Loprinzi, Charles L.

Abstract Introduction: AI-induced joint symptoms negatively impact drug adherence and quality of life. Based on observations that n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) have anti-inflammatory effects and that the mechanism of AI-induced joint symptoms may be partly due to inflammation, we hypothesized that women taking more n-3 PUFAs are less likely to develop AI-induced joint symptoms. Methods: We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study comparing n-3 PUFA vs placebo in postmenopausal breast cancer patients starting adjuvant AIs. Participants were randomized to n-3 supplements [2.58 g eicosapentaenoic acid + 1.74 g docosahexaenoic acid/day; Marine Nutriceuticals, Mt. Bethel, PA] vs matched placebo for 24 weeks (wks). Primary endpoints was feasibility; secondary outcomes were self-reported symptoms as assessed by the Brief Pain Inventory short form (BPI-SF), Functional Assessment of Cancer Treatment, Breast & Endocrine Symptoms (FACTB-ES), and Stanford's Health Assessment and Disability Index (HAQ) at baseline prior to AI receipt, 12 and 24 wks. Compliance and toxicity were evaluated monthly. Serial peripheral blood n-3 PUFA levels and inflammatory cytokines (IL-6, TNFR2, IL-17) were drawn. MRI of hands/wrists was performed in selected patients using a 3 Tesla dedicated wrist coil at baseline and treatment end. Results: Forty-four women were enrolled and randomized to study drug; 42 received ≥1 cycle (4 wks) of treatment; 36 had ≥1 post treatment evaluation at wk 12 or 24. Median age was 59.5 (range 43-76); history of prior taxane (n=15, 34%). The two groups’ baseline characteristics were similar. Overall, 93% and 88% of patients took >80% of the placebo and n-3 PUFA doses, respectively. Baseline erythrocyte n-3 PUFA was similar for both groups (6.6% ± 1.6%, 7.2% ±1.9%, p=0.20), but higher in the n-3 PUFA arm by wk 24 (6.5%±1.0% vs 15.0%±3.3%, p<0.001). Most toxicities were grade 1; the n-3 PUFA arm had only 1 (2.5%) grade 3 toxicity (diarrhea). The n-3 PUFA arm reported lower mean BPI-SF scores after treatment [(-.0.28/ -0.25 at week 12/24); but not statistically significant compared to placebo (p=0.494 and 0.601)]. Based on BPI-SF, the n-3 PUFA arm reported less interference of pain symptoms compared to placebo at 12 weeks (-.72, p=0.08). This arm also had a decreased walking, activity and working (WAW) score on BPI-SF at 12 weeks (-.81 p=0.05), and reported significantly greater pain relief from medications at 12 (p=0.043) and 24 weeks (p=0.011). Both arms had similar baseline and wk 24 serum IL-6 levels; levels decreased from baseline to wk 24 in the n-3 PUFA arm (-0.54±0.25, p=0.048). There was a non-significant trend (p= 0.2) toward decreased wrist inflammation by MRI imaging at 24 wks in the n-3 PUFA arm. Conclusions: This is the first randomized pilot study to show that n-3 PUFA supplementation to prevent AI-induced joint symptoms is feasible and well tolerated. There is preliminary evidence that this intervention may help reduce the burden of AI-induced arthralgias. OSU Study #11022; ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01478477. Grants from the National Cancer Institute (CA037447-26) to the Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology supported this pilot study. Citation Format: Maryam B Lustberg, Tonya Orchard, Xueliang Pan, Raquel Reinbolt, Amanda Logan, Joanne Lester, Rachel M Layman, Erin Macrae, Ewa Mrozek, Bhuvaneswari Ramaswamy, Robert Wesolowski, Michael Berger, Michael Knopp, Charles Loprinzi, Charles L Shapiro, Lisa Yee. Prevention of aromatase Inhibitor (AI)-induced joint symptoms with omega-3 fatty acid supplementation: A randomized placebo-controlled pilot study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Seventh Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2014 Dec 9-13; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(9 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-09-03.

BACKGROUNDPostmenopausal women with breast cancer receiving aromatase inhibitors are at an increased risk of bone loss. The current study was undertaken to determine whether upfront versus delayed treatment with zoledronic acid (ZA) impacted bone loss. This report described the 5‐year follow‐up results.METHODSA total of 551 postmenopausal women with breast cancer who completed tamoxifen treatment and were undergoing daily letrozole treatment were randomized to either upfront (274 patients) or delayed (277 patients) ZA at a dose of 4 mg intravenously every 6 months. In the patients on the delayed treatment arm, ZA was initiated for a postbaseline bone mineral density T‐score of <‐2.0 or fracture.RESULTSThe incidence of a 5% decrease in the total lumbar spine bone mineral density at 5 years was 10.2% in the upfront treatment arm versus 41.2% in the delayed treatment arm (P<.0001). A total of 41 patients in the delayed treatment arm were eventually started on ZA. With the exception of increased NCI Common Toxicity Criteria (CTC) grade 1/2 elevated creatinine and fever in the patients treated on the upfront arm and cerebrovascular ischemia among those in the delayed treatment arm, there were no significant differences observed between arms with respect to the most common adverse events of arthralgia and back pain. Osteoporosis occurred less frequently in the upfront treatment arm (2 vs 8 cumulative cases), although this difference was not found to be statistically significant. Bone fractures occurred in 24 patients in the upfront treatment arm versus 25 patients in the delayed treatment arm.CONCLUSIONSImmediate treatment with ZA prevented bone loss compared with delayed treatment in postmenopausal women receiving letrozole and these differences were maintained at 5 years. The incidence of osteoporosis or fractures was not found to be significantly different between treatment arms. Cancer 2015;121:2537–2543. © 2015 American Cancer Society.

ObjectiveMutations in Charcot–Marie–Tooth disease (CMT) genes are the cause of rare familial forms of polyneuropathy. Whether allelic variability in CMT genes is also associated with common forms of polyneuropathy—considered “acquired” in medical parlance—is unknown. Chemotherapy‐induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) occurs commonly in cancer patients and is individually unpredictable. We used CIPN as a clinical model to investigate the association of non‐CMT polyneuropathy with CMT genes.MethodsA total of 269 neurologically asymptomatic cancer patients were enrolled in the clinical trial Alliance N08C1 to receive the neurotoxic drug paclitaxel, while undergoing prospective assessments for polyneuropathy. Forty‐nine CMT genes were analyzed by targeted massively parallel sequencing of genomic DNA from patient blood.ResultsA total of 119 (of 269) patients were identified from the 2 ends of the polyneuropathy phenotype distribution: patients that were most and least susceptible to paclitaxel polyneuropathy. The CMT gene PRX was found to be deleteriously mutated in patients who were susceptible to CIPN but not in controls (p = 8 × 10−3). Genetic variation in another CMT gene, ARHGEF10, was highly significantly associated with CIPN (p = 5 × 10−4). Three nonsynonymous recurrent single nucleotide variants contributed to the ARHGEF10 signal: rs9657362, rs2294039, and rs17683288. Of these, rs9657362 had the strongest effect (odds ratio = 4.8, p = 4 × 10−4).InterpretationThe results reveal an association of CMT gene allelic variability with susceptibility to CIPN. The findings raise the possibility that other acquired polyneuropathies may also be codetermined by genetic etiological factors, of which some may be related to genes already known to cause the phenotypically related Mendelian disorders of CMT. Ann Neurol 2014;76:727–737

Abstract Introduction: Symptom control is an important objective in the care of patients with cancer and a critical goal for long-term survivors of antineoplastic treatments. Commonly used chemotherapies, including paclitaxel, are associated with a toxic effect on the peripheral nervous system in a substantial fraction of patients, termed chemotherapy induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN), that is often debilitating. CIPN cannot be predicted from clinical parameters in neurologically normal subjects, suggesting a genetic basis as the root cause. Patients with hereditary neuropathy (HN) due to one of ~50 recognized genes are prone to developing severe CIPN even if the hereditary predisposition is clinically silent. Assessment of CIPN has usually been an afterthought of cancer treatment studies using crude symptom measurement instruments. N08C1 and N08CA are recent clinical trials_the latter analyzed only in early 2013_focusing on extensive phenotyping by patient reported outcomes (PRO) to support genetic investigations of paclitaxel-related CIPN. Massively parallel (“nextgen”) DNA sequencing is the genetic technology of choice and represents an as-yet unrealized potential to study cancer symptom control. Methods: Exome sequencing_analysis of 20,794 genes at nucleotide resolution_was performed on blood of CIPN cases (n=73) and controls (n=46) from N08C1. The primary endpoint was the association of HN genes with CIPN. Bioinformatic analysis determined SNV and other genetic variations across 6.2x107 nucleotides. The association of genes with CIPN was statistically examined by the over-dispersion test C-alpha. The role of singleton SNV was assessed by a burden test. N08CA served as validation. Results: 386,644 SNV were detected with an estimated sensitivity of 90% and specificity of 99.9%; the orthogonal validation rate (PCR of &gt;1000 genotypes) was 99.7%. The association of the minor allele (C&gt;T) at rs7349683 in the gene EPHA5, previously reported by Baldwin et al. (2012) for CALGB40101, was confirmed in N08C1. Two hereditary neuropathy genes were identified as new CIPN candidate genes: Firstly, ARHGEF10 was highly significant with p=5x10-4 based on single gene testing and p&lt;0.02 after Bonferroni correction for multiple testing of 41 hereditary neuropathy genes with non-synonymous SNV. Three SNV were predictive, rs17683288, rs2294039 and rs9657362, the latter with an odds ratio (OR)=3.62. Validation in an independent patient group (n=75) from another paclitaxel CIPN trial, N08CA, confirmed the impact of ARHGEF10 on CIPN (p&lt;0.025; rs9657362 OR=2.51). Secondly, peraxin (PRX) was disrupted by non-synonymous singleton SNV in n=8 cases and n=0 controls (OR=6.4; unadjusted p=0.04). 7 of the 8 mutations were also scored as deleterious by both Polyphen 2 and SIFT. Because PRX SNV were non-recurrent validation was performed in N08C1 by Sanger sequencing. Several neuro-genes across the exome were noted as additional CIPN gene candidates. Conclusions: ARHGEF10 and PRX associations with CIPN suggest that CIPN and HN might share genetic roots in a subset of patients. Construct validity of N08C1 is supported by confirmation of a published result from CALGB40101 relating EPHA5 to CIPN. Germline exome sequencing in cancer patients is highly informative for understanding complex pharmacogenomic traits including outcomes in symptom control research. Citation Format: Andreas S. Beutler, Amit Kulkarni, Rahul Kanwar, Rui Qin, Julie M. Cunningham, Terry M. Therneau, Charles L. Loprinzi. Sequencing symptom control: Results from the Alliance N08C1 and N08CA genetics of chemotherapy neuropathy trials. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 104th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2013 Apr 6-10; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2013;73(8 Suppl):Abstract nr LB-196. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2013-LB-196

BACKGROUNDDespite targeted antiemetics, data support an unmet need related to the management of delayed nausea and vomiting (NV). Promising pilot data informed this phase III trial evaluating gabapentin for delayed NV from highly emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC).METHODSParticipants were randomized to receive prophylactic treatment with 20 mg of dexamethasone and a 5HT3 receptor antagonist (RA) on the day of chemotherapy, followed by gabapentin 300 mg twice a day and dexamethasone (dex) or placebo and dex after HEC. Gabapentin/placebo was started the day of chemotherapy and continued through day 5 for the first chemotherapy cycle, whereas dex was titrated down on days 2‐4. The primary end point was complete response (CR), defined as no emesis and no use of rescue medications on days 2‐6, using an NV diary. The percentages of those in each group with a CR were compared by Fisher's exact test.RESULTSFour hundred thirty patients were enrolled in this study. Forty‐seven percent of patients in the gabapentin arm and 41% in the placebo arm had a CR (P = .23). Mean number of emesis episodes was <0.5 daily, and mean nausea severity was < 2 (mild). In both arms, patient satisfaction with NV control was greater than 8 (with 10 being perfectly satisfied). There were no significant differences in unwanted side effects.CONCLUSIONSIn this study, gabapentin did not significantly improve delayed NV. Patients were satisfied with the control of their nausea and vomiting irrespective of arm. The use of a 5HT3 RA and dexamethasone provided good control of nausea and vomiting for most patients. Cancer 2014;120:3575–3583. © 2014 American Cancer Society.

Purpose Painful oral mucositis (OM) is a significant toxicity during radiotherapy for head and neck cancers. The aim of this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was to test the efficacy of doxepin hydrochloride in the reduction of radiotherapy-induced OM pain. Patients and Methods In all, 155 patients were randomly allocated to a doxepin oral rinse or a placebo for the treatment of radiotherapy-related OM pain. Patients received a single dose of doxepin or placebo on day 1 and then crossed over to receive the opposite agent on a subsequent day. Pain questionnaires were administered at baseline and at 5, 15, 30, 60, 120, and 240 minutes. Patients were then given the option to continue doxepin. The primary end point was pain reduction as measured by the area under the curve (AUC) of the pain scale using data from day 1. Results Primary end point analysis revealed that the AUC for mouth and throat pain reduction was greater for doxepin (−9.1) than for placebo (−4.7; P < .001). Crossover analysis of patients completing both phases confirmed that patients experienced greater mouth and throat pain reduction with doxepin (intrapatient changes of 4.1 for doxepin-placebo arm and −2.8 for placebo-doxepin arm; P < .001). Doxepin was associated with more stinging or burning, unpleasant taste, and greater drowsiness than the placebo rinse. More patients receiving doxepin expressed a desire to continue treatment than did patients with placebo after completion of each of the randomized phases of the study. Conclusion A doxepin rinse diminishes OM pain. Further studies are warranted to determine its role in the management of OM.

BACKGROUNDChemotherapy‐induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a significant side effect of taxane and platinum‐based chemotherapy. Several studies have supported the potential benefit of glutathione for the prevention of platinum‐induced CIPN. The current trial was designed to determine whether glutathione would prevent CIPN as a result of carboplatin/paclitaxel therapy.METHODSIn total, 185 patients who received treatment with paclitaxel and carboplatin were accrued between December 4, 2009 and December 19, 2011. Patients were randomized to receive either placebo (n = 91) or 1.5 g/m2 glutathione (n = 94) over 15 minutes immediately before chemotherapy. CIPN was assessed using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality‐of‐Life (EORTC‐QLQ) 20‐item, CIPN‐specific (CIPN20) sensory subscale and the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), version 4.0.RESULTSThere were no statistically significant differences between the 2 study arms with regard to: 1) peripheral neurotoxicity, as assessed using both the EORTC‐QLQ‐CIPN20 (P = .21) and the CTCAE scales (P = .449 for grade ≥2 neurotoxicity; P = .039 for time to development of grade ≥2 neuropathy, in favor of the placebo); 2) the degree of paclitaxel acute pain syndrome (P = .30 for patients who received paclitaxel every 3‐4 weeks and P = .002, in favor of the placebo, for patients who received weekly paclitaxel); 3) the time to disease progression (P = .63); or 4) apparent toxicities. Subgroup analyses did not reveal any evidence of benefit in any particular subgroup.CONCLUSIONSThe results from this study do not support the use of glutathione for the prevention of paclitaxel/carboplatin‐induced CIPN. Cancer 2014;120:1890–1897. © 2014 American Cancer Society.