Fields, Julie A.

AbstractBackgroundUp to 30% of frontotemporal dementia (FTD) cases are due to known pathogenic mutations (f‐FTD). Little is known about the factors that predict who will choose to learn their results. Upcoming clinical trials in f‐FTD may require disclosure prior to enrollment, even before symptom onset, and thus characterizing this sample is important. Furthermore, understanding the mood impacts of genetic disclosure may guide genetic counseling practice.MethodF‐FTD participants (n=568) from families with a known pathogenic mutation (MAPT, C9orf72, GRN) were enrolled through the ARTFL/LEFFTDS Longitudinal FTD Study (ALLFTD) and provided the opportunity for disclosure. Independent‐sample t‐tests compared demographic and psychosocial factors between participants who did and did not receive their results. In participants who were asymptomatic at baseline and follow up (n=199,177 with follow‐up), linear mixed effects modeling was used to investigate pre‐ to post‐disclosure changes in the 15‐item Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS).ResultOf participants from families with a known pathogenic genetic mutation, 47% received genetic disclosure. Of the asymptomatic subset (n=386), 36% know their mutation status. Of these asymptomatic learners, 46% received disclosure through the study, and the remainder learned their genetic status prior to study enrollment. None of the analyzed demographic or psychosocial factors (i.e., sex, age, education, having children) differed between learners and non‐learners (p’s > 0.05). In the longitudinal analysis of asymptomatic participants, learners showed a pre‐ to post‐increase of 0.31 GDS points/year (95%CI: ‐0.08, 0.69, p = 0.12), whereas non‐learners showed a slight decline (‐0.15 points/year, 95%CI: ‐0.36, 0.06, p = 0.16). This difference between slopes was statistically significant (0.46, 95%CI: 0.02, 0.89, p=0.04) but represents a small clinical effect. In asymptomatic learners, slopes did not differ based on mutation status (0.28, 95%CI: ‐0.66, 1.20, p=0.55). Conclusions were based on the estimates and full range of confidence intervals.ConclusionThe majority of asymptomatic research participants do not know their genetic status, which will be a consideration for clinical trials that require disclosure. No considered demographic factors were strongly associated with the decision to receive disclosure. The findings suggest that disclosure in asymptomatic participants has minimal impact on depressive symptoms regardless of genetic results.

AbstractBackgroundCaregiving for persons with dementia negatively impacts physical and mental health, including increased risk for chronic loneliness and isolation. This Phase I study aimed to recruit former and current dementia caregivers as engaged partners in the design of a unique, technology‐assisted pairing platform to match caregivers to one another for meaningful connection and support based on characteristics chosen by the caregivers themselves.MethodWe recruited thirty‐two caregivers to participate in two semi‐structured focus groups (audio recorded for qualitative analyses) and complete a survey to understand the characteristics desired in another caregiver for the purpose of emotional support. Participants interacted with a website prototype on their personal device and completed a user experience feedback form. An iterative process was used to design the website and matching questionnaire allowing participants to validate preferences and concerns. Website analytics were captured (e.g. time to answer each question, total time spent on the website).ResultThe efforts culminated in a website ‘look and feel’ that addressed the preferences and criticisms of study participants. Figure 1 shows the home page slider inviting caregivers to join (images 1‐3) and describes the matching process (4); the caregiver answers up to 34 questions to create a profile (5‐7) and the website provides a list of caregivers that best match criteria (8). Overall, 87% of study participants rated a high level of comfort with completing the personal profile questions; 82% felt confident the questions asked would lead to a good match. An algorithm to match caregivers was created using the profile questions which asked participants to self‐select and then rank the characteristics of highest importance. Good and poor matches are scored by the algorithm, with 1 being a “perfect” match (Figure 2). In the current cohort, each participant had at least one match that scored 0.708 or higher.ConclusionOur study established interest in a technology assisted peer‐to‐peer caregiver matching program that is a potential low‐cost, high‐impact resource. The study resulted in a set of matching characteristics and an algorithm prototype within a user influenced website and will be further tested in Phase 2. Research supported from NIA of the NIH.

AbstractBackgroundFrontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) refers to a group of neurodegenerative conditions, affecting the frontal and/or temporal lobes. Ongoing research has provided insight into developing clinical trials for FTLD and key clinical measures such as structural MRI. To inform clinical trial design and optimize participation, it is imperative to explore facilitators and barriers for potential candidates.ObjectiveThe objective of this study is to explore facilitators and barriers to participating in future clinical trials for FTLD.MethodsAdvancing Research and Treatment for Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration (ARTFL) and Longitudinal Evaluation of Familial Frontotemporal Dementia Subjects (LEFFTDS) are observational studies focused on characterizing FTLD syndromes in preparation for clinical trials. The 584 participants enrolled across 18 research sites in the United States and Canada completed a survey assessing interest in clinical trial participation.Results29% of respondents self‐reported as patients (63±10 years), 26% self‐reported as caregivers answering on behalf of patients (65±10 years), and 45% self‐reported as healthy but at risk for FTLD (48±14 years). Travel reimbursement was the most common factor reported to positively influence participation (≧66%), with the healthy but at risk group showing the strongest endorsement (83%). Cost and time involved in travel were possible barriers for about half of the patients (48%) and healthy but at risk respondents (53%). The respondents value receiving feedback on the study findings (≧80%) and being informed of their individual disease progression (≧75%). Particularly, keeping participation confidential was very important for the healthy but at risk group (62%). In regard to research assessments, most participants demonstrated a high interest in physical and neurological exams at a research center (≧87%) whereas only half were interested in doing more invasive procedures such as the lumbar puncture (≧52%). Overall, respondents showed a positive attitude and support for research participation (≧77%) and trusted that their health information would remain confidential in a clinical trial (≧53%).ConclusionsFavorable attitudes and interest towards medical research exist among participants. To optimize participation, clinical trials should allocate funding for travel and involve participants in feedback about study results and their disease progression. Alternatives to invasive assessments may increase participation.

AbstractBackgroundIsolated REM Sleep Behavior Disorder (iRBD) patients are known to be at high risk for developing an overt synucleinopathy – particularly Dementia with Lewy Bodies (DLB) and Parkinson’s Disease (PD). Reduced nigrostriatal uptake on 123I‐FP‐CIT SPECT reflects dopamine deficiency, which is common in the overt synucleinopathies. We sought to assess how 123I‐FP‐CIT SPECT imaging in iRBD changes longitudinally and whether an abnormal 123I‐FP‐CIT SPECT scan precedes and predicts future transition to an overt synucleinopathy.MethodParticipants with polysomnography‐confirmed iRBD from the Mayo Clinic Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center database +/‐ North American Prodromal Synucleinopathy (NAPS) Consortium who had two or more longitudinal 123I‐FP‐CIT SPECT scans and been followed prospectively for at least 24 months were included in this analysis. Striatonigral dopamine transporter uptake was evaluated semi‐quantitatively with 123I‐FP‐CIT SPECT using DaTQUANT software (GE Healthcare) to calculate z‐scores of putamen uptake.ResultThirty‐five iRBD participants (86% male) were evaluated prospectively (mean 62.5 ± 19.4 months) and underwent two or more 123I‐FP‐CIT SPECT scans at a minimum of 12 months intervals. Thirteen participants (37%) developed an overt synucleinopathy (11 DLB and 2 PD; phenoconverters) and 22 participants (63%) remained as iRBD (stable iRBD). Phenoconverters were older (mean 70.8 ± 7.0 vs 63.4 ± 6.0 years old) and had more negative DaTQUANT putamen z‐scores (mean ‐1.68 ± 1.42 vs ‐0.33 ± 1.52) than stable iRBD participants at baseline. Among phenoconverters, nine participants (69%) had one or more 123I‐FP‐CIT SPECT scans with DaTQUANT putamen z‐score of <‐2.0 prior to phenoconversion, and mean time from initial DaTQUANT putamen z‐score of <‐2.0 to phenoconversion was 36.8 ± 28.7 months. In stable RBD participants, eight participants (36%) showed a decline in DaTQUANT putamen z‐score of >1 between the most recent and the baseline scan, and four participants (18%) presented DaTQUANT putamen z‐score of <‐2.0 at the most recent scan.ConclusionThese findings suggest that a decline in putamen uptake on 123I‐FP‐CIT SPECT in iRBD serves as a predictor and a surrogate biomarker for progression of iRBD to an overt synucleinopathy.

AbstractBackgroundMayo Test Drive (MTD): Test Development through Rapid Iteration, Validation and Expansion, is a web‐based platform for remote self‐administered assessment for novel (Stricker Learning Span; SLS) and open access (Symbols Test) cognitive measures. The SLS is a computer adaptive word‐list memory test that matches test difficulty to user performance. The SLS visually presents words for learning exposures and 4‐choice recognition to test encoding across 5 trials. Symbols is a measure of processing speed being used in many remote assessment studies and typically employs a burst design; in MTD participants complete 4 trials (12‐items each). We examine validity and reliability of the SLS and Symbols via MTD.MethodForty‐five women enrolled in an ongoing study of the Sex‐Specific Effects of Endocrine Disruption on Aging and Alzheimer’s Disease were recruited via email or phone. The Auditory Verbal Learning Test (AVLT) and Digit Symbol Coding (Coding), administered in person within the past 2 years (Mean=11 months), were used to establish construct validity. Participants (91.3% White, Mean age=66.2 years, Mean education=15.3 years) were emailed a link to complete the SLS and Symbols remotely at their convenience on their own device and emailed to repeat testing after approximately 1 week. Pearson correlations (n=45) and 2‐way mixed intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC; n=42) determined construct validity and test‐retest reliability, respectively. Significance was set at p<.05.ResultAcross all test sessions initiated, 97% were successfully completed. Most were completed at home (92.6%; vs. at work or in a public space), and device type varied (48% smartphone, 2% tablet, 50% PC). Median session completion time was 15 minutes. SLS learning scores (max span, total correct trials 1‐5) significantly correlated with AVLT 1‐5 total (r’s .37‐.39) and AVLT Trial 5 (r’s .51‐.52). SLS delay significantly correlated with AVLT delay (r=0.45) and recognition (r=0.61). Symbols time‐based scores averaged across trials were significantly correlated with Coding (r’s=‐.48‐(‐).50). Test‐retest reliabilities across 2 sessions were high for SLS (ICC’s=.80‐.88) and Symbols (ICC’s=.81‐.82).ConclusionSLS and Symbols are valid and reliable self‐administered remote tests in older females. Future work will examine effects of Alzheimer’s disease neuroimaging biomarkers and risk factors on these tests.

AbstractBackgroundClinicopathologic studies reported that the NACC Uniform Dataset (UDS) 2.0 core measures do not adequately differentiate patients who ultimately died of Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration (FTLD) from Alzheimer’s disease (AD). The FTLD Module (FTLD‐MOD) assesses core features of behavioral variant FTD (bvFTD) and primary progressive aphasia (PPA). Initial investigations suggest that the FTLD‐MOD improves discrimination between biomarker‐supported bvFTD and typical late‐onset AD, and that clinically diagnosed PPA participants performed worse than bvFTD on all FTLD‐MOD language tasks. However, the utility of these measures in the differential diagnosis of AD vs. major FTLD syndromes in young‐onset cases remains underexplored.MethodWe examined participants with age‐of‐onset < 65 years in the ARTFL‐LEFFTDS Longitudinal Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration (ALLFTD) consortium and the Longitudinal Early Onset AD Study (LEADS). 115 bvFTD, 53 semantic variant PPA (svPPA), 29 non‐fluent variant PPA (nfvPPA) and 124 early‐onset AD (eoAD) cases completed the UDS3 and FLTD‐MOD. Linear regression analyses measured group differences in FLTD‐MOD raw scores and UDS3 neuropsychological z‐scores after accounting for group differences in demographic variables and global severity ratings. Alpha was 0.05 with Bonferroni corrections.ResultsParticipants with eoAD demonstrated the most impaired scores on tasks of attention, working memory, and processing speed, including Digit Span Backward (z=‐1.87) and Trails A (z=‐3.82). They also demonstrated difficulty on FTLD‐MOD language tasks with a working memory requirement (sentence repetition raw=3.68/5) and, as expected, memory (story delayed recall z=‐2.4z). svPPA performed the worst on FTLD‐MOD and UDS3 tasks assessing semantic memory, especially naming (all p’s ≤ 0.03). nfvPPA performed worst on sentence reading, sentence repetition, and letter fluency (all p’s ≤ 0.02). Consistent with previous work, these measures differentiate between bvFTD and PPA variants. However, relative to eoAD, bvFTD was equivalent (Trails B: bvFTDz=‐3.8, eoADz=‐3.82; p=0.12) or outperformed (sentence repetition: bvFTD=4.22/5, eoAD=3.68/5; p<0.001) the eoAD group on all tasks.ConclusionsWe undertook this analysis to compare performance of the major young‐onset sporadic AD and FTLD clinical syndromes in the ALLFTD and LEADS studies. Results demonstrate relatively distinct cognitive profiles among eoAD, svPPA, and nfvPPA, but not in bvFTD. Future analyses will include FTLD‐MOD behavioral symptom questionnaires to assess their utility in differentiating bvFTD.

AbstractBackgroundImpaired olfaction has been associated with neurodegenerative diseases and may be a useful tool to aid in diagnosis or track disease progression. We sought to compare olfaction in participants with the clinical diagnoses of idiopathic REM sleep behavior disorder (RBD), dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB), or Alzheimer’s disease dementia (AD).MethodParticipants from the Mayo Clinic Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center database who had a diagnosis of RBD (n=27, 56% male), DLB (n=51, 84% male), or AD (n=83, 47% male), and were given the Brief Smell Identification Test (B‐SIT) were included in this analysis. The B‐SIT score was calculated as the sum of correct responses (12 possible). Scores were categorized as reflecting anosmia (<6), hyposmia (6‐10), and normal olfactory function (>10). All participants underwent clinical and neuropsychological evaluations.ResultGlobal cognition was lower in AD and DLB than RBD (MMSE 21.5 ±4.9 in AD, 23.3 ±4.3 in DLB, 28.8 ± 1.2 in RBD; p <0.001). The mean B‐SIT total score was significantly lower for DLB (4.5 ± 3.1) compared to RBD (7.5 ± 3.0) or AD (7.0 ± 2.7) (p<0.001) using an ANOVA F‐test. Anosmia was present in 76% of DLB, which compared to 32% in RBD, and 32% in AD (p=0.9). Hyposmia was present in 18% of DLB, 47% of RBD, and 52% of AD (p=ns). Of 22 patients with normal olfaction, X% were DLB, X% RBD, and X% AD (p=X). An item analysis illustrated that participants with DLB were less likely to identify Menthol, Clove, Strawberry, Smoke, and Soap than those with RBD and AD. On serial examination, 12 RBD (60%) patients’ B‐SIT score decreased by at least one point at their most recent visit compared to their baseline visit.ConclusionThese findings suggest that impaired olfactory function is frequent in RBD, DLB and AD, with olfaction being worst in DLB in this cohort. Olfaction was declining in most of those with RBD who underwent serial evaluations. Further analyses are needed to determine if any scents are more sensitive to phenotype, progression, and degree of cognitive impairment. Supported by: NIH grants AG016574, NS100620, AG056639, AG015866

AbstractBackgroundNeocortical tau can be present in over half of patients with Lewy body disease at autopsy, and may influence the timing of when a diagnosis of Dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) can be made. We examined whether the core features, onset age and latency of probable DLB diagnosis differ by pathological subgroups.MethodAll patients (n=176) met clinical criteria for probable DLB, underwent autopsy and were classified as transitional or diffuse Lewy body disease (TLBD, DLBD). The TLBD and DLBD groups were further subdivided based on the absence of neocortical tangles represented by a low (L) Braak NFT stage of 0‐III or by the presence of neocortical tangles represented by a high (H) Braak NFT stage of IV‐VI. Onset age and latency from cognitive symptom onset to probable DLB were compared for TLBD‐L (n=30), DLBD‐L (n=47), DLBD‐H (n=78) and TLBD‐H (n=21).ResultThe TLBD‐H group met criteria for DLB at an older age (median 76 years) compared to TLBD‐L, DLBD‐L or DLBD‐H groups (median age 70 years, p<0.001). The latency to probable DLB from cognitive onset was shortest for TLBD‐L and DLBD‐L (median < 1 year), which was shorter than DLBD‐H (median 2 years; p=0.016), each of which were shorter than TLBD‐H (median 7.3 years; p<0.001). RBD was more common in men (79% men vs. 40% women, p<0.001) and in patients without neocortical tangles (86% vs. 57%, p<0.001). Patients with RBD met criteria for probable DLB at a younger age than those without a history of RBD (median 69 years vs. 76 years, p<0.001). Men had a shorter latency to probable DLB than women (median 1.0 year vs. 2.8 years, p<0.01), but this was related to RBD status that was more common in men.ConclusionPresence of RBD in both sexes led to a younger onset age and shorter latency to diagnosis of probable DLB. Patients with more widespread tau relative to α‐synuclein pathology (TLBD‐H) were older when probable DLB was diagnosed compared to those with so‐called pure Lewy body disease (TLBD‐L, DLBD‐L) or those with diffuse α‐synuclein and tau pathology (DLBD‐H).

AbstractBackgroundBlack/African Americans (B/AA) are nearly twice as likely as White/European Americans (W/EA) to have Alzheimer’s or other dementias and are more likely to provide care for persons with dementia (PwD). Evidence indicates that B/AA desire having someone to talk with who understands their caregiving challenges, yet are less likely than W/EA to ask for support. Further, community resources supporting caregivers’ ability to maintain health and well‐being developed with input from B/AA are lacking. We aimed to determine how a technology‐assisted caregiver matching service designed with user input could address diverse caregiver needs.MethodsFor this Phase I project, 32 caregivers of PwD (31% B/AA) participated in semi‐structured focus groups and completed surveys to provide input regarding characteristics deemed valuable in someone they would choose to be connected with for emotional support. Through an iterative process as new information emerged, a web‐based prototype and matching algorithm were developed.ResultsAge and sex distribution were similar between B/AA and W/EA (71 and 68 yrs; 90% and 86%, respectively). W/EA were most likely caring for a spouse/significant other (73%) whereas B/AA were caring for spouse/significant other (30%), a parent (30%;18% W/EA), a sibling (10%; 0% W/EA), or other (30%; 9%W/EA). Level of emotional support was rated “poor” (50% B/AA, 18% W/EA); “average” (0% B/AA, 14% W/EA); “good” (40% B/AA, 41% W/EA); and “excellent” (10%, 27% W/EA). Characteristics B/AA deemed “very important” or “absolutely essential” for a supportive match included living in close proximity, same ethnicity, similar lifestyle, and common values. Alternatively, W/EA selected similar age, living in close proximity, same sex, similar lifestyle, common values and interests, having the same caregiving relationship, and having the same diagnosis in their PwD (see chart).ConclusionIn this cohort, B/AA reported poorer levels of emotional support than W/EA. B/AA were equally likely to be supporting a spouse/significant other as a parent or other acquaintance, whereas W/EA provided support primarily for a spouse/significant other. Characteristics B/AA and W/EA consider important in a supportive caregiver match show important differences that should be considered when optimizing caregiving resources. Phase II will explore further in a much larger sample.

Abstract Study Objectives To analyze cognitive deficits leading to unsafe driving in patients with REM Sleep Behavior Disorder (RBD), strongly associated with cognitive impairment and synucleinopathy-related neurodegeneration. Methods Twenty isolated RBD (iRBD), 10 symptomatic RBD (sRBD), and 20 age- and education-matched controls participated in a prospective case-control driving simulation study. Group mean differences were compared with correlations between cognitive and driving safety measures. Results iRBD and sRBD patients were more cognitively impaired than controls in global neurocognitive functioning, processing speeds, visuospatial attention, and distractibility (p &lt; .05). sRBD patients drove slower with more collisions than iRBD patients and controls (p &lt; .05), required more warnings, and had greater difficulty following and matching speed of a lead car during simulated car-following tasks (p &lt; .05). Driving safety measures were similar between iRBD patients and controls. Slower psychomotor speed correlated with more off-road accidents (r = 0.65) while processing speed (−0.88), executive function (−0.90), and visuospatial impairment (0.74) correlated with safety warnings in sRBD patients. Slower stimulus recognition was associated with more signal-light (0.64) and stop-sign (0.56) infractions in iRBD patients. Conclusions iRBD and sRBD patients have greater selective cognitive impairments than controls, particularly visuospatial abilities and processing speed. sRBD patients exhibited unsafe driving behaviors, associated with processing speed, visuospatial awareness, and attentional impairments. Our results suggest that iRBD patients have similar driving-simulator performance as healthy controls but that driving capabilities regress as RBD progresses to symptomatic RBD with overt signs of cognitive, autonomic, and motor impairment. Longitudinal studies with serial driving simulator evaluations and objective on-road driving performance are needed.