Dwosh, Emily

Importance TMEM106B is a frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) genetic susceptibility factor, and TMEM106B protein aggregates are a feature of aging and neurodegeneration. Whether TMEM106B protein levels are associated with clinical features is unknown. Objective To investigate the clinical associations of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) TMEM106B in FTLD. Design, Setting, and Participants This cross-sectional study was conducted in 2 independent frontotemporal dementia (FTD) cohorts (recruitment from April 2009 through July 2023, with analyses from January 2025 through April 2026), with a 2-year follow up. This multicenter clinical study integrated clinical, genetic, biomarker, and neuroimaging data. Individuals were recruited through the University of California, San Francisco (n = 3733), or ALLFTD (n = 2343). Participants with available CSF were included. A discovery cohort (n = 271) included participants with sporadic neuropathology-confirmed FTLD; presymptomatic or symptomatic carriers of pathogenic variants in C9orf72 , GRN , or MAPT ; or controls. An independent validation cohort (n = 383) included participants with clinically diagnosed sporadic FTD, Alzheimer disease (AD), and controls. Exposures CSF samples for TMEM106B quantification with aptamer proteomics (SomaScan version 3.0 [discovery cohort] and SomaScan version 4.1 [validation cohort]). Main Outcomes and Measures Parametric tests compared the primary outcome, CSF TMEM106B, by disease severity, TMEM106B rs1990622 genotype, sex, clinical syndrome, pathological diagnosis, and pathogenic variant and determined associations with brain volume. Results In the discovery (n = 271; 136 women [51%]; median [IQR] age, 59 [38-80] years) and validation (n = 383; 183 women [48%]; median [IQR] age, 64 [50-78] years) cohorts, lower CSF TMEM106B was associated with more severe disease (β, −0.15; 95% CI, −0.24 to −0.04; P = .003), lower frontotemporal brain volumes (β, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.24-0.61; P < .001), and faster clinical progression (β, −2.21; 95% CI, −3.70 to −0.72; P = .001). Associations of TMEM106B with clinical disease severity were independent of those with neurofilament light chain. TMEM106B levels were influenced by TMEM106B rs1990622 genotype, where individuals with the protective G/G genotype had lower levels than the risk A/A genotype. CSF TMEM106B levels did not differentiate between FTLD subtypes or between FTLD and AD. Conclusions and Relevance Per the results of this cross-sectional study, TMEM106B is detectable in CSF and levels reflect disease severity in sporadic and genetic FTLD and AD, but levels are also influenced by the TMEM106B rs1990622 genotype. CSF TMEM106B could support further studies to understand the mechanisms of disease and develop clinical tools in FTLD and other neurodegenerative diseases.

Abstract Background Frontotemporal dementia (FTD) is a neurodegenerative disorder marked by early impairments in executive function and altered prefrontal neural circuitry. These traits are also observed in Attention Deficit Disorder (ADD) and Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), suggesting the possibility of shared mechanisms and a role for developmental neurocognitive factors in the onset of FTD. High‐penetrance mutations in GRN, C9orf72, and MAPT increase FTD risk and are suspected to influence neurodevelopment. This study hypothesizes that pre‐symptomatic carriers of these mutations exhibit cognitive and behavioral traits that overlap with those observed in ADD/ADHD. Method This cross‐sectional study analyzed participants from the ARTFL‐LEFFTDS Longitudinal FTLD (ALLFTD) Study. Inclusion criteria restricted the sample to mutation carriers with pathogenic variants in GRN, C9orf72, or MAPT while excluding individuals with prior psychiatric diagnoses (e.g., bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder) and those taking antipsychotic or anxiolytic medications to avoid potential confounding effects on test validity and interpretation. The final sample included N = 338 participants, categorized as pre‐symptomatic mutation carriers ( N = 227) or asymptomatic noncarriers ( N = 111). To assess potential overlaps with ADD/ADHD traits, a targeted subset of measures reflecting executive function, working memory, attention, social behavior, and hyperactivity were extracted from validated cognitive and neuropsychiatric assessments. Mutation carriers were further classified as either converters ( N = 20) who progressed to symptomatic FTD (CDR ≥ 1) or non‐converters ( N = 95) who remained asymptomatic. Only pre‐conversion scores were analyzed for converters. Group comparisons were conducted using general linear models adjusted for age and sex. Result Pre‐symptomatic mutation carriers showed significantly lower verbal fluency ( p = 0.004) and a trend toward reduced working memory ( p = 0.05) compared to noncarriers. Converters exhibited poorer overall cognitive performance ( p <0.0001), verbal fluency ( p = 0.001), and memory and attention ( p = 0.04) compared to non‐converters. Converters demonstrated higher Neuropsychiatric Inventory scores ( p = 0.0001), particularly in hyperactivity ( p = 0.003), reflecting greater behavioral disturbances. Conclusion Baseline impairments in cognitive function, memory, and neuropsychiatric profiles distinguish converters from non‐converters, highlighting overlaps between ADD/ADHD traits and prodromal FTD. These findings suggest shared neurobiological mechanisms and underscore the need for mutation‐specific studies to further explore the neurodevelopmental factors driving FTD progression.