Spitzer, Stephanie M.

Although intelligibility deficits are common across various forms of dysarthria, it was hypothesized that the causes of intelligibility reductions depend on the ways the degraded signal challenges listener cognitive-perceptual strategies. This hypothesis was confirmed by analyzing the lexical boundary errors (LBE) elicited by 44 speakers with one of four forms of dysarthria (ataxic, hypokinetic, hyperkinetic, mixed spastic-flaccid). Error patterns from 60 listener transcripts revealed reliance on metrical stress to segment the 80 six-syllable phrases. However, reductions and disturbances in the acoustic cues to syllabic stress associated with each form of dysarthria resulted in different LBE patterns. Explanations for these unique patterns are found, in part, in the metrical structures of the dysarthric speech. For example, the temporal relationships among stressed and unstressed syllables varied widely in hyperkinetic speech, which ostensibly prevented listeners from optimally exploiting metrical stress as a cue for segmentation. The equal-even temporal structure of the spastic-flaccid speech resulted in the highest proportion of boundary insertions. The presence of interword pauses facilitated the assignment of word onset to strong syllables. Results will be presented relative to models of lexical segmentation and clinical implications for targets of remediation in the dysarthrias. [Work supported from NIH-NIDCD 5R01 DC6859.]

The detrimental effect of speaker variability on word recognition has been reported using a wide variety of tasks and stimuli. In this study, the use of dysarthric speech alongside unimpaired speech allowed us to examine the effect of indexical variability from a new perspective. We compared voice-specificity effects in words produced by healthy speakers and the same words produced by dysarthric patients suffering from Huntington’s disease (HD). The speech of persons with HD is particularly suited to this issue because of its idiosyncratic and variable manifestation. Reaction time and accuracy results provided confirmatory evidence for Luce et al.’s (2003) time-course hypothesis: The slower responses occasioned by processing dysarthric stimuli were accompanied with greater reliance on surface details of the stimuli. Thus, specificity effects can be seen as resulting from a coping strategy called upon when the system is presented with an input that is highly dissimilar from canonical lexical representations. In addition, we found some evidence that the time-course hypothesis holds even when intelligibility is controlled. This finding confirms that time, rather than processing effort, is the cause of specificity effects, with activation confined to abstract representations in an early stage and spreading to episodic traces later on.

Disturbances in speech rhythm are common in dysarthria, and deficit patterns vary among dysarthria subtypes. Attempts to quantify differences in disordered rhythm patterns have met with limited success. Here, we attempt to differentiate various forms of dysarthria using metrics designed to quantify linguistic rhythm on a stress-timed versus syllable-timed continuum. Speakers with hypokinetic, ataxic, hyperkinetic, or mixed flaccid-spastic dysarthria read sentences. Rhythm metrics were calculated for these utterances based on vocalic and consonantal interval durations. Differences among groups were discovered for %V (percentage of utterance duration comprised of vocalic intervals), VarcoV (rate-normalized standard deviation of vocalic interval durations), and nPVI-V (normalized pairwise variability index for vocalic intervals). Differences were independent of variable speaking rates among groups. All dysarthric groups produced rhythm patterns less stress-timed than the control American English speakers, with lower VarcoV and nPVI-V and higher %V. Those with flaccid-spastic dysarthria secondary to amyotrophic lateral sclerosis exhibited a syllable-timed pattern more extreme than even control Spanish speakers, indicating minimal differentiation of stressed and unstressed syllables. These results show that the various types of rhythmic disturbance accompanying dysarthria can be effectively described and distinguished within a stress-/syllable-timed continuum and relative to healthy speech.

Purpose In this study, the authors examined whether rhythm metrics capable of distinguishing languages with high and low temporal stress contrast also can distinguish among control and dysarthric speakers of American English with perceptually distinct rhythm patterns. Methods Acoustic measures of vocalic and consonantal segment durations were obtained for speech samples from 55 speakers across 5 groups (hypokinetic, hyperkinetic, flaccid-spastic, ataxic dysarthrias, and controls). Segment durations were used to calculate standard and new rhythm metrics. Discriminant function analyses (DFAs) were used to determine which sets of predictor variables (rhythm metrics) best discriminated between groups (control vs. dysarthrias; and among the 4 dysarthrias). A cross-validation method was used to test the robustness of each original DFA. Results The majority of classification functions were more than 80% successful in classifying speakers into their appropriate group. New metrics that combined successive vocalic and consonantal segments emerged as important predictor variables. DFAs pitting each dysarthria group against the combined others resulted in unique constellations of predictor variables that yielded high levels of classification accuracy. Conclusions This study confirms the ability of rhythm metrics to distinguish control speech from dysarthrias and to discriminate dysarthria subtypes. Rhythm metrics show promise for use as a rational and objective clinical tool.

This study is the third in a series that has explored the source of intelligibility decrement in dysarthria by jointly considering signal characteristics and the cognitive–perceptual processes employed by listeners. A paradigm of lexical boundary error analysis was used to examine this interface by manipulating listener constraints with a brief familiarization procedure. If familiarization allows listeners to extract relevant segmental and suprasegmental information from dysarthric speech, they should obtain higher intelligibility scores than nonfamiliarized listeners, and their lexical boundary error patterns should approximate those obtained in misperceptions of normal speech. Listeners transcribed phrases produced by speakers with either hypokinetic or ataxic dysarthria after being familiarized with other phrases produced by these speakers. Data were compared to those of nonfamiliarized listeners [Liss et al., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 107, 3415–3424 (2000)]. The familiarized groups obtained higher intelligibility scores than nonfamiliarized groups, and the effects were greater when the dysarthria type of the familiarization procedure matched the dysarthria type of the transcription task. Remarkably, no differences in lexical boundary error patterns were discovered between the familiarized and nonfamiliarized groups. Transcribers of the ataxic speech appeared to have difficulty distinguishing strong and weak syllables in spite of the familiarization. Results suggest that intelligibility decrements arise from the perceptual challenges posed by the degraded segmental and suprasegmental aspects of the signal, but that this type of familiarization process may differentially facilitate mapping segmental information onto existing phonological categories.

This investigation evaluated a possible source of reduced intelligibility in hypokinetic dysarthric speech, namely the mismatch between listeners’ perceptual strategies and the acoustic information available in the dysarthric speech signal. A paradigm of error analysis was adopted in which listener transcriptions of phrases were coded for the presence and type of word boundary errors. Seventy listeners heard 60 phrases produced by speakers with hypokinetic dysarthria. The six-syllable phrases alternated strong and weak syllables and ranged in length from three to five words. Lexical boundary violations were defined as erroneous insertions or deletions of lexical boundaries that occurred either before strong or before weak syllables. A total of 1596 lexical boundary errors in the listeners’ transcriptions was identified unanimously by three independent judges. The pattern of errors generally conformed with the predictions of the Metrical Segmentation Strategy hypothesis [Cutler and Norris, J. Exp. Psychol. 14, 113–121 (1988)] which posits that listeners attend to strong syllables to identify word onsets. However, the strength of adherence to this pattern varied across speakers. Comparison of acoustic evidence of syllabic strength to lexical boundary error patterns revealed a source of intelligibility deficit associated with this particular type of dysarthric speech pattern.

This investigation is the second in a series to examine a potential source of reduced intelligibility in dysarthric speech, namely the mismatch between listeners’ perceptual strategies and the acoustic information available in the dysarthric speech signal. Lexical boundary error (LBE) analysis was conducted on listener transcripts from phrases produced by speakers with hypokinetic dysarthria, ataxic dysarthria, and normal controls. By design, the hypokinetic and ataxic dysarthric tapes elicited similar intelligibility (words-correct) scores. However, they elicited different numbers and patterns of lexical boundary errors. The nature of the error pattern differences can be traced to the listeners’ use of available syllabic strength information to segment the acoustic stream. Specifically, although both dysarthric speech samples elicited numerous lexical boundary errors, those for the hypokinetic speech generally conformed to predictions offered from studies of degraded normal speech. Those for the ataxic speech did not conform strongly to such predictions. It appears that the prosodic deficits of the ataxic speech (tendency toward syllabic isochrony, excessive loudness variation, and reduced vowel working space consequent to reductions in vowel strength) posed more of a problem for listeners than did the prosodic deficits of the hypokinetic speech (rapid rate, monotony, reduced vowel working space).