Rizza, Robert A.

The characteristics of pulsatile insulin secretion are important determinants of type 2 diabetes pathophysiology, but they are understudied due to the difficulties in measuring pulsatile insulin secretion noninvasively. Deconvolution of either peripheral C-peptide or insulin concentrations offers an appealing alternative to hepatic vein catheterization. However, to do so, there are a series of methodological challenges to overcome. C-peptide has a relatively long half-life and accumulates in the circulation. On the other hand, peripheral insulin concentrations reflect relatively fast clearance and hepatic extraction as it leaves the portal circulation to enter the systemic circulation. We propose a method based on nonparametric stochastic deconvolution of C-peptide concentrations, using individually determined C-peptide kinetics, to overcome these limitations. The use of C-peptide (instead of insulin) concentrations allows estimation of portal (and not post-hepatic) insulin pulses, whereas nonparametric stochastic deconvolution allows evaluation of pulsatile signals without any a priori assumptions of pulse shape and occurrence. The only assumption required is the degree of smoothness of the (unknown) secretion rate. We tested this method first on simulated data and then on 29 nondiabetic subjects studied during euglycemia and hyperglycemia and compared our estimates with the profiles obtained from hepatic vein insulin concentrations. This method produced satisfactory results both in the ability to fit the data and in providing reliable estimates of pulsatile secretion, in agreement with hepatic vein measurements. In conclusion, the proposed method enables reliable and noninvasive measurement of pulsatile insulin secretion. Future studies will be needed to validate this method in people with type 2 diabetes.

Abstract Context A better understanding of nocturnal regulation of glucose homeostasis will provide the framework for designing rational therapeutic strategies to improve the management of overnight glucose in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). Objective To establish the nocturnal pattern and regulation of glucose production (EGP) in humans and to determine whether the pattern is dysregulated in people with T2D. Design Subjects were infused with [3-3H] glucose overnight. Arterial blood samples were drawn for hormones and analytes to estimate EGP throughout the night. Deuterium-labeled water was provided to measure gluconeogenesis (GNG) using the hexamethylenetetramine method of Landau. Setting Mayo Clinic Clinical Research Trials Unit, Rochester, MN, USA. Participants and Interventions A total of 43 subjects [23 subjects with T2D and 20 nondiabetic (ND) subjects comparable for age and body mass index] were included in this study. Main Outcome(s) Measure(s) Glucose and EGP. Results Plasma glucose, C-peptide, and glucagon concentrations were higher throughout the night, whereas insulin concentrations were higher in subjects with T2D vs ND subjects at 1:00 and 4:00 am but similar at 7:00 am. EGP was higher in the subjects with T2D than in the ND subjects throughout the night (P < 0.001). Glycogenolysis (GGL) fell and GNG rose, resulting in significantly higher (P < 0.001) rates of GNG at 4:00 and 7:00 am and significantly (P < 0.001) higher rates of GGL at 1:00, 4:00, and 7:00 am in T2D as compared with ND. Conclusions These data imply that optimal therapies for T2D for nocturnal/fasting glucose control should target not only the absolute rates of EGP but also the contributing pathways of GGL and GNG sequentially.

AbstractContextChronic pancreatitis (CP) is characterized by inflammation, fibrosis, and a loss of pancreatic acinar cells, which can result in exocrine and eventually endocrine deficiency. Pancreatitis has been reported to induce formation of new endocrine cells (neogenesis) in mice. Our recent data have implicated chromogranin A–positive hormone-negative (CPHN) cells as potential evidence of neogenesis in humans.ObjectiveWe sought to establish if CPHN cells were more abundant in CP in humans.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsWe investigated the frequency and distribution of CPHN cells and the expression of the chemokine C-X-C motif ligand 10 (CXCL10) and its receptor chemokine C-X-C motif receptor 3 in pancreas of nondiabetic subjects with CP.ResultsCPHN cell frequency in islets was increased sevenfold in CP [2.1% ± 0.67% vs 0.35% ± 0.09% CPHN cells in islets, CP vs nonpancreatitis (NP), P < 0.01], as were the CPHN cells found as scattered cells in the exocrine areas (17.4 ± 2.9 vs 4.2 ± 0.6, CP vs NP, P < 0.001). Polyhormonal endocrine cells were also increased in CP (2.7 ± 1.2 vs 0.1 ± 0.04, CP vs NP, % of polyhormonal cells of total endocrine cells, P < 0.01), as was expression of CXCL10 in α and β cells.ConclusionThere is increased islet endogenous expression of the inflammation marker CXCL10 in islets in the setting of nondiabetic CP and an increase in polyhormonal (insulin-glucagon expressing) cells. The increase in CPHN cells in CP, often in a lobular distribution, may indicate foci of attempted endocrine cell regeneration.

The amylin analog pramlintide delays gastric emptying in type I diabetics. The effects of multiple doses of pramlintide and the mechanism of action in non-amylin-deficient humans are unknown. We investigated the effects of pramlintide on gastrointestinal and colonic transit and on the plasma pancreatic polypeptide response to the meal in a parallel-group dose-response study with subjects randomized to placebo, or 30 or 60 μg (tid, sc) of pramlintide. Pramlintide delayed gastric emptying [half-time ( t½): 112 min (SE 8.7 min), 169 min (SE 12 min), or 177 min (SE 25 min) after placebo or 30- or 60-μg pramlintide treatment, respectively; P = 0.033]. Pramlintide did not significantly affect small bowel or colonic transit. Pancreatic polypeptide concentrations in the first postprandial hour were lower with pramlintide than with placebo ( P < 0.01 for drug effect). An inverse correlation was observed between mean pancreatic polypeptide concentrations in the first postprandial hour and gastric emptying t½[Spearman correlation coefficient ( Rs) = 0.48; P = 0.044]. Pramlintide at 30 and 60 μg delays gastric emptying in healthy humans without affecting small bowel or colonic transit. Vagal inhibition is a potential mechanism of the effects of pramlintide on gastric emptying.

Increased use of laxatives and constipation are more common among people with diabetes mellitus than matched nondiabetic people in the same community. The mechanism of constipation in diabetes is unclear. Acute hyperglycemia was previously reported to reduce the gastrocolonic response. Our aim was to determine the effects of acute hyperglycemia on the colon compliance and motor response to feeding and on the sensory function of the colon and rectum in healthy human subjects. Eleven healthy individuals were studied under conditions of hyperglycemia (mean blood glucose 280 ± 13 mg/dl) and euglycemia. We evaluated three parameters: 1) colonic motility and compliance by a multilumen manometry and barostatic balloon assembly in the descending colon (motility was studied during fasting and for 2 h postprandially); 2) perception of isobaric distensions of polyethylene balloons in the rectum and colon; and 3) rectal compliance. Initial tonic response to meal ingestion (0–5 min) was slightly lower during hyperglycemia ( P = 0.3). However, colonic tone, motility, compliance, and sensation, as well as rectal compliance and sensation, were not significantly different under the conditions of euglycemia and acute hyperglycemia. In healthy individuals, acute hyperglycemia does not significantly change colonic or rectal motor functions or the perception of mechanosensory stimuli in the colon or rectum compared with euglycemia. These results do not support the hypothesis that hyperglycemia abolishes the colonic response to feeding.

To determine whether type 2 diabetes mellitus alters systemic and regional free fatty acid ([3H]palmitate) metabolism, 14 nondiabetic (ND) and 14 type 2 diabetic (D) subjects underwent hyperinsulinemic-hyperglycemic (∼9.3 mM) clamps. The subjects were matched for age, body mass index, percent body fat, and fat-free mass. D subjects had more ( P < 0.05) visceral fat than ND. During somatostatin, replacement growth hormone, and glucagon infusions, insulin was infused to achieve moderate (∼75 pmol/l) and high (∼150 pmol/l) physiological insulin levels. D subjects had greater ( P < 0.02) systemic and regional (splanchnic and leg) palmitate release than ND subjects during both insulin infusion intervals. The relative contributions of splanchnic, leg, and nonsplanchnic upper body regions to systemic palmitate release did not differ between groups, although the last contributed the most (∼75%) to systemic palmitate release. Visceral fat area correlated with systemic palmitate flux ( r = 0.45, P < 0.03) during both insulin infusions. We conclude that type 2 diabetes is associated with a generalized impairment in insulin suppression of lipolysis compared with equally obese ND individuals.

Abstract Context Abnormal glucagon concentrations contribute to hyperglycemia, but the mechanisms of α-cell dysfunction in prediabetes are unclear. Objective We sought to determine the relative contributions of insulin secretion and action to α-cell dysfunction in nondiabetic participants across the spectrum of glucose tolerance. Design This was a cross-sectional study. A subset of participants (n = 120) was studied in the presence and absence of free fatty acid (FFA) elevation, achieved by infusion of Intralipid (Baxter Healthcare, Deerfield, IL) plus heparin, to cause insulin resistance. Setting An inpatient clinical research unit at an academic medical center. Participants A total of 310 nondiabetic persons participated in this study. Interventions Participants underwent a seven-sample oral glucose tolerance test. Subsequently, 120 participants were studied on two occasions. On one day, infusion of Intralipid plus heparin raised FFA. On the other day, participants received glycerol as a control. Main Outcome Measure(s) We examined the relationship of glucagon concentration with indices of insulin action after adjusting for the effects of age, sex, and weight. Subsequently, we sought to determine whether an acute decrease in insulin action, produced by FFA elevation, altered glucagon concentrations in nondiabetic participants. Results Fasting glucagon concentrations correlated positively with fasting insulin and C-peptide concentrations and inversely with insulin action. Fasting glucagon was not associated with any index of β-cell function in response to an oral challenge. As expected, FFA elevation decreased insulin action and also raised glucagon concentrations. Conclusions In nondiabetic participants, glucagon secretion was altered by changes in insulin action.

Aims To compare the performance of population‐based kinetics with that of directly measured C‐peptide kinetics when used to calculate β‐cell responsivity indices, and to study people with and without acute insulin resistance to ensure that population‐based kinetics apply to all conditions where β‐cell function is measured. Methods Somatostatin was used to inhibit endogenous insulin secretion in 56 people without diabetes. Subsequently, a C‐peptide bolus was administered and the changing concentrations were used to calculate individual kinetic measures of C‐peptide clearance. In addition, the participants were studied on 2 occasions in random order using an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). On one occasion, free fatty acid elevation, to cause insulin resistance, was achieved by infusion of Intralipid + heparin. The Disposition Index (DI) was then estimated by the oral minimal model using either population‐based or individual C‐peptide kinetics. Results There were marked differences in the exchange variables ( k 12 and k 21 ) of the model describing C‐peptide kinetics, but smaller differences in the fractional clearance; that is, the irreversible loss from the accessible compartment ( k 01 ), obtained from population‐based estimates compared with experimental measurement. Because it is predominantly influenced by k 01 , DI estimated using individual kinetics correlated well with DI estimated using population‐based kinetics. Conclusions These data support the use of population‐based measures of C‐peptide kinetics to estimate β‐cell function during an OGTT.