Back to Authors

Blei, Andrés T.

A5038845488 | I111979921

Mayo Clinic

Northwestern University

Citations 2

Results of a Prospective Study of Acute Liver Failure at 17 Tertiary Care Centers in the United States

Annals of Internal Medicine | April 12, 2013 | Volume: 137 | Issue: 12 | Pages: 947-954

10.7326/0003-4819-137-12-200212170-00007 | PMID 12484709

Randomised clinical trial: the safety and efficacy of long‐acting octreotide in patients with portal hypertension

Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics | March 3, 2012 | Volume: 35 | Issue: 8 | Pages: 904-912

10.1111/j.1365-2036.2012.05050.x | PMID 22380529

SummaryBackgroundIt remains unclear whether a long‐acting preparation of octreotide (Sandostatin LAR) can be safely used for portal hypertension in patients with compensated cirrhosis.AimTo determine the safety and efficacy of LAR among patients with Child Pugh Class A or B cirrhosis and small oesophageal varices.MethodsA randomised, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled study was conducted in 39 patients with cirrhosis and small oesophageal varices. Safety was based on frequency and severity of adverse events. Efficacy was determined by hepatic vein pressure gradient (HVPG) measured at baseline and day 84 following administration of LAR 10 mg (n = 15), 30 mg (n = 10) or saline (n = 14). Fasting and postprandial portal blood flow (PBF), superior mesenteric artery pulsatility index (SMA‐PI), glucagon and octreotide levels were measured. An intention‐to‐treat analysis was performed.ResultsFour patients in the LAR 30 group (40%) withdrew from the study due to serious adverse events. No patient in the LAR 10 or control group had serious adverse events. There was no statistically significant decrease between HVPG at day 84 and baseline with LAR 30 mg (11.8 ± 2.3 mmHg vs. 14.1 ± 3.2), LAR 10 mg (15.3 ± 4.8 mmHg vs. 15.1 ± 3.8), or saline (13.3 ± 3.8 mmHg vs. 15.1 ± 4.3) (P = 0.26). Neither PBF, SMA‐PI nor plasma glucagon levels were significantly decreased from baseline (P = 0.56).ConclusionsThe absence of significant haemodynamic benefit, as well as the high frequency of severe adverse events associated with use of LAR, do not support the use of this agent in the treatment of portal hypertension.