Dodick, David W.

Abstract Background In vivo biomarkers that can detect long‐term neuropathologies from repetitive head impact (RHI) exposure are needed, especially for the neurodegenerative tauopathy chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE). Here, we evaluated plasma p ‐tau217 as a potential biomarker for CTE p ‐tau pathology, and examined the concordance between plasma p ‐tau217 and Aβ pathology in an at‐risk for CTE sample. Method The sample included 180 male former football players (120 professional, 60 college), and 56 asymptomatic men without RHI (i.e., controls). Participants completed blood draws, 18F‐florbetapir (Aβ+=SUVR≥1.10), and 18F‐flortaucipir PET. Traumatic encephalopathy syndrome (TES) diagnoses were made. Single molecule array for plasma p ‐tau217 (ALZpath) was performed (≥0.6 cutoff used to maximize sensitivity). Nine participants had post‐mortem tissue. ANCOVA examined group differences in p ‐tau217 (football vs controls; TES‐CTE no, TES‐CTE suggestive, TES‐CTE possible/probable). Multivariable regression models tested associations between p ‐tau217 and florbetapir/flortaucipir PET. Covariates included age, race and APOE e4 . Result Sample characteristics are in Table 1. p ‐tau217 concentrations were higher in former football players compared to controls (est. marginal mean difference=‐0.217, p = 0.005). There were no group differences in Aβ‐PET SUVR. No differences were found across TES‐CTE certainty levels. In football players, higher p ‐tau217 was associated with higher Aβ‐PET SUVR (B=1.380, 95%CI[0.597‐2.155], p = 0.001) but not when Aβ+ ( n = 17) participants and those with kidney/liver disease ( n = 5) were excluded. Aβ+ participants had the highest p ‐tau217 (Figure 1). When compared against Aβ‐PET, several false Aβ‐positives (high p ‐tau217, Aβ‐) were identified, including one extreme outlier (assay related) and a cluster of Aβ‐ participants with p ‐tau217 between 0.60–1.0. There were no associations with flortaucipir SUVR (frontal, mesial temporal, left parietal). Two extreme p ‐tau217 outliers had autopsy‐confirmed CTE stage III (AD‐, Table 2). Of the remaining donors, all were AD‐ and four had CTE (stages II‐IV) with ptau217 between 0.125‐0.449. Conclusion Plasma p ‐tau217 has usefulness in quantifying Aβ pathology but restricted utility for detection of CTE. In this at‐risk for CTE sample, p ‐tau217 and Aβ‐PET were associated at the group level. At the individual level, false Aβ‐positives (and negatives) existed, including Aβ‐ participants with high p ‐tau217. We will explore whether this discrepancy is due to disease or peripheral interference with the N‐terminal binding in p ‐tau assays.

Abstract Background Chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE) is a neurodegenerative tauopathy associated with repetitive head impacts (RHI). Autopsy studies show that RHI influences risk for other later‐life neuropathologies, particularly white matter and vascular injury. We have observed a unique pattern of white matter hyperintensities (WMH) on FLAIR MRI in people exposed to RHI (RHI‐WMH) characterized by small, discrete lesions near the depths of sulci (Figure 1a). The objective of this study was to characterize this pattern empirically in former American football players and to investigate neuropathology co‐localizing with the WMH. Method The sample included 164 male former football players ( n = 111 professional, n = 53 college) and 55 asymptomatic males without RHI from the DIAGNOSE CTE Project (Table 1). Visual ratings of WMH blind to the participant's RHI and clinical status were conducted to count lesions that were a.) within 1.0cm of the gray/white matter boundary, b.) as bright as the cortex, c.) spherical and d.) <1.0cm in size. ANCOVA compared groups on total number of WMH adjusted for age and vascular risk factors. We selected one individual (former professional player) with the typical RHI‐WMH pattern and who donated their brain for neuropathological examination. Guided by in vivo MRI, ex vivo MRI was done to locate the WMH near the depths of the sulci in the tissue. Tissue sections were tested for phosphorylated tau immunoreactivity and reactive astrocytes and microglia in areas surrounding the lesion seen on MRI. Result Number of RHI‐WMH was greater in football players compared to controls ( p = 0.007) (Figure 1b). Number of RHI‐WMH was greater in former professional players compared to controls ( p = 0.001) but not compared to the college players ( p = 0.983). In the neuropathology case study, we located the punctate RHI‐WMH on ex vivo MRI. Immunostaining revealed that the RHI‐WMH was adjacent to a sulcus with the pathognomonic CTE p ‐tau lesion and was characterized by myelin pallor, dense GFAP‐positive glial scarring, and increased total and activated microglia (Figure 2). Conclusion We provide empirical support for exposure to RHI as potentially leading to a unique pattern of WMH. Importantly, histopathological evidence showed that the RHI‐WMH co‐localized with RHI and CTE‐related neuropathologies at the depths of the sulci.

Abstract Background Exposure to repetitive head impacts (RHI) is associated with developing chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE) neuropathology. Cognitive and behavioral symptoms have been associated with CTE neuropathology, but efforts to define the specific clinical syndrome are ongoing. This study characterizes the current use of centrally acting medications (CAMs), chronic pain, and number of orthopedic surgeries in former American football players and evaluates for associations with cognitive and behavioral symptoms. Methods This study analyzed data from the DIAGNOSE CTE Research Project, which includes 120 former professional football players, 60 collegiate football players, and 56 asymptomatic men without history of RHI. Medical history was obtained by self‐report, and participants completed the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), Brief Pain Inventory, Barratt Impulsiveness Scale‐11 (BIS‐11), BRIEF‐A Behavioral Regulation Index (BRI), Beck Depression Inventory‐II (BDI‐II), Beck Anxiety Index (BAI), and Brown‐Goodwin Lifetime History of Aggression adulthood score (BGLHA). Logistic regression assessed the association of CAMs, average pain score, and orthopedic surgeries on the cognitive impairment and neurobehavioral dysregulation components of the NINDS traumatic encephalopathy syndrome (TES) research criteria, in former American football players. Linear regression assessed the associations with MoCA and behavioral scales. Models were adjusted for age, education, race, and years of football played. Results Tables 1 and 2 describe the sample and CAM burden. More orthopedic surgeries, CAMs, and higher average pain were observed in former American football players. Number of CAMs was associated with neurobehavioral dysregulation (OR = 2.18), lower MoCA (β = ‐0.47), and higher BIS‐11 (β = 2.23), BDI‐II (β = 2.01), BRI (β = 3.71), BAI (β = 2.04), and BGLHA (β = 0.68) scores. Higher average pain was associated with neurobehavioral dysregulation (OR = 1.57) and higher BIS‐11 (β = 2.20), BDI‐II (β = 1.98), BRI (β = 2.20), BAI (β = 1.84), and BGLHA (β = 0.52) scores. No associations were observed with orthopedic surgeries. Conclusions In former American football players, the number of CAMs and higher average pain were associated with neurobehavioral dysregulation. No associations were observed with diagnosis of cognitive impairment by TES criteria, though the number of CAMs was associated with decreased MoCA.

Abstract Repetitive head impacts are common in contact and collision sports and are linked to structural brain changes and an elevated risk of neurodegenerative diseases such as Chronic Traumatic Encephalopathy. Identifying early in vivo structural markers remains challenging. Although diagnosis currently requires post-mortem confirmation, clinical symptoms, including cognitive impairment and behavioural changes, are reflected in the diagnosis of Traumatic Encephalopathy Syndrome. These symptoms align with dysfunction in key brain regions—amygdala, hippocampus and thalamus—which support memory, emotion and behaviour and commonly show tau pathology in Chronic Traumatic Encephalopathy. This study uses shape analysis to examine structural differences in these regions between former American football players and unexposed asymptomatic controls and evaluates the influence of age, head impact exposure and clinical diagnosis on brain structure. We analyzed brain morphology in former American football players (n = 163) and unexposed, asymptomatic controls (n = 53). Structural segmentation was performed with FreeSurfer 7.1, and the shape analysis pipeline was used to generate subregional reconstructions. Vertex-level morphometry, based on the logarithm of the Jacobian determinant and radial distance, quantified local surface area dilation and thickness. Group differences were examined with covariate-adjusted linear regression models contrasting football players and controls, as well as participants with and without a Traumatic Encephalopathy Syndrome diagnosis. Partial correlations examined the influence of age, age of first football exposure and cumulative head impact index metrics, including frequency, linear acceleration and rotational force. Models were adjusted accordingly for age, body mass index, education, race, imaging site, apolipoprotein ϵ4 status and total intracranial volume. Former football players exhibited bilateral surface area contractions in the hippocampus and amygdala, along with reduced amygdala thickness, compared to controls. Older age was associated with widespread surface contractions and thinning across all regions, except for preserved thickness in the left hippocampus. An earlier age of first exposure to football correlated with surface contractions in the thalamus and left hippocampus. Greater cumulative linear acceleration was linked to bilateral hippocampal surface contractions and reduced thickness in the left thalamus, while greater rotational force exposure was associated with hippocampal thinning. No significant structural differences were found between players with and without a diagnosis of Traumatic Encephalopathy Syndrome. These findings extend volume-based research by revealing localized alterations in surface area dilation and thickness and emphasize the roles of age and repetitive head impact exposure in long-term brain changes.

Objective To develop evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for non-invasive neuromodulation devices in acute and preventive migraine treatment. Methods A systematic review was conducted across six databases from 1946 to April 2025. Randomized controlled trials evaluating Food and Drug Administration-cleared or Conformité Européenne (CE)-marked non-invasive neuromodulation devices were included. The quality of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology, and recommendations were developed through consensus following GRADE Evidence-to-Decision frameworks. The working group comprised 15 senior members and six junior members. Results From 1536 initial records, 15 studies met the inclusion criteria and were finally used to develop evidence-based recommendations. Evidence quality ranged from very low to moderate. Weak recommendations were issued for SAVI Dual, Cefaly, Relivion, and Nerivio in the treatment of acute migraine attacks, and for gammaCore Sapphire, Cefaly, and Nerivio in the preventive migraine treatment. Other cleared devices received no recommendations or have no eligible studies for the GRADE assessment. The primary limitations across studies included imprecision due to small sample sizes and various methodological concerns. Additionally, expert consensus recommendations were developed for devices and clinical scenarios not adequately covered by randomized controlled trials, including potential applications in pediatric populations, vestibular migraine, chronic migraine, menstrual migraine, and medication overuse headache. Conclusion Non-invasive neuromodulation devices offer promising alternatives to drug treatment for migraine management. These devices are safe and generally well tolerated and devoid of drug interactions. While current evidence quality varies, ongoing research and technological advancements show encouraging potential. Future studies should adhere to International Headache Society guidelines for neuromodulation device trials, address proper sham controls and blinding assessment, and account for patient adherence challenges in device use. Expanded insurance coverage would enhance cost-effectiveness and device accessibility. These guidelines provide a framework for clinical decision-making while highlighting areas requiring further research.

Abstract Objective To evaluate the effect of erenumab treatment beyond monthly migraine days in patients with high‐frequency episodic migraine who did not respond to at least one previous migraine preventive treatment. Background Reduction in monthly migraine days has been the efficacy standard for migraine preventive treatments; however, it does not fully capture the holistic benefit of the therapy. Erenumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting the calcitonin gene–related peptide pathway, has demonstrated reduction in monthly migraine days and improvement in function in patients with episodic and chronic migraine. Methods In this phase 4, interventional, double‐blind, randomized, placebo‐controlled, multicenter, global study, treatment with erenumab was assessed over 4 months in adults with high‐frequency episodic migraine. The study was conducted at 61 sites located across North America and Europe between September 2020 and October 2023. Patients with ≥1 qualifying oral triptan‐treated migraine attack at baseline were randomized to receive erenumab 140 mg or placebo subcutaneously once monthly. The primary endpoint was change from baseline in mean monthly hours of at least moderate headache pain intensity over months 1, 2, and 3; secondary endpoints included change from baseline in mean monthly function, mean monthly duration of at least moderate pain intensity in migraine attacks, and mean monthly peak migraine pain intensity. Safety outcomes were also assessed. Results Of 512 randomized patients, 510 received erenumab 140 mg ( n = 254) or placebo ( n = 256) once monthly. Demographics and baseline characteristics were balanced between the two treatment arms. Erenumab 140 mg was superior to placebo in reducing duration of moderate or severe headache pain intensity over months 1, 2, and 3 (least squares mean [95% confidence interval {CI}] difference, −7.95 [−11.45, −4.46]; p < 0.001). Compared with placebo, erenumab significantly reduced migraine functional impact as assessed by the four domains of the Migraine Functional Impact Questionnaire, with a least squares mean (95% CI) difference of −7.36 (−10.80, −3.92) for physical functioning, −7.10 (−10.34, −3.87) for usual activities, −6.82 (−10.37, −3.27) for social functioning, and − 7.05 (−10.76, −3.34) for emotional functioning ( p < 0.001 for all domains). Significant reductions with erenumab compared with placebo were also observed in duration of at least moderate pain intensity in residual or break‐through migraine attacks (least squares mean [95% CI] difference, −1.07 [−1.92, −0.22]; p = 0.013) and peak migraine pain intensity (−0.48 [−0.85, −0.11]; p = 0.011). Incidence of grade 3 adverse events was 1.6% with erenumab and 1.2% with placebo; no grade 4 or fatal adverse events were reported in either treatment arm. Conclusion Findings from the EMBRACE study demonstrated that treatment with erenumab in patients with high‐frequency episodic migraine can provide positive therapeutic effects on ictal burden and pain, with residual migraine attacks tending to be shorter and less painful, with less overall impact.

Abstract Objective This study aimed to understand the factors limiting access to medications for the preventive treatment of migraine and to improve access to evidence‐based preventive care. Background For decades, the effective use of medication for the preventive treatment of migraine was limited by slow onset, slow and complex dose titration schedules, modest benefits, drug interactions, frequent side effects, and very low long‐term adherence. The calcitonin gene‐related peptide (CGRP) targeted preventive medications mitigate some of these limitations and demonstrated substantial therapeutic benefits in a significant proportion of adults with migraine. The American Headache Society considers these medications among the first‐line options for migraine prevention, although access to them remains limited. The American Migraine Foundation hosted a single‐day, multidisciplinary expert panel discussion to identify barriers to optimal preventive care and developed recommendations to address them. Methods Participants identified and prioritized barriers and used a modified nominal group technique to achieve consensus on them. A series of moderated discussions in plenary and breakout sessions was used to create possible solutions. Modified nominal group technique was also employed to achieve consensus on the priorities among these barriers and to achieve whole‐group consensus on the recommendations. Ethical issues that inform access were discussed. Results Participants included eight neurologists and board‐certified headache specialists, six representatives of reimbursement decision‐makers, six employees of life sciences companies, four patient advocates with lived experience with migraine, and a medical ethicist. Among those who have consulted healthcare professionals and received a diagnosis of migraine, we identified four main barriers to accessing preventive treatment: restrictive prior authorization requirements, the perceived lack of real‐world evidence and treatment guidelines, the need for clinician education, and the need for patient education. Consensus recommendations for eliminating barriers centered on using new evidence to evaluate policies that restrict the selection of first‐line therapies, initiating/improving collaboration among stakeholders, sharing of data and best practices, and increased training. Participants agreed to explore novel definitions of the value of preventive treatment and to establish the Migraine Prevention Network to facilitate ongoing cooperation and collective action. However, due to financial limitations, staffing changes, and time constraints, post‐meeting discussions led to a shift from establishing a broad Migraine Prevention Network to forming smaller task forces focused on the top‐priority barriers (real‐world evidence and The Patient Playbook ) identified through collaborative voting among American Headache Society, American Migraine Foundation, and industry stakeholders. Conclusions Adults with migraine face multiple barriers in accessing novel migraine‐specific, CGRP‐targeted preventive treatment. Stakeholders in the delivery of care, including clinicians, reimbursement decision‐makers, life sciences companies, and patient and clinician advocates, may be able to overcome many of these barriers and improve access by working with and on behalf of patients.

Abstract Repetitive head impacts are associated with structural brain changes and an increased risk for chronic traumatic encephalopathy, a progressive neurodegenerative disease that can only be diagnosed after death. Chronic traumatic encephalopathy is defined by the abnormal accumulation of phosphorylated tau protein, particularly at the depths of the superior frontal sulci, suggesting that sulcal morphology may serve as a relevant structural biomarker. Contact sport athletes, such as former football players, are at elevated risk due to their prolonged exposure to repetitive head impacts. Cortical atrophy linked to underlying tau accumulation may result in shallower and wider sulci, potentially making sulcal morphology an imaging marker for identifying individuals at risk for this disease. This study investigated sulcal morphological differences in former football players and examined associations with age, football-related exposure, clinical diagnosis of traumatic encephalopathy syndrome, levels of certainty for chronic traumatic encephalopathy pathology, neuropsychological performance, and positron emission tomography imaging using flortaucipir. We analysed structural magnetic resonance imaging data from 169 male former football players (mean age 57.2 (8.2) years, range 45–74) and 54 age-matched, unexposed asymptomatic male controls (mean age 59.4 (8.5) years, range 45–74). Sulcal depth and width were quantified using the CalcSulc, focusing on two regions in each hemisphere commonly affected by chronic traumatic encephalopathy pathology: the superior frontal and occipitotemporal sulci. Generalized least squares models were used to assess group differences and interactions with age and football exposure variables, including age of first exposure, total years played, and cumulative head impact exposure. An analysis of covariance evaluated relationships between sulcal morphology, clinical measures, and flortaucipir uptake, adjusting for age, race, body mass index, education, imaging site, apolipoprotein E4 status, and total intracranial volume. Former football players demonstrated significantly shallower sulcal depth in the left superior frontal sulcus compared to unexposed controls. Earlier age of first exposure and longer football careers were associated with greater widening of the left occipitotemporal sulcus. Higher cumulative head impact exposure was linked to reduced sulcal depth in the left superior frontal region. However, sulcal morphology was not associated with clinical diagnosis, levels of certainty, neuropsychological test performance, or flortaucipir imaging. These findings suggest that sulcal morphology may reflect cumulative exposure to repetitive head impacts, particularly in brain regions vulnerable to chronic traumatic encephalopathy pathology. Future ante- and post-mortem validation studies are needed to determine whether sulcal morphology can serve as a reliable in vivo biomarker of risk.

Abstract Objective This study explores and documents the patient experience during the prodrome phase of migraine. Background Migraine attacks can be divided into four stages: the prodrome (or premonitory phase), the aura, the headache phase, and postdrome. Qualitative data on the range of symptoms during the prodrome and their timing relative to headache onset are sparse. Prodromal symptoms may predict the onset of migraine headache pain and provide a clinically useful benchmark for initiation of treatment early in an attack before pain begins. Design/Methods Eligible participants with a clinician‐confirmed diagnosis of migraine and at least one prodromal symptom were consented, screened, and then participated in 60‐min interviews. The interview guide included open‐ended questions to elicit spontaneous reports and specific probes about prodromal symptoms based on a clinician‐established list. A theory approach was used to analyze the qualitative data collected in interviews to identify key themes and gather insights; data were analyzed using ATLAS.ti. Results Data collection for this study occurred from March 8, 2022, to May 16, 2022. Twenty interviews were conducted, and analyses demonstrated that concept saturation was achieved. Participants reported 36 unique prodromal symptoms, and each participant experienced a mean of 13 symptoms (standard deviation [SD] = 6.6) and a median of 11 symptoms (interquartile range [IQR] = 7.8–17.0) during the prodrome phase. The most commonly reported prodromal symptoms were nausea ( n = 17/20, 85%), fatigue/tiredness ( n = 16/20, 80%), sensitivity to light ( n = 13/20, 65%), neck pain/stiffness ( n = 12/20, 60%), and dizziness/vertigo/light‐headedness ( n = 10/20, 50%). Of the symptoms reported by at least four participants ( n ≥ 4/20, 20%), neck pain/stiffness was rated most bothersome (8.9 out of 10) and sensitivity to light was rated most severe (8.5 out of 10). Almost 40% of all symptoms reported occurred less than 2 h before the start of migraine headache. Of the commonly reported symptoms, nausea (0.8h), sensitivity to light (1.0 h), and dizziness/vertigo/lightheadedness (2.0 h) began closest to headache onset; fatigue/tiredness (4.0 h) and neck pain/stiffness (4.8 h) were the most remote from headache onset. Conclusion This study identified frequently reported prodromal symptoms, with participants commonly reporting that a migraine headache would follow their experience of prodrome within a 1‐ to 6‐h window. Characterizing the prodrome experience may improve measurement strategies for the burden of migraine and create opportunities to treat during the prodromal phase to prevent the onset of moderate or severe headaches.

ABSTRACTBackgroundErenumab‐induced medication overuse headache (MOH) remission in participants with chronic migraine (CM) in a prospective, Phase 4, randomized, placebo‐controlled trial with an open‐label treatment period (OLTP). We present 1‐year results from the combined double‐blind treatment period (DBTP) and OLTP for the stratified nonopioid cohort.MethodsParticipants with CM‐MOH were randomized 1:1:1 to subcutaneous 70 or 140 mg erenumab every 4 weeks (QM) or placebo for the initial 24 weeks (DBTP). Those successfully completing DBTP could continue the 28‐week OLTP, maintaining the same erenumab dose received during DBTP or, if receiving placebo, randomly assigned 1:1 to erenumab 70 or 140 mg QM. OLTP endpoints were exploratory.ResultsOverall, 552 participants received erenumab (70 mg, n = 274; 140 mg, n = 278); 95.3% completed OLTP. One‐year MOH relapse in participants who achieved MOH remission at DBTP Month 6 was 2.7% (3/111) and 2.4% (3/124) with erenumab 70 and 140 mg, respectively; absence of MOH at study end was observed in 69.0% (189/274) and 75.5% (210/278) of participants. Sustained MOH absence over 1 year was reported in 60.5% (107/177) and 68.8% (119/173) of participants, respectively. Sustained improvements in measures of headache days, medication days, and function were observed in both groups. No new safety concerns were identified (grade ≥ 3, 35 [6.3%]; serious, 17 [3.1%]; adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation, 5 [0.9%]).ConclusionsErenumab was effective in inducing and sustaining MOH remission and improving function over 1 year. Treatment compliance remained high, with safety events consistent with erenumab's known safety profile.Trial RegistrationNCT03971071