Wathanavasin, Wannasit

Background/Objectives: Malnutrition is a prevalent yet under-recognized condition in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD), contributing to increased morbidity, mortality, and healthcare burden. The aim of this study is to determine the prevalence and trends of malnutrition and investigate the impact of malnutrition on in-hospital outcomes, treatments, and resource utilization in hospitalized patients with advanced CKD. Methods: This study utilized the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database to identify hospitalized patients with advanced CKD from 2016 to 2021. This study investigated temporal trends in the prevalence and in-hospital mortality across different degrees of malnutrition in advanced CKD patients. Multivariable regression models were used to assess the association between malnutrition and in-hospital outcomes. Results: Out of 1,244,415 advanced CKD patients, 67,587 (5.4%) had mild to moderate malnutrition, and 63,785 (5.1%) had severe malnutrition. Malnourished patients exhibited significantly higher in-hospital mortality, with adjusted odds ratios of 1.70 (95% confidence interval (CI), 1.64–1.75) for mild to moderate cases and 2.67 (95% CI, 2.60–2.75) for severe cases. Severely malnourished patients were associated with longer mean hospital stay by 7.0 days and higher hospitalization costs by $97,767 compared with non-malnourished patients. The prevalence of severe malnutrition showed a significant uptrend from 4.2% in 2016 to 5.5% in 2021 (p for trend < 0.001). Conclusions: Malnutrition in advanced CKD is an increasingly prevalent condition linked to worsened in-hospital outcomes and heightened healthcare resource utilization. The rising trend of severe malnutrition underscores the need for early nutritional screening and the need for future interventional studies to mitigate adverse clinical outcomes in this high-risk population.

Background/Objectives: With the growing population of kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) in intensive care units (ICUs), understanding their prognostic outcomes is critical. As conflicting findings exist, we aim to systematically evaluate and meta-analyze ICU outcomes in kidney transplant recipients compared to non-recipients. Methods: We conducted a comprehensive search of the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases, from inception through 23 December 2024, to identify relevant studies comparing the outcomes of KTRs and non-transplant ICU patients. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for dichotomous outcomes, and weighted mean differences (WMDs) were calculated for continuous outcomes. The risk of bias was assessed using the ROBINS-I V2 tool. The study protocol was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42024595104). Results: Seven studies, including 12,062 patients, were analyzed. Demographics, including age and sex, were comparable across groups. No statistically significant associations were found for overall mortality (OR: 1.82, 95% CI: 0.79 to 4.16), ICU mortality (OR: 1.06, 95% CI: 0.45 to 2.48), or 28/30-day mortality (OR: 2.06, 95% CI: 0.30 to 14.10) in KTRs, though there was a trend suggesting a potential increase in the odds of overall mortality. KTRs tended to have longer ICU stays (WMD: +1.96 days, 95% CI: 0.81–3.11) and higher Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores (WMD: +0.79, 95% CI: −0.78–2.36), but these findings did not reach statistical significance. One study reported higher 1-year and 5-year mortality for KTRs. Sensitivity analyses revealed one influential study. Begg’s test for overall mortality suggested non-significant publication bias (p = 1.0). Conclusions: KTRs in ICUs are at significantly higher risk for long-term mortality, emphasizing the need for tailored critical care strategies and long-term management. Future research should focus on standardizing methodologies, reducing heterogeneity, and addressing gaps in data to improve evidence-based care for this vulnerable population.

Emerging evidence supports the beneficial effects of dietary fiber supplementation in alleviating gut dysbiosis, which leads to a reduction in uremic toxins and inflammatory markers in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients. However, current evidence-based renal nutrition guidelines do not provide recommendations regarding dietary fiber intake. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate and highlight the effects of dietary fiber supplementation on modulating uremic toxins and inflammatory markers in individuals with CKD, with or without dialysis. The eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were identified from PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled trials until 27 November 2024. The results were synthesized using a random-effects model and presented as standardized mean differences (SMDs) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). A total of 21 studies with 700 patients were included. When compared with the control group, dietary fiber supplementation ranging from 6 to 50 g/day, for typically more than 4 weeks, could significantly reduce the levels of serum uremic toxins, including p-cresyl sulfate, indoxyl sulfate, and blood urea nitrogen (SMD −0.22, −0.34, −0.25, respectively, with p-values < 0.05), as well as biomarkers of inflammation, including interleukin-6 and tumor necrosis factor alpha (SMD −0.44, −0.34, respectively, with p-values < 0.05). These beneficial effects were consistent across different types of fibers and CKD status (with or without dialysis). However, no significant reduction in serum trimethylamine N-oxide, uric acid, and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein levels was observed with dietary fiber intervention. This study would pave the way for prioritizing dietary quality, particularly a fiber-rich diet, beyond the traditional focus on the quantities of protein, energy, and electrolyte restrictions among individuals with CKD.

ABSTRACT Background Cognitive impairment (CI) is a critical complication in peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients, associated with decreased quality of life and increased hospitalization. Despite its significant impact, the prevalence, risk factors, and consequences of CI in PD patients are not well understood. We aimed to determine the prevalence, risk factors, and outcomes of CI in PD patients. Methods We performed systematic reviews in OVID Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases until February 2024 to identify cross-sectional and cohort studies on prevalence of CI (identified by cognitive assessment scales) in PD patients. The Newcastle–Ottawa Scale was used to assess risk of bias. A pooled meta-analysis of CI prevalence in PD and a subgroup analysis comparing the risk of CI between PD and non-PD settings were performed using a random-effects model. Results A total of 19 studies were identified, involving 2882 PD patients. The pooled prevalence of CI in PD patients was 47.7% (95%CI: 35.8–59.9%). CI in patients undergoing PD appears to be associated with older age, female gender, lower levels of education, and is linked to higher rates of hospitalization and peritonitis, compared to those without CI. However, it is not associated with increased mortality. Compared to hemodialysis, PD showed a trend toward a lower risk of CI (OR 0.64, 95%CI 0.39–1.03; P = .068). Conclusion CI is highly prevalent and associated with several adverse clinical outcomes in PD patients. These findings could contribute to facilitate the development of screening and early intervention strategies to reduce the burden of disease in this population.