Back to Authors

Kapetanakis, Vasilis

A5102071523 | I4210127938

Mayo Clinic

Mayo Clinic Hospital

Citations 2

Surgeon Fatigue and Postural Stability: Is Robotic Better Than Laparoscopic Surgery?

Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques | February 14, 2013 | Volume: 23 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 343-346

10.1089/lap.2012.0531 | PMID 23410117

Robotic presacral neurectomy – technique and results

The International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery | October 7, 2011 | Volume: 8 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 73-76

10.1002/rcs.438 | PMID 21984315

AbstractBackgroundThe feasibility, safety and outcomes of robotic presacral neurectomy were evaluated.MethodsA retrospective analysis was performed of 33 patients with midline chronic pelvic pain, who underwent robotic presacral neurectomy. Data were collected during the period March 2004–March 2010.ResultsAll patients underwent robotic presacral neurectomy and additional robotic procedures. Mean operating time for robotic presacral neurectomy was 5.8 (range 4.4–6.9) min. Mean blood loss, including concomitant procedures, was 39 (range 15–150) ml. Most patients were discharged the same day (60%) and mean hospital stay was 0.39 (range 0–2) days. There were no conversions or intra‐operative complications. There were two postoperative complications: one pelvic abscess and one Clostridium difficile colitis. Pain improvement was reported by 73% (22/30) of patients.ConclusionRobotic presacral neurectomy is safe and feasible, resulting in improvement of pelvic pain in selected patients. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.