Min, Paul H

Abstract Background Respiration has traditionally been considered a source of artifact in functional MRI (fMRI) due to chest motion. However, the respiratory cycle also induces changes in local oxygen concentration, resulting in fluctuations in the fMRI signal. These breathing‐triggered signals (BTS) may reflect underlying oxygen metabolism. This preliminary study developed a method to extract BTS from resting‐state BOLD fMRI and examined differences between healthy and mild cognitive impairment (MCI) groups. Method MRI scans were conducted under IRB approval on a compact 3T MRI system. Participants included two groups of 18 healthy volunteers (42.6±16.0 years) and 12 MCI patients (70.9±7.3 years). Each MRI scan included T 1 ‐weighted anatomy imaging and multi‐echo resting‐state fMRI acquisitions. The preprocessing pipeline was implemented by AFNI and FreeSurfer. Figure 1 illustrates the workflow for extracting and averaging fMRI data based on respiratory or cardiac cycle windows. As depicted in Figure 2(c,d), the mean fMRI signals corresponding to the breathing or cardiac cycles were modeled using a low‐order Fourier series to assess their amplitudes. A linear mixed‐effects model was employed to examine the effects of group and breathing cycle period, using MATLAB's ‘fitlme’ function with the formula: BTS ∼ Period + Group. Result As shown in Figure 2(e,f), breathing‐triggered BOLD signals were prominent, while cardiac‐driven BOLD signals were rarely observed. Figure 2(g) shows that global BTSs in the healthy group exhibited a linear relationship with the breathing cycle period, persisting even after artifact correction (RETROICOR for respiration and cardiac cycles and RVT). Figure 3 highlights significant regional differences between groups, particularly in the hippocampus and thalamus ( p < 0.05, uncorrected), where BTS amplitudes were greater in the MCI group. Potentially, the detected BTS could provide some insights into the coupling between respiration and cerebral oxygen metabolism and potentially serve as an imaging biomarker to assess brain health. However, due to the limited number of samples, these findings should be interpreted with caution, and further analysis is needed. Conclusion This preliminary study suggests that breathing‐triggered signals in resting‐state BOLD fMRI have the potential to serve as a noninvasive biomarker for early detection and monitoring of neurodegenerative conditions such as MCI.

Abstract Background Some data suggest that neuroinflammation may be associated with pro‐inflammatory states in the body. Systemic, proinflammatory cytokines (TNFα, IL‐1, IL‐6, etc.) are produced by a variety of comorbidities. Neuroinflammation has been shown to be associated with the accumulation of amyloid in the brain (Becher, Heneka). We hypothesized that systemic cytokine production could be associated with neuroinflammation and thereby be related to brain amyloid accumulation. This study aims to evaluate the relationship between neuroinflammation, amyloid accumulation and systemic cytokines. Method 90 participants from the Mayo Clinic Study of Aging (MCSA) received a fasting cytokine panel over a 5‐year span where IL‐1, IL‐6, IL‐10, TNFa levels were measured. Participants were divided into four groups: cognitively unimpaired with normal levels of amyloid (CU A‐, n = 25), cognitively unimpaired with elevated amyloid (CU A+, n = 25), and mild cognitively impaired (MCI) with amyloid positive (MCI A+, n = 25), and Alzheimer's disease (AD) with elevated amyloid (AD A+, n = 15). To compare regional standardized uptake value ratio (SUVr) from neuroinflammation PET based on amyloid status (A+ vs A‐) and the four cytokines, Spearman's rank correlation and Fishers r‐to‐z transformations were used to assess pairwise group differences. Result Using Spearman's rank correlation and Fishers r‐to‐z transformations, no strong relationship was found between systemic inflammation and neuroinflammation. While comparing CUA‐ vs CUA+ in Figure 1, three regions (supplementary motor area, frontal superior medial lobe, and middle cingulate cortex) showed a significant difference ( p < 0.05). However, Figure 2 showed an overarching trend bias towards significance across most regions in IL10, IL6, and TNFa. Conclusion Although significant relationships between systemic inflammation, brain amyloid and neuroinflammation were limited, the data show an overarching trend bias in broad brain regions, suggesting that further analyses are needed, possibly with larger sample sizes, to assess the relationship of regional neuroinflammation and amyloid to systemic inflammation. Future analyses could also regress out factors like sex, age, and genotype to further proinflammatory cytokine research.