Back to Authors

Farias, Sarah Tomaszewski

https://orcid.org/0009-0009-8969-3387

A5112904024 | I84218800

Mayo Clinic

University of California, Davis

Citations 16

Measuring cognition and function in the preclinical stage of Alzheimer's disease

Alzheimer's & Dementia: Translational Research & Clinical Interventions | February 13, 2018 | Volume: 4 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 64-75

10.1016/j.trci.2018.01.003 | PMID 29955653

Abstract The Alzheimer's Association's Research Roundtable met in November 2016 to explore how best to measure changes in cognition and function in the preclinical stage of Alzheimer's disease. This review will cover the tools and instruments currently available to identify populations for prevention trials, and measure subtle disease progression in the earliest stages of Alzheimer's disease, and will include discussions of suitable cognitive, behavioral, functional, composite, and biological endpoints for prevention trials. Current prevention trials are reviewed including TOMMOROW, Alzheimer's Prevention Initiative Autosomal Dominant Alzheimer's Disease Trial, the Alzheimer's Prevention Initiative Generation Study, and the Anti‐Amyloid Treatment in Asymptomatic Alzheimer's to compare current approaches and tools that are being developed.
Self‐rated and informant‐rated everyday function in comparison to objective markers of Alzheimer's disease

Alzheimer's & Dementia | November 17, 2014 | Volume: 11 | Issue: 9 | Pages: 1080-1089

10.1016/j.jalz.2014.09.002 | PMID 25449531

It is recognized that individuals with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) already demonstrate difficulty in aspects of daily functioning, which predicts disease progression. This study examined the relationship between self‐ versus informant‐report of functional ability, and how those reports relate to objective disease measures across the disease spectrum (i.e. cognitively normal, MCI, Alzheimer's disease). A total of 1080 subjects with self‐ and/or informant‐rated Everyday Cognition questionnaires were included. Objective measures included cognitive functioning, structural brain atrophy, cerebrospinal fluid abnormalities, and a marker of amyloid deposition using positron emission tomography with [ 18 F]AV45 (florbetapir). Overall, informant‐report was consistently more associated with objective markers of disease than self‐report although self‐reported functional status may still have some utility in early disease.
P2–200: Self‐ versus informant‐based cognitive complaints: Relation of E‐Cog scores to imaging, biomarkers and clinical Status in ADNI‐2

Alzheimer's & Dementia | October 9, 2013 | Volume: 9 | Issue: 4S_Part_10 | Pages: No page available

10.1016/j.jalz.2013.05.845

IC‐P‐105: Self‐reported versus informant‐based cognitive complaints: Relation of E‐Cog scores to imaging biomarkers and clinical status in ADNI‐2

Alzheimer's & Dementia | October 9, 2013 | Volume: 9 | Issue: 4S_Part_2 | Pages: No page available

10.1016/j.jalz.2013.05.102

CAG repeat expansion in Huntington disease determines age at onset in a fully dominant fashion

Neurology | February 9, 2012 | Volume: 78 | Issue: 10 | Pages: 690-695

10.1212/wnl.0b013e318249f683 | PMID 22323755

Assessment of cognition in early dementia

Alzheimer's & Dementia | July 25, 2011 | Volume: 7 | Issue: 3 | Pages: No page available

10.1016/j.jalz.2011.05.001 | PMID 23559893

Better tools for assessing cognitive impairment in the early stages of Alzheimer's disease (AD) are required to enable diagnosis of the disease before substantial neurodegeneration has taken place and to allow for detection of subtle changes in the early stages of progression of the disease. The National Institute on Aging and the Alzheimer's Association convened a meeting to discuss state‐of‐the art methods for cognitive assessment, including computerized batteries, as well as new approaches in the pipeline. Speakers described research using novel tests of object recognition, spatial navigation, attentional control, semantic memory, semantic interference, prospective memory, false memory, and executive function as among the tools that could provide earlier identification of individuals with AD. In addition to early detection, there is a need for assessments that reflect real‐world situations so as to better assess functional disability. It is especially important to develop assessment tools that are useful in ethnically, culturally, and linguistically diverse populations as well as in individuals with neurodegenerative disease other than AD.