Mielke, Michelle M.

Abstract Dementia and mortality rates rise inexorably with age and consequently interact. However, because of the major logistical difficulties in accounting for both outcomes in a defined population, very little work has examined how risk factors and biomarkers for incident dementia are influenced by competing mortality. The objective of this study was to examine long-term associations between amyloid PET, APOE ɛ4, sex, education and cardiovascular/metabolic conditions, and hazard and absolute risk of dementia and mortality in individuals without dementia at enrolment. Participants were enrolled in the Mayo Clinic Study of Aging, a population-based study of cognitive ageing in Olmsted County, MN, USA. All were without dementia and were age 55–92 years at enrolment and were followed longitudinally. Predictor variables were amyloid PET, APOE ɛ4 status, sex, education, cardiovascular/metabolic conditions and age. The main outcomes were incident dementia and mortality. Multivariable, multi-state models were used to estimate mortality and incident dementia rates and absolute risk of dementia and mortality by predictor variable group. Of the 4984 participants in the study, 4336 (87%) were cognitively unimpaired and 648 (13%) had mild cognitive impairment at enrolment. The median age at enrolment was 75 years; 2463 (49%) were women. The median follow-up time was 9.4 years (7.5 years after PET). High versus normal amyloid (hazard ratio 2.11, 95% confidence interval 1.43–2.79), APOE ɛ4 (women: hazard ratio 2.24, 95% confidence interval 1.80–2.77; men: hazard ratio 1.37, 95% confidence interval 1.09–1.71), older age and two additional cardiovascular/metabolic conditions (hazard ratio 1.37, 95% confidence interval 1.22–1.53) were associated with the increased hazard of dementia (all P < 0.001). Among APOE ɛ4 carriers with elevated amyloid, remaining lifetime risk of dementia at age 65 years was greater in women [74% (95% confidence interval 65–84%) high and 58% (95% confidence interval 52–65%) moderate amyloid], than men [62% (95% confidence interval 52–73%) high and 44% (95% confidence interval 35–53%) moderate amyloid]. Overall, the hazard and absolute risk of dementia varied considerably by predictor group. The absolute risk of dementia associated with predictors characteristic of Alzheimer’s disease was greater in women than men while at the same time the combination of APOE ɛ4 non-carrier with normal amyloid was more protective in women than men. This set of findings may be attributed in part to different biological effects and in part to lower mortality rates in women.

AbstractIntroduction/AimsImmune‐mediated necrotizing myopathy (IMNM) is considered a rare subtype of the immune‐mediated myopathies, but its incidence and prevalence are unknown. In this study we aimed to determine the incidence and prevalence of IMNM among adults in Olmsted County, Minnesota.MethodsWe identified adult patients with IMNM, as defined by the 2016 European Neuromuscular Centre diagnostic criteria, among residents of Olmsted County, Minnesota over a 20‐year period.ResultsSeven patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Six patients were tested for IMNM antibodies: four were anti–3‐hydroxy‐3‐methylglutaryl‐coenzyme A reductase (HMGCR) positive, one was anti–signal recognition particle positive, and one was seronegative. The incidence of IMNM during 2010‐2019 was 8.3 per million person‐years. The prevalence of IMNM in 2010 was 1.85 per 100 000 people at least 50 years of age. Median age at symptom onset was 64 (range, 52‐86) years and median time from symptom onset to diagnosis was 3 (range, <1 to 156) months. Statin use among anti‐HMGCR IMNM patients, but not the entire IMNM cohort, was higher than in controls (P = .024). Two IMNM patients developed cancers. The incidence of malignancy in IMNM was not higher than that of the general population. Treatment outcome was favorable in all patients except for one patient with delayed treatment and another with insufficient therapy. Among three deceased patients, one died of cancer and another died of IMNM‐related cardiorespiratory complications.DiscussionIMNM is a rare disease. Its prevalence is one tenth that of inclusion‐body myositis in Olmsted County, Minnesota. IMNM patients in our cohort were not at higher risk for developing cancer.

Abstract Introduction The aim of this study was to examine white matter hyperintensities (WMH) and fractional anisotropy (FA) in empirically derived incident mild cognitive impairment (MCI) subtypes. Methods We evaluated 188 participants with incident MCI in the Mayo Clinic Study of Aging (MCSA) identified as having one of four cluster‐derived subtypes: subtle cognitive impairment, amnestic, dysnomic, and dysexecutive. We used linear regression models to evaluate whole brain and regional WMH volumes. We examined fractional anisotropy (FA) on a subset of 63 participants with diffusion tensor imaging. Results Amnestic and dysexecutive subtypes had higher WMH volumes in differing patterns than cognitively unimpaired; the dysexecutive subtype had higher WMH than subtle cognitive impairment. There was widespread WM degeneration in long association and commissural fibers in the amnestic, dysnomic, and dysexecutive subtypes, and corpus callosum FA accounted for significant variability in global cognition. Discussion White matter changes likely contribute to cognitive symptoms in incident MCI.

AbstractBackgroundRecent advances in the development of novel Alzheimer’s disease (AD) measures of amyloid, tau, and neurodegeneration in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and blood have enabled a better understanding of the links between amyloid‐beta (Aβ), tau species and neurodegeneration in the brain, CSF, and blood. The discoveries of novel tau species in CSF and blood, including specific phospho‐tau (p‐tau) and truncated species containing the microtubule binding region of tau (MTBR‐tau) which aggregates in tau tangles, have greatly expanded our understanding of tau biology and tau target development. The longitudinal Aβ, tau, and neurofilament light chain (NfL) changes previously measured in CSF are now being measured accurately in blood, enabling interpretation and understanding of AD progression in much larger and more robust populations.MethodWe analyzed longitudinal CSF and/or blood plasma mass spectrometry measures of Aβ42/Aβ40, multiple p‐tau species (including p‐tau217, 231, 181, 205, etc.), total tau, MTBR‐tau (e.g., MTBR‐tau243, MTBR‐tau299, and MTBR‐tau354), and NfL in sporadic AD and dominantly inherited AD cohorts. Mass spectrometry results were compared to amyloid and tau aggregation measures by Positron Emission Tomography (PET) scans and clinical and cognitive measures in local and international clinical cohorts including ADNI, AIBL, BioFINDER, Mayo Clinic, the Knight ADRC, and the DIAN.ResultThe longitudinal results indicate that a pathophysiological cascade of events begin with altered CSF and blood plasma Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio, followed by increases in amyloid plaques as measured by amyloid PET, associated with increased phosphorylation of specific CSF tau species (e.g., p‐tau217, p‐tau181, etc.), before increases in p‐tau205, NfL, total tau concentrations, hypometabolism, and atrophy. Finally, some species of MTBR‐tau increase before or with tau aggregation by tau PET and onset of clinical symptoms and correlate with longitudinal tau aggregation and clinical progression.ConclusionThese findings indicate that CSF and blood plasma Aβ, p‐tau, MTBR‐tau and NfL measures are highly precise biomarkers of brain amyloidosis, tauopathy, and neurodegeneration and can accurately identify stages of preclinical and clinical AD.

AbstractBackgroundBlood phosphorylated tau (p‐tau) has proven to be the primary candidate as an accessible and scalable biomarker for Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Both p‐tau181 and p‐tau217 are highly accurate to detect AD within dementia cases. Our recent work in cerebrospinal fluid, however, indicates p‐tau231 to be associated to incipient AD pathology. In light of this, we developed a Single molecule array (Simoa) to detect plasma p‐tau231 and assessed its performance in multiple domains, specifically, its ability to detect preclinical AD.MethodIn all cohorts, plasma p‐tau231 was quantified using an in‐house Simoa method developed at the Clinical Neurochemistry Laboratory, Gothenburg University, Sweden. Data presented in this study are samples acquired from Translational Biomarkers of Aging and Dementia (TRIAD, n=503), King’s College London (n=55), Mayo Clinic Study of Aging (n=145), KARVIAH (n=140), Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging (n=430), University College London (n=70), Paris University (n=213), PREVENT‐AD (n=257), University of California (n=309) and ALFA+ (n=385).ResultIn the TRIAD cohort, plasma p‐tau231 demonstrated high accuracy in determining AD from young individuals (AUC=0.95), Aβ‐ elderly (AUC=0.92), Aβ‐ MCI (AUC=0.88) and other neurodegenerative disorders (AUC=0.92). In an autopsy study, plasma p‐tau231 could detect neuropathologically confirmed AD amongst dementia cases (AUC=0.99). In comparing healthy elderly Aβ‐ and Aβ+ individuals, p‐tau231 predicted preclinical Aβ pathology (AUC=0.83). Furthermore, inflection points of the weighted regression curves demonstrate that increases in plasma p‐tau231 occur before plasma p‐tau181 as a function of Aβ deposition load. Plasma p‐tau231 data from additional cohorts will focus on cross‐sectional and longitudinal preclinical datasets. In addition, further data will show the performance of p‐tau231 in symptomatic and presymptomatic PSEN1/APP mutation carriers, memory clinic cohorts, longitudinal neuropathology confirmed and acute neurological injury.ConclusionPlasma p‐tau231 is a new biomarker specific for AD pathology and at higher concentrations relative to p‐tau181 and p‐tau217. Our initial results indicate that plasma p‐tau231 is equivalent to p‐tau181 in diagnostic utility but has greater potential as a biomarker to monitor emerging Aβ pathology. This presentation will give an overview of novel cross‐sectional and longitudinal plasma p‐tau231 data, in more than 3000 individuals, that encompasses the AD continuum, familial AD and other neurological conditions.

AbstractBackgroundBlood‐based biomarkers of amyloid pathology and neurodegeneration are entering clinical use. It is critical to understand what factors affect these plasma marker levels for accurate clinical interpretation. Herein we examined factors associated with plasma Ab42, Ab40, neurofilament light (NfL), total tau (T‐tau), and the ratio of Ab42 to Ab40 (Ab42/40).MethodThe plasma markers were measured for 996 participants (859 cognitively unimpaired [CU], 133 mild cognitive impairment [MCI], 4 dementia) from the Mayo Clinic Study of Aging (MCSA), aged 51 to 95 years. The Quanterix Simoa® HD‐1 analyzer was employed to measure the plasma markers using the Simoa® Neurology 3‐Plex A (N3PA) (T‐tau, Ab42, Ab40) (catalog #101995) and the Simoa® NF‐light (catalog #103180). All other data was collected during in‐person MCSA visits or abstracted from the medical record. Statistical significance was determined using an alpha level of 0.05.ResultAmong CU, all of the plasma markers showed correlation with age. T‐tau (Spearman’s rho = 0.113, p<0.001) showed the weakest correlation and NfL (rho = 0.695, p<0.001) had the strongest. Women had higher levels of T‐tau (Median women: 2.782 vs. 2.390, p<0.001) and lower Ab42/40 (0.033 vs. 0.035, p=0.024) compared to men. In linear regression models predicting z‐scored plasma markers and adjusted for age and sex, several statistically significant predictors were found. For example, higher Charlson comorbidity index and chronic kidney disease were associated with higher levels of all markers; slower gait speed was associated with higher levels for all but Ab42/40 where no relationship was seen. A higher BMI was associated with higher levels of Ab42, Ab40, and T‐tau whereas NfL tended to be lower with increased BMI. Among participants with MCI or dementia, the relationship between gait speed or chronic kidney disease with NfL and T‐tau strengthened considerably.ConclusionMultiple variables affect plasma markers of amyloid pathology and neurodegeneration among CU in the general population. Some relationships differed among MCI and dementia participants. Incorporating this information is critical for accurate interpretation of the marker levels and for the development of reference ranges.

AbstractBackgroundBlood‐based biomarkers for the diagnosis and prognosis of Alzheimer’s disease are now becoming a reality. Indeed, the first plasma amyloid‐beta blood test and algorithm is available for clinical use in some locations. With the very promising plasma phosphorylated tau 181 and 217 results in the past two years, it is likely additional tests will be approved in the near future. However, many questions remain as to how blood‐based biomarkers should best be used in the clinic, including how they should be utilized in the general population and among primary care physicians.MethodWe will discuss some of the key considerations and steps that must be taken before implementation in the clinic, especially in primary practice. Examples will be incorporated from the existing literature and data collected in the Mayo Clinic Study of Aging.ResultOne consideration includes the peripheral factors that might affect the levels of the biomarkers in blood including demographics (age and sex), and comorbidities. For example, a high body mass index is associated with a larger blood volume and renal disease can affect the clearance rate of the biomarker. Another consideration is the utility of a blood‐based biomarker among those with subjective memory complaints and the corresponding ethical implications and guidance for use that is needed. A third consideration is the context of use of blood‐based biomarkers in healthcare settings would could include general screening purposes, targeted screening in people at high risk and actively seeking counseling in primary care, and/or diagnosis in specialized/tertiary care.ConclusionBlood‐based biomarkers for the diagnosis and/or prognosis of Alzheimer’s disease and related disorders are much more feasible and less costly and invasive than a lumbar puncture for the collection of cerebrospinal fluid or amyloid and tau PET imaging. However, it is critical to address several concerns prior to implementing blood‐based biomarkers into the clinic, both in specialty and primary care settings, for the interpretation of the results and upmost consideration of the patient. Specific research actions will be needed to better understand the role of peripheral factors and the use of blood biomarkers in clinical care.

AbstractBackgroundMayo Test Drive (MTD): Test Development through Rapid Iteration, Validation and Expansion, is a web‐based platform for remote self‐administered assessment for novel (Stricker Learning Span; SLS) and open access (Symbols Test) cognitive measures. The SLS is a computer adaptive word‐list memory test that matches test difficulty to user performance. The SLS visually presents words for learning exposures and 4‐choice recognition to test encoding across 5 trials. Symbols is a measure of processing speed being used in many remote assessment studies and typically employs a burst design; in MTD participants complete 4 trials (12‐items each). We examine validity and reliability of the SLS and Symbols via MTD.MethodForty‐five women enrolled in an ongoing study of the Sex‐Specific Effects of Endocrine Disruption on Aging and Alzheimer’s Disease were recruited via email or phone. The Auditory Verbal Learning Test (AVLT) and Digit Symbol Coding (Coding), administered in person within the past 2 years (Mean=11 months), were used to establish construct validity. Participants (91.3% White, Mean age=66.2 years, Mean education=15.3 years) were emailed a link to complete the SLS and Symbols remotely at their convenience on their own device and emailed to repeat testing after approximately 1 week. Pearson correlations (n=45) and 2‐way mixed intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC; n=42) determined construct validity and test‐retest reliability, respectively. Significance was set at p<.05.ResultAcross all test sessions initiated, 97% were successfully completed. Most were completed at home (92.6%; vs. at work or in a public space), and device type varied (48% smartphone, 2% tablet, 50% PC). Median session completion time was 15 minutes. SLS learning scores (max span, total correct trials 1‐5) significantly correlated with AVLT 1‐5 total (r’s .37‐.39) and AVLT Trial 5 (r’s .51‐.52). SLS delay significantly correlated with AVLT delay (r=0.45) and recognition (r=0.61). Symbols time‐based scores averaged across trials were significantly correlated with Coding (r’s=‐.48‐(‐).50). Test‐retest reliabilities across 2 sessions were high for SLS (ICC’s=.80‐.88) and Symbols (ICC’s=.81‐.82).ConclusionSLS and Symbols are valid and reliable self‐administered remote tests in older females. Future work will examine effects of Alzheimer’s disease neuroimaging biomarkers and risk factors on these tests.

AbstractBackgroundThere have been no standard definitions of successful cognitive aging (SA). Our goal was to apply different SA definitions to the 80+ population in the Mayo Clinic Study of Aging (MCSA) on the basis of (i) cross‐sectional vs longitudinal cognition (“Exceptionality” vs “Maintenance”) and (ii) memory vs global cognitive scores and explore the participant characteristics for each SA definition on the basis of baseline imaging markers and mid/late‐life health.MethodWe included 2157 participants from the MCSA, all ≥80 years at baseline and classified them into two SA definitions using memory z‐scores or global z‐scores: “Exceptionality” when high cognitive performance was observed (z‐scores ≥ 1 SD), “Maintenance” when cognitive function was preserved over time (Slope ≥ ‐0.1/year using mixed‐effect models). Our imaging markers were: PET‐based amyloid positivity (A+), MRI‐based neurodegeneration positivity (N+), WMH, FDG‐PET SUVR markers of resilience (anterior cingulate, ACC) and AD‐related areas (posterior cingulate). We also examined APOE4 status and other health characteristics. Group comparison was performed within each definition (e.g. exceptional vs non‐exceptional memory) using ANCOVA and binary logistic regressions with adjustments for age, sex, and education.ResultA lower number of participants met the “Exceptionality” criteria (10%: memory and 4%: global). A greater number met the “Maintenance” criteria (53%: memory and 32%: global). Less than 7% showed both “Exceptional” cognition and “Maintenance” over time. Participants across SA definitions were in general younger, more often women, with a higher education/occupation and less often APOE4 carriers. All SA groups showed higher ACC metabolism and lower N+ compared to the corresponding non‐SA group. More than 50% of the participants in the “Exceptional” groups were A+ (57%: memory, 50%: global). A+ frequency was significantly lower in the “Maintainers” (<42%). Better mid/late‐life health indicators were observed in the SA groups, including lower cardio‐metabolic conditions, higher mid‐life cognitive activities, lower depressive symptomatology, lower hypersomnolence and better self‐perception of health.ConclusionDifferent SA definitions identified mainly non‐overlapping 80+ groups that showed several common features including higher education/occupation, percent of women, better lifestyles, lower N+ frequency, and higher ACC metabolism. Lower A+ frequency was a key distinct feature of “Maintenance”.