D’Souza, Anita

Introduction: SystemicAL amyloidosis is a progressive and often fatal disease caused by misfolded light chains that aggregate into amyloid fibrils and deposit in vital organs, leading to organ dysfunction. Current standard of care (SoC) therapies for AL amyloidosis target the plasma cell clone to reduce or eliminate light chain production, but do not remove soluble toxic light chain aggregates or insoluble amyloid deposits. Early mortality remains high for patients with advanced disease (e.g., Mayo 2012 Stage IV disease, median overall survival <6 months). Birtamimab - a humanized monoclonal antibody that neutralizes soluble, toxic light chain aggregates and depletes insoluble amyloid deposits by inducing phagocytosis - is under investigation for the treatment of AL amyloidosis. Here, we present a pooled safety analysis from previous Phase 1-3 clinical trials, with a focus on the 2 double-blind randomized controlled trials (RCTs): PRONTO (NCT02632786) and VITAL (NCT02312206). Methods: Patients with AL amyloidosis were treated with intravenous birtamimab up to 24 mg/kg every 28 daysin the non-placebo-controlled Phase 1/2 open-label trial (NCT01707264) with open-label extension (OLE; NCT02613182) and 2 RCTs (Phase 2 PRONTO with OLE [NCT03154047] and Phase 3 VITAL). In PRONTO, patients had received ≥1 previous systemic therapy with at least a partial hematologic response and persistent cardiac dysfunction, and received birtamimab or placebo. In VITAL, newly diagnosed treatment-naïve patients with cardiac involvement received birtamimab + SoC or placebo + SoC (where SoC was a bortezomib-containing chemotherapy regimen). The analysis included all patients who received ≥1 dose of birtamimab. Pooled median exposure times were calculated, and baseline characteristics and demographics were summarized. For VITAL and PRONTO, pooled rates and severity of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) with birtamimab were compared with rates in the placebo arms. In addition, safety data from the non-placebo-controlled studies were summarized. Results: The median (range) exposure to birtamimab among 302 patients pooled from the Phase 1-3 trials was 12.24 (0.03-57.72) months. Of the 302 patients exposed to birtamimab, 295 received at least one 24-mg/kg infusion, up to 2500 mg. Analysis of the 2 randomized, placebo-controlled trials included data from 196 patients treated with birtamimab from the PRONTO (n=66) and VITAL (n=130) trials and 193 patients who received placebo (PRONTO, n=63; VITAL, n=130). Both trials had comparable treatment durations overall. The rates of TEAEs, serious and grade ≥3 TEAEs were similar between birtamimab and placebo arms within each trial and between treatment arms in the placebo-controlled pooled analysis set (PRONTO and VITAL; Table 1). Higher rates of treatment-related, serious, and grade ≥3 TEAEs were reported in VITAL compared with PRONTO, presumably due to the treatment-naïve population and receipt of concomitant SoC therapy in VITAL. In the pooled analysis set, the most common TEAEs that occurred with greater frequency in the birtamimab vs placebo arms in either trial were, respectively, fatigue (36.2%, 34.2%), diarrhea (33.2%, 33.7%), nausea (31.6%, 30.1%), constipation (31.1%, 31.6%), and dyspnea (25.0%, 24.9%). The most commonly reported (≥5%) serious and grade ≥3 TEAEs were primarily cardiac disorders (cardiac failure, syncope, cardiac arrest), consistent with the underlying disease. Infusion-associated TEAE rates were low in the pooled birtamimab and placebo arms (5.1% vs 3.6%, respectively) and were generally mild to moderate. The safety profile observed in the non-placebo-controlled Phase 1/2 trial plus OLE and PRONTO OLE (n=106) was consistent with the safety data reported in the placebo-controlled studies. Conclusions: Birtamimab was well tolerated in patients with AL amyloidosis when administered as monotherapy and did not demonstrate additive toxicity when given with SoC chemotherapy. Rates of TEAEs in the birtamimab arm were similar to rates in the placebo arm in the PRONTO and VITAL trials. The safety and efficacy of birtamimab is being further investigated in an ongoing confirmatory Phase 3 double-blind RCT in patients with Mayo Stage IV AL amyloidosis (AFFIRM-AL; NCT04973137), which is currently enrolling.

Abstract Background: MM remains incurable and new tx options are needed, especially in heavily pre-treated R/R pts. REGN5459, a BCMAxCD3 bispecific Ab, binds to BCMA on MM cells and with low affinity to CD3 on T cells, triggering T-cell activation and plasma cell depletion with low cytokine release preclinically. This first-in-human study aimed to assess the safety, tolerability, and preliminary anti-tumor activity of REGN5459 monotherapy in pts with R/R MM. Methods: Eligible pts had received ≥3 prior lines of tx including an anti-CD38 Ab, proteasome inhibitor, and immunomodulatory drug, and had exhausted all available tx options. Pts could receive REGN5459 until progression/intolerable toxicity. Primary objectives were to assess safety, tolerability, dose limiting toxicities (DLTs), and determine the recommended Ph 2 dose (RP2D) of REGN5459 (Ph 1) and assess efficacy of REGN5459 (Ph 2) per ORR. Results: As of June 9, 2022, 43 pts were enrolled (Ph 1, 33; Ph 2, 10): median age 67 yrs (range, 26-85), 51% female, 16% high cytogenetic risk, 14% extramedullary plasmacytoma, 37% R-ISS Stage III disease, 61% triple-class refractory, and median of 5 (range, 2-9) prior lines of tx. In Ph 1, one DLT was reported in a pt receiving the highest dose (900 mg; Gr 3 hypoxia, pt later found to have primary lung cancer). RP2D was identified as 480 mg. All pts enrolled had ≥1 TEAE, 74% had Gr ≥3 TEAEs. TEAEs all-Gr in ≥30% of pts were CRS (54%), fatigue (44%), neutropenia (37%), anemia (35%), cough (30%), and diarrhea (30%). Gr ≥3 TEAEs in ≥15% of pts were neutropenia (37%), anemia (26%), lymphopenia (23%), thrombocytopenia (19%), and hypertension (16%). CRS Gr 1, 2, and 3 were reported in 47%, 2%, and 5%, respectively; there was no Gr 4 or 5 CRS. No Gr 3 CRS with RP2D. Tocilizumab was used in 19% and steroids in 9% of pts. One pt developed ICANS (2%, Gr 2). Incidence of serious TEAEs and TEAEs leading to tx discontinuation was 63% and 16%. Infections occurred in 61% (37% Gr ≥3). After data-cutoff, two deaths due to COVID pneumonia and COVID infection have been reported. ORR was 67% (58% ≥VGPR) for the entire cohort and 100% (85% ≥VGPR; 15% sCR; 39% CR) among pts receiving the RP2D (n=13). Median follow-up was 7 mos (range, 1-26) with longest response ongoing for 22+ mos. Median time to response was 0.8 mos. Median DOR was NR (95% CI, 12-NE); 12-mo DOR for RP2D was 66.7% (95% CI, 5.4-94.5). Of pts in ≥CR with available MRD results (n=8), 50% were MRD negative at the 10−5 threshold. Conclusion: These initial data show that REGN5459 has acceptable safety/tolerability in R/R MM with most CRS of low grade and low incidence of ICANS. Modulation of CD3 affinity on bispecific Abs to maximize tumor killing, and mitigate CRS and T-cell exhaustion, warrants further research. Efficacy in this heavily pre-treated cohort was encouraging, with 100% ORR with the RP2D. Updated data will be presented at the meeting. Citation Format: Attaya Suvannasankha, Prashant Kapoor, Matthew J. Pianko, Joshua Richter, Anita D'Souza, Larry D. Anderson, Andrew Magyar, Oluwaseun Aina, Anita Boyapati, Damien Cronier, Nikhil Singh, Karen Rodriguez-Lorenc, Glenn S. Kroog, Hans C. Lee. Safety and efficacy from the phase 1/2 first-in-human study of REGN5459, a BCMA×CD3 bispecific antibody with low CD3 affinity, in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 2 (Clinical Trials and Late-Breaking Research); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(8_Suppl):Abstract nr CT013.

AbstractBackgroundLenalidomide maintenance after autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) in multiple myeloma (MM) results in superior progression‐free survival and overall survival. However, patients with high‐risk multiple myeloma (HRMM) do not derive the same survival benefit from lenalidomide maintenance compared with standard‐risk patients. The authors sought to determine the outcomes of bortezomib‐based maintenance compared with lenalidomide maintenance in patients with HRMM undergoing ASCT.MethodsIn total, the authors identified 503 patients with HRMM who were undergoing ASCT within 12 months of diagnosis from January 2013 to December 2018 after receiving triplet novel‐agent induction in the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research database. HRMM was defined as deletion 17p, t(14;16), t(4;14), t(14;20), or chromosome 1q gain.ResultsThree hundred fifty‐seven patients (67%) received lenalidomide alone, and 146 (33%) received bortezomib‐based maintenance (with bortezomib alone in 58%). Patients in the bortezomib‐based maintenance group were more likely to harbor two or more high‐risk abnormalities and International Staging System stage III disease (30% vs. 22%; p = .01) compared with the lenalidomide group (24% vs. 15%; p < .01). Patients who were receiving lenalidomide maintenance had superior progression‐free survival at 2 years compared with those who were receiving either bortezomib monotherapy or combination therapy (75% vs. 63%; p = .009). Overall survival at 2 years was also superior in the lenalidomide group (93% vs. 84%; p = .001).ConclusionsNo superior outcomes were observed in patients with HRMM who received bortezomib monotherapy or (to a lesser extent) in those who received bortezomib in combination as maintenance compared with lenalidomide alone. Until prospective data from randomized clinical trials are available, post‐transplant therapy should be tailored to each patient with consideration for treating patients in clinical trials that target novel therapeutic strategies for HRMM, and lenalidomide should remain a cornerstone of treatment.

Abstract The overall survival (OS) has improved significantly in multiple myeloma (MM) over the last decade with the use of proteasome inhibitor and immunomodulatory drug-based combinations, followed by high-dose melphalan and autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (auto-HSCT) and subsequent maintenance therapies in eligible newly diagnosed patients. However, clinical trials using auto-HSCT followed by lenalidomide maintenance have shown an increased risk of second primary malignancies (SPM), including second hematological malignancies (SHM). We evaluated the impact of SPM and SHM on progression-free survival (PFS) and OS in patients with MM after auto-HSCT using CIBMTR registry data. Adult patients with MM who underwent first auto-HSCT in the United States with melphalan conditioning regimen from 2011 to 2018 and received maintenance therapy were included (n = 3948). At a median follow-up of 37 months, 175 (4%) patients developed SPM, including 112 (64%) solid, 36 (20%) myeloid, 24 (14%) SHM, not otherwise specified, and 3 (2%) lymphoid malignancies. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that SPM and SHM were associated with an inferior PFS (hazard ratio [HR] 2.62, P &lt; .001 and HR 5.01, P &lt; .001, respectively) and OS (HR 3.85, P &lt; .001 and HR 8.13, P &lt; .001, respectively). In patients who developed SPM and SHM, MM remained the most frequent primary cause of death (42% vs 30% and 53% vs 18%, respectively). We conclude the development of SPM and SHM leads to a poor survival in patients with MM and is an important survivorship challenge. Given the median survival for MM continues to improve, continued vigilance is needed to assess the risks of SPM and SHM with maintenance therapy post–auto-HSCT.

PURPOSE ABBV-383, a B-cell maturation antigen × CD3 T-cell engaging bispecific antibody, has demonstrated promising results in an ongoing first-in-human phase I study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03933735 ) in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). Herein, we report safety and efficacy outcomes of this phase I dose escalation/expansion study. METHODS Patients with RRMM (≥ three prior lines including a proteasome inhibitor, an immunomodulatory drug, and an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody) were eligible. ABBV-383 was administered intravenously over 1-2 hours once every 3 weeks, without any step dosing. A 3 + 3 design with backfilling for dose escalation was used (intrapatient escalation to highest safe dose permitted) followed by initiation of dose expansion. RESULTS As of January 8, 2022, 124 patients (dose escalation [0.025-120 mg], n = 73; dose expansion [60 mg], n = 51) have received ABBV-383; median age was 68 years (range, 35-92 years). The most common hematologic treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were neutropenia (all grades: 37%) and anemia (29%). The most common nonhematologic TEAEs were cytokine release syndrome (57%) and fatigue (30%). Seven deaths from TEAEs were reported with all considered unrelated to study drug by the investigator. For all efficacy-evaluable patients (n = 122; all doses), the objective response rate (ORR) was 57% and very good partial response (VGPR) or better (≥ VGPR) rate was 43%. In the 60 mg dose expansion cohort (n = 49), the ORR and ≥ VGPR rates were 59% and 39%, respectively; and in the ≥ 40 mg dose escalation plus dose expansion cohorts (n = 79) were 68% and 54%, respectively. CONCLUSION ABBV-383 in patients with RRMM was well tolerated with an ORR of 68% at doses ≥ 40 mg. This novel therapy's promising preliminary antitumor activity in heavily pretreated patients warrants further clinical evaluation.