Couch, Fergus J.

AbstractEpidemiological, biological, and molecular data suggest links between endometriosis and endometrial cancer, with recent epidemiological studies providing evidence for an association between a previous diagnosis of endometriosis and risk of endometrial cancer. We used genetic data as an alternative approach to investigate shared biological etiology of these two diseases. Genetic correlation analysis of summary level statistics from genomewide association studies (GWAS) using LD Score regression revealed moderate but significant genetic correlation (rg = 0.23, P = 9.3 × 10−3), and SNP effect concordance analysis provided evidence for significant SNP pleiotropy (P = 6.0 × 10−3) and concordance in effect direction (P = 2.0 × 10−3) between the two diseases. Cross‐disease GWAS meta‐analysis highlighted 13 distinct loci associated at P ≤ 10−5 with both endometriosis and endometrial cancer, with one locus (SNP rs2475335) located within PTPRD associated at a genomewide significant level (P = 4.9 × 10−8, OR = 1.11, 95% CI = 1.07–1.15). PTPRD acts in the STAT3 pathway, which has been implicated in both endometriosis and endometrial cancer. This study demonstrates the value of cross‐disease genetic analysis to support epidemiological observations and to identify biological pathways of relevance to multiple diseases.

Investigating the most likely causal variants identified by fine‐mapping analyses may improve the power to detect gene–environment interactions. We assessed the interplay between 70 single nucleotide polymorphisms identified by genetic fine‐scale mapping of susceptibility loci and 11 epidemiological breast cancer risk factors in relation to breast cancer. Analyses were conducted on up to 58,573 subjects (26,968 cases and 31,605 controls) from the Breast Cancer Association Consortium, in one of the largest studies of its kind. Analyses were carried out separately for estrogen receptor (ER) positive (ER+) and ER negative (ER–) disease. The Bayesian False Discovery Probability (BFDP) was computed to assess the noteworthiness of the results. Four potential gene–environment interactions were identified as noteworthy (BFDP < 0.80) when assuming a true prior interaction probability of 0.01. The strongest interaction result in relation to overall breast cancer risk was found between CFLAR‐rs7558475 and current smoking (ORint = 0.77, 95% CI: 0.67–0.88, pint = 1.8 × 10−4). The interaction with the strongest statistical evidence was found between 5q14‐rs7707921 and alcohol consumption (ORint =1.36, 95% CI: 1.16–1.59, pint = 1.9 × 10−5) in relation to ER– disease risk. The remaining two gene–environment interactions were also identified in relation to ER– breast cancer risk and were found between 3p21‐rs6796502 and age at menarche (ORint = 1.26, 95% CI: 1.12–1.43, pint =1.8 × 10−4) and between 8q23‐rs13267382 and age at first full‐term pregnancy (ORint = 0.89, 95% CI: 0.83–0.95, pint = 5.2 × 10−4). While these results do not suggest any strong gene–environment interactions, our results may still be useful to inform experimental studies. These may in turn, shed light on the potential interactions observed.

Abstract Background: The strongest known risk factor for endometrial cancer is obesity. To determine whether SNPs associated with increased body mass index (BMI) or waist–hip ratio (WHR) are associated with endometrial cancer risk, independent of measured BMI, we investigated relationships between 77 BMI and 47 WHR SNPs and endometrial cancer in 6,609 cases and 37,926 country-matched controls. Methods: Logistic regression analysis and fixed effects meta-analysis were used to test for associations between endometrial cancer risk and (i) individual BMI or WHR SNPs, (ii) a combined weighted genetic risk score (wGRS) for BMI or WHR. Causality of BMI for endometrial cancer was assessed using Mendelian randomization, with BMIwGRS as instrumental variable. Results: The BMIwGRS was significantly associated with endometrial cancer risk (P = 3.4 × 10−17). Scaling the effect of the BMIwGRS on endometrial cancer risk by its effect on BMI, the endometrial cancer OR per 5 kg/m2 of genetically predicted BMI was 2.06 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.89–2.21], larger than the observed effect of BMI on endometrial cancer risk (OR = 1.55; 95% CI, 1.44–1.68, per 5 kg/m2). The association attenuated but remained significant after adjusting for BMI (OR = 1.22; 95% CI, 1.10–1.39; P = 5.3 × 10−4). There was evidence of directional pleiotropy (P = 1.5 × 10−4). BMI SNP rs2075650 was associated with endometrial cancer at study-wide significance (P &lt; 4.0 × 10−4), independent of BMI. Endometrial cancer was not significantly associated with individual WHR SNPs or the WHRwGRS. Conclusions: BMI, but not WHR, is causally associated with endometrial cancer risk, with evidence that some BMI-associated SNPs alter endometrial cancer risk via mechanisms other than measurable BMI. Impact: The causal association between BMI SNPs and endometrial cancer has possible implications for endometrial cancer risk modeling. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 25(11); 1503–10. ©2016 AACR.

Abstract Purpose: Expression of the tumor suppressor gene E-cadherin is diminished in lobular breast cancers and has been implicated in epithelial mesenchymal transition. We assessed risk factor associations for breast cancer stratified by low vs. high E-cadherin protein expression in a pooled analysis within the Breast Cancer Association Consortium (BCAC) studies. Methods: E-cadherin tumor tissue staining was performed centrally at the NCI on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue microarray (TMA) sections representing 6,010 breast cancer patients from 12 US and European BCAC studies. TMAs were digitally scanned and scored using the SlidePath Digital Image Hub (Leica Biosystems, Wetzlar, Germany). For 5,896 cancers with evaluable tumors, E-cadherin was visually scored as estimated percent of positive cells times stain intensity (0, 1+, 2+, 3+) (score range 0-300). E-cadherin low was defined as tumors with a score &lt; 100. Risk factor associations for low vs. high E-cadherin expressing tumors were evaluated by logistic regression, adjusted for age and study site, and stratified by ER status and histologic subtype. To assess the consistency in results by study, meta-analyses were performed using the random-effects model. All statistical tests were two-sided. Results: E-cadherin low cancers comprised 20% of tumors and were associated with lobular histology, well/moderately differentiated cancers, &gt; 2cm in size, and HER2-negative status (χ2, P &lt; 0.003 for all factors). E-cadherin low status was associated with family history of breast cancer (FH) (OR = 1.32, 95% CI = 1.09-1.60, P-het = 0.005) and ever use of menopausal hormones (OR = 1.26, 95% CI = 1.02-1.56, P-het = 0.03). Study specific meta-plots showed consistent effects across studies for menopausal hormone therapy (I2 = 0.0%, p = 0.64); however, E-cadherin loss by FH did show evidence of heterogeneity by study (I2 = 54%, P = 0.03). Differences in E-cadherin expression remained significant for FH, and menopausal hormone use when further adjusted for ER (P &lt; 0.05). We also found relationships with E-cadherin loss to vary by BMI, number of live births, age at first birth, and oral contraceptive use in stratified analysis by ER status and histologic subtype. Conclusion: This large pooled analysis shows that breast cancer risk factor associations may differ by E-cadherin expression independent of ER status, suggesting that it may represent a marker of etiologic heterogeneity. Citation Format: Hisani N. Horne, Hannah Oh, Mark E. Sherman, Maya Palakal, Stephen H. Hewitt, Marjanka Schmidt, Javier Benitez, Roger Milne, Hermann Brenner, Heli Nevanlinna, Arto Mannermaa, Georgia Chenevix-Trench, Fergus Couch, Peter Devilee, Diana Eccles, Maartje Hooning, Anthony J. Swerdlow, Nick Orr, Melissa A. Troester, Renata Cora, Paul D. Pharoah, Montserrat Garcia-Closas, Jonine D. Figueroa. Breast cancer risk factor associations by loss of E-cadherin tumor tissue expression: A pooled analysis of 5,896 cases in 12 studies from the Breast Cancer Association Consortium (BCAC). [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 107th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2016 Apr 16-20; New Orleans, LA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(14 Suppl):Abstract nr 3451.

Previous genome‐wide association studies among women of European ancestry identified two independent breast cancer susceptibility loci represented by single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) rs13281615 and rs11780156 at 8q24. A fine‐mapping study across 2.06 Mb (chr8:127,561,724–129,624,067, hg19) in 55,540 breast cancer cases and 51,168 controls within the Breast Cancer Association Consortium was conducted. Three additional independent association signals in women of European ancestry, represented by rs35961416 (OR = 0.95, 95% CI = 0.93–0.97, conditional p = 5.8 × 10−6), rs7815245 (OR = 0.94, 95% CI = 0.91–0.96, conditional p = 1.1 × 10−6) and rs2033101 (OR = 1.05, 95% CI = 1.02–1.07, conditional p = 1.1 × 10−4) were found. Integrative analysis using functional genomic data from the Roadmap Epigenomics, the Encyclopedia of DNA Elements project, the Cancer Genome Atlas and other public resources implied that SNPs rs7815245 in Signal 3, and rs1121948 in Signal 5 (in linkage disequilibrium with rs11780156, r2 = 0.77), were putatively functional variants for two of the five independent association signals. The results highlighted multiple 8q24 variants associated with breast cancer susceptibility in women of European ancestry.