Castaneda, Regina

Background: Functional hypothalamic amenorrhea (FHA) is a common form of secondary amenorrhea caused partly by undernutrition relative to demand. Objective: To compare the dietary nutritional intake between women with FHA and eumenorrheic controls and evaluate micronutrient profiles. Methods: This cross-sectional study included 30 women with FHA and 29 eumenorrheic controls not on hormones. FHA was defined as ≥3 consecutive months of amenorrhea, estradiol of <50 pg/mL, and FSH and LH of <10 mIU/L, excluding other etiologies. A 3-day food diary was collected for dietary analysis, excluding dietary supplements using ESHA Research Food Processor. Results: The mean age of women with FHA and controls was 26.4 years ± 6.2 versus 30.3 years ± 3.7 ( p = 0.002), with no differences in BMI ( p = 0.16) or the waist-to-hip ratio ( p = 0.71). Women with FHA and controls consumed comparable median calorie intake (1784 kcal [1465, 2011] vs. 1732 kcal [1578, 1982], p = 0.62), with no differences in self-reported exercise patterns. Women with FHA consumed more dietary protein (84.2g [74, 112] vs. 74 g [59, 92], p = 0.001) and dietary fiber (30.1 g [22, 43] vs. 17.3 g [15, 23], p = 0.02) versus controls, respectively. When expressed as a percentage of estimated average requirements (% estimated average requirement), women with FHA had higher intakes of vitamin A (105% [45, 219] vs. 43% [21, 86], p = 0.005), vitamin C (201% [139, 351] vs. 107% [75, 190], p = 0.004), and iron (169% [146, 220] vs. 120% [99, 192], p = 0.027) compared with controls. Conclusions: Women with FHA had similar caloric intake to eumenorrheic controls but consumed more dietary protein, fiber, vitamin A, vitamin C, and iron. Future studies should examine the nutritional profiles of women with FHA in relation to long-term health consequences such as bone and vascular health.

Objective: Perimenopause is the time leading up to a woman’s last menstrual cycle and includes the 12 months afterward. Studies that systematically compare perimenopause symptoms across diverse cultural and geographic settings are lacking. This study, utilizing data from Flo, an international mobile health application, aimed to assess global knowledge and symptom experiences related to perimenopause. Methods: This cross-sectional survey was conducted via the Flo application, offered to users aged 18 years and above. The primary endpoints were knowledge of perimenopause symptoms from all survey participants, and self-reported perimenopause symptoms for survey participants aged 35 years and above. Secondary analyses compared knowledge scores and symptoms across geographic regions. Results: A total of 17,494 women from 158 countries were included. Commonly recognized perimenopause symptoms included hot flashes (71%), sleep problems (68%), and weight gain (65%). Of the participants, 12,681 were aged 35 years or above, with the most common self-reported symptoms being fatigue (83%), physical and mental exhaustion (83%), irritability (80%), depressive mood (77%), sleep problems (76%), digestive issues (76%), and anxiety (75%). This pattern of symptoms was similar among those who self-reported being in perimenopause, though higher than in those not in perimenopause. International variation in perimenopause symptom knowledge and symptoms experienced was noted ( P <0.001). Conclusions: This survey highlights a discordance between perimenopause knowledge and actual symptoms experienced across diverse global populations. While hot flashes were the most widely recognized symptom, respondents aged 35 years or above most commonly reported experiencing fatigue, physical and mental exhaustion, and irritability.

Background/Objectives: Individuals with type 2 diabetes (T2D) achieve less total body weight loss (TBWL) with obesity medications compared to those without T2D. The individualized metabolic surgery (IMS) score, originally developed to predict T2D remission after bariatric surgery, inversely correlates with TBWL response to semaglutide. IMS reflects T2D severity, incorporating HbA1c and T2D duration and medication use. This study aims to evaluate TBWL with tirzepatide across IMS severity categories and identify predictors of response in a real-world cohort. Methods: This retrospective analysis included 717 adults with T2D using tirzepatide for overweight or obesity within the Mayo Clinic Health System. Patients were stratified by IMS severity (mild, moderate, severe) and quartiles. Primary endpoint: TBWL% at 15 months. Secondary endpoints: categorical thresholds (≥5%, ≥10%, ≥15%, ≥20%) and predictors of TBWL%. Linear mixed-effects models and regression models were employed. Results: At 15 months, TBWL was greater in mild versus severe IMS groups (14.8% vs. 11.0%, p = 0.015), with similar trends across quartiles. The proportion achieving ≥ 20% TBWL was nearly two-fold higher in mild versus severe IMS (27% vs. 14%, p = 0.03). Female sex independently predicted greater TBWL, whereas insulin use, higher T2D medication burden (particularly weight-promoting agents), and HbA1c > 7% were associated with less TBWL. Conclusions: Tirzepatide produced clinically meaningful TBWL across all IMS categories, although TBWL declined with increasing IMS severity. Glycemic control and T2D medication use emerged as strong predictors of TBWL. The IMS score may serve as a practical tool to anticipate weight-loss trajectories, guide personalized treatment decisions, and inform patient counseling.

Background: Peripheral artery disease (PAD) is a global health challenge. Advances in artificial intelligence (AI), such as large language models (LLMs) and chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning, offer novel approaches for clinical recommendations. This study compared the readability and guideline adherence of responses from physicians and AI for a standardized PAD case. Methods: This cross-sectional study gathered responses from 30 specialized physicians (11 cardiologists, 19 vascular surgeons) across seven Latin American countries and 13 LLM systems (10 standard, three CoT). Both groups addressed diagnosis, treatment, risks, and prognosis; LLMs responded as vascular specialists. Responses were blindly evaluated with five validated Spanish readability indices and compared to the 2024 ACC/AHA multisocietal PAD guideline. Three experts scored guideline adherence; nonparametric tests were applied. Results: Guideline adherence did not differ significantly between physicians (median 5.8 [3.4–7.6]) and LLMs (7.3 [4.7–9.7], p = 0.169), though CoT-LLMs achieved the highest scores (9.7 [8.5–11.0]). LLMs more often recommended supervised exercise (84.6% vs 30.0%, p = 0.002) and revascularization for quality of life (69.2% vs 20.0%, p = 0.004), whereas physicians favored cilostazol (60.0% vs 30.8%, p = 0.104). LLM responses had lower Readability μ values (46.9 vs 51.4, p = 0.012). Inter-rater reliability was highest for CoT-LLMs (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] = 0.98) versus physicians (ICC = 0.76). Conclusion: LLM showed comparable guideline adherence to physicians although CoT models achieved the highest scores. The difference in physician and AI treatment preferences suggest the potential of AI as adjunct clinical tools and warrants further study.