Sarr, Michael G.

BACKGROUND: Malnutrition after bariatric operation is a rare but potentially life-threatening complication. The safety and efficacy of revisional bariatric operation in malnourished patients are not well elucidated. STUDY DESIGN: We performed a retrospective chart review of patients who underwent revisional bariatric operation for severe malnutrition at our institution between 2008 and 2020. Associations of demographic and clinical characteristics with dichotomous outcomes of interest were examined using Fisher’s exact tests, Cochran-Armitage tests for trend, and two-sample t-tests when appropriate. RESULTS: Fifty-three patients underwent revisional bariatric operation for malnutrition from 2008 and 2020. The median follow-up was 24 months. The anatomy before revision was Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (n = 40, 75%), biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch (n = 6, 11%), sleeve gastrectomy (n = 4, 8%), and mini gastric bypass (n = 3, 6%). The percentage of patients requiring supplemental or total nutritional support decreased from 89% preoperatively (47% on enteral feedings and 42% on total parenteral nutrition (TPN) with or without tube feeding) to 13.2% at the last encounter after revision (7.5% still requiring enteral feedings and 5.7% on TPN). There was an association between the number of prior abdominal operations and postoperative pneumonia (p 0.03) and need for blood transfusion (p 0.01). There were no associations between major complications or last encounter nutrition and any preoperative variables other than age at the time of operation. There were 2 mortalities during a median follow-up of 24 months, and both occurred more than 1 year postoperatively. CONCLUSION: Revisional operation for severely malnourished bariatric operation patients is effective in the discontinuation of supportive nutrition. Postoperative complications are increased but not prohibitive.

AbstractBackgroundThere is a huge difference in the standard of surgical training in different countries around the world. The disparity is more obvious in the various models of surgical training in low‐ and middle‐income countries (LMICs) compared to high‐income countries. Although the global training model of surgeons is evolving from an apprenticeship model to a competency‐based model with additional training using simulation, the training of surgeons in LMICs still lacks a standard pathway of training.MethodsThis is a qualitative, descriptive, and collaborative study conducted in six LMICs across Asia, Africa, and South America. The data were collected on the status of surgical education in these countries as per the guidelines designed for the ASSURED project along with plans for quality improvement in surgical education in these countries.ResultsThe training model in these selected LMICs appears to be a hybrid of the standard models of surgical training. The training models were tailored to the country's need, but many fail to meet international standards. There are many areas identified that can be addressed in order to improve the quality of surgical education in these countries.ConclusionsMany areas need to be improved for a better quality of surgical training in LMICs. There is a need of financial, technical, and research support for the improvement in these models of surgical education in LMICs.

Open access for all?

The aims of this study were to determine the effects of duodenal and jejunoileal nutrient infusions on small intestinal motor patterns and intestinal contractions in neurally intact and neurally isolated small bowel. Fifteen dogs were prepared with duodenal and jejunal infusion and manometry catheters and a diverting jejunal cannula. Ten of the dogs underwent in situ neural isolation of the jejunoileum. A mixed nutrient meal (0.5 kcal/ml) was infused into the duodenum or jejunum at 3 ml/min for 5 h. Control experiments involved infusion of a balanced salt solution. Manometric data collected on-line to a microcomputer were analyzed for direction, distance, and velocity of spread of single pressure waves (SPW) and clustered contractions. Isolated duodenal and jejunoileal nutrient infusions inhibited the fasting motor pattern in neurally intact and neurally isolated small bowel. Motor activity (motility index) increased slightly during nutrient infusion within groups, but there were few differences between groups. Neither neural isolation nor nutrient infusion had a consistent effect on spread of SPW or migration of clustered contractions. Isolated duodenal and jejunoileal nutrient infusions in the dog inhibit fasting motor patterns and increase motor activity slightly but have little effect on characteristics of individual and clustered contractions. Extrinsic innervation to the jejunoileum or intrinsic neural continuity of the jejunum with the duodenum had little effect on single or grouped contractions. Although the changes in motor activity demonstrated in this study appear small, alterations in intestinal transit and absorption may still occur and may be of importance physiologically.

Our aim was to determine the effect of in situ neural isolation of the jejunoileum (extrinsic denervation and disruption of enteric neural continuity with the duodenum) on the spread of single pressure waves (SPW) and clustered contractions (CC) in response to increasing rates of isolated duodenal and jejunoileal nonnutrient infusions. Ten dogs were prepared with duodenal and jejunal infusion and manometry catheters and a diverting proximal jejunal cannula. Five of the dogs also underwent in situ neural isolation of the entire jejuno- ileum A noncaloric solution was infused at 0-15 ml/min into proximal duodenum or jejunum while manometric data were collected. Alterations in direction, distance, and velocity of spread of SPW and CC with increasing rates of intestinal infusion were analyzed by linear regression of responses to increasing infusion rates. Neural isolation of the jejunoileum did not markedly alter characteristics of duodenal or jejunal SPW or CC under conditions of no intestinal infusion. After neural isolation of jejunoileum, increasing rates of jejunal infusion decreased both the proportion and distance of antegrade spread of SPW in duodenum. These findings suggest that extrinsic innervation to the jejunoileum and enteric neural continuity with the duodenum do not regulate jejunal SPW or CC. Increasing rates of nonnutrient intestinal infusions do not alter local motor patterns in the innervated or neurally isolated jejunum, but after neural isolation of the jejunoileum, these infusions do alter characteristics of duodenal SPW by mechanisms independent of neural pathways.

To explore mechanisms whereby unabsorbed nutrients in the ileum inhibit the upper gut ("ileal brake"), we perfused the canine ileum or colon and monitored phase 3 in the duodenum. Fasting motility was recorded when the ileum or colon was perfused with 154 mM NaCl, a mixed isotonic nutrient solution (Ensure), or individual nutrients (maltose, casein hydrolysates, or sodium oleate). Blood samples were collected before and during the perfusions. The ileum was also perfused with 154 mM NaCl while peptide YY (PYY) was infused by vein. In both sets of experiments, plasma levels of PYY, neurotensin, and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) were measured. Ileal or colonic perfusion of Ensure delayed phase 3 [migrating motor complexes (MMC)] in the duodenum, inhibited ileal motility, and increased plasma levels of PYY and GLP-1. Ileal casein and oleate and colonic casein also delayed the duodenal MMC. The MMC cycle length and plasma levels of PYY were closely correlated. Intravenous PYY prolonged the MMC cycle; an intravenous dose of 100 pmol.kg-1.h-1 of PYY mimicked the effects of ileal Ensure. These results support the hypothesis that PYY, and possibly GLP-1, participate in the ileal brake. This negative feedback loop also affects the distal small bowel. The proximal colon also triggers the feedback inhibition of gut motility (colonic brake).

We tested the hypothesis that the duodenum is necessary to coordinate interdigestive pancreatic trypsin secretion with gastrointestinal motility and determined whether duodenectomy altered interdigestive cycles of plasma motilin and pancreatic polypeptide and their relationship to trypsin secretion and motility. Consequently, in normal and duodenectomized dogs, we measured trypsin secretion, gastrointestinal motility, and plasma concentrations of motilin and pancreatic polypeptide during the interdigestive period. After duodenectomy, peaks of trypsin secretion continued to cycle at normal intervals (102 +/- 15 min), but the amounts of trypsin were reduced during peaks of secretion (P = 0.02) and throughout the entire cycle (P = 0.02). Trypsin secretory cycles after duodenectomy, however, were not coordinated with cycles of interdigestive motility, and the plasma concentrations of motilin (P = 0.02) and pancreatic polypeptide (P = 0.05) were reduced and had no cyclic pattern. In addition, we confirmed that duodenectomy alters canine interdigestive antral motility, interrupts coordination between antral and intestinal motility, and shortens the period of jejunal migrating motor complexes. We conclude that duodenectomy disrupts the relationship between the cycles of interdigestive gastrointestinal motility and trypsin secretion and reduces the amount of interdigestive trypsin secretion. These effects of duodenectomy may be due to interruption of the duodenopancreatic neural connections or the hormonal abnormalities we have described. The loss of the cyclic pattern of plasma pancreatic polypeptide after duodenectomy suggests that the duodenum controls the release of pancreatic polypeptide by either a neural or hormonal mechanism.