Donato, Leslie J.

Abstract Introduction Analytical outliers occur with most troponin assays and can adversely affect patient management. We developed a system to detect analytical outliers for the Roche Troponin T (cTnT) Gen 5 assay using repeat analysis of samples manifesting changing values over 2 to 6 hours. Methods In our ED practice, troponins are collected at baseline, 2 hours, and at times at 6 hours in plasma separator tubes and processed on the Roche Cobas e411 (Indianapolis, IN). When troponin values change by ≥10 ng/L or ≤10 ng/L in the 2- or 6-hour sample compared to baseline, the sample that produced the result is repeated. If initial and repeat values differ by > ±5 ng/L (cTnT <100 ng/L) or ±5% (cTnT ≥100 ng/L), the initial value is deemed to be an analytical outlier. Outliers are confirmed by a third measurement. Results Since March 2018, 19 of 17,154 (0.11%) troponin samples analyzed have been labeled outliers. Outliers were falsely elevated in 14 cases and falsely decreased in 5. Mean (range) of initial cTnT values for outliers was 39 ng/L (18-621 ng/L), with only one initial value >100 ng/L. All changes could affect analysis of change over time. Eleven of 19 outliers were outside gender-specific reference interval on both samples and thus did not cause a change from abnormal to normal. Repeat measurements on 8 of 19 outliers were within the URL, which may have greater clinical consequences. Conclusions Repeat analysis upon observation of changing values allows detection of analytical outliers in real time, prior to reporting results. These outliers are almost always clinically significant in terms of interpretation of changing values and at times change patients from above to below the URL. If we tested more than just changing samples, we might detect still more outliers.

SummaryBackgroundBiomarkers in irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) may guide targeted therapy in this multifactorial disease. It has been suggested that 75% accuracy and cost <$500 categorise biomarkers as cost‐effective.AimTo identify differences in faecal bile acids, faecal fat and fasting serum C4 (7a‐hydroxy‐4‐cholesten‐3‐one) and fibroblast growth factor 19 (FGF19) among patients with IBS‐D, IBS‐C and healthy controls and to determine accurate, cost‐effective biomarkers for clinically relevant diarrhoea and constipation.MethodsWe assessed daily stool frequency and consistency (Bristol Stool Form Scale) from validated bowel diaries, 48 hours total and individual faecal bile acids, 48 hours faecal fat and weight, fasting serum C4 and FGF19, and colonic transit by scintigraphy from healthy volunteers (HV) and patients with IBS‐D and IBS‐C (Rome III criteria). We utilised multivariate logistic regression to determine biomarkers of clinically significant diarrhoea or constipation based on stool frequency, consistency and weight.ResultsAmong the 126 HV (44M/82F, 37.5 ± 10.9 years [SD]), 64 IBS‐D (5M/59F, 41.9 ± 12.2 years), and 30 IBS‐C (0M/30F, 44.6 ± 10 years) patients, there were significant differences between all groups in stool weight, frequency, and consistency; in addition, there were differences in colonic transit at 48 hours, faecal fat, and total and individual faecal bile acids between IBS‐D and IBS‐C. Reduced total and primary faecal bile acids and increased faecal lithocholic acid were significant predictors of decreased faecal weight, frequency and consistency with AUC > 0.82 (sensitivity >76%, specificity >72%). Total and primary faecal bile acids and faecal fat were significant predictors of increased stool weight, frequency and consistency with AUC > 0.71 (sensitivity >55%, specificity >74%).The faecal parameters had a 11.5 positive likelihood ratio in predicting elevated faecal weight.ConclusionsFaecal bile acids and faecal fat are cost‐effective and accurate biomarkers associated with significant bowel dysfunction among IBS‐D and IBS‐C patients.

Although U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approved and CLIA-waived point-of-care (POC) molecular systems are being implemented in routine clinical practice, instrument reliability, test performance in the hands of end users, and the potential for environmental contamination resulting from use of POC molecular systems have not been extensively evaluated.

Objective— Ceramides are sphingolipids involved with cellular signaling. Synthesis of ceramides occurs in all tissues. Ceramides accumulate within tissues and the blood plasma during metabolic dysfunction, dyslipidemia, and inflammation. Elevations of ceramides are predictive of cardiovascular mortality. We sought to verify the utility of plasma concentrations of 4 ceramides: N-palmitoyl-sphingosine [Cer(16:0)], N-stearoyl-sphingosine [Cer(18:0)], N-nervonoyl-sphingosine [Cer(24:1)], and N-lignoceroyl-sphingosine [Cer(24:0)] in predicting major adverse cardiovascular events in a diverse patient population referred for coronary angiography. Approach and Results— Plasma ceramides were measured in 495 participants before nonurgent coronary angiography. Coronary artery disease, defined as >50% stenosis in ≥1 coronary artery, was identified 265 (54%) cases. Ceramides were not significantly associated with coronary artery disease. Patients were followed for a combined primary end point of myocardial infarction, percutaneous intervention, coronary artery bypass, stroke, or death within 4 years. Ceramides were significantly predictive of outcomes after adjusting for age, sex, body mass index, hypertension, smoking, LDL (low-density lipoprotein) cholesterol, HDL (high-density lipoprotein) cholesterol, triglycerides, serum glucose, and family history of coronary artery disease. The fully adjusted per SD hazard ratios (95% confidence interval) were 1.50 (1.16–1.93) for Cer(16:0), 1.42 (1.11–1.83) for Cer(18:0), 1.43 (1.08–1.89) for Cer(24:1), and 1.58 (1.22–2.04) for the ceramide risk score. Conclusions— Elevated plasma concentrations of ceramides are independently associated with major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with and without coronary artery disease.

SummaryBackgroundThe serum biomarkers, elevated 7αC4 (C4) and decreased FGF19, have been proposed as screening tests for bile acid diarrhoea.AimTo analyse prevalence, specificity and reproducibility of fasting C4 and FGF19 in identifying bile acid diarrhoea in patients with irritable bowel syndrome with predominant diarrhoea or functional diarrhoea (summarised as IBS‐D).MethodsWe prospectively studied fasting serum C4 and FGF19 in 101 IBS‐D patients; we reviewed data from 37 of the 101 patients with prior fasting serum C4 and FGF19 and from 30 of the 101 patients with prior faecal bile acids per 48 hours. We compared results with normal values (C4 ≥52.5 ng/mL [n=184], FGF‐19 ≤61.7 pg/mL [n=50]). We used Spearman correlation and Bland‐Altman plots to appraise reproducibility.ResultsAmong the 101 patients, there was a negative correlation between serum C4 and FGF19 (Rs=−.342, P=.0005). Bile acid diarrhoea was diagnosed in 10 patients based on elevated serum C4 levels (mean 23.5±23.1 [SD] ng/mL) and 21 patients based on decreased FGF19 levels (121.6±84.2 pg/mL). With replicate tests in patients with stable IBS‐D, 78% of C4 and 70% of FGF19 measurements remained concordant, with 3% and 11% respectively consistently positive for bile acid diarrhoea in the 101 patients. Compared to 48 hours faecal bile acids, specificity for C4 and FGF19 was 83% and 78%, respectively. Bland‐Altman plots demonstrated greater reliability of C4 than FGF19.ConclusionsAmong 101 patents with IBS‐D, fasting FGF19 and C4 levels had good specificity and negative predictive value, suggesting utility as screening tests to exclude bile acid diarrhoea.

Abstract Background The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of a glucose meter with surgical patients under general anesthesia in the operating room. Methods Glucose measurements were performed intraoperatively on 368 paired capillary and arterial whole blood samples using a Nova StatStrip (Nova Biomedical, USA) glucose meter and compared with 368 reference arterial whole blood glucose measurements by blood gas analyzer in 196 patients. Primary outcomes were median bias (meter minus reference), percentage of glucose meter samples meeting accuracy criteria for subcutaneous insulin dosing as defined by Parkes error grid analysis for type 1 diabetes mellitus, and accuracy criteria for intravenous insulin infusion as defined by Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines. Time under anesthesia, patient position, diabetes status, and other variables were studied to determine whether any affected glucose meter bias. Results Median bias (interquartile range) was −4 mg/dl (−9 to 0 mg/dl), which did not differ from median arterial meter bias of −5 mg/dl (−9 to −1 mg/dl; P = 0.32). All of the capillary and arterial glucose meter values met acceptability criteria for subcutaneous insulin dosing, whereas only 89% (327 of 368) of capillary and 93% (344 of 368) arterial glucose meter values met accuracy criteria for intravenous insulin infusion. Time, patient position, and diabetes status were not associated with meter bias. Conclusions Capillary and arterial blood glucose measured using the glucose meter are acceptable for intraoperative subcutaneous insulin dosing. Whole blood glucose on the meter did not meet accuracy guidelines established specifically for more intensive ( e.g. , intravenous insulin) glycemic control in the acute care environment.