Citations 141

Tumor extracellular vesicles drive immunosuppression in glioblastoma via TIGIT upregulation in myeloid cells 4110

The Journal of Immunology | November 21, 2025 | Volume: 214 | Issue: Supplement_1 | Pages: No page available

10.1093/jimmun/vkaf283.1831

Abstract Description Glioblastoma (GBM), the most common and deadly primary brain tumor in adults, is associated with profound local and systemic immune suppression. Increasing evidence points to tumor-derived extracellular vesicles (EVs) as key mediators of this immunosuppression. In surveying the tumor-immune microenvironment in samples of ultrasonic aspirate collected during surgical resection of GBM (n = 12), we identified several key immunomodulatory markers expressed across a range of immune cells in the tumor microenvironment. Particularly, we found TIGIT, classically understood as a T cell inhibitory protein, expressed across a range of myeloid cell populations, including in myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs, 46.84±16.78% of total monocytic MDSCs). Co-culture of healthy donor monocytes (n = 10) with patient-derived EVs replicated similar effects (control 11.69±1.87 vs EV treated 23.32±2.0). Furthermore, Induced MDSCs significantly inhibit T cell proliferation (30.65±5.97% proliferation, v/s control 86.47±2.94, p = 0.0001), concomitant with a surge in Th2 immune responses via TIGIT+ suppressive monocytes. Targeted TIGIT inhibition restored T cell proliferation (64.13±1.327% v/s non-inhibited, 30.65±5.97%; p = 0.02) and protective immune response, confirming a pivotal role of TIGIT in immune suppressive GBM microenvironment. Furthermore, TIGIT inhibition may unmask NLRP3 function, potentially contributing to immune rescue. Funding Sources Neurosurgery Research& Education Foundation, K12 grant Topic Categories Tumor Immunology: Checkpoints, Prevention, and Treatment (TIPT)
PATH-104. Comparison of clinical, radiographic and genomic alterations between classic and molecular glioblastoma, IDH-wildtype (updated report)

Neuro-Oncology | November 11, 2025 | Volume: 27 | Issue: Supplement_5 | Pages: v266-v266

10.1093/neuonc/noaf201.1056

Abstract Glioblastoma (GBM) diagnosis integrates morphology and tumor molecular alterations. Patients with classic morphology are designated as histologic GBM (hGBM). Patients without classic morphology harboring TERT promoter mutation (TERTp), or epidermal growth factor receptor amplification (EGFRamp), or combined gain of chromosome 7 and loss of 10 (+7/-10) designate molecular GBM (mGBM). We compared radiographic features, genomic alterations, and clinical outcome between hGBM and mGBM. 109 mGBM Mayo Clinic cases diagnosed between 1993-2021 were matched to 101 cGBM by age, sex, year of diagnosis, and TERT promoter (TERTp) status. Clinical and radiographic data abstraction was blinded. Progression-free and overall survival were compared across groups in the subset of patients who received standard of care. Contrast enhancement was present on index MRI (MRI at diagnosis) for 98% (96/98) hGBM and 50% (54/107) mGBM (p<0.0001) patients. mGBM tumors harbored fewer total copy number alterations (median of 16.5 vs 20, p=0.029) and were less likely to have CDKN2A/B homozygous deletion (56% vs 77%, p=0.005). Among the 87 mGBM and 82 hGBM receiving standard of care, median overall survival was longer for mGBM versus hGBM (2.24 vs 1.62 years, p=0.016). mGBM patients with +7/-10 (HR=2.60, p=0.035) or CDKN2A/B (HR=3.61, p=0.002) had poorer overall survival compared to mGBM patients without the corresponding alteration. On index MRI mGBM patients without contrast enhancement had better overall survival compared to hGBM (HR=0.50; p=0.003) whereas there was no survival difference between mGBM with enhancement and hGBM. mGBM with enhancement on index MRI likely represent undersampled, or early / evolving hGBM. mGBM patients with non-enhancing MRI, younger than 60, with long symptom profile including seizures, and some combination of non-anaplastic morphology, TERTp only, no homozygous deletion of CDKN2A/B, and low copy number complexity may represent other IDHwt glioma entities. Caution is advised in counseling, management, discussing prognosis, and inclusion in clinical trials.
IMG-122. PSMA uptake in glioblastoma: a diagnostic curveball in neuro-oncology

Neuro-Oncology | November 11, 2025 | Volume: 27 | Issue: Supplement_5 | Pages: v304-v304

10.1093/neuonc/noaf201.1201

Abstract OBJECTIVE To demonstrate that Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET imaging, though primarily used in prostate cancer surveillance, can reveal PSMA uptake in non-prostatic tumors due to neovascular PSMA expression. BACKGROUND PSMA PET imaging is increasingly used for staging and monitoring prostate cancer. However, PSMA uptake is not exclusive to prostate carcinoma and may be observed in non-prostatic malignancies, including glioblastoma, due to neovascular expression. CASE REPORT We present a 67-year-old gentleman with metastatic prostate carcinoma, diagnosed in 2014 and treated with neoadjuvant Lupron, prostatectomy, and salvage radiation. In 2019, he developed nodal recurrence in retroperitoneal and bilateral iliac chain nodes, treated with lymphadenopathy, six cycles of Taxotere-based chemotherapy, and consolidative proton beam radiation (56.25 Gy/25 fractions). He later developed progression to the right proximal humerus and left coracoid process, treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy (25Gy/5 fractions). Follow-up PSMA PET/CT revealed no systemic abnormalities but showed a new PSMA-avid lesion in the right medial temporal lobe. Brain MRI confirmed a 3.5 x 1.7 x 2.5 cm ring-enhancing, intra-axial lesion with edema. The patient was asymptomatic. PSA was undetectable on abiraterone/prednisone and leuprolide. He underwent right frontotemporal craniotomy and resection. Pathology confirmed Glioblastoma, IDH-wildtype, CNS WHO Grade 4 with focal epithelioid features and positive MGMT promoter methylation. He received standard-of-care treatment with radiation, temozolomide, and TTF device. Surveillance PSMA PET and MRI showed no residual brain avidity or progression. Discussion: PSMA is a type II transmembrane glycoprotein expressed by prostatic and various non-prostatic tissues. In healthy brain parenchyma, PSMA expression is typically absent but is overexpressed in neovasculature of high-grade gliomas, including glioblastoma, IDH-wildtype, allowing for radiotracer uptake, as seen in this case. CONCLUSION This case illustrates the potential role of PSMA as a diagnostic tool, as it allows for easy identification of glioblastoma neovasculature, as demonstrated in our case report.
CTNI-08. WSD0922-FU THERAPY IN PATIENTS WITH EGFR MUTANT GLIOBLASTOMA – UPDATES FROM THE DOSE EXPANSION COHORTS OF A FIRST-IN-HUMAN PHASE 1 CLINICAL TRIAL (MC1914)

Neuro-Oncology | November 11, 2025 | Volume: 27 | Issue: Supplement_5 | Pages: v126-v126

10.1093/neuonc/noaf201.0505

Abstract WSD0922-Fu is an oral, CNS-penetrant, small molecule EGFR inhibitor which potently inhibits EGFR aberrations specific to non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and glioblastoma (GBM). MC1914 (NCT04197934) is a first-in-human phase 1 trial in patients with EGFR aberrant recurrent GBM and NSCLC. After determining the maximum tolerated dose, adults with recurrent GBM were treated in two expansion cohorts: (a) non-surgical cohort (6/12 patients thus far): EGFRvIII mutation, first recurrence; food-effect study included (b) surgical cohort (6/6 patients), any EGFR mutation, any recurrence; window-of-opportunity study (WOO) included. Among these 12 patients, median age = 60 years; 50% female; 58% ECOG 0). All patients received prior radiation and temozolomide. After the WOO or food-effect study, patients were dosed at 120 mg BID (5 days on, 2 days off), and escalated to 160 mg BID (5 days on, 2 days off) based on tolerability. Common adverse events (>40%) are comparable to other EGFR inhibitors (acneiform rash, diarrhea, fatigue, xerosis, pruritis). Treatment-related grade 3+ adverse events were limited to lymphopenia (n = 1). WSD0922-Fu exposure in the fed state exceeded the fasted state (median plasma Cmax and AUC0-24h are 1.6x and 1.3x, respectively) with a delayed Tmax (6.0 vs 1.8 hours). For the WOO, time between last dose administered to tumor collection ranged between 4 - 13.5 hours. Median tumor WSD0922-Fu concentration was 0.76 µg/g; estimated median unbound tumor concentration was 24.9 ng/g and within expectations for pharmacodynamic effect. Median brain/plasma ratio = 0.59; median unbound brain/unbound plasma = 0.88. Enrollment to the non-surgical cohort is ongoing, so formal efficacy data remain immature. However, examples of clinical efficacy will be shown along with data on recurrence patterns. Phase 2 clinical trial development is in progress.
PATH-36. DNA copy number clustering reveals alterations that influence survival in primary IDH-mutant astrocytoma patients

Neuro-Oncology | November 11, 2025 | Volume: 27 | Issue: Supplement_5 | Pages: v248-v248

10.1093/neuonc/noaf201.0988

Abstract The WHO 2021 classification of central nervous system tumors incorporated molecular markers to better define diffuse glioma subgroups. We analyzed array-based copy number, targeted next-generation sequencing, germline genotyping, and Illumina EPIC array methylation data from 404 primary IDH-mutant astrocytomas to further understand the relationship between copy number and outcomes. Loss of chromosome arm 13q was associated with poor overall survival after adjusting for age, sex, tumor grade, and treatment status (hazard ratio [HR]=2.04 (95% confidence interval: 1.25-3.33), p=0.004). Chromosome 13q loss was also significantly associated with the total number of copy number alterations (p<0.001). Loss of arm 11p was associated with poor survival in the adjusted analysis (HR=2.29 (1.38-3.79), p=0.001). Unsupervised clustering of the raw copy number data identified 12 clusters, where each cluster was defined by distinct copy number alteration(s). Clusters that contained 13q loss exhibited worse overall survival compared to other clusters. The clusters were significantly associated with age at diagnosis (p=0.015), tumor grade (p<0.001) and copy number complexity (p<0.001). The clusters with a high proportion of grade 4 tumors and with the highest complexity had the poorest overall survival. These findings highlight the prognostic relevance of chromosome 13q and 11p losses in IDH-mutant astrocytomas and support the integration of additional copy number alterations into molecular classification frameworks of IDH-mutant astrocytomas to improve risk stratification and patient management.
CNSC-69. TUMOR EXTRACELLULAR VESICLES PROMOTE IMMUNOSUPPRESSIVE MONOCYTE INDUCTION VIA THE TIGIT/CD155 AXIS, DAMPENING NLRP3-MEDIATED INFLAMMATORY RESPONSE IN GLIOBLASTOMA

Neuro-Oncology | November 11, 2025 | Volume: 27 | Issue: Supplement_5 | Pages: v69-v69

10.1093/neuonc/noaf201.0276

Abstract Glioblastoma (GBM), the most aggressive primary brain tumor in adults, is marked by profound immune suppression. Tumor-derived extracellular vesicles (TEVs) are increasingly recognized as key mediators of this immunosuppressive environment. In this study, we examined the tumor-immune microenvironment using ultrasonic aspirate samples from GBM patients (n = 14). Several immune checkpoint molecules, including PDL1, B7-H3, and VISTA, were notably elevated. TIGIT, a receptor typically associated with T cells, was widely expressed across multiple myeloid subsets, including monocytic myeloid-derived suppressor cells (mMDSCs; 64.27 ± 7.99%) and non-classical monocytes (NCM; 39.8 ± 4.37%). Co-culture of healthy donor monocytes (n=10) with TEVs replicated similar effects (control 11.69±1.87 vs EV treated 23.32±2.0). We found CD155, the primary TIGIT ligand, to be heavily enriched in TEVs and co-expressed with TIGIT in co-culture, suggesting the TIGIT/CD155 axis may be involved in promoting immune suppression. Additionally, induced MDSCs significantly inhibit T cell proliferation (30.65±5.97% proliferation, v/s control 86.47±2.94, p=0.0001), concomitant with a surge in Th2 immune responses via TIGIT+ monocytes along with an increase in NLRP3 and IL-1β expressing cells. Interestingly, TIGIT knockdown did not affect NLRP3 expression but did restore T cell proliferation (64.13 ± 1.33%; p = 0.02) and pro-inflammatory cytokine production. However, the restoration of T cell proliferation was lost when NLRP3 was also silenced, indicating its essential role in mediating immune rescue. Overall, our findings highlight a crucial role of TIGIT in driving myeloid-mediated immune suppression in GBM. Furthermore, TIGIT inhibition may unmask NLRP3 function, potentially contributing to immune rescue.
RADT-01. PROGNOSTIC FACTORS FOR 90-DAY SURVIVAL AFTER STEREOTACTIC RADIOSURGERY FOR BRAIN METASTASIS PATIENTS

Neuro-Oncology | November 11, 2025 | Volume: 27 | Issue: Supplement_5 | Pages: v92-v92

10.1093/neuonc/noaf201.0372

Abstract Brain metastases significantly impact neurocognitive function and overall survival. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is a cornerstone of treatment for patients with limited metastases and expected survival beyond three months. Despite current guidelines, up to 20% of patients with brain metastases undergoing SRS have been reported to die within 90 days. This study retrospectively evaluates prognostic factors associated with 90-day survival after SRS, aiming to improve patient selection. We retrospectively analyzed a cohort of 1,546 patients who underwent Gamma Knife SRS for brain metastases at our institution between 2015 and 2023. One hundred seventy patients who survived fewer than 90 days post-SRS were identified and case-matched to 170 patients who survived over 90 days. Measured variables included patient demographics, tumor characteristics, treatment history, functional status, and control of the primary cancer. We modeled post-SRS 90-day survival using binomial and multivariate logistic regression. Multivariate analysis highlighted Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) < 70 (OR: 17.4, p < 0.001), prior whole brain radiation (OR: 6, p = 0.004), and focal neurological deficits (OR: 3.02, p = 0.003) as significant predictors of early deaths, while CNS progression before SRS (OR: 0.22, p < 0.001) and control of systemic cancer (OR: 0.556, p = 0.002) were associated with a less than 90-day survival. The predictive model demonstrated acceptable performance with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.85, accuracy of 80%, sensitivity of 87%, and specificity of 71%. Key predictors of 90-day survival following SRS for brain metastases include functional status (KPS), control of systemic cancer, CNS progression status, and focal neurologic deficits. These findings are complementary factors that can assist in making decisions and SRS patient selection.
Window of opportunity evaluation of blood–brain barrier permeability heterogeneity within and across high-grade glioma patients

Neuro-Oncology | September 3, 2025 | Volume: 28 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 130-142

10.1093/neuonc/noaf204 | PMID 40916832

Abstract Background Disruption of the blood–brain barrier (BBB) in high-grade brain tumors is characterized by contrast accumulation on diagnostic imaging. This window of opportunity study correlates contrast imaging features with the tumor distribution of BBB-permeable (levetiracetam) and -impermeable (cefazolin) drugs. Methods Patients with a clinical diagnosis of a high-grade brain tumor underwent MRI for surgical planning. Cefazolin and levetiracetam were administered prior to skin incision, and serial plasma and image-registered tumor samples were collected during the operation. Drug levels were measured by LC-MS/MS, tissue drug levels were corrected for residual blood, and tumor-to-plasma concentration ratios were calculated. Intraoperative microdialysis was performed in a subset of patients to measure the same two drugs. Results Tumor (n = 125) and plasma (n = 261) samples were available for analysis from 42 operative cases. Across all samples, the tumor-to-plasma ratio was significantly lower for cefazolin (marginal mean [MM]: 0.15, 95% CI: 0.11–0.19) as compared to levetiracetam (MM: 0.70, 95% CI: 0.64–0.75; P < .001). When compared between contrast-enhancing and non-enhancing regions, tumor-to-plasma ratios for cefazolin varied by 4.4-fold (0.27, 95% CI: 0.20–0.35 vs. 0.06, 95% CI: 0.04–0.08, respectively; P < .001), and varied for levetiracetam by 1.4-fold (0.88, 95% CI: 0.78–0.97 vs. 0.61, 95% CI: 0.55–0.66, respectively; P < .001). These results were confirmed with the intra-operative microdialysis and a population pharmacokinetic analysis. Conclusions This study demonstrates significant inter- and intra-tumoral heterogeneity in drug delivery for both levetiracetam and cefazolin within high-grade brain tumors that is not necessarily predicted by clinical MR imaging and may reflect tumor-induced changes in both perfusion and BBB integrity.
Immunotherapy for High-Grade Gliomas

Cancers | June 2, 2025 | Volume: 17 | Issue: 11 | Pages: 1849

10.3390/cancers17111849 | PMID 40507329

Background: High-grade gliomas (HGGs), particularly glioblastoma (GBM), are associated with exceptionally high mortality and inevitable recurrence. In considering novel treatment options for these devastating diseases, immunotherapies represent promising candidates. Immunotherapies have demonstrated efficacy for several advanced tumors outside the central nervous system, highlighting a potential role for these agents in treating HGGs. However, multiple challenges to immunotherapy efficacy have tempered therapeutic benefit in practice, including local and systemic immunosuppression, intratumoral heterogeneity, and various mechanisms of intrinsic and acquired resistance. In the past 30 years, diverse immunotherapeutic subclasses have been assessed for benefit against HGGs. Methods: We performed a PubMed search for randomized clinical trials performed within the last 30 years evaluating the following immunotherapy agents for high-grade gliomas: immune checkpoint inhibitors, vaccines, oncologic viruses, cytokines, and CAR T-cells. The present review offers a critical analysis of key pre-clinical and clinical trials that have shaped the immunotherapy landscape for high-grade gliomas over the past two decades. Results/Conclusions: Across the different immunotherapeutic methods and modalities explored thus far, a recurring theme emerges: while therapeutic strategies with a compelling conceptual basis are continually under development and even demonstrate a benefit in preclinical and early-phase trials, larger and later-phase trials consistently fail to produce concordantly significant outcomes. To date, no large-scale clinical trial has demonstrated a benefit of sufficient consequence to change practice. Continued critical appraisal of the strengths and pitfalls of prior investigative work, optimization of treatment development and delivery, and innovative approaches to combination therapy design will collectively be integral to future therapeutic advancement.
TIGIT expression dictates the immunosuppressive reprogramming of myeloid cells in glioblastoma

No container title available | April 25, 2025 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.1101/2025.04.24.648993 | PMID 40654798

Abstract Glioblastoma (GBM) is a deadly brain cancer with near-universal recurrence despite maximal treatment for which new innovations are sorely needed. Immunotherapy has yet to make significant gains in GBM treatment despite revolutionizing other cancer therapies, due in part to GBM-mediated immune suppression. This immune derangement proceeds through several mechanisms, but increasing evidence points to critical roles for tumor-derived extracellular vesicles (EVs) and immunosuppressive myeloid cells as key factors in this process. In the present study, we demonstrate broad expression of TIGIT across myeloid cell populations in the GBM microenvironment, a finding recapitulated by conditioning healthy monocytes with GBM-derived EVs. Further, knockdown of TIGIT expression reduced the immunosuppressive polarization of monocytes, resulting in improvement in T cell function. This finding proceeded in an NLRP3-dependent manner, with substantial co-localization of TIGIT and NLRP3 expression prior to knockdown. These findings point to a novel role for TIGIT expression in diverse myeloid cells in the GBM microenvironment as a marker of immunosuppressive activity and further indicate a hierarchy of immunomodulatory protein activity in these myeloid cells, with TIGIT knockdown unmasking the pro-inflammatory activity of NLRP3. This study bolsters understanding of the immunosuppressive complexities of myeloid cells in the GBM microenvironment, while lending further support to prevention or attenuation of immunosuppressive myeloid cell activity as a means of restoring immune function in GBM. Graphical abstract (Created in BioRender. Asad, M. (2025) https://BioRender.com/euiljoq Key Points Tumor-mediated immune suppression is a key barrier to the development of effective immunotherapies for GBM. TIGIT is broadly expressed in myeloid cells within the GBM microenvironment and can be induced by GBM-derived extracellular vesicles. Knockdown of TIGIT reduces immunosuppressive polarization of monocytes and enhances T cell activity via NLRP3 signaling, implicating TIGIT expression as a targetable modifier of immunosuppressive activity in GBM-associated myeloid cells. Importance of the Study Glioblastoma (GBM) remains a formidable clinical challenge, with poor prognosis and limited response to current immunotherapies. This study uncovers a novel immunosuppressive axis involving TIGIT expression in myeloid cells, which are key players in the GBM tumor microenvironment. By demonstrating GBM-derived extracellular vesicles induce TIGIT in healthy monocytes and TIGIT knockdown diminishes immunosuppressive polarization in an NLRP3-dependent manner, this study highlights TIGIT as both a marker and modulator of immune dysfunction in GBM. These findings introduce a functional hierarchy of immunoregulatory proteins in tumor-associated myeloid cells, positioning TIGIT as a potential checkpoint target. Restoring immune activity by disrupting this axis could enhance the efficacy of immunotherapy in GBM. Thus, this research not only advances our understanding of tumor-induced immune suppression but also opens a promising therapeutic avenue to reinvigorate anti-tumor immunity in a cancer type historically resistant to immunotherapeutic approaches.