Wang, Yucai

ABSTRACT 162 patients with relapsed secondary central nervous system lymphoma (R‐SCNSL) (median age, 65 years; male, 59.9%) including central nervous system (CNS)‐only ( n = 120) and concomitant CNS/systemic relapse ( n = 42) were retrospectively analyzed. Overall, 21.9% of patients were classified as high risk according to the CNS International Prognostic Index (CNS‐IPI). Several biological and clinical features were significantly associated with leptomeningeal involvement, including double‐ or triple‐hit (DHL/THL) status, MYC rearrangement, negative BCL6 expression by IHC, bone marrow involvement, and concomitant R‐SCNSL. Multivariable analysis showed that leptomeningeal involvement independently predicted inferior OS and was associated with a 98% increase in the hazard of death compared with parenchymal relapse (HR = 1.98, 95% CI: 1.20–3.26, p = 0.008). Based on anatomical localization, R‐SCNSL was classified into four subtypes: parenchymal‐only involvement (parenchymal‐CNS [P‐CNS], 68/42%) and parenchymal involvement plus systemic relapse (parenchymal‐concomitant [P‐concomitant], 17/10.5%); and leptomeningeal with or without parenchymal involvement (leptomeningeal‐CNS [LM‐CNS], 52/32.1%) and leptomeningeal with systemic relapse (leptomeningeal‐concomitant [LM‐concomitant], 25/15.4%). This anatomical classification significantly impacted OS and PFS ( p < 0.001). Two‐year OS and PFS were 58.2% and 29.1% for P‐CNS, 32.4% and 17.7% for P‐concomitant, 22% and 13.9% for LM‐CNS, and 7.1% and 0% for LM‐concomitant, respectively. ASCT showed a trend toward improved survival among patients with a response (CR/PR) in a 4‐month landmark analysis. These findings support the clinical application of the anatomical classification in the management of R‐SCNSL.

Abstract Secondary central nervous system (CNS) large B-cell lymphoma (SCNSL) occurs in the de novo setting, as a CNS-isolated relapse, or synchronous (concomitant CNS and systemic) relapse. SCNSL is a devastating event without therapeutic consensus. Thus, we aimed to evaluate treatment outcomes in an international cohort. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR, estimated using competing-risk models) were reported. Prognostic factors were identified in a 6-month landmark multivariate analysis. Outcomes after thiotepa autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy (CAR-T) delivered at relapse were compared after propensity score matching (PSM). A total of 1139 patients were included in the analysis (de novo: 537; relapsed SCNSL: 602). Two-year PFS estimates were 40.4%, 43.9%, and 16.2% for de novo SCNSL, CNS-isolated relapse, and synchronous relapse, respectively. Patients with CNS-isolated relapse demonstrated low rates of systemic recurrence (24-month CIR, 6%). Thiotepa-ASCT correlated with longer survival in de novo SCNSL (PFS: hazard ratio [HR], 0.57; P = .005; and OS: HR, 0.62; P = .023) and CNS-isolated relapses (PFS: HR, 0.55; P = .002; and OS: HR, 0.39; P&lt; .0001). ASCT (thiotepa or no thiotepa) also associated with improved survival in synchronous relapses (PFS: HR, 0.57; P = .023; and OS: HR, 0.48; P = .019). Higher survival with thiotepa-ASCT than CAR-T was observed after PSM (PFS: HR, 0.45; P = .005 and OS: HR, 0.41; P = .014). These data support thiotepa-ASCT in eligible patients, particularly de novo disease and CNS-isolated relapses. CNS-isolated relapse was infrequently associated with systemic recurrence, supporting treatment regimens adopted from primary CNS lymphoma.

Abstract Castleman disease (CD) is a heterogeneous group of lymphoproliferative disorders anatomically classified by distribution (unicentric CD [UCD], oligocentric CD [oligoCD], or multicentric CD [MCD]). Human herpes virus 8–negative MCD is called idiopathic MCD (iMCD), which includes clinical subtypes with varying phenotypes and responses: TAFRO (thrombocytopenia, anasarca, fever, renal dysfunction and/or reticulin fibrosis, and organomegaly), IPL (idiopathic plasmacytic lymphadenopathy), and not otherwise specified. OligoCD has recently emerged as an intermediate form between UCD and MCD, with unclear clinical behavior, and IPL has not been validated in a Western cohort. We retrospectively analyzed 217 patients with CD evaluated at our institution between January 2004 and August 2024. Survival probabilities were compared using log-rank tests. Overall, 57% had UCD, 20% had oligoCD, and 23% had iMCD. Patients with oligoCD and iMCD more frequently exhibited systemic symptoms than those with UCD. Patients with oligoCD and iMCD had significantly shorter event-free survival (EFS) of 8.9 and 2.3 years, respectively, than those with UCD (not reached; P&lt; .001 and P&lt; .02). Among iMCD subtypes, iMCD-IPL demonstrated a longer EFS than iMCD-TAFRO (P = .02), with no deaths during the follow-up periods. The results validate oligoCD and iMCD-IPL as new subtypes in this Western cohort. The survival outcome in oligoCD was intermediate between UCD and iMCD, with only a subset of patients with oligoCD requiring systemic therapy. iMCD-IPL had a favorable survival outcome in this US cohort, similar to what has been reported in non-Western countries. Tailoring treatment strategies to disease subtypes and vigilant monitoring of oligoCD for progression may improve survival outcomes in CD.