outcomes should be incorporated into drug development. This review and expert opinion examine MASLD and metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis from the patient and physician perspective from pre-diagnosis to diagnosis and early care, through to progression to advanced liver damage. Specifically, the paper dives into the issues patients and physicians experience, and, in turn, what is required to improve diagnosis and management, including tips and tools to empower patients and physicians dealing with MASLD.

Background and Aims: Aldafermin, an engineered analog of the human hormone FGF19, improves liver histology in patients with noncirrhotic NASH; however, its efficacy and safety in compensated cirrhosis is unknown. No drug has yet to demonstrate benefit in the compensated NASH population. Approach and Results: In this multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2b trial, 160 patients with compensated NASH cirrhosis were randomized to aldafermin 0.3 mg (n = 7), 1 mg (n = 42), 3 mg (n = 55), or placebo (n = 56) for 48 weeks. The 0.3 mg group was discontinued to limit exposure to suboptimal doses. The primary end point was a change in Enhanced Liver Fibrosis from baseline to week 48. The analyses were performed in the intention-to-treat population. At week 48, the least-squares mean difference in the change in Enhanced Liver Fibrosis was −0.5 (95% CI, −0.7 to −0.2; p = 0.0003) between the 3 mg group and the placebo group. 15%, 21%, and 23% of patients in the placebo, 1 mg, and 3 mg group, respectively, achieved fibrosis improvement ≥ 1 stage; and 13%, 16%, and 20% achieved fibrosis improvement ≥ 1 stage without NASH worsening. Improvement in alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, neoepitope-specific N-terminal pro-peptide of type III collagen, and liver stiffness favored aldefermin groups over placebo. Diarrhea was the most frequent adverse event, occurring at 26% and 40% in the 1 mg and 3 mg groups, respectively, compared to 18% in the placebo group. Overall, 0%, 2%, and 9% of patients in the placebo, 1 mg, and 3 mg group, respectively, discontinued due to treatment-related adverse events. Conclusions: Aldafermin 3 mg resulted in a significant reduction in Enhanced Liver Fibrosis in patients with compensated NASH cirrhosis.

The principal limitations of the terms NAFLD and NASH are the reliance on exclusionary confounder terms and the use of potentially stigmatising language. This study set out to determine if content experts and patient advocates were in favor of a change in nomenclature and/or definition. A modified Delphi process was led by three large pan-national liver associations. The consensus was defined a priori as a supermajority (67%) vote. An independent committee of experts external to the nomenclature process made the final recommendation on the acronym and its diagnostic criteria. A total of 236 panelists from 56 countries participated in 4 online surveys and 2 hybrid meetings. Response rates across the 4 survey rounds were 87%, 83%, 83%, and 78%, respectively. Seventy-four percent of respondents felt that the current nomenclature was sufficiently flawed to consider a name change. The terms “nonalcoholic” and “fatty” were felt to be stigmatising by 61% and 66% of respondents, respectively. Steatotic liver disease was chosen as an overarching term to encompass the various aetiologies of steatosis. The term steatohepatitis was felt to be an important pathophysiological concept that should be retained. The name chosen to replace NAFLD was metabolic dysfunction–associated steatotic liver disease. There was consensus to change the definition to include the presence of at least 1 of 5 cardiometabolic risk factors. Those with no metabolic parameters and no known cause were deemed to have cryptogenic steatotic liver disease. A new category, outside pure metabolic dysfunction–associated steatotic liver disease, termed metabolic and alcohol related/associated liver disease (MetALD), was selected to describe those with metabolic dysfunction–associated steatotic liver disease, who consume greater amounts of alcohol per week (140–350 g/wk and 210–420 g/wk for females and males, respectively). The new nomenclature and diagnostic criteria are widely supported and nonstigmatising, and can improve awareness and patient identification.

Background and Aims: With distinct mechanisms of action, the combination of tropifexor (TXR) and cenicriviroc (CVC) may provide an effective treatment for NASH. This randomized, multicenter, double-blind, phase 2b study assessed the safety and efficacy of TXR and CVC combination, compared with respective monotherapies. Approach and Results: Patients (N = 193) were randomized 1:1:1:1 to once-daily TXR 140 μg (TXR140), CVC 150 mg (CVC), TXR 140 μg + CVC 150 mg (TXR140 + CVC), or TXR 90 μg + CVC 150 mg (TXR90 + CVC) for 48 weeks. The primary and secondary end points were safety and histological improvement, respectively. Rates of adverse events (AEs) were similar across treatment groups. Pruritus was the most frequently experienced AE, with highest incidence in the TXR140 group (40.0%). In TXR and combination groups, alanine aminotransferase (ALT) decreased from baseline to 48 weeks (geometric mean change: −21%, TXR140; −16%, TXR140 + CVC; −13%, TXR90 + CVC; and +17%, CVC). Reductions in body weight observed at week 24 (mean changes from baseline: TXR140, −2.5 kg; TXR140 + CVC, −1.7 kg; TXR90 + CVC, −1.0 kg; and CVC, −0.1 kg) were sustained to week 48. At least 1-point improvement in fibrosis stage/steatohepatitis resolution without worsening of fibrosis was observed in 32.3%/25.8%, 31.6%/15.8%, 29.7%/13.5%, and 32.5%/22.5% of patients in the TXR140, CVC, TXR140 + CVC, and TXR90 + CVC groups, respectively. Conclusions: The safety profile of TXR + CVC combination was similar to respective monotherapies, with no new signals. TXR monotherapy showed sustained ALT and body weight decreases. No substantial incremental efficacy was observed with TXR + CVC combination on ALT, body weight, or in histological end points compared with monotherapy.

Key Points Hepatorenal syndrome type 1 (HRS-1) is an often fatal, but potentially reversible, kidney failure in patients with decompensated cirrhosis. Treatment with terlipressin in patients with HRS-1 is associated with a reduction in the need for RRT. Background Hepatorenal syndrome type 1 (HRS-1)—also known as hepatorenal syndrome-AKI (HRS-AKI)—is a rapidly progressing and usually fatal, but potentially reversible, kidney failure occurring in patients with decompensated cirrhosis. A large proportion of patients with HRS-1 require renal replacement therapy (RRT). Terlipressin demonstrated efficacy in reversing HRS and improving renal function in patients with HRS-1 in three phase III, randomized, clinical trials (RCTs; i.e. , OT-0401, REVERSE, and CONFIRM). However, these RCTs were not designed to evaluate the effect of terlipressin on the requirement of RRT. In this study, the effect of terlipressin on RRT requirements in the pooled phase III patient population was assessed. Methods For this retrospective analysis, data from patients who participated in the OT-0401, REVERSE, and CONFIRM studies were integrated in the largest-to-date randomized database ( N =608). Results The need for RRT was significantly decreased in patients in the terlipressin group versus the placebo group by day 30 (28.1% versus 35.9%, respectively; P = 0.040) and day 60 (30.1% versus 37.9%, respectively; P = 0.045) in the pooled population and also postliver transplantation (LT) at day 60 (20.5% versus 40.3%, respectively; P = 0.008) and day 90 (25.3% versus 43.1%, respectively; P = 0.018). More patients were alive and RRT-free by day 90 in the overall population (36.9% versus 28.5%; P = 0.030) and among patients who received an LT (60.0% versus 39.7%; P = 0.010). Random assignment to receive terlipressin was an independent positive predictor of avoidance of RRT ( P = 0.042); while higher baseline serum creatinine (sCr) level and Child-Pugh scores were negatively associated with RRT avoidance ( P < 0.001 and P = 0.040, respectively). Conclusions Terlipressin decreased the requirement of RRT compared with placebo among patients with HRS-1, including those receiving LT. A lower sCr level at the beginning of therapy was associated with avoidance of RRT.

Abstract Alcoholic hepatitis (AH) develops in a small percentage of heavy drinkers. The adaptive immune system of AH patients is hyper-activated, yet dysregulated and ineffective against infectious diseases. Mucosal-associated invariant T (MAIT) cells are innate-like lymphocytes that are found in liver, intestinal mucosa, and peripheral blood and contribute to protection against infectious diseases. To determine whether MAIT cells were dysregulated in heavy drinkers and the effect of alcohol abstinence on MAIT cell recovery, we compared peripheral MAIT cells between AH patients and heavy drinkers without liver disease (HDC) at baseline and 6- and 12-month followup. At baseline, AH patients had severely reduced frequency of MAIT cells than HDC and healthy donor controls (HC), whereas MAIT cell frequency was not significantly different between HDC and HC. In addition, MAIT cells in AH patients expressed higher levels of the activation markers (CD69, CD38, and HLA-DR) as well as the immune checkpoint inhibitor PD-1. Multiplex immunoassays showed that plasma levels of several cytokines related to MAIT cell activation were elevated in AH patients (IFN-s, IL-7, IL-15, IL-17, IL-18, and IL-23, and TNF-a). In AH patients, the frequency MAIT cells and CD38-expressing MAIT cells correlated with levels of several cytokines and AST. At followup, AH patients had increased MAIT cell frequency and decreased MAIT cell activation with cessation of alcohol. However, abstinent AH patients still had higher levels of CD38-expressing MAIT cells than HDC at 6-month followup. Conclusion Blood MAIT cells were severely reduced and were dysregulated in AH patients and alcohol abstinence partially reversed abnormalities in MAIT cell frequency and phenotype.

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and cardiovascular diseases are both highly prevalent conditions around the world, and emerging data have shown an association between them. This review found several longitudinal and cross-sectional studies showing that NAFLD was associated with coronary artery disease, cardiac remodeling, aortic valve remodeling, mitral annulus valve calcifications, diabetic cardiomyopathy, diastolic cardiac dysfunction, arrhythmias, and stroke. Although the specific underlying mechanisms are not clear, many hypotheses have been suggested, including that metabolic syndrome might act as an upstream metabolic defect, leading to end-organ manifestations in both the heart and liver. Management of NAFLD includes weight loss through lifestyle interventions or bariatric surgery, and pharmacological interventions, often targeting comorbidities. Although there are no Food and Drug Administration–approved nonalcoholic steatohepatitis-specific therapies, several drug candidates have demonstrated effect in the improvement in fibrosis or nonalcoholic steatohepatitis resolution. Further studies are needed to assess the effect of those interventions on cardiovascular outcomes, the major cause of mortality in patients with NAFLD. In conclusion, a more comprehensive, multidisciplinary approach to diagnosis and management of patients with NAFLD and cardiovascular diseases is needed to optimize clinical outcomes.

Summary Background Previous studies suggested increased mortality in patients with hepatorenal syndrome type 1 (HRS1) and advanced acute‐on‐chronic liver failure (ACLF). Aim To assess mortality and respiratory failure (RF) in patients with HRS1 and ACLF treated with terlipressin. Methods In the CONFIRM study, we randomised 299 patients with HRS1 2:1 to terlipressin or placebo, both with albumin. At enrolment, all patients were assessed for organ failure (OF) using a validated ACLF grading system. Post hoc analyses assessed the effects of terlipressin vs. placebo on the incidence of RF and 90‐day mortality. Results The incidence of RF with terlipressin ( n = 200) was 9.4% in patients with grades 1–2 ACLF, and 30% with grade 3 ACLF ( p = 0.0002); no such difference was observed in placebo‐treated patients ( n = 99) (6.2% grades 1–2 vs. 0% grade 3 ACLF, p > 0.05). RF incidence between terlipressin and placebo in patients with grade 3 ACLF was significant ( p = 0.01). Baseline predictors of RF with terlipressin were INR ( p = 0.011), mean arterial pressure ( p = 0.037), and SpO 2 ( p = 0.014). Prior albumin as a continuous variable was not a predictor of RF. 90‐day survival between terlipressin and placebo arms was similar for grades 1–2 ACLF (55.5% and 56.6%, respectively), but lower for grade 3 ACLF (27.55% vs. 50.0%) ( p = 0.122), mainly related to RF. Conclusion Terlipressin should be used with caution in patients with HRS1 and grade 3 ACLF. Patients with hypoxaemia are at increased risk of RF and mortality.