Back to Authors

Rosen, Howard J.

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9281-7402

A5072009949 | I180670191

Mayo Clinic

University of California, San Francisco

Citations 171

Frontotemporal dementia with the V337M MAPT mutation

Neurology | January 27, 2017 | Volume: 88 | Issue: 8 | Pages: 758-766

10.1212/wnl.0000000000003636 | PMID 28130473

Increased prevalence of autoimmune disease within C9 and FTD/MND cohorts

Neurology Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation | October 29, 2016 | Volume: 3 | Issue: 6 | Pages: No page available

10.1212/nxi.0000000000000301 | PMID 27844039

Willingness to Be a Brain Donor

Alzheimer Disease & Associated Disorders | October 25, 2016 | Volume: 31 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 135-140

10.1097/wad.0000000000000174 | PMID 27779492

Introduction: Racial and ethnic groups are under-represented among research subjects who assent to brain donation in Alzheimer disease research studies. There has been little research on this important topic. Although there are some studies that have investigated the barriers to brain donation among African American study volunteers, there is no known research on the factors that influence whether or not Asians or Latinos are willing to donate their brains for research. Methods: African American, Caucasian, Asian, and Latino research volunteers were surveyed at 15 Alzheimer Disease Centers to identify predictors of willingness to assent to brain donation. Results: Positive predictors included older age, Latino ethnicity, understanding of how the brain is used by researchers, and understanding of what participants need to do to ensure that their brain will be donated. Negative predictors included African/African American race, belief that the body should remain whole at burial, and concern that researchers might not be respectful of the body during autopsy. Discussion: The predictive factors identified in this study may be useful for researchers seeking to increase participation of diverse ethnic groups in brain donation.
P3‐309: Advancing research and treatment of frontotemporal lobar degeneration (ARTFL): Preparing for clinical trials for ftld in north america

Alzheimer's & Dementia | December 15, 2015 | Volume: 11 | Issue: 7S_Part_16 | Pages: No page available

10.1016/j.jalz.2015.06.1683

O5‐03‐01: Longitudinal evaluation of familial frontotemporal dementia subjects (LEFFTDS): Subject characteristics, aims, and methodology

Alzheimer's & Dementia | December 15, 2015 | Volume: 11 | Issue: 7S_Part_7 | Pages: No page available

10.1016/j.jalz.2015.07.457

Memory, executive, and multidomain subtle cognitive impairment

Neurology | June 18, 2015 | Volume: 85 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 144-153

10.1212/wnl.0000000000001738 | PMID 26085606

Brain amyloidosis ascertainment from cognitive, imaging, and peripheral blood protein measures

Neurology | January 22, 2015 | Volume: 84 | Issue: 7 | Pages: 729-737

10.1212/wnl.0000000000001231 | PMID 25609767

The advantages of frontotemporal degeneration drug development (part 2 of frontotemporal degeneration: The next therapeutic frontier)

Alzheimer's & Dementia | October 10, 2012 | Volume: 9 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 189-198

10.1016/j.jalz.2012.03.003 | PMID 23062850

Frontotemporal degeneration (FTD) encompasses a spectrum of related neurodegenerative disorders with behavioral, language, and motor phenotypes for which there are currently no effective therapies. This is the second of two articles that summarize the presentations and discussions that occurred at two symposia in 2011 sponsored by the Frontotemporal Degeneration Treatment Study Group, a collaborative group of academic and industry researchers that is devoted to developing treatments for FTD. This article discusses the current status of FTD clinical research that is relevant to the conduct of clinical trials, and why FTD research may be an attractive pathway for developing therapies for neurodegenerative disorders. The clinical and molecular features of FTD, including rapid disease progression and relatively pure molecular pathology, suggest that there are advantages to developing drugs for FTD as compared with other dementias. FTD qualifies as orphan indication, providing additional advantages for drug development. Two recent sets of consensus diagnostic criteria will facilitate the identification of patients with FTD, and a variety of neuropsychological, functional, and behavioral scales have been shown to be sensitive to disease progression. Moreover, quantitative neuroimaging measurements demonstrate progressive brain atrophy in FTD at rates that may surpass Alzheimer's disease. Finally, the similarities between FTD and other neurodegenerative diseases with drug development efforts already underway suggest that FTD researchers will be able to draw on this experience to create a road map for FTD drug development. We conclude that FTD research has reached sufficient maturity to pursue clinical development of specific FTD therapies.
Vascular burden and Alzheimer disease pathologic progression

Neurology | September 13, 2012 | Volume: 79 | Issue: 13 | Pages: 1349-1355

10.1212/wnl.0b013e31826c1b9d | PMID 22972646

Predicting missing biomarker data in a longitudinal study of Alzheimer disease

Neurology | April 5, 2012 | Volume: 78 | Issue: 18 | Pages: 1376-1382

10.1212/wnl.0b013e318253d5b3 | PMID 22491869