Yoon, Harry H.

AbstractBackgroundGastric cancer with synchronous peritoneal metastases is a debilitating disease with limited treatment options. This article describes an update of the 2018 Chicago Consensus guidelines addressing the management of gastric cancer with synchronous peritoneal metastases in line with the most recent evidence.MethodsA clinical management pathway was updated through two rounds of a Delphi consensus to assess agreement levels with pathway blocks. Supporting evidence underwent evaluation using a rapid literature review. Meta‐analyses were performed as appropriate.ResultsOverall, the level of evidence in this disease subset was low to moderate. Of 124 participants in the first round, 109 (88%) responded in the second round. Strong consensus (>90%) was achieved in six of eight blocks (75%) in rounds 1 and 2. A multidisciplinary preoperative assessment and diagnostic laparoscopy should be offered to all patients, whereas patients with a high burden of disease or progression should undergo nonsurgical management. Patients with stable/responsive disease and a low peritoneal carcinomatosis index should subsequently be offered treatment with regional therapeutic interventions and cytoreductive surgery. In patients who are cytology‐positive, systemic therapy can be used to convert them to cytology‐negative, with subsequent surgery offered according to the patient's goals of care. Meta‐analysis of observational and randomized control trials revealed a survival benefit with the addition of intraperitoneal chemotherapy to cytoreductive surgery (hazard ratio, 0.52).ConclusionsThe consensus‐driven clinical pathway for gastric cancer with synchronous peritoneal metastases offers vital clinical guidance for practitioners. There is a growing body of high‐quality evidence to support management strategies, and future clinical trials are eagerly awaited.

e16157 Background: The optimal treatment for resectable gastric/GEJ AC is unclear due to limited direct comparisons among chemotherapy and chemoradiation regimens. Addressing this gap is critical to improve patient outcomes. We performed this network meta-analysis (NMA) to determine the relative efficacy of multimodality regimens for resectable gastric/GEJ AC. Methods: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, and CENTRAL were searched from inception till September 20, 2024, to identify phase III trials evaluating perioperative/neoadjuvant systemic therapy ± radiation in resectable gastric/GEJ AC. Primary outcomes were disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). A frequentist NMA was conducted to compare hazard ratios (HR) and 95% CI for each outcome. Relative treatment rankings were assessed using P-scores. Results: Fifteen trials (8,072 patients) were analyzed. pFLOT (perioperative fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and docetaxel) ranked highest for DFS in the overall population (P score 91%) (Table), significantly outperforming surgery alone (HR 0.48, 95% CI 0.38-0.60) and nCROSS (neoadjuvant paclitaxel, carboplatin and radiotherapy) (0.67, 0.56-0.81). For OS, nPLF+nCRT(EP) (neoadjuvant cisplatin, leucovorin and fluorouracil for induction, followed by etoposide, cisplatin, and radiotherapy) (P score 90%) and pFLOT (P score 87%) were the top regimens, with pFLOT significantly outperforming surgery alone (0.57, 0.45-0.72), and nCROSS (0.73, 0.60-0.89). Adding neoadjuvant chemoradiation to pFLOT provided no additional OS (1.14, 0.76-1.72) or DFS (1.22, 0.83-1.82) benefit. Similarly, adding pembrolizumab to perioperative chemotherapy (CF/CX) (cisplatin and fluorouracil/capecitabine) was not superior to pFLOT in terms of DFS (1.10, 0.71-1.69) or OS (1.09, 0.69-1.72). Conclusions: pFLOT demonstrated superior efficacy in resectable gastric/GEJ AC, surpassing surgery alone, nCROSS, and other perioperative regimens. The additive role of immunotherapy to pFLOT requires further investigation to refine patient selection and optimize outcomes. Regimen Overall Population GEJ cohort OS DFS OS DFS nPLF+nCRT(EP) 1 (90) 2 (84) 1 (85) NA pFLOT 2 (87) 1 (91) 2 (79) 2 (88) pPembrolizumab+CF/CX 3 (75) 3 (81) 5 (41) - nECX 4 (61) 5 (55) - - pCF 5 (59) 8 (51) 3 (72) - pECF/ECX 6 (47) 6 (55) 7 (40) 3 (57) nECX+aCRT(CX) 7 (45) 7 (52) 9 (31) - nCF 8 (42) 10 (28) 6 (40) - nCROSS 9 (41) 9 (35) 8 (34) 4 (43) pECF/ECX/FLOT+nCRT(F/X) 10 (38) 4 (57) 4 (72) 1 (90) nCRT(CF) 11 (9) 11 (6) - 5 (14) Surgery 12 (7) 12 (5) 10 (5) 6 (9) Data reported as rank (P-score). Abbreviations: n: neoadjuvant; p: perioperative; ECX: epirubicin + cisplatin + capecitabine; CF: cisplatin + fluorouracil; ECF: epirubicin + cisplatin + fluorouracil; aCRT(CX): adjuvant radiotherapy + cisplatin + capecitabine; CRT(F/X): fluorouracil/capecitabine + radiotherapy; CRT(CF): cisplatin + fluorouracil + radiotherapy.

Abstract Background Optimal treatment for resectable gastric and gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma remains unclear due to limited head-to-head comparisons among chemotherapy and chemoradiation regimens. This network meta-analysis aimed to determine the relative efficacy of available multimodality treatment regimens in these patients. Methods MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science, and CENTRAL were searched till September 20, 2024. Phase 3 randomized trials evaluating perioperative/neoadjuvant systemic therapy ± radiation in resectable gastric/GEJ adenocarcinoma were included. Primary outcomes were disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Frequentist network meta-analysis was conducted to compare hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results Fifteen trials (8072 patients) were analyzed. pFLOT (perioperative fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and docetaxel) ranked highest for DFS in the overall population (P-score 91%), achieving significant improvements compared to surgery alone (HR 0.48, 95% CI, 0.38-0.60) and nCROSS (neoadjuvant paclitaxel, carboplatin, and radiotherapy) (0.67, 0.56-0.81). For OS, nPLF + nCRT(EP) (neoadjuvant cisplatin, leucovorin, and fluorouracil for induction, followed by etoposide, cisplatin, and radiotherapy) (P-score 90%) and pFLOT (P-score 87%) were the top regimens. pFLOT significantly outperformed surgery alone (0.57, 0.45-0.72) and nCROSS (0.73, 0.60-0.89). Based on the limited data available, adding neoadjuvant chemoradiation to pFLOT provided no additional OS (1.14, 0.76-1.72) or DFS (1.22, 0.83-1.82) benefit. Similarly, adding pembrolizumab to perioperative chemotherapy (cisplatin and fluorouracil/capecitabine) was not superior to pFLOT (DFS: 1.10, 0.71-1.69; OS: 1.09, 0.69-1.72). Conclusions pFLOT demonstrated superior efficacy in resectable gastric/GEJ adenocarcinoma, outperforming surgery alone, nCROSS, and alternative perioperative regimens. The additive role of immunotherapy requires further investigation to optimize patient selection and outcomes.

Gastric cancer is the fifth leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Over 95% of gastric cancers are adenocarcinomas, which are typically classified based on anatomic location and histologic type. Gastric cancer generally carries a poor prognosis because it is often diagnosed at an advanced stage. Systemic therapy can provide palliation, improve survival, and enhance the quality of life in patients with locally advanced or metastatic disease. The implementation of biomarker testing has had a significant impact on clinical practice and patient care. Targeted therapies have demonstrated encouraging results in clinical trials for the treatment of patients with locally advanced or metastatic disease. This selection from the NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology for Gastric Cancer highlights recommendations for biomarker testing and discusses updates for the treatment of advanced disease, including peritoneal carcinoma as only disease and unresectable locally advanced, recurrent, or metastatic disease.

366 Background: While improved survival has been previously demonstrated, the impact of immunotherapy on HRQoL in ESCC has not been well examined. Traditional PRO-based analyses in oncology trials, such as time to deterioration (TTD) and mixed models for repeated measures (MMRMs), are limited by discounting recurrent PRO events. Thus, we applied a 3-component joint model (JM) framework to define more clinically interpretable associations between patient-reported symptoms, treatment effects, and OS among subgroups of patients with ESCC from RATIONALE-306, which met its primary endpoint, with PD-L1 expression of ≥1%, ≥5%, and ≥10%. Methods: The final analytic sample included 226 patients in the tislelizumab + chemotherapy arm (T+C), 242 in the placebo + chemotherapy arm (P+C) for PD-L1 ≥1%, 113 in the T+C arm and 103 in the P+C arm for PD-L1 ≥5%, and 168 in the T+C arm and 178 in the P+C arm for PD-L1 ≥10%.From EORTC QLQ-C30 and OES18, 7 keysymptom domains were modeled (GHS, physical functioning, fatigue, dysphagia, pain, reflux, dietary restrictions). PRO data were collected at baseline and at every treatment cycle (up to 6 cycles), then every other cycle, and at safety follow-up, and change from baseline (CFBL) was analyzed. The joint model comprised three components: 1) linear mixed model predicting CFBL symptom scores; 2) Cox proportional hazard model (CPH) for time to OS; and 3) frailty (random effects for recurrent deterioration events [RDEs]) CPH model for time to PRO-based RDEs. Osoba (1998) 10-point threshold was used to define RDEs. Results: Adjusted completion rates were >90% in the ITT population for both arms. Significant T+C treatment effects wereobserved for physical functioning in PD-L1 ≥5% ( P =0.0476), and pain in PD-L1 ≥1% ( P =0.0028) and PD-L1 ≥5% ( P =0.0149) subgroups, but not in PD-L1 ≥10%. For other 5 symptoms (ie, GHS, fatigue, reflux, dysphagia, dietary restrictions), there were no statistically significant differences between treatment arms. However, T+C was associated with significant reductions in the risk of death across all 7 key symptoms and PD-L1 subgroups. As one example, with respect to interaction between pain and OS, T+C was associated with a 22% (HR, 0.78 [95% CI, 0.652-0.931]), 33% (HR, 0.67 [95% CI, 0.515-0.860]), and 47% (HR, 0.50 [95% CI, 0.344-0.720]) reduction in the risk of death in PD-L1 ≥1%, ≥5%, and ≥10%, respectively compared with P+C. Conclusions: In this analysis, the addition of tislelizumab to chemotherapy was associated with significantly less deterioration in multiple PRO symptoms including physical functioning and pain, alongside a lower risk of death, after adjusting for recurring deterioration events using a frailty model across multiple PD-L1 expression subgroups.

4032 Background: RATIONALE-306 (NCT03783442) is the first global study to investigate anti-programmed cell death protein 1 therapy in combination with different chemotherapy (chemo) options in the first-line (1L) treatment of advanced/metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). At interim analysis (IA), tislelizumab (TIS) plus chemo demonstrated a statistically significant, clinically meaningful improvement in overall survival (OS) versus placebo (PBO) plus chemo, with a manageable safety profile. Here, we report updated efficacy and safety data with minimum 3 years’ follow-up after study unblinding at IA. Methods: Adults with unresectable locally advanced recurrent/metastatic ESCC and no prior systemic treatment for advanced disease were enrolled and randomized (1:1; stratified by region, prior definitive therapy, and investigator [INV]-chosen chemo) to receive TIS 200 mg (Arm A) or PBO (Arm B) IV every 3 weeks plus chemo (platinum plus fluoropyrimidine or platinum plus paclitaxel), until disease progression or intolerable toxicity. The primary endpoint was OS in the intent-to-treat population. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and duration of response (DoR), all per INV, and safety. Results: In total, 649 patients (pts) were randomized (Arm A, n=326; Arm B, n=323). At a minimum study follow-up of 36.0 months, improvements in OS, PFS, and DoR in Arm A versus B (Table) were maintained relative to the IA. The hazard ratio (HR) for OS with TIS plus chemo versus PBO plus chemo was 0.70 (95% confidence interval: 0.59, 0.83). Similar to the IA, incidences of any-grade (96.6% vs 96.3%) or grade ≥3 (67.0% vs 64.5%) treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were comparable between Arms A and B, respectively; treatment-emergent adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation were higher in Arm A (32.1%) versus B (22.1%). In Arm A versus B, respectively, serious TRAEs occurred in 29.9% vs 19.6% of pts; TRAEs leading to death occurred in 1.9% and 1.2%. Conclusions: After minimum 3 years’ follow-up, 1L TIS plus chemo continued to demonstrate clinically meaningful improvements in OS and PFS and durable antitumor response benefit versus PBO plus chemo in pts with advanced/metastatic ESCC, with no new safety signals. Clinical trial information: NCT03783442 . [Table: see text]

356 Background: Autologous anti-claudin 18.2 (CLDN18.2) CAR T cell, satricabtagene autoleucel (satri-cel), was developed to treat solid tumors. We report the completed results of the Phase 1b ELIMYN18.2 study (Cohort A) in gastric/gastroesophageal junction (GC/GEJ) and pancreatic cancer (PC). Methods: This single-arm, open-label, Phase 1b/2 study (NCT04404595) evaluated the safety and efficacy of satri-cel in patients with CLDN18.2-positive advanced GC/GEJ or PC. Cohort A consisted of a modified 3+3 design. After a conditioning regimen of fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and nab-paclitaxel, patients were administered 1-3 cycles of satri-cel. The primary objectives were safety and determination of the recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D). Adverse Events (AEs) were graded per CTCAE 5.0, objective response rate (ORR), and clinical benefit rate (CBR) including CR, PR, and ≥6-month SD were assessed by the investigator per RECIST 1.1. Results: As of May 14, 2023, twenty-four patients underwent leukapheresis in Cohort A. Nineteen patients (7 GC/GEJ and 12 PC) with a median of 3 (range: 1-8) prior therapeutic lines had satri-cel at three dose levels (DLs) between 250×106 and 600×106 cells. Seven patients received a 2nd dose and two patients received a 3rd dose of satri-cel at a median of 113 and 259 days, respectively, post-first infusion. All 19 patients experienced at least one AE. No DLTs occurred and 17 patients experienced cytokine release syndrome (CRS). Two cases of Grade 3 CRS were reported, and all other CRS were Grade 1 or 2. Two Grade 1 immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) occurred. All CRS and ICANS were resolved. No severe gastrointestinal-related AEs were found. No increased toxicities were reported after any reinfusion. No satri-cel treatment-related death occurred. For all patients, the best ORR was 26.3%, the median DOR was 3.7 months and the CBR was 42.1%. The median PFS was 5.2 months, and overall survival was 12.8 months (95% CI 5.7-NE) after leukapheresis, and the median PFS was 3.3 months, and overall survival was 8.9 months (95% CI 3.3-NE) after the first infusion. In the GC/GEJ group, the ORR was 42.9% (3/7), the median DOR was 6.9 months and the CBR was 57.1%. In the PC group, the ORR was 16.7% (2/12), the median DOR was 3.4 months and the CBR was 33.3%. An ORR of 42.9% (3/7) and a CBR of 71.4% were reported at the DL3 of 600×106 cells which was selected as RP2D. At DL3, one GC patient achieved a CR and two PC patients had PR, suggesting the PC group achieved an ORR of 40% (2/5) and the GC group achieved an ORR of 50% (1/2). In addition, tumor shrinkage was detected in 73.7 % (14/19) of patients. Conclusions: The safety profile and therapeutic efficacy of satri-cel were shown to be promising in heavily pretreated patients with CLDN18.2-positive advanced GC/GEJ and PC . In the Phase 2 study, the first patient with GC received satri-cel in May 2023. Clinical trial information: NCT04404595 .

31 Background: T-cell immunoreceptor with immunoglobulin and immunoreceptor tyrosine-based inhibitory motif domains (TIGIT) inhibitor in combination with an anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) antibody has shown antitumor activity in solid tumors. AdvanTIG-105 (NCT04047862) is a phase 1/1b open-label study designed to assess the safety and preliminary antitumor activity of OCI, an anti-TIGIT monoclonal antibody (mAb), + TIS, an anti-PD-1 mAb, in pts with unresectable, locally advanced or metastatic solid tumors. In the dose-escalation part, OCI + TIS was well tolerated with preliminary antitumor activity observed, and the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of OCI 900 mg intravenously (IV) every three weeks (Q3W) + TIS 200 mg IV Q3W was established. We report results from the dose-expansion part (GC/GEJC Cohort 9) of the AdvanTIG-105 study. Methods: Eligible pts had histologically/cytologically confirmed stage IV GC/GEJC. Pts were excluded if they had squamous cell, undifferentiated or other histological types of GC, had GC/GEJC with positive HER2 expression, or if they had received any prior therapy for metastatic disease. Pts received either the RP2D of OCI + TIS with oxaliplatin + capecitabine Q3W for 6 cycles (C), followed by maintenance therapy with the RP2D of OCI + TIS, + capecitabine Q3W, or the RP2D of OCI + TIS with cisplatin + 5-fluorouracil Q3W for 6 C. Treatment continued until disease progression, intolerable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed overall response rate (ORR) per RECIST v1.1. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), duration of response (DoR), disease control rate (DCR) per RECIST v1.1, and safety. Results: As of September 29, 2022, 60 pts with a median age of 61.5 years (range 35-82) were enrolled; 59 were efficacy evaluable. Median study follow-up was 31.1 weeks (range 1.4-78.4). ORR was 50.8% (95% CI: 37.5, 64.1); DCR was 84.7% (95% CI: 73.0, 92.8) with a median DoR of 8.1 months (95% CI: 4.5, not evaluable [NE]). Median PFS was 8.2 months (95% CI: 5.8, NE). In a subgroup analysis, ORR in pts with PD-L1 tumor area positivity (TAP) score ≥5% (n=27) was 59.3% (95% CI: 38.8, 77.6), and 50.0% (95% CI: 30.7, 69.4) in pts with PD-L1 TAP <5% (n=28). All 60 pts reported ≥1 treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE), the most common being anemia (43.3%) and platelet count decreased (41.7%). In total, 43 pts (71.7%) had ≥grade 3 TEAEs and 28 (46.7%) had serious adverse events. TEAEs leading to discontinuation of TIS and OCI occurred in 5 (8.3%) pts. TEAEs led to death in 2 (3.3%) pts; one event (neutropenic sepsis) was related to chemo, while the other (pulmonary embolism) was not treatment related. Conclusions: OCI 900 mg + TIS 200 mg + chemo was generally well tolerated and showed encouraging antitumor activity in pts with stage IV GC/GEJC. Clinical trial information: NCT04047862 .

4028 Background: T-cell immunoreceptor with immunoglobulin and immunoreceptor tyrosine-based inhibitory motif domains (TIGIT) inhibitor in combination with an anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) antibody has shown antitumor activity in solid tumors. AdvanTIG-105 (NCT04047862) is a phase 1/1b open-label study designed to assess the safety and preliminary antitumor activity of OCI, an anti-TIGIT monoclonal antibody (mAb), + TIS, an anti-PD-1 mAb, in pts with unresectable, locally advanced or metastatic solid tumors. In the dose-escalation part, OCI + TIS was well tolerated with preliminary antitumor activity observed, and the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of OCI 900 mg intravenously (IV) every three weeks (Q3W) + TIS 200 mg IV Q3W was established. We report results from the dose-expansion part (GC/GEJC Cohort 9) of the AdvanTIG-105 study. Methods: Eligible pts had histologically/cytologically confirmed stage IV GC/GEJC. Pts were excluded if they had squamous cell, undifferentiated or other histological types of GC, had GC/GEJC with positive HER2 expression, or if they had received any prior therapy for metastatic disease. Pts received either the RP2D of OCI + TIS with oxaliplatin + capecitabine Q3W for 6 cycles (C), followed by maintenance therapy with the RP2D of OCI + TIS, + capecitabine Q3W, or the RP2D of OCI + TIS with cisplatin + 5-fluorouracil Q3W for 6 C. Treatment continued until disease progression, intolerable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed overall response rate (ORR) per RECIST v1.1. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), duration of response (DoR), disease control rate (DCR) per RECIST v1.1, and safety. Results: As of September 29, 2022, 60 pts with a median age of 61.5 years (range 35-82) were enrolled; 59 were efficacy evaluable. Median study follow-up was 31.1 weeks (range 1.4-78.4). ORR was 50.8% (95% CI: 37.5, 64.1); DCR was 84.7% (95% CI: 73.0, 92.8) with a median DoR of 8.1 months (95% CI: 4.5, not evaluable [NE]). Median PFS was 8.2 months (95% CI: 5.8, NE). In a subgroup analysis, ORR in pts with PD-L1 tumor area positivity (TAP) score ≥5% (n = 27) was 59.3% (95% CI: 38.8, 77.6), and 50.0% (95% CI: 30.7, 69.4) in pts with PD-L1 TAP < 5% (n = 28). All 60 pts reported ≥1 treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE), the most common being anemia (43.3%) and platelet count decreased (41.7%). In total, 43 pts (71.7%) had ≥grade 3 TEAEs and 28 (46.7%) had serious adverse events. TEAEs leading to discontinuation of TIS and OCI occurred in 5 (8.3%) pts. TEAEs led to death in 2 (3.3%) pts; one event (neutropenic sepsis) was related to chemo, while the other (pulmonary embolism) was not treatment related. Conclusions: OCI 900 mg + TIS 200 mg + chemo was generally well tolerated and showed encouraging antitumor activity in pts with stage IV GC/GEJC. Clinical trial information: NCT04047862 .