Yepez‐Sisalema, Geovanna

AbstractBackgroundAlzheimer's disease (AD) is the most prevalent neurodegenerative disease, yet our comprehension predominantly relies on studies within the non‐Hispanic White (NHW) population. To address this, Accelerating Medicines Partnership in AD (AMP‐AD) aimed to promote inclusivity in multi‐omics AD research, to unravel unique molecular signatures and pathways. The study aimed to provide comprehensive insights into the proteomic landscape of AD across diverse racial groups.MethodDorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) and superior temporal gyrus (STG) brain tissues were donated from multiple centers (Mayo Clinic, Emory University, Rush University, Mt. Sinai School of Medicine) and were harmonized through neuropathological evaluation, specifically adhering to the Braak staging and CERAD criteria. Among 1105 DLPFC tissue samples (980 unique individuals), 322 were from African American donors, 214 from Latino Americans, 551 from NHW donors, and the rest were from a mixed or unknown racial background. Among 280 STG samples, 86 were African American, 76 Latino American, 116 NHW and the rest were mixed or unknown ethnicity. All tissues were uniformly homogenized and analyzed by tandem mass tag‐based mass spectrometry (TMT‐MS). Following quality control (QC), proteins with more than 50% missing values were removed and iterative principal component analysis was conducted to remove outliers within brain regions. Differential protein expression was conducted within and across races after adjusting for batch using regression‐analysis.ResultIn total, 9,180 proteins from the DLPFC, and 9,734 proteins from STG brain tissues were quantified by TMT‐MS. Further analysis identified approximately 3,000 differentially abundant proteins in AD brains compared to controls within race. The AD‐associated differentially abundant proteins were strongly correlated between DLPFC and STG regions and with CERAD and Braak. Protein levels of MAPT and APP demonstrated equivalent disease‐related elevations in both African American and NHW individuals with AD. Notably, after adjusting for AD, significant differences in protein levels were identified across race.ConclusionThe proteomics approach employed by AMP‐AD sheds light on the brain proteome in AD across diverse racial groups, emphasizing the importance of inclusive research in establishing robust and generalizable discoveries. The identified proteins here could underscore racial disparities beyond disease association, contributing to a more nuanced understanding of AD pathophysiology.

AbstractBackgroundAfrican Americans (AA) and Latin Americans (LA) are at a higher risk of developing AD compared to non‐Hispanic whites (NHW) but are traditionally underrepresented in AD research. The disproportionate risk is likely multifactorial including differences in co‐morbidities and structural and social determinants of health (SSDoH). AD risk is thought to result from multiple genetic and environmental factors, and their interactions (GxE). However, the molecular mechanisms underlying these interactions are largely unknown. The best‐established genetic risk factor for AD is APOE‐ε4, while APOE‐ε2 is protective. Environmental factors, such as living in neighborhoods with greater socioeconomic disadvantage, have been associated with greater AD neuropathology and worse cognitive function. Studying the potential modifying role of neighborhood disadvantage regarding associations of APOE‐ε4 and APOE‐ε2 with AD risk using a socioeconomic metric like the Area Deprivation Index (ADI) in a multiethnic post‐mortem cohort could offer valuable insights for precision medicine.MethodWe analyzed a post‐mortem cohort of 421 multi‐ethnic donors (NHW: N = 234, AD = 70, non‐AD = 164; LA: N = 145, AD = 102, non‐AD = 43; AA: N = 42, AD = 24, non‐AD = 18), from Mayo Clinic Florida, Banner Sun Health Research Institute, and the University of Florida Brain Banks as part of the AMP AD Diversity initiative. This study used the same neuropathological criteria to categorize AD vs. non‐AD as in the MayoRNAseq study (syn5550404). ADI from the Neighborhood Atlas® was obtained from de‐identified addresses. Associations of APOE‐ε4, APOE‐ε2, and ADI with AD risk were examined using logistic regression models adjusted for age‐at‐death, sex, and ethnic group; interactions of APOE genotype with ADI were also assessed.ResultAPOE‐ε4 and APOE‐ε2 showed a significant association with AD diagnosis (APOE‐ε4combined cohort OR = 3.23, P = 3.14E‐08; APOE‐ε2combined cohort OR = 0.30, P = 0.003). However, contrary to prior findings, our study found no association between ADI and AD diagnosis [OR = 1.023 (per each 10 unit increase in ADI), P = 0.629]. No significant interactions of ADI with APOE‐ε4 or APOE‐ε2 regarding association with AD diagnosis were identified (P = 0.083, P = 0.781).ConclusionThis is the first study evaluating the potential interaction of neighborhood disadvantage with APOE on AD risk in a multi‐ethnic autopsy cohort. However, these findings require further investigation in larger, more well‐powered cohorts for validation.

AbstractBackgroundAlzheimer’s disease (AD) is a devastating neurodegenerative disorder with few therapies to treat, mitigate or prevent its onset. Understanding of this disease is predominantly based on research in non‐Hispanic Whites (NHW) although AD disproportionately affects African Americans (AA) and Latin Americans (LA), underrepresented in AD research. To address this knowledge gap, the Accelerating Medicine Partnership for Alzheimer’s Disease (AMP‐AD) Diversity Working Group was launched to generate multi‐omics data from post‐mortem brain tissue from donors of predominantly AA and LA descent. Here, we focus on genomic and transcriptomics measures, made available through the AD Knowledge Portal (ADKP).MethodBrain tissue from dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), caudate nucleus (CN), superior temporal gyrus (STG) and temporal pole (TP) regions of AA (N = 299), LA (N = 344) and NHW (N = 532) donors was obtained through Mayo Clinic, Mt. Sinai School of Medicine, Emory, Columbia, Rush Alzheimer’s Disease Center, Banner Sun Health, and 1Florida. DNA extracted from DLPFC tissue samples (n = 641) was utilized for whole genome sequencing (WGS) at New York Genome Center (NYGC). RNAseq of 2,224 samples was conducted either at Mayo, Rush or NYGC. Sequencing reads were processed through GenomeGPS and MAPRseq pipelines for WGS and RNAseq data, respectively. Following quality control (QC), RNAseq data was normalized and assessed for sources of variation (SOV). Integration of WGS and RNAseq data to perform comparative eQTL analysis across multi‐ethnic populations and brain regions is ongoing.ResultWGS data for 621 donors, and RNAseq data generated at Mayo (n = 1,136 samples), Rush (n = 627), and NYGC (n = 779) sequencing centers, were deposited to the ADKP. Consensus processing of RNAseq data revealed site, sex, race/ethnicity, RIN, AD diagnosis, age at death and/or library batch as SOV across various sites and brain regions. Principal component analysis of gene expression measures revealed no major stratification by disease or brain region. Accompanying clinical metadata of donors have been distributed through ADKP.ConclusionThese multi‐omics data made available to the research community is expected to be an initial step towards bridging our data and knowledge gap to elucidate conserved and distinct AD related pathways across these underrepresented at‐risk populations.