Yoon, Harry H.

AbstractImmune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), as a novel class of anticancer therapy, can be more efficacious and less toxic than chemotherapy, but their clinical success is confined to certain tumor types. Elucidating their targets, mechanisms and scope of action, and potential synergism with chemotherapy and/or targeted therapies are critical to widen their clinical indications. Treatment response to an ICI targeting programmed death‐1 (anti‐PD‐1) is sought to be understood here by conducting a preplanned correlative analysis of a phase II clinical trial in patients with small bowel adenocarcinoma (SBA). The cytolytic capacity of circulating immune cells in cancer patients using a novel ex vivo cytotoxicity assay is evaluated, and the utility of circulating biomarkers is investigated to predict and monitor the treatment effect of anti‐PD‐1. Baseline expression of Bim and NKG7 and upregulation of CX3CR1 in circulating T cells are associated with the clinical benefit of anti‐PD‐1 in patients with SBA. Overall, these findings suggest that the frequency and cytolytic capacity of circulating, effector immune cells may differentiate clinical response to ICIs, providing a strong rationale to support immune monitoring using patient peripheral blood.

Gastric cancer is the third leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Over 95% of gastric cancers are adenocarcinomas, which are typically classified based on anatomic location and histologic type. Gastric cancer generally carries a poor prognosis because it is often diagnosed at an advanced stage. Systemic therapy can provide palliation, improved survival, and enhanced quality of life in patients with locally advanced or metastatic disease. The implementation of biomarker testing, especially analysis of HER2 status, microsatellite instability (MSI) status, and the expression of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), has had a significant impact on clinical practice and patient care. Targeted therapies including trastuzumab, nivolumab, and pembrolizumab have produced encouraging results in clinical trials for the treatment of patients with locally advanced or metastatic disease. Palliative management, which may include systemic therapy, chemoradiation, and/or best supportive care, is recommended for all patients with unresectable or metastatic cancer. Multidisciplinary team management is essential for all patients with localized gastric cancer. This selection from the NCCN Guidelines for Gastric Cancer focuses on the management of unresectable locally advanced, recurrent, or metastatic disease.

344 Background: ICI with anti-PD-1 therapy was approved by the US FDA as 1st/2nd-line treatment of advanced GEC regardless of PD-L1 status. It is argued that patients (pts) with PD-L1-low GEC do not benefit from ICI. To avoid spurious exclusion of pts, we systematically reviewed phase 3 trials to assess the magnitude and consistency of PD-L1 to predict benefit from ICI. We also examined other potential predictive factors to understand their magnitude and consistency in comparison with PD-L1 status. Methods: MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central Register were searched for all randomized clinical trials (RCT; 2000-2021) in advanced GEC comparing ICI, alone or with chemotherapy, vs standard of care (SOC). The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Study screening, data abstraction, and bias assessment were done independently by two reviewers per PRISMA guidelines. The mean HR for ICI vs SOC was calculated by random effects model. The predictive value of a factor was quantified using relative magnitude and consistency (table). Results: 14 RCTs at low risk of bias were included (N = 9,210 pts; KN62, CM649, CM648, ESCORT1st, KN590, ATT4, JAV100, KN181, KN61, ATT3, ESCORT, RATIONALE302, JAV300, ATT2). 6 trials were 1st-line, 8 were after 1st-line. Treatment comparisons were ICI + chemo vs chemo (6 trials), ICI vs chemo (9 trials), and ICI vs placebo (1 trial). ICI was always anti-PD-1/-L1 (1 trial also had anti-CTLA-4). Table shows primary results. To enable head to head comparisons, subgroup analyses of trials containing both levels of a factor or having similar design were done and generally yielded consistent results. Conclusions: PD-L1 CPS is the strongest predictive biomarker, after MSI, for OS benefit from ICI-containing therapy vs SOC. Additional research on gender is warranted.[Table: see text]

AbstractThrough our involvement in KEYNOTE‐059, we unexpectedly observed durable responses in two patients with metastatic gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (mGEA) who received ramucirumab (anti‐VEGFR‐2)/paclitaxel after immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI). To assess the reproducibility of this observation, we piloted an approach to administer ramucirumab/paclitaxel after ICI in more patients, and explored changes in the immune microenvironment. Nineteen consecutive patients with mGEA received ICI followed by ramucirumab/paclitaxel. Most (95%) did not respond to ICI, yet after irRECIST‐defined progression on ICI, all patients experienced tumor size reduction on ramucirumab/paclitaxel. The objective response rate (ORR) and progression‐free survival (PFS) on ramucirumab/paclitaxel after ICI were higher than on the last chemotherapy before ICI in the same group of patients (ORR, 58.8% vs 11.8%; PFS 12.2 vs 3.0 months; respectively). Paired tumor biopsies examined by imaging mass cytometry showed a median 5.5‐fold (range 4‐121) lower frequency of immunosuppressive forkhead box P3+ regulatory T cells with relatively preserved CD8+ T cells, post‐treatment versus pre‐treatment (n = 5 pairs). We then compared the outcomes of these 19 patients with a separate group who received ramucirumab/paclitaxel without preceding ICI (n = 68). Median overall survival on ramucirumab/paclitaxel was longer with (vs without) immediately preceding ICI (14.8 vs 7.4 months) including after multivariate analysis, as was PFS. In our small clinical series, outcomes appeared improved on anti‐VEGFR‐2/paclitaxel treatment when preceded by ICI, in association with alterations in the immune microenvironment. However, further investigation is needed to determine the generalizability of these data. Prospective clinical trials to evaluate sequential treatment with ICI followed by anti‐VEGF(R)/taxane are underway.

TPS264 Background: Trastuzumab (T), a monoclonal antibody (mAb) targeting HER2, is standard of care 1st-line therapy for advanced HER2+ GEJ/GC patients. M, an investigational Fc-engineered anti-HER2 mAb, targets the same HER2 epitope but with higher affinity for both 158V (high binding) and 158F (low binding) alleles of activating Fc receptor CD16A. Data suggest margetuximab coordinately enhances both innate and adaptive immunity, including antigen-specific T-cell responses to HER2. PD-1 and LAG-3 are T-cell checkpoint molecules that suppress T-cell function. Retifanlimab (also known as MGA012 or INCMGA00012) is a humanized, hinge-stabilized, IgG4 Κ anti-PD-1 mAb blocking binding of PD-L1 or PD-L2 to PD-1. Tebotelimab (also known as MGD013) is a humanized Fc-bearing bispecific tetravalent DART® protein that binds to both PD-1 and LAG-3, inhibiting their respective ligand binding. We previously reported that a CTX-free regimen of M+PD-1 blockade was well tolerated in GEJ/GC patients, and induced a 44% objective response rate (ORR) in a double-positive biomarker population. This was 2- to 3-fold greater than in historical controls with checkpoint inhibitors alone. This registration-directed trial assesses efficacy, safety, and tolerability of M+checkpoint inhibition ± CTX in metastatic/locally advanced, treatment-naïve, HER2+ GEJ/GC patients. Methods: This is a 2-cohort, adaptive open-label phase 2/3 study (NCT04082364). The first single arm, CTX-free cohort A, evaluates M+retifanlimab in HER2+ (immunohistochemistry [IHC] 3+) and PD-L1+ (excluding microsatellite instability high) patients. After 40 patients are evaluated for response/safety, additional patients will be enrolled if the threshold for continuation is met. In randomized cohort B, HER2+ (IHC 3+ or 2+/fluorescent in situ hybridization+) patients are enrolled irrespective of PD-L1 status. Part 1 of cohort B randomizes patients to 1 of 4 arms (50 patients each): control arm (T+CTX) or 1 of 3 experimental arms (M+CTX; M+CTX+retifanlimab; M+CTX+tebotelimab). CTX is investigator’s choice XELOX or mFOLFOX-6. Part 2 of cohort B consists of control (T+CTX) vs 1 experimental arm (M+CTX) + either retifanlimab or tebotelimab, depending on results from part 1; with 250 patients each. The primary efficacy endpoint for cohort A (both parts) is ORR per RECIST 1.1; for cohort B part 2 it is overall survival. Clinical trial information: NCT04082364.

239 Background: After trastuzumab (T) approval for advanced HER2-positive E/GEJ-AC, HER2 testing has increased in patients (pts) with resectable disease. Neoadjuvant carboplatin/paclitaxel chemoradiation (nCP-CRT) is a common therapy approach. We performed the largest evaluation, to our knowledge, of the prognostic impact of HER2 in E/GEJ-AC pts treated with nCP-CRT. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed medical records of all trimodality-eligible (T2+ or N+) pts with E/GEJ-AC who started nCP-CRT (usually 50.4 Gy) with planned surgery at Mayo Clinic (2014-2019). HER2 was tested using standard criteria for HER2 positivity (ie, immunohistochemistry 3+ or amplification by in situ hybridization). Clinicopathologic data and time to recurrence (TTR), disease free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), survival after recurrence (SAR), and pathologic complete response (pCR – ie, no residual tumor in primary or nodes) were collected. Kaplan Meier and multivariate Cox analysis were used. Results: Of 161 consecutive eligible pts, HER2 status was available in 107 pts (HER2-positive n=26, HER2-negative n=81) of whom n=82 had surgery and n=19 had pCR. Most tumors were clinical T3 (80%) or N+ (81%), histologic grade 3 of 3 (62%). HER2 positivity was significantly associated with lower grade, but not with age, clinical T or N, or ECOG performance status (PS). A similar proportion of HER2-positive ( vs negative) pts had surgery. Among pts who had surgery, pCR rates were lower in HER2-positive ( vs negative) pts (11% [2/19] vs 27% [17/63]). After a median follow up of 23 mo, DFS and TTR were significantly shorter in HER2 positive ( vs negative) pts, independent of other pretreatment covariables (Table). Yet OS was comparable. Lung recurrence was enriched in HER2 positive ( vs negative) pts. Among pts with recurrence, SAR was longer in HER2-positive vs -negative pts. A total of 53% (10/19) of previously HER2-positive pts received T-based therapy after recurrence, and these pts were the drivers of favorable SAR (median 22 mo in n=10 HER2-positive pts who received T vs 11 mo in n=9 HER2-positive pts who did not receive T vs 11 mo in n=40 HER2-negative pts; P log-rank=.01). Conclusions: HER2 positivity ( vs negativity) is independently associated with shorter TTR and DFS, but more comparable OS. The adverse association of HER2 on tumor response and TTR may have been largely overcome through enhanced survival after recurrence, although OS data are maturing. These data may have implications for the design of endpoints in future curative-intent anti-HER2 trials. [Table: see text]

4530 Background: EAC has eluded cure even with platin-based CRT. Stratifying pts by likelihood of success is one approach to improving outcomes. We assessed whether SNPs in DNA repair paths are associated with complete pathologic response (pCR) in EAC pts who received C-based CRT followed by surgery. Methods: Patients and specimens: Pretreatment biopsy or post-CRT resection samples were obtained from pts (EAC, stage II-IVa) treated on a randomized phase II trial, E1201 (n=86), of preop CRT (RT to 45 Gy). Arm A: Preop C 30 mg/m2 + irinotecan (I) 50 mg/m2 days (d) 1, 8, 22, 29 with RT. Post-op C 30 mg/m2 + I 65 mg/m2 d 1, 8 q21 days x 3. Arm B: Preop C 30 mg/m2 + paclitaxel (P) 50 mg/m2 d 1, 8, 15, 22, 29 with RT. Post-op C 75 mg/m2 + P 175 mg/m2 d 1 q21 days x 3. Clinical outcome - pCR: (A) 14% [95% CI 5.5%, 28.5%]; (B) 16% [95% CI 6.7%, 30.1%]. Median overall survival (OS): (A) 34.9 m (months) [90% CI 23.5, not reached]; (B) 20.9 m [90% CI 17.4, 46.7]. Experimental procedure: Normal tissue was microdissected from unstained sections of paraffin-embedded tissue. DNA was extracted (Qiagen). Genotyping was performed by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight (Sequenom) for all SNPs. Each SNP was dichotomized a priori into: (1) major homozygote vs (2) minor (heterozygote plus minor homozygote) allele groups. Data analysis was performed centrally, with lab investigators blinded to clinical data. Exact logistic regression was used to derive ORs for non-pCR, using the major homozygote as the reference (2-sided p values). Results: Germline DNA was available in 68 pts; 60 were eligible and began therapy ( Table ). Conclusions: In this homogenous, well-defined cohort, the XRCC1 Arg399Gln minor allele group was associated with lower pCR (p=0.06). Lab data on a panel of additional SNPs have been collected and are under analysis for presentation at the meeting. [Table: see text] [Table: see text]

4541 Background: Anti-VEGFR2 therapy (ramucirumab/paclitaxel [RAM/TAX]) and ICI are approved as 2nd- and 3rd-line therapy (Tx), respectively, for pts with mGEA. We unexpectedly saw durable responses in 2 pts on RAM/TAX after progression on an ICI trial (KN-059; PMID 29674442). We performed a pilot to examine the clinical activity of ICI followed by RAM/TAX. Then we retrospectively compared the outcomes of pts who received this serial Tx to pts who received RAM/TAX without prior ICI. Methods: All pts with mGEA at Mayo Clinic who received RAM/TAX (2014-19) were included (N = 87). Outcomes were best objective response rate (ORR: complete [CR] or partial response) per RECIST1.1, progression-free survival (PFS), duration of response (DOR), and overall survival (OS). Chi square and multivariate (MV) logistic and Cox regression were used. Results: 15 consecutive pts with measurable mGEA received ICI immediately followed by RAM/TAX after irRECIST progression. Most pts (95%) did not respond to ICI. Yet on RAM/TAX, 100% (15/15) had tumor reduction (range -8% to -100%) with an ORR of 73% (11/15), including 3 CRs. In these pts (who received ICI followed by RAMTAX), PFS on RAMTAX was longer than on last chemotherapy before ICI (12.3 vs 3.0 m, P < .001). Outcomes on RAM/TAX in these pts were significantly better than in pts who received RAM/TAX alone (see Table). Associations were strengthened after adjusting for total lines of Tx, line of Tx of RAM/TAX, age, and ECOG PS. Exploratory analysis of paired tumor biopsies collected pre-ICI and on RAM/TAX in a small subset revealed that the frequency of intratumoral immunosuppressive FOXP3+ Tregs decreased on RAM/TAX, whereas the frequency of antitumor CD8+ T cells was preserved. Conclusions: RAM/TAX immediately preceded by ICI was associated with significantly higher OS, ORR, and DOR than RAM/TAX alone, suggesting ICI may enhance efficacy of subsequent anti-VEGFR/taxane therapy. This novel sequence of therapy will be tested prospectively in a new randomized phase 2 trial (NCT04069273). [Table: see text]