Vijai, Joseph

Abstract Marginal zone lymphomas (MZL) are a group of indolent non-Hodgkin's B-cell lymphomas (NHL) comprising extranodal MZL of mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) type, splenic MZL and nodal MZL. MZL comprises 7-12% of adult NHLs. The genetic etiology of MZL is poorly understood. To better understand the genetic risk factors for MZL, we conducted the first genome-wide association study (GWAS) of this lymphoid malignancy. The GWAS included 824 MZL cases and 6,220 controls of European ancestry from 22 studies of NHL. Genotyping was carried out at the Cancer Genomics Research Laboratory (CGR) of NCI using Illumina Human OmniExpress arrays. Standard genotyping quality controls were performed. Imputation of common SNPs was performed using IMPUTE2 software and 1000 Genomes Project release version 3 data. Association testing was subsequently performed using SNPTEST, assuming a log-additive genetic model adjusting for age, gender and three significant eigenvectors. We identified one locus at 6p21.32 within the HLA class II region that attained genome-wide significance (P<5x10-8). When a small number of additional cases (n=58) and controls (n=66) genotyped using Taqman assays were included, rs9461741 (BTNL2) was associated with an increased risk of MZL (per-allele odds ratio = 2.38, 95% confidence interval: 1.74-3.24; P=4.32x10-8). Other SNPs at the 6p21.32 locus were also highly associated with MZL, suggesting that this is unlikely to be a chance finding. Promising signals yet to be confirmed were also observed on chromosomes 3 and 14. The BTNL2 protein has extracellular immunoglobulin domains and is expressed in multiple tissues including various immune organs and the gut and it inhibits T-cell activation. Genetic variability at BTNL2 has been associated with inflammatory and infectious phenotypes, highlighting the importance of this locus for immune diseases. In conclusion, findings from this GWAS identify the HLA class II region as an important susceptibility locus for MZL. Citation Format: Joseph Vijai, Zhaoming Wang, Sonja I. Berndt, Susan L. Slager, James R. Cerhan, Christine Skibola, Sophia S. Wang, Angela R. Brooks-Wilson, Silvia de Sanjose, Paige M. Bracci, Mads Melbye, Bengt Glimelius, Rebecca D. Jackson, Wendy Cozen, Nikolaus Becker, Lauren R. Teras, John J. Spinelli, Jenny Turner, Qing Lan, Mark P. Purdue, Kimberly A. Bertrand, Kenneth Offit, Paolo Vineis, Brian K. Link, Graham G. Giles, Anne Zelenuich-Jacquotte, Alain Monnereau, Maria Grazia Ennas, Demetrius Albanes, Laurie Burdett, Nathaniel Rothman, Stephen J. Chanock, Alexandra Nieters, On behalf of the NHL GWAS Consortium. A genome-wide association study suggests evidence of variants at 6p21.32 associated with marginal zone lymphoma. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 105th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2014 Apr 5-9; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2014;74(19 Suppl):Abstract nr 5071. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2014-5071

Abstract Germline mutations of BRCA1 and BRCA2 underlie joint susceptibility to breast and ovarian cancers, but do not account for all cases. Genome wide association studies show little overlap between common variants associated with breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility, whereas rare variants in genes initially identified as breast cancer susceptibility genes also confer susceptibility to ovarian cancer cases, unselected for breast cancer. Ovarian and breast tumors also are observed in Peutz-Jeghers and possibly in Lynch syndrome. To further elucidate rare germline susceptibilities for breast and ovarian cancer, we have ascertained a unique cohort of 90 BRCA1/2-negative probands with a personal history of breast cancer and ovarian/fallopian tube/peritoneal cancer, unselected for family history. Cases are from the clinical genetics services of Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center and University of Pennsylvania. Analysis is ongoing using both targeted and exome sequencing approaches. Germline DNA of 69 cases will be subjected to whole exome sequencing. A total of 21 additional cases will undergo targeted sequencing for 28 genes (8 cases) and an extended panel of 54 genes (13 cases). The majority of ovarian cancers are high-grade serous epithelial ovarian carcinoma (n=51), in combination with invasive ductal or DCIS (n=36), invasive lobular (n=4), or unspecified (n=11) breast cancers. The remaining ovarian subgroups comprise other epithelial subtypes; endometrioid (n=9), clear cell (n=3), mucinous and low-grade serous (n=3) and non-epithelial (n=4) or unclassified (n=20), in combination with invasive ductal or DCIS (n=21), invasive lobular (n=5) or unspecified (n=13) breast cancers. Preliminary analysis of the targeted set of genes in 69 cases, reveals 43 predicted pathogenic coding or splice site variants; 17 of which are within PALB2, MSH2, MSH6, BARD1, FANCE, CDKN2A, TP53, SETD2, SIRT1, BRIP1, RAD50, and RAD51D and are not seen in dbSNP138, 1000 Genomes or Exome Variant Server ESP6500 and 26 variants with reported frequencies in MUTYH, MSH6, MLH1, FAM175A, RAD50, UIMC1, JARID2, PHF3, SIRT1, MRE11A, ATM, BRCA2, TP53BP1, CDH1, RAD51D, BRCA1, BABAM1 of less than 1% allele frequency in public databases. Analysis of these variants across and within histologic subtypes is being undertaken to look for specific genotype-phenotype correlations. Analysis of novel candidate genes and pathways by co-segregation, functional analysis, as well as external replication is underway to determine whether shared rare variants, mutated genes, or altered pathways confer cancer susceptibility in this cohort. Germline susceptibility to breast and ovarian cancer is heterogenous and remains a critical research and clinical question. Improved understanding of the susceptibility genetics will allow further examination of the utility of targeted cancer prevention strategies in those who are found to be at risk. Citation Format: Kasmintan A. Schrader, Kara N. Maxwell, Joseph Vijai, Steven Hart, Tinu Thomas, Bradley Wubbenhorst, Lucia Guidugli, Robert Klein, Marina Corines, Liying Zhang, Susan Neuhausen, Jeffrey Weitzel, Namrata Gupta, Larry Norton, Clifford Hudis, Gad Getz, Mark Daly, Steven Lipkin, David Altshuler, Fergus Couch, Katherine Nathanson, Kenneth Offit. Determination of cancer susceptibility in probands with breast and ovarian cancer. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 105th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2014 Apr 5-9; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2014;74(19 Suppl):Abstract nr 3282. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2014-3282

Abstract Massively parallel next generation sequencing data (NGS) has proved to be useful in identification of rare Mendelian disorders. Efforts are on-going to use NGS for discovery of novel rare variants in common disease etiology. Distinguishing rare private mutations from causal variants remains a major challenge in complex disorders. With decreasing cost, investigators are generating NGS data for common cancers. However, power and other considerations suggest that a consortia approach of pooling data is more likely to succeed where individual efforts fail. Combining data within such consortia brings its own level of challenges. We enumerate these challenges and suggest recommendations based on our experience of combining and harmonizing NGS data on 358 breast cancer samples from four centers; (City of Hope n=8, Mayo Clinic n=221, MSKCC n=96 and University of Pennsylvania n=33). Major concerns were ability of individual datasets to discover known and novel variations, depth of coverage across the exome, and quality of variants. Using pre- and post-processed data, we demonstrate an increased power for detecting variants when using a joint-calling method, quality control (QC) and quality assurance pre- and post-merge, as well as the advantages of combined annotations and filtering procedures. To generate a filtered list of high confident calls, we subset the data on Depth per Allele (DP), Genotyping Quality (GQ), Allele balance, Phred likelihood score (PL) as well as using frequency filters on the alternate allele both within the data and comparing against convenience control summaries. We describe general principles and QC measures to be adopted when NGS data is used from diverse sources, specifically applicable to large consortia. Note: This abstract was not presented at the meeting. Citation Format: Joseph Vijai, Steven Hart, Tinu Thomas, Bradley Wubbenhorst, Lucia Guidugli, Kasmintan Schrader, Kara Maxwell, Lauren Jacobs, Danylo Villano, Robert Klein, Steven Lipkin, Susan Neuhausen, Jeffrey Weitzel, David Altshuler, Fergus Couch, Kenneth Offit, Katherine Nathanson. Harmonization of next generation sequencing data within consortia for gene discovery in familial breast cancer. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 105th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2014 Apr 5-9; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2014;74(19 Suppl):Abstract nr 2378. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2014-2378

Abstract BRCA1 and BRCA2 (BRCA) testing is uninformative in approximately 80% of families with clinical features of inherited susceptibility to breast cancer. Early identification of the individuals at risk in BRCAx families may lead to enhanced screening and prevention strategies, and potentially improved overall survival as has been seen for carriers of BRCA1/2 mutations. A proportion of these families are likely explained by mutations in other high penetrance and moderate penetrance breast cancer susceptibility genes. Although multi-gene panels are now commercially available for clinical testing, only limited information is available on the spectrum of mutations in breast cancer susceptibility genes in specific subgroups of high-risk breast cancer patients. We performed whole exome sequencing in 278 BRCA1/2 negative individuals with high-risk familial breast cancer, defined as a proband and at least two first or second degree relatives with breast cancer. Samples included 232 individuals from 97 families and 49 unrelated individuals, for a total of 146 independent cases. Data were analyzed for identification of all variants in 18 known high and moderate penetrance breast cancer susceptibility genes, in addition to BRCA1 and BRCA2. Two of the 97 families and one of the 49 singletons (2% of independent cases) were found to have deleterious mutations in high penetrance genes, namely TP53 (2) and CDH1 (1). In addition, nine of 146 independent cases (6%) were found to have deleterious mutations in the other predisposition genes. Mutations in ATM and CHEK2 accounted for seven of the ten moderate penetrance mutations identified; additionally one family had a mutation in BLM, one in MRE11A, and one in PALB2. Furthermore, 15 of 146 independent cases (10%) were found to have variants of unknown significance (VUS) in one of eight genes. There were no deleterious mutations or VUS in eight of the 18 genes. Our data show that significant genetic heterogeneity exists in BRCAx families. Large-scale collaborative efforts will be required to attain sufficient power to understand how to appropriately apply these results clinically in cancer risk evaluation. Citation Format: Kara N. Maxwell, Lucia Guidugli, Kasmintan Schrader, Steven Hart, Vijai Joseph, Tinu Thomas, Xianshu Wang, Bradley Wubbenhorst, Robert Klein, Susan M. Domchek, Csilla Szabo, Susan Neuhausen, Jeffrey Weitzel, Katherine L. Nathanson, Kenneth Offit, Fergus Couch. High and moderate penetrance germline mutations in a number of genes are responsible for a small proportion of familial breast cancer risk in BRCAx families. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 105th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2014 Apr 5-9; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2014;74(19 Suppl):Abstract nr 1291. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2014-1291

AbstractObjectivesDiffuse large B‐cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is an aggressive subtype of non‐Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) and is the most common NHL subtype diagnosed worldwide. The first large‐scale genome‐wide association study (GWAS) of DLBCL with over 4000 cases conducted among individuals of European ancestry recently identified five independent SNPs that achieved genome‐wide significance, and two SNPs that showed a suggestive association with DLBCL risk.MethodsTo evaluate whether Eastern Asians and individuals of European ancestry share similar genetic risk factors for this disease, we attempted to replicate these GWAS findings in a pooled series of 1124 DLBCL cases and 3596 controls from Hong Kong, South Korea, and Thailand.ResultsThree of the five genome‐wide significant SNPs from the DLBCL GWAS were significantly associated with DLBCL in our study population, including the top finding from the GWAS, EXOC2 rs116446171, which achieved genome‐wide significance in our data (per allele OR = 2.04, 95% CI = 1.63–2.56; ptrend = 3.9 × 10−10). Additionally, we observed a significant association with PVT1 rs13255292 (per allele OR = 1.34, 95% CI = 1.19–1.52; ptrend = 2.1 × 10−6), which was the second strongest finding in the GWAS, and with HLA‐B rs2523607 (per allele OR = 3.05, 95% CI = 1.32–7.05; ptrend = 0.009).ConclusionsOur study, which provides the first evaluation in Eastern Asians of SNPs definitively associated with DLBCL risk in individuals of European ancestry, indicates that at least some of the genetic factors associated with risk of DLBCL are similar between these populations.

Abstract Background:BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers are at substantially increased risk for developing breast and ovarian cancer. The incomplete penetrance coupled with the variable age at diagnosis in carriers of the same mutation suggests the existence of genetic and nongenetic modifying factors. In this study, we evaluated the putative role of variants in many candidate modifier genes. Methods: Genotyping data from 15,252 BRCA1 and 8,211 BRCA2 mutation carriers, for known variants (n = 3,248) located within or around 445 candidate genes, were available through the iCOGS custom-designed array. Breast and ovarian cancer association analysis was performed within a retrospective cohort approach. Results: The observed P values of association ranged between 0.005 and 1.000. None of the variants was significantly associated with breast or ovarian cancer risk in either BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers, after multiple testing adjustments. Conclusion: There is little evidence that any of the evaluated candidate variants act as modifiers of breast and/or ovarian cancer risk in BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers. Impact: Genome-wide association studies have been more successful at identifying genetic modifiers of BRCA1/2 penetrance than candidate gene studies. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 24(1); 308–16. ©2014 AACR.

Abstract Despite limited discovery stages (<1,125 cases), genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have successfully identified 13 loci associated with risk of chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL); however, these loci only explain a portion of the heritability. To identify additional genetic loci associated with CLL susceptibility, we conducted the largest meta-analysis of GWAS, to date, including 3,100 CLL cases and 7,667 controls of European ancestry from 25 independent studies genotyped on four different SNP microarrays. Association testing was conducted assuming a log-additive genetic model, adjusting for age, sex, and significant principal components. Meta-analyses were performed using the fixed effects inverse variance method based on the beta estimates and standard errors from each study. Promising loci were taken forward for replication in three additional studies totaling 788 cases and 4,872 controls. In the meta-analysis of both the discovery and replication studies, we conclusively identified ten independent SNPs in nine novel loci that reached genome-wide significance (P<5 x 10−8): 10q23.31 (FAS; P=1.22x10−14), 18q21.33 (BCL2; P=2.66x10−12 and P=7.76x10−11), 11p15.5 (C11orf21; P=2.15x10−10), 4q25 (LEF1; P=4.24x10−10), 2q33.1 (CASP8; P=2.50x10−9), 9p21.3 (CDKN2B-AS1; P=1.27x10−8), 18q21.32 (PMAIP1; P=2.51x10−8), 15q15.1 (BMF; P=2.71x10−10), and 2p22.2 (QPCT; P=1.68x10−8) as well as an independent signal at an established locus (2q13, ACOXL, P=2.08x10−18). We also found evidence for two additional promising loci that reached marginal genome-wide significance (P<2.0x10−7) at 8q22.3 (ODF1; P=5.40x10−8) and 5p15.33 (TERT; P=1.92x10−7). Although further studies are required, the proximity of five of the novel loci to genes involved in apoptosis suggests a possible unifying underlying biological mechanism. Together with the previously established loci, these genetic loci explain ~17% of the familial risk of CLL. Citation Format: Sonja I. Berndt, Christine F. Skibola, Vijai Joseph, Nicola J. Camp, Alexandra Nieters, Zhaoming Wang, Wendy Cozen, Alain Monnereau, Rachel S. Kelly, Silvia de Sanjose, Martha S. Linet, Elio Riboli, Paolo Vineis, Henrik Hjalgrim, James R. Cerhan, Stephen J. Chanock, Nathaniel Rothman, Susan L. Slager. Meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies identifies multiple loci associated with chronic lymphocytic leukemia. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 104th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2013 Apr 6-10; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2013;73(8 Suppl):Abstract nr LB-23. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2013-LB-23

Abstract Background: Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) identified variants at 19p13.1 and ZNF365 (10q21.2) as risk factors for breast cancer among BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers, respectively. We explored associations with ovarian cancer and with breast cancer by tumor histopathology for these variants in mutation carriers from the Consortium of Investigators of Modifiers of BRCA1/2 (CIMBA). Methods: Genotyping data for 12,599 BRCA1 and 7,132 BRCA2 mutation carriers from 40 studies were combined. Results: We confirmed associations between rs8170 at 19p13.1 and breast cancer risk for BRCA1 mutation carriers [HR, 1.17; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.07–1.27; P = 7.42 × 10−4] and between rs16917302 at ZNF365 (HR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.73–0.97; P = 0.017) but not rs311499 at 20q13.3 (HR, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.94–1.31; P = 0.22) and breast cancer risk for BRCA2 mutation carriers. Analyses based on tumor histopathology showed that 19p13 variants were predominantly associated with estrogen receptor (ER)-negative breast cancer for both BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers, whereas rs16917302 at ZNF365 was mainly associated with ER-positive breast cancer for both BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. We also found for the first time that rs67397200 at 19p13.1 was associated with an increased risk of ovarian cancer for BRCA1 (HR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.05–1.29; P = 3.8 × 10−4) and BRCA2 mutation carriers (HR, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.10–1.52; P = 1.8 × 10−3). Conclusions: 19p13.1 and ZNF365 are susceptibility loci for ovarian cancer and ER subtypes of breast cancer among BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. Impact: These findings can lead to an improved understanding of tumor development and may prove useful for breast and ovarian cancer risk prediction for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 21(4); 645–57. ©2012 AACR.