Hocker, Sara E.

This case report describes a rare presentation of ischemic stroke secondary to an extensive internal carotid artery thrombus, subsequent therapeutic dilemma, and clinical management. A 58-year-old man was administered intravenous (IV) thrombolysis for right middle cerebral artery territory ischemic stroke symptoms. A computed tomography angiogram of the head and neck following thrombolysis showed a longitudinally extensive internal carotid artery thrombus originating at the region of high-grade calcific stenosis. Mechanical embolectomy was deferred because of risk of clot dislodgement and mild neurological symptoms. Recumbency and hemodynamic augmentation were used acutely to support cerebral perfusion. Anticoagulation was started 24 hours after thrombolysis. Carotid endarterectomy was completed successfully within 1 week of presentation. Clinical outcome was satisfactory with discharge modified Rankin Scale score 0. A longitudinally extensive carotid artery thrombus poses a risk of dislodgement and hemispheric stroke. Optimal management in these cases is not known with certainty. In our case, IV thrombolysis, hemodynamic augmentation, delayed anticoagulation, and carotid endarterectomy resulted in a favorable clinical outcome.

Abstract This book comprises a collection of case studies of patients with acute and critical neurological disease, along with pertinent discussion of approaches to each particular condition. Case studies provide a way to examine how difficult it is to approach these patients situated in the neurosciences intensive care unit. Some patients need close observation and management of emerging problems, others need a neurosurgical intervention or a neurointerventional procedure, a few patients are in extremis. The examples provided in this book are quintessential to the practice of neurocritical care. Some are less common conditions that need to be recognized and appropriately treated. Another purpose of this book is to introduce the reader to the field of neurocritical care and to show what goes on. The book shows the complexity of care and urgent decision-making involved in treating patients who deteriorate. Practical suggestions are included for each topic it covers. Not only is treatment of serious neurological disorders discussed but also prognostication in practice and end-of-life care discussions. In some ways this book summarizes the entire spectrum of presenting acute illness and how best to intervene.

SummaryObjectiveSeizures are common in patients with posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES), which is reported in up to 70% of cases, and antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) are commonly prescribed. There is a paucity of data regarding the risk of subsequent seizures following resolution of PRES, and therefore the optimal duration of treatment with AEDs is currently unknown. The objective of this study was to identify the frequency of recurrent seizures and epilepsy following recovery from PRES.MethodsWe performed a retrospective review of consecutive adults diagnosed with PRES between 2000 and 2010.ResultsOne hundred twenty‐seven patients, median age 53 years (interquartile range [IQR] 37–64), were included in the analysis. The most common causes of PRES were hypertension (72%) and immunosuppression (20%). Renal failure was present in 47%. Eighty‐four patients (66%) had seizures at presentation (39 focal, 45 generalized), and 13 (15%) of them presented with status epilepticus. Median duration of follow‐up was 3.2 years (IQR 4 months to 6.9 years). Patients with seizures were treated with AEDs for a median of 3 months (IQR 2–7). Fifteen patients (12%) had provoked seizures during the follow‐up period; in eight (53%) patients seizures were caused by recurrent PRES. Only three patients had subsequent unprovoked seizures, one of whom was considered to have developed epilepsy.SignificanceWe conclude that unprovoked seizures and epilepsy are uncommon in patients who have recovered from PRES. Discontinuation of AEDs following resolution of PRES should be considered, provided there is adequate control of risk factors, and absence of factors that could substantially lower the seizure threshold.

Summary Objective To describe the etiologies, clinical presentations, outcomes, and predictors of postencephalitic epilepsy ( PE ) in a large series of adult patients with acute encephalitis. Methods We conducted a retrospective review of patients diagnosed with acute encephalitis at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, between January 2000 and December 2012. The patients were categorized into two groups based on the presence or absence of PE at last follow‐up. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to analyze factors associated with PE . Results We identified 198 consecutive patients (100 [50.5%] male and 98 [49.5%] female) with a median age of 58 years (range 41.8–69). Etiologies included viral infection (n = 95, 48%), autoimmune (n = 44, 22%), and unknown/others (n = 59, 30%). During hospitalization, seizures were seen in patients with autoimmune encephalitis (n = 24, 54.5%), unknown/others (n = 20, 33.9%), and viral encephalitis (n = 23, 24.2%). Interictal epileptiform discharges on electroencephalography (EEG) were present in 34 (54%), whereas periodic lateralized epileptiform discharges (PLEDs) and generalized periodic discharges (GPDs) were seen in 14 (41.2%) and 2 (5.9%) patients. Forty‐six patients with seizures (70.8%) had fluid‐attenuated inversion recovery ( FLAIR )/T 2 abnormalities, 20 (31.3%) diffusion abnormalities, and 43 (66.2%) cortical involvement. Good outcome at discharge among patients with seizures was seen in 8/23 patients with viral etiology (34.8%), 10/24 patients with autoimmune encephalitis (45.5%), and 12/20 patients with unknown cause (60%). PE was present in 43 patients (29.9%). On multivariate regression analysis, the factors associated with PE were generalized seizures during hospitalization (p = 0.03), focal seizures (p ≤ 0.001), and the presence of FLAIR /T 2 abnormalities on brain magnetic resonance imaging ( MRI ) (p = 0.003). Significance The presence of seizures during hospitalization and an abnormal brain MRI are the strongest predictors of the development of PE . The etiology of encephalitis, presence of focal neurologic deficits, and interictal EEG abnormalities did not influence the development of PE .