Ramanan, Vijay K.

Abstract Background Anti‐amyloid therapy trials have reported changes in some Alzheimer's disease (AD) blood biomarkers (BBMs) suggesting that these BBMs may be useful minimally invasive measures of amyloid clearance and treatment outcomes. However, a better understanding of how AD BBMs changes at the individual level reflect treatment response in relation to other relevant clinical endpoints is necessary before they can be adopted for treatment monitoring. Here, several AD BBMs were assessed longitudinally in patients undergoing lecanemab therapy. Method Patients undergoing lecanemab therapy at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN were recruited to participate in this study. Patients were asked to provide an EDTA‐plasma sample before treatment initiation during the first infusion visit and thereafter at 3‐, 6‐, 12‐, and 18 months post‐treatment. p ‐tau217, p ‐tau181, GFAP, NfL, Aβ42, Aβ40, Aβ42/40, and p ‐tau217/Aβ42 measurements were obtained using Fujirebio Lumipulse assays. Biomarker median differences were assessed between all time points. Patients were grouped into three categories: a decreased biomarker (median decrease of at least 10%), an increased biomarker (median increase of at least 10%), and a stable biomarker (median change < +/−10%.) Biomarker data up to 6 months after treatment is presented. Result Of forty‐one patients enrolled since November 2023, twenty had time points up to 6 months. None of the biomarkers showed a statistically significant median change from baseline at 3 months ( p >0.05). At 6 months, only Aβ42/40 showed a statistically significant median change (decrease) between 0 and 6 months ( n = 20, p = 0.0058). Table 1 shows patients grouped by median biomarker changes from baseline to 6 months. GFAP, p ‐tau217, and Aβ42/40 exhibited the greatest number of patients with decreased biomarker concentrations (80%, 60%, and 60% of patients with median decreases of ‐25%, ‐26%, and ‐18% respectively), followed by p ‐tau181 (50% of patients; median decrease ‐22%), p ‐tau217/Aβ42 (45% of patients; median decrease ‐40%) and Aβ42 (45% of patients; median decrease ‐18%). None of the patients showed a decreased NfL or Aβ40 concentration. Conclusion Preliminarily analysis revealed that GFAP, p ‐tau217, and Aβ42/40 had the most frequent post‐lecanemab biomarker decreases. Additional sample collection is ongoing to assess the association of AD BBM changes with Amyloid PET over time.

Abstract Background Cognitive resilience is the discrepancy in individuals with intermediate to high Alzheimer's disease neuropathologic change (ADNC) and normal cognition. Currently, the role of microglial activation in cognitive resilience is understudied. Method In the MCSA brain bank, high‐cognitively unimpaired (high‐CU) participants were defined as those performing in the upper quartile of their respective age groups based upon antemortem global cognition z‐scores, computed from memory, language, executive function, and visuospatial domain z‐scores. From the high‐CU group ( N = 118, global z‐scores from 1.55 to 1.78), cognitively resilient (CR) individuals were identified as those with intermediate to high ADNC upon neuropathologic evaluation. First, regression models were fit to evaluate global cognition as a function of age, sex, amyloid PET, and microglial‐specific genes of interest, including MS4A gene cluster SNPs. Second, a subset of CR participants was analyzed for postmortem ARM expression in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Single immunohistochemistry was performed on formalin‐fixed, paraffin‐embedded sections using antibodies against beta‐amyloid (6F3D) and CD163 (10D6). Digital image analysis was performed on scanned sections (40x, Leica Aperio GT 450), and ARM (CD163%area) and beta‐amyloid (%area) measurements were obtained using QuPath. Cognitively impaired (CI) control group was matched on age, sex, ADNC level, and APOE4 status. Spearman correlations were performed between postmortem ARM and antemortem MRI, PET, plasma, and global cognition metrics. Result A third (39/118) of high‐CU cases showed intermediate/high ADNC (CR group). Furthermore, 28% of CR individuals harbored an MS4A6A SNP, which showed a protective effect on cognition via amyloid‐PET ( p = 0.043, Figure 1). Moreover, CR individuals harbored significantly higher ARM:amyloid than the CI group ( p <0.001, Figure 2) and fewer neuritic plaques ( p = 0.03, Figure 3). Antemortem white matter hyperintensities and global cognition were significantly correlated to ARM expression (r=0.556 [p=0.042] and r=0.648 [p=0.02], respectively). Conclusion Microglial specific MS4A6A SNP, which modulates microglial activation, was seen in a third of CR individuals. Postmortem analyses in CR individuals revealed increased ARM:amyloid, which was also associated with higher antemortem cognitive performance. These findings underscore the role of microglial activation in cognitive resilience. Future work is needed to investigate microglial protective mechanisms and links between vascular disease and microglial activation.