Rechter, Griffin R.

Abstract To report clinical and functional outcomes, including patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), complications, reoperation rates, and arthritic progression in patients who sustained a knee dislocation (KD) type V fracture dislocation at minimum 2-year follow-up. A retrospective review from a prospectively collected database was performed to identify all patients with a KD type V fracture dislocation between 2001 and 2022 at a single institution. Patient demographics, pre- and postoperative clinical examination findings, intraoperative details, and postoperative complication rates were obtained from medical records. PROMs, including Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Tegner Activity Scale, Lysholm score, and International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective (IKDC) score were analyzed. A total of 11 patients (mean age: 33.9 ± 7.6, mean BMI: 33.5 ± 6.4 kg/m2) were included with a mean follow-up of 6.4 ± 5.4 years. Seven patients (64%) had a tibial plateau fracture involving the weight-bearing surface. Four patients (36%) had a concomitant nerve injury, one patient (9%) had a concomitant vascular injury, three patients (27%) had a concomitant cartilage injury (ICRS grade 3 + ), and seven patients (64%) had a concomitant meniscus injury. In all, 10 patients (82%) underwent fracture fixation. The mean postoperative Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) grade was 3.0 ± 1.0. Postoperative PROMs included VAS at rest of 2.0 ± 2.3, VAS with activity of 3.3 ± 3.2, IKDC of 68.3 ± 22.1, Lysholm of 79.0 ± 23.6, and Tegner of 4.3 ± 1.7. Nine patients (83%) experienced a complication, with four (36%) patients requiring a subsequent reoperation. Patients with a KD V fracture dislocation who underwent surgical management demonstrated high complication and reoperation rates with advanced radiographic evidence of osteoarthritis but ultimately satisfactory functional outcomes at mid-term follow-up. These findings underscore the complexity of KD V injuries and the importance of early recognition, multidisciplinary surgical planning, and patient counseling regarding the prolonged recovery and likelihood of residual symptoms. Level of evidence is IV—retrospective case series.

Background: The origin of arthrofibrosis of the knee is multifactorial; however, it is more commonly seen in patients with arthritis, prolonged immobility, or a history of trauma or surgery to the knee. Arthrofibrosis that results in a flexion contracture of the knee is commonly attributable to scarring and shortening of the posterior joint capsule as seen in the setting of operative intervention, such as anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). Indications: Arthroscopic posterior capsular releases of the knee are indicated in patients with recalcitrant arthrofibrosis who have (1) failed nonoperative management and (2) a flexion contracture of ≥10°. Technique Description: This arthroscopic technique utilizes posteromedial and posterolateral portals in addition to the standard anteromedial and anterolateral portals. A transpatellar tendon portal may also be used to create the posterolateral portal. Both a 30° and a 70° arthroscope are used to better visualize the posteromedial and posterolateral inferior and superior releases. In addition to releases of the capsule both inferiorly and posteriorly, the medial and lateral gastrocnemius tendons can be partially released from the femur to allow for a more adequate release. The 70° arthroscope is necessary to access the capsule posterior to the posterior cruciate ligament to ensure complete release. Results: This procedure is typically reserved for patients who have failed conservative management with extension splinting, physical therapy, and the use of corticosteroids. Persistent arthrofibrosis with flexion contracture can occur after ACLR, with an incidence as high as 38% in some series. The specific technique described in this video has documented patient-reported outcomes of achieving full extension in >90% of patients after an arthroscopic posterior capsular release at final follow-up. Discussion/Conclusion: Recalcitrant arthrofibrosis leading to a persisting extension deficit can be devastating for a patient, as it results in increased pain and stiffness, as well as a significant decrease in functionality. Performing a posterior capsular release in addition to the standard manipulation under anesthesia and lysis of adhesions/synovectomy will allow for greater knee range of motion, particularly greater knee extension. Patient Consent Disclosure Statement: The author(s) attests that consent has been obtained from any patient(s) appearing in this publication. If the individual may be identifiable, the author(s) has included a statement of release or other written form of approval from the patient(s) with this submission for publication.

Abstract Anterior and posterior cruciate ligament (ACL and PCL) reconstruction poses the risk of residual anterior or posterior tibial translation, respectively. As a result, patients may have residual knee instability and laxity, which can contribute to poor outcomes and graft failure. Ultimately, minimizing anterior and posterior tibial translation through proper ACL and PCL graft tensioning has the potential to improve clinical and functional outcomes in the setting of ACL and PCL reconstruction surgery. This technique aims to show a reproducible method for “setting” anterior and posterior tibial translation in the setting of ACL and PCL reconstructions.

Abstract Tunnel convergence in multiligament knee surgery remains a technical challenge. Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) femoral sockets/tunnels and lateral collateral ligament (LCL) femoral sockets/tunnels during anatomic posterolateral corner (PLC) reconstructions are particularly vulnerable to convergence. This is secondary to the limited amount of bony real estate available on the lateral distal femur. Previous studies have attempted to define a specific angle to direct the LCL tunnel away from the ACL tunnel. However, inconsistency with ACL femoral socket creation and variability in bony architecture can make this strategy unreliable. This surgical technique describes how to minimize the risk of ACL and LCL tunnel convergence during ACL and PLC reconstructions.

Abstract Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) using bone–patellar tendon–bone autograft remains one of the most common autografts used, and there is significant evidence to support its title as the “gold standard.” There are nuances and technical challenges associated with every step of an ACLR, which always leave room for improvement. The purpose of this Technical Note is to provide reproducible, technical pearls where errors are commonly encountered during ACLR. In this article, we detail 10 technical pearls that surgeons should consider to enhance operative workflow and optimize success during ACLR with a bone–patellar tendon–bone autograft. Technique Video video See video under supplementary data.

Abstract The ability of the knee to resist valgus stress is largely a result of the integrity of the superficial medial collateral ligament (MCL) and neighboring supporting structures (i.e., deep MCL, semimembranosus, and posterior oblique ligament). The MCL is known to have a robust healing capacity; consequently, the decision to proceed with operative versus nonoperative management of even grade III MCL tears is controversial. When it comes to operative management of these injuries, the decision to proceed with repair or reconstruction is nuanced because the chronicity and location of the MCL tear (i.e., proximal, midsubstance, or distal) largely determine which technique is appropriate. In distal MCL avulsions, including the so‐called Stener lesion, with good tissue quality, direct MCL repair has shown excellent mid‐term outcomes. Consequently, there is a growing need to understand different techniques to address MCL incompetence. In this article, we present a method for primary MCL repair using a washer post–suture post construct. Technique Video video See video under supplementary data.