el‐Azhary, Rokea A.

AbstractBackgroundViral superinfection of skin affected by preceding dermatosis has been studied extensively in eczema and reported anecdotally in pemphigus. Little is known about its involvement and complications in patients with other immunobullous diseases.MethodsTo investigate clinical features and complications of viral superinfection in patients with immunobullous diseases, we performed a retrospective chart review.ResultsWe identified 12 patients with immunobullous diseases (linear immunoglobulin A bullous dermatosis, n = 2; pemphigoid, n = 3; pemphigus, n = 7) and superinfection by herpes simplex virus 1 (n = 9) or 2 (n = 3). Complications included inpatient hospitalization for intensive management of skin lesions during viral flare (n = 6), herpes keratitis (n = 1), and death due to sepsis (n = 1). Five patients previously had a skin swab negative for herpes simplex virus polymerase chain reaction before a positive test. Nine patients were taking systemic corticosteroids or corticosteroid‐sparing agents at herpetic infection; two with linear immunoglobulin A bullous dermatosis and one with a new diagnosis of pemphigus vulgaris had not.ConclusionsViral superinfection is a potentially serious complication in patients with immunobullous diseases. Clinicians should have a high index of suspicion for this phenomenon, even when patients are not otherwise immunosuppressed or when previous viral skin assays have been negative.

AbstractIn this review, we summarize the recent literature and use case examples to reach diagnostic criteria for the diagnosis of immunoglobulin G4 (IgG4)‐related diseases that may be of relevance to the practicing dermatologist.

AbstractBackgroundVoriconazole is a commonly used antifungal medication in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo‐HSCT) patients. In solid organ transplantation, voriconazole use has been associated with the development of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). We sought to determine if voriconazole use was associated with SCC in patients undergoing allo‐HSCT.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed consecutive adult patients who underwent allo‐HSCT at Mayo Clinic from January 2007 through July 2012. Multivariable Cox models were created to assess the relationship of SCC with two time‐dependent voriconazole exposure variables: (i) history of voriconazole exposure (yes/no), and (ii) cumulative days of voriconazole use.ResultsIn our cohort of 381 allo‐HSCT patients, SCC developed in 26 of 312 patients exposed to voriconazole (25 post‐voriconazole) and in 1 of 69 patients who received alternative antifungal agent(s). Cumulative incidence of SCC was estimated to be 19% at 5 years post allo‐transplant. Cumulative days of voriconazole use was found to be a risk factor for SCC, and this relationship persisted in a multivariable model using previously identified risk factors as covariates (hazard ratio 1.859 for each 180 days of use, P < 0.001).ConclusionThis is the first study, to our knowledge, to identify cumulative days of voriconazole use as a risk factor for SCC development following allo‐HSCT, and may help guide appropriate antifungal use in this patient population.

BackgroundComplications from graft‐vs.‐host disease (GVHD), a major contributor to morbidity and mortality following hematopoietic cell transplantation, may be mitigated by early diagnosis and intervention. However, differentiation between acute cutaneous GVHD and other common skin eruptions that develop in the post‐transplantation period, such as drug hypersensitivity reaction, can be challenging clinically and microscopically. Because recent evidence indicates that CD123, a marker of plasmacytoid dendritic cells, can help to distinguish gastrointestinal GVHD from the clinicopathologic mimic cytomegalovirus colitis, we aimed to determine whether CD123 could aid in the diagnosis of acute cutaneous GVHD.MethodsWe studied 12 skin specimens of patients with grades I–II cutaneous GVHD and 12 from patients who had drug hypersensitivity reaction with vacuolar interface changes on biopsy.ResultsNo differences were seen between the two groups with regards to density or distribution of CD123 expression. Specimens representing GVHD showed significantly less spongiosis (P < 0.001) and fewer dermal eosinophils (P = 0.03) compared to those representing drug hypersensitivity reaction.ConclusionsWe conclude that CD123 does not appear to be a useful ancillary test in the diagnosis of acute cutaneous GVHD. Careful correlation between clinical findings and features with microscopy remains the cornerstone of accurate diagnosis of acute cutaneous GVHD.

AbstractBackgroundIntensive treatment options are lacking for patients with severe skin disease recalcitrant to outpatient therapy. The availability of inpatient dermatology care has almost disappeared in many parts of the United States. One possible solution for this is a day treatment center for patients with severe dermatologic disease recalcitrant to outpatient therapy.MethodsDescriptive study based on retrospective medical record review of all patients attending the day hospital for treatment in 2010. We collected data on patient demographics, distribution of admission diagnosis, treatments used, and length of stay.ResultsA total of 211 patients had 235 admissions. Mean age was 57.7 years (range 3.8–92.1 years). The most common indications for admission were dermatitis (139 admissions [59.2%]), psoriasis (58 [24.7%]), and mycosis fungoides (eight [3.4%]). The main treatment interventions were wet dressings (195 admissions [83.0%]) and Goeckerman treatment (38 [16.2%]). The median number of days of treatment was three (interquartile range, 2–5 days) for wet dressings and 22 days (interquartile range, 21–24 days) for Goeckerman therapy.ConclusionsThe dermatology day treatment center provided intensive skin‐directed therapy and filled a critical practice gap in the management of our patients with severe widespread skin diseases recalcitrant to outpatient therapy. We propose that the dermatology day treatment center is a valuable model that could be considered by both private practitioners and academic centers in the United States as an important adjunct to fill the gap in availability of intensive topical treatments for patients with severe skin disease.

AbstractBackgroundDermatology consultations are frequently requested by inpatient hospital services. As inpatient dermatology services in the USA decline, dermatology hospital consultations are becoming increasingly important.ObjectivesWe aim to describe the spectrum of skin diseases encountered and the health care subspecialties requesting dermatology hospital consultations.MethodsWe performed a retrospective chart review of adult patient (age: ≥18 years) dermatology hospital consultations from January 1 to December 31, 2010. We examined patient demographic characteristics, consultation requesting services, and consultation diagnoses.ResultsAmong dermatology services, 614 patients had 674 separate inpatient dermatology consultations during 2010. Of these patients, 55.9% were male (mean age: 59 years). In total, 205 consultations (30.4%) were requested by the internal medicine subspecialty, 137 (20.3%) by the hematology and oncology subspecialty, and 93 (13.8%) by the surgical subspecialty. The most common conditions seen by the hospital dermatology consulting service were skin infections (n = 125, 18.5%), dermatitis (n = 120, 17.8%), drug eruptions (n = 87, 12.9%), chronic wounds and ulcers (n = 55, 8.1%), cutaneous neoplasms (n = 39, 5.8%), graft‐versus‐host disease (n = 37, 5.5%), ecchymosis, purpura simplex or petechia (n = 26, 3.8%), intertrigo (n = 21, 3.1%), and urticaria (n = 20, 3.0%).ConclusionsThe majority of consultations conducted by the dermatology hospital consulting service were for the management of common skin diseases, such as cutaneous infections, dermatitis, and drug eruptions. Most consultations were requested by the departments of internal medicine, hematology and oncology, and surgical services.

AbstractBackgroundThe term pharmacogenetics is used to describe an evolving field that aims to understand the relationship between individual variations in genetic sequence and differences in the therapeutic and toxic response to medications. The promise of pharmacogenetics is empowerment of clinicians with information that will enable them to personalize drug therapy – to prescribe the right medication at the right dose for each patient, while minimizing adverse effects. Despite dramatic advances, wide application of pharmacogenetics to clinical practice has been slow for a number of reasons, including lack of evidence‐based therapeutic guidelines as well as ethical concerns and cost.MethodsTo illustrate applications to dermatology practice, we present three clinical scenarios that serve as a springboard for discussion of the principles of pharmacogenetics and how they can be used to guide treatment with azathioprine, 5‐fluorouracil, and trastuzumab.ConclusionThe therapeutic and toxic effects of a given medication ultimately depend on its combined pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, and pharmacogenetic properties in a given individual. Pharmacodynamic properties of individual medications must be correlated with single nucleotide polymorphisms. Test recommendations and standardization of therapy for specific disorders can then be established.