Pellikka, Patricia A.

Background: Lung ultrasound detects pulmonary congestion as B-lines at rest, and more frequently, during exercise stress echocardiography (ESE). Methods: We performed ESE plus lung ultrasound (4-site simplified scan) in 4392 subjects referred for semi-supine bike ESE in 24 certified centers in 9 countries. B-line score ranged from 0 (normal) to 40 (severely abnormal). Five different populations were evaluated: control subjects (n=103); chronic coronary syndromes (n=3701); heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (n=395); heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (n=70); ischemic mitral regurgitation ≥ moderate at rest (n=123). In a subset of 2478 patients, follow-up information was available. Results: During ESE, B-lines increased in all study groups except controls. Age, hypertension, abnormal ejection fraction, peak wall motion score index, and abnormal heart rate reserve were associated with B-lines in multivariable regression analysis. Stress B lines (hazard ratio, 2.179 [95% CI, 1.015–4.680]; P =0.046) and ejection fraction <50% (hazard ratio, 2.942 [95% CI, 1.268–6.822]; P =0.012) were independent predictors of all-cause death (n=29 after a median follow-up of 29 months). Conclusions: B-lines identify the pulmonary congestion phenotype at rest, and more frequently, during ESE in ischemic and heart failure patients. Stress B-lines may help to refine risk stratification in these patients. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT 03049995.

Background The aim of this study was to establish prognostic hemodynamic parameters in patients with mitral stenosis secondary to mitral annular calcification. Methods and Results A retrospective cohort of 105 patients undergoing transseptal catheterization for hemodynamic evaluation of mitral annular calcification–related mitral stenosis between 2004 and 2020 was studied. Mitral valve gradient (MVG) and mitral valve area (MVA; calculated by the Gorlin formula) were measured using direct left atrial and left ventricular pressures. The median age of the patients was 70.3 years (58.4–76.7 years), and 53.3% were women. The median MVA was 1.7 cm 2 (1.3–2.3 cm 2 ) and MVG was 7.3 mm Hg (5.3–10.3 mm Hg); left ventricular end‐diastolic pressure was 17.6±28.3 mm Hg. During a median of 2.1 years (0.7–4.5 years), there were 63 deaths; 1‐ and 5‐year survival were 76% and 40%, respectively. There was no association between left ventricular end‐diastolic pressure and survival. After adjusting for age and comorbidities, both MVA (hazard ratio [HR], 0.50 per cm 2 ; 95% CI, 0.34–0.73) and MVG (HR, 1.1 per mm Hg; 95% CI, 1.05–1.20) were independent predictors of death. Atrial fibrillation was also independently associated with mortality. When added to a combined model, MVA remained associated with death (HR, 0.51 per cm 2 ; 95% CI, 0.33–0.79) while MVG was not. Conclusions In patients with mitral annular calcification–related mitral stenosis, survival was poor. MVA and MVG were independently associated with death, but MVA was a better predictor of outcomes.

Background: Patients evaluated for coronary artery disease have a range of symptoms and underlying risk. The relationships between patient-described symptoms, clinician conclusions, and subsequent clinical management and outcomes remain incompletely described. Methods: In this secondary analysis, we examined the association between 4 types of presenting symptoms (substernal/left-sided chest pain, other chest/neck/arm pain, dyspnea, and other symptoms) and patient risk, noninvasive test results, clinical management, and outcomes for stable outpatients randomized in the PROMISE (Prospective Multicenter Imaging Study for Evaluation of Chest Pain) trial. Multivariable regression models were used to evaluate differences in noninvasive test result, all-cause death/myocardial infarction/unstable angina hospitalization and cardiovascular death/myocardial infarction by symptom type. Results: Among 9996 patients, most presented with chest pain (47.2% substernal, 29.2% other), followed by dyspnea (14.9%), and other symptoms (8.7%). Patients with dyspnea were older (median age 63 versus 60, P ≤0.02) with higher baseline risk (78.2% with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease >7.5% versus 67.6%, P ≤0.02). Using patients with substernal chest pain as a reference, there was no difference in noninvasive test positivity across symptom groups (all P >0.05), but test-positive patients with dyspnea (adjusted odds ratio, 0.66 [95% CI, 0.51–0.85]) or other symptoms (adjusted odds ratio, 0.65 [95% CI, 0.47–0.90]) were less likely to be referred for cardiac catheterization. While symptom type alone was not associated with outcomes, symptom presentation with chest pain or dyspnea did modify the association between a positive noninvasive test and clinical outcome (interaction P =0.025 for both all-cause death/myocardial infarction/unstable angina hospitalization and cardiovascular death/MI). Conclusions: Among low-risk outpatients evaluated for coronary artery disease, typicality of symptoms was not closely associated with higher baseline risk but was related to differences in processes of care and the prognostic value of a positive test. Adverse events were not associated with clinician risk estimates or symptoms alone. These unexpected findings highlight the limitation of relying solely on symptom presentation or clinician risk estimation to evaluate patients for suspected coronary artery disease. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT01174550.

Introduction: Subclinical cardiovascular involvement in COVID-19 patients has not been well described. 2D-Speckle Tracking Echocardiography derived global longitudinal strain (GLS) and systolic and early diastolic strain rate (SRs, SRe) measurements are more sensitive than standard echocardiographic parameters to diagnose subclinical mechanical dysfunction in patients with normal Left Ventricle Ejection Fraction (LVEF). Hypothesis: Evaluate subclinical myocardial mechanical function and reserve in active COVID-19 systemic disease patients with normal LVEF vs controls and between survivors and non survivors of COVID-19 in the longitudinal domain of contractility. Methods & Results: 166 adult patients with active COVID 19 having normal LVEF were included and compared to 89 healthy volunteers. Baseline parameters were recorded. Peak GLS, SRs and SRe, were measured offline. Mean age was 62.53 ± 18.96 years and 87 (52%) were males and Mean LVEF was 62±5%. COVID-19 patients had higher GLS compared to controls (-20.93%±0.30 vs. -18.48%±0.40; p value <0.0001), SRs was similar (-0.97 s -1 ±0.10 vs. -0.98 s -1 ±0.02, p value 0.2528) and SRe was lower (0.85 s -1 ±0.0 vs. 1.05 s -1 ±0.02; p value <0.0001) respectively. After adjusting for age and sex, GLS, SRs and SRe was significant (p<0.001). GLS, SRs and SRe were similar in survivors vs. non survivors (p NS), both groups had elevated biomarkers (cardiac troponin, NT-pro BNP, CRP), but non survivors had higher levels (3.22±0.18 vs 3.62±0.28, p = 0.2371, 5.86±0.19 vs 7.15±0.27, p = 0.0004, 3.75±0.14 vs 4.31±0.21, p = 0.0422, 7.64±0.17 vs 8.26±0.25, p=0.0487 respectively) (Table 1). Conclusions: In our cohort, COVID-19 patients had better systolic reserve and abnormal relaxation compared to controls. There was no significant difference in strain (GLS) and strain rate (SRs & SRe) amongst survivors and non survivors in the longitudinal domain of contractility despite of higher inflammatory biomarkers in non-survivors.

A significant proportion of patients diagnosed with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis (ssAS) do not receive treatment with aortic valve replacement (AVR) despite current ACC/AHA guidelines. Delayed care leads to increased hospitalizations, worsening heart failure and death. Timely referral to a cardiac specialist is a critical step in the treatment pathway. We sought to identify the impact of managing provider type on follow-up care for newly diagnosed patients with severe aortic stenosis (sAS). We analyzed Optum® electronic medical records to identify adults with a new outpatient sAS echo diagnosis in the pre-COVID era (1/2017 - 3/2019). We identified integrated delivery network patients alive 1d post echo excluding those with missing data or AVR within 3d of echo, then selected those managed by a primary care provider (PCP) or a cardiologist (n=5,683). Baseline characteristics were used for covariate-adjusted Cumulative Incidence Function and Fine-Gray subdistribution hazard models. We estimated the impact of managing provider type on the specialist follow-up visit rate (cardiologist, interventional cardiologist and/or cardiothoracic surgeon) for all sAS patients and of surgical or transcatheter AVR for ssAS patients within 1 year of diagnosis. Within 90d of sAS diagnosis, 47% of PCP- vs. 73% of cardiologist-managed patients had a follow-up visit (1-year rates: PCP, 69% vs. cardiologist, 90%; Hazard ratio [HR]=0.54, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.49-0.59, p<0.0001). Within 1 year of diagnosis, 36% of PCP- vs. 51% of cardiologist-managed ssAS patients underwent AVR (HR=0.72, CI: 0.63-0.82, p<0.0001) (Figure). Analysis suggests lower referral rates for PCP- than cardiologist-managed patients. In ssAS, 1-year AVR rates were low, particularly for PCPs. These data underscore the importance of timely follow up of all severe AS patients for symptom assessment and appropriate treatment, presenting an opportunity for initiatives to drive behavior change.

Introduction and Aims of The Study: The relief of outflow obstruction after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is expected to improve cardiac output, LV systolic and diastolic function and to regress left ventricular (LV) mass. The impact of these changes on left atrial (LA) reservoir, conduit and contractile function remains unknown. Our aims were to compare LA functions in patients with transfemoral (TF) vs transapical (TA) TAVR and test whether they have an impact on patient outcomes. Methods: Retrospective analysis of LA deformation by speckle tracking strain echocardiography in 54 patients with TA TAVR and 54 TF TAVR, matched for age, sex and STS score. Measurements were performed pre TAVR and 1 month and 1 year post TAVR. Follow up data was available up to 5 years. Results: At baseline, there were no significant differences between the TF and TA groups with regard to patient age (81 ± 8 vs 82 ± 8 years), male gender (44% vs. 44%) or STS score (8.3 ± 4.4 vs 9.7 ± 4.5, respectively). LV filling pressures (E/e’) at baseline and 1 month were higher in TA vs. TF group (see table). LV global longitudinal strain (GLS) were similar at baseline and improved at 1 month only in the TF group (p=0.0001), while in the TA group it showed an improvement only at 1 year. LA reservoir, conduit and contractile functions improved within 1 month post TAVR in the TF group. In contrast, despite similar baseline LA functions in both groups, no improvement was observed in the TA group (see Table). At Cox proportional hazard analysis, lower LA reservoir function predicted major adverse events (death, cardiac rehospitalization or stroke) even after adjusting for age, gender and group allocation (p=0.034; risk ratio per unit decrease in LA function 1.04). Conclusion: These findings suggest that patients with TA TAVR have poor (if any) recovery of LA functions post TAVR. Presence of a stiff LA, best reflected by a persistently reduced LA reservoir strain, may contribute to the excess morbidity seen in TA patients.

Background: Cardiac amyloidosis (CA) results from extracellular deposition of insoluble amyloid fibrils in the myocardium, leading to myocardial stiffening, restrictive cardiomyopathy and poor prognosis. Thus, measurements of myocardial stiffness might help with identification of patients with cardiac amyloid deposition. The speed of wave transmission of myocardial stretch (Vm) is a novel measure of myocardial elasticity. Our aim was to investigate the behavior of Vm in the left ventricular (LV) myocardium of patients with CA. We hypothesized this wave speed will be increased in these patients and will partly explain the reduction in systolic myocardial function. Methods: We prospectively studied 23 consecutive patients with systemic amyloidosis, of whom 17 (age 59±13 years) had confirmed cardiac involvement (15 AL, 2 TTR), and compared to 18 control subjects (age 47±13 years) with normal LV function. Comprehensive transthoracic echocardiography was performed. Tissue Doppler cineloops (350-450 frames/s) were acquired from 6 LV walls from 3 standard apical views. Regional and global Vm were measured as the wave speed of the onset of myocardial stretch from LV base to apex (late diastole). Results: Subjects with CA (n=17) had higher Vm compared to normal subjects (2.5±0.8 vs 1.5±0.2 m/s; P<0.001, respectively). They also had lower LV ejection fraction (56±11 vs 65±4%; P=0.02), global longitudinal strain (GLS -14±5 vs -20±2%, P<0.001), and myocardial relaxation (mitral annulus septal e’ velocity 4.7±1.9 vs 9.2±2.4 cm/s; P<0.001) and higher LV mass (150±54 vs 87±18 g/m2; P<0.001), left atrial volume (44±7 vs 27±6 mL/m2; P<0.001), and estimated LV filling pressure (E/e’ 20±9 vs 8±3; P<0.001). There was a strong positive association between Vm and LV wall thickness (R=0.62; P<0.001), GLS (R=0.45; P=0.01) and septal E/e’ (R=0.42; P=0.02) and an inverse correlation between Vm and septal e’ (R=-0.39; P=0.03), but not with ejection fraction (P=0.37). Conclusion: This pilot study indicates that Vm is elevated in patients with CA compared to normal subjects, commensurate with the effects of amyloid deposition on LV structure and function. This novel measurement shows promise for noninvasive assessment of diastolic myocardial stiffness in patients with CA.

Objective To evaluate informal physician judgement versus pretest probability scores in estimating risk in patients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD). Methods We included 4533 patients from the PROMISE (Prospective Multicenter Imaging Study for Evaluation of Chest Pain) trial. Physicians categorised a priori the pretest probability of obstructive CAD (≥70% or ≥50% left main); Diamond-Forrester (D-F) and European Society of Cardiology (ESC) pretest probability estimates were calculated. Agreement was calculated using the κ statistic; logistic regression evaluated estimates of pretest CAD probability and actual CAD (as determined by CT coronary angiography), and clinical outcomes were modelled using Cox proportional hazard models. Results Physician estimates agreed poorly with D-F (κ 0.16; 95% CI 0.14 to 0.18) and ESC (κ 0.04; 95% CI 0.02 to 0.05). Actual obstructive CAD was significantly more prevalent in both the high-likelihood (OR 3.30; 95% CI 2.30 to 4.74) and the intermediate-likelihood (OR 1.43; 95% CI 1.16 to 1.76) physician-estimated groups versus the low-likelihood group; ESC similarly differentiated between the three groups (OR 9.07; 95% CI 2.87 to 28.70; and OR 3.87; 95% CI 1.22 to 12.28). However, using D-F, only the high-probability group differed (OR 2.49; 95% CI 1.74 to 3.54). Only physician estimates were associated with a higher incidence of adjusted death/myocardial infarction/unstable angina hospitalisation in the high-probability versus low-probability group (HR 2.68; 95% CI 1.52 to 4.74); neither pretest probability score provided prognostic information. Conclusions Compared with D-F and ESC estimates, physician judgement more accurately identified obstructive CAD and worse patient outcomes. Integrating physician judgement may improve risk prediction for patients with stable chest pain. Trial registration number NCT01174550 .

AbstractObjectivesTo compare all‐cause mortality in patients with mitral annulus calcification (MAC) and severe mitral valve dysfunction (MVD) who received standard mitral intervention versus no intervention.BackgroundPatients with MAC often have high surgical risk due to advanced age, comorbidities, and technical challenges related to calcium. The impact of a mitral intervention on outcomes of patients with MAC and severe MVD is not well known.MethodsRetrospective review of patients with MAC by transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) in 2015 at a single institution. Patients with severe mitral stenosis (MS) or regurgitation (MR) were analyzed and stratified into two groups: surgical or transcatheter intervention performed <1 year after the index TTE, and no or later intervention. The primary endpoint was all‐cause mortality.ResultsOf 5502 patients with MAC, 357 had severe MVD (MS = 27%, MR = 73%). Of those, 108 underwent mitral intervention (surgery = 87; transcatheter = 21). They were younger (73 ± 11 vs. 76 ± 11 years, p < 0.01) and less frequently had cardiovascular diseases compared with no‐intervention. Frequency in women was similar (45% vs. 50%, p = 0.44). During median follow‐up of 3.2 years, the intervention group had higher estimated survival than those without intervention (80% vs. 72% at 1 year and 55% vs. 35% at 4 year, p < 0.01). Adjusted for age, eGFR, LVEF < 50%, and pulmonary hypertension, mitral intervention was an independent predictor of lower mortality (hazard ratio = 0.66, 95% confidence interval 0.43–0.99, p = 0.046).ConclusionPatients with MAC and severe MVD who underwent mitral intervention <1 year from index TTE had lower mortality than those without intervention. Mitral intervention was independently associated with lower mortality.