Homburger, H A

Abstract Anti-IgA may cause anaphylactic transfusion reactions in IgA-deficient individuals. Testing for IgG anti-IgA is useful to identify persons at risk. This report describes an immunoassay for anti-IgA that uses polyclonal IgA coupled to fluorescent microspheres as an immunosorbent. Anti-IgA is detected by phycoerythrin-labeled anti-IgG. The assay is calibrated in arbitrary units by use of a serum that contains anti-IgA. Dose-response studies with sera that contain anti-IgA showed positive responses at dilutions up to 32-fold greater than the dilution used to test patients’ samples. Inhibition studies with purified IgA and IgA-deficient serum showed no inhibition with IgA-deficient serum and complete inhibition with soluble IgA. Clinical tests performed in more than 90 assays had a CV of 13.6 percent for measurements of an internal positive control. The fluorescent immunoassay method is rapid, reproducible, and sensitive to low concentrations of IgG anti-IgA. Immunohematology 2009;25:24–28.

Abstract We developed rapid 24-h immunoblot assays for detecting autoantibodies to Scl 70 and Jo 1 antigens in serum. In comparative studies, we evaluated the analytical sensitivity of the immunoblot assays and commercial immunodiffusion assays for anti-Scl 70 and anti-Jo 1 autoantibodies with the use of positive control sera, and compared the frequencies of positive and negative results in a group of 116 sera, including specimens from 34 healthy controls and 82 patients with various connective-tissue diseases. The immunoblot assays were greater than 100-fold more sensitive than immunodiffusion for detecting both autoantibodies. Despite greater analytical sensitivity, there were no false-positive results by the immunoblot assay for anti-Scl 70 or anti-Jo 1 autoantibodies in sera from either the controls or the patients. The diagnostic sensitivity of the immunoblot assay for anti-Scl 70 autoantibodies in patients with scleroderma was greater than that of the immunodiffusion assay, 70% vs 20%, and was equivalent in patients with polymyositis, 43%. We conclude that rapid immunoblot assays for anti-Scl 70 and anti-Jo 1 autoantibodies are superior to immunodiffusion assays for clinical use and are suitable for routine use in the clinical laboratory.

Summary Serum and plasma are used interchangeably to measure anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA), even though the release of ANCA target antigens during the preparation of serum could affect ANCA assays and cause discrepancies between the results obtained from serum and plasma. To what extent ANCA test results obtained from serum agree and correlate with results from plasma remains unknown. Therefore, a comprehensive comparison was performed using serum and plasma samples which were collected in 175 patients with active Wegener's granulomatosis at enrolment of a recent randomized trial. These paired serum and plasma samples were subjected to parallel ANCA testing by standard indirect immunofluoresence on ethanol-fixed neutrophils, a direct enzyme-linked immunoassay (ELISA) for proteinase 3 (PR3)-ANCA and myeloperoxidase (MPO)-ANCA, and two different capture ELISAs for PR3-ANCA. The concordance of categorical serum and plasma ANCA results was assessed using κ-coefficients. These were > 0·8 for all assays, indicating a very good concordance between positive and negative serum and plasma results. Spearman's correlation coefficients for serum and plasma PR3-ANCA values obtained by direct ELISA and both capture ELISAs were ≥ 0·95 (P < 0·0001). Our study shows that serum and plasma samples can be used interchangeably for measuring ANCA.

SUMMARY We have expressed conformationally intact, enzymatically active recombinant PR3 in HMC-1 cells (HMC-1/PR3 cells) that is recognized by C-ANCA. Here we directly compared the clinical utility of C-ANCA testing by indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) using HMC-1/PR3 cell cytospin versus polymorphonuclear neutrophil (PMN) cytospin preparations and commercially available anti-PR3 ELISA kits. Two hundred sera were tested independently by three investigators: 101 previously determined to be C-ANCA-positive by routine clinical laboratory testing using standard IIF on PMN cytospins, and 99 control samples chosen primarily because they contained antibodies against other cytoplasmic target antigens. Discrepant test results between the two cellular substrates were found in seven samples: 2/7 were PMN-positive and HMC-1/PR3 cell-negative (one Sjögren's syndrome, one hand injury); 5/7 were PMN-negative and HMC-1/PR3-positive (all Wegener's granulomatosis (WG)). All C-ANCA-positive WG patients were also positive on HMC-1/PR3 cells. IIF using HMC-1/PR3 cells was as sensitive as the most sensitive anti-PR3 ELISA (79.8% versus 80.7%, P = 0.739), and more sensitive than standard IIF C-ANCA testing using PMN cytospins (79.8% versus 75.2%, P = 0.025) or the anti-PR3 ELISA with the least false-positive test results (79.8% versus 63%, P < 0.01). These findings indicate that HMC-1/PR3 cells are a very sensitive antigen-specific substrate for clinical anti-PR3 ANCA testing which appears superior to standard C-ANCA testing using PMN cytospin substrates and anti-PR3 ELISA. Our results also suggest that in WG the C-ANCA fluorescence pattern is not caused by antibodies against target antigens other than PR3.

SUMMARYANCA directed against PR3 are highly specific for Wegener's granulomatosis and microscopic polyangiitis, and have been implicated in the pathogenesis of small vessel vasculitis. Most PR3-ANCA are directed against conformational epitopes on PR3. This study was designed to determine whether the cleavage of the N-terminal activation dipeptide of PR3 is required for the binding of PR3-ANCA. Recombinant PR3 (rPR3) variants were expressed in the epithelial cell line, 293. As confirmed by radiosequencing, the rPR3 secreted into the 293 cell culture supernatant is N-terminally unprocessed. Two enzymatically inactive rPR3 mutants were expressed in 293 cells: rPR3-S176A and δ-rPR3-S176A. rPR3-S176A contains the N-propetide Ala-2-Glu-1, δ-rPR3-S176A does not. Culture supernatants of rPR3-S176A and δ-rPR3-S176A expressing 293 cells were used as sources of target antigen for PR3-ANCA testing by capture ELISA. Forty unselected consecutive PR3-ANCA+ sera were tested. With δ-rPR3-S176A as antigen all 40 were recognized, compared with only 34 of 40 when rPR3-S176A served as target antigen. The majority of the serum samples contained a mixture of antibodies reacting with epitopes accessible on the mature and on the proform of PR3. In conclusion, the cleavage of the N-terminal activation dipeptide of PR3 is not an absolute requirement for recognition by all PR3-ANCA. However, a substantial proportion of PR3-ANCA recognize (a) target antigen(s) exposed only after the conformational change of PR3 associated with the N-terminal processing. In 15% of sera this PR3-ANCA subset occurred exclusively. PR3-ANCA subtypes can be differentiated using specifically designed rPR3 variants as target antigens, and non-haematopoietic mammalian cells without regulated secretory pathway can be used for their expression.