Coker, Jon

Abstract Introduction In 2018, our institution implemented a MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry (MS) method (Mass-Fix) to detect myeloma associated M-proteins in blood. Currently, the lab has performed more than 500K tests by Mass-Fix. While Mass-Fix has been found to be more sensitive and specific than IFE, an ESI-Q-TOF (High Resolution Mass-Fix) method has demonstrated the potential to detect M-proteins at significantly lower levels. Blood minimal residual disease (MRD) detection in lieu of bone marrow (BM) is desirable since blood is easier and less expensive to obtain and analyze. This feature can allow for more frequent MRD monitoring for myeloma patients. Methods 66 residual blood samples from myeloma patients with varying M-protein varying isotypes were diluted into healthy blood to estimate the limit of detection of HR-Mass-Fix method. 179 Rochester Mayo Clinic patients who had a clinically ordered BM MRD assessment by next generation flow (NGF) cytometry (2 x 10-6), a blood sample available within 7 days of the BM biopsy, and a pre-treatment measured M-protein mass by Mass-Fix were utilized to assess the concordance of the BM and blood MRD status. Results The average limit of detection (LOD) of the HR-Mass-Fix was found to be significantly lower than Mass-Fix (0.0003 g/dL and 0.01 g/dL, respectively). The treated patient cohort utilized for comparison consisted of 145 myeloma, 21 AL amyloid, 4 LPL lymphoma and 9 other PCDs. Comparing the Mass-Fix and HR-Mass-Fix results, 100% of blood positive MRD results by Mass-Fix were positive by HR-Mass-Fix. HR-Mass-Fix detected residual M-proteins (mass within +/- 1 Da of pre-treatment) in 29 samples (40%) that were negative by Mass-Fix. Thus, HR-Mass-Fix increased the overall blood MRD positivity rate from 57% by Mass-Fix to 78%. The BM NGF MRD positivity was lower at 54%. The overall agreement of blood and BM by Mass-Fix was 71% (kappa 0.4) which decreased to 0.63 (kappa 0.3) with HR-Mass-Fix. Most of the disagreements were HR-Mass-Fix Blood (+)/BM NGF (-). Blood M-protein MRD appeared to be affected by M-protein half-lives. To determine this, the M-protein isotype distribution of Blood/BM MRD status was compared the M-protein isotype distribution of the overall cohort. The half-lives are as follows: IgG 23 days, IgA 6 days, IgM 5 days and FLC 0.25 days. When both blood and BM were positive, the isotype distribution was not significantly different than the overall cohort. For blood(+)/BM(-) patients, IgG (with the longest half-life) were significantly overrepresented compared to the overall cohort (74% vs 51%) . For blood(-)/BM(+) cases, there were no IgG M-proteins, and the majority were FLC patients. These results suggest that patients with shorter half-life M-proteins (non-IgG) are more likely to be Blood MRD(-) than patients with longer half-life M-proteins. M-protein rate changes over time will likely be needed to resolve the M-protein half- life affect. Conclusions HR-Mass-Fix can significantly increase the detection of M-proteins in comparison to our current Mass-Fix method. Ig recycling was found to be a likely reason for the disagreement between BM and blood. Therefore, a negative blood MRD status by HR-Mass-Fix is most likely to be the most significant in predicting patient outcomes.

Background The detection, isotyping and quantitation of over-expressed immunoglobulin(s) (Igs) (M-protein) is key for diagnosing and monitoring patients with monoclonal gammopathies. Traditionally, our lab has used a combination of agarose gel protein electrophoresis (SPEP) and immunofixation electrophoresis (IFE) for these purposes. In 2018, a mass spectrometric method (Mass-Fix) was implemented to replace IFE for M-protein isotyping. This work documents the validation of a quantitative version (Q-Mass-Fix) to replace both SPEP and IFE. Methods 24,645 samples submitted for M-protein testing between 7/2018 and 9/2023 with quantitative IgG, IgA and IgM measurements, Mass-Fix analysis and SPEP results were utilized for this study. A separate cohort of 100,000 M-protein negative samples were utilized to mathematically model the spectral shapes IgG, IgA and IgM polyclonal background. To detect M-proteins, software was developed that fits the polyclonal Ig portion of the spectra and M-proteins are detected as peaks above the polyclonal background. M-proteins isotypes are determined by matching similar peaks in spectra in 5 sperate immuno enrichments (IgG, IgA, IgM, kappa and lambda). M-protein quantitation was obtained by multiplying total M-protein isotype quantity by the fraction area of the M-protein in the spectra. M-protein dilutional studies were used to examine the linearity and level of detection of Q-Mass-Fix. Results SPEP and Q-Mass-Fix M-protein quantitation had the best agreement between the range of 10 to 40 g/L. Below 10 g/L, Q-Mass Fix had on average, lower M-protein values. Above 40 g/dL, Q-Mass-Fix values were on average, higher than SPEP. The automated isotyping assignment was 98.8 percent consistent with the isotype assigned by visual inspection. Dilutional studies revealed that Q-Mass-Fix quantitation was linear over a range of 70 to 0.04 g/L (slope 1.0, r2 0.99) with an analytical limit of quantitation of 0.1 g/L and a limit of detection of 0.04 g/L. Conclusion Q-Mass-Fix represents a significant improvement in comparison to our current SPEP method. Q-Mass-Fix is more capable of removing the interference of polyclonal Igs below 10 g/L and is not subjective to the dye saturation effect at high M-protein levels. The increased analytical measuring range and improved limit of detection of detection could be beneficial in tracking patient's response. Q-Mass Fix is more automated than SPEP and the workflow in our laboratory.

Background: Vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT) is a severe thrombotic thrombocytopenia that predominantly occurs after adenoviral vector-based vaccines. VITT patients produce anti-platelet factor 4 (PF4) antibodies with restricted clonality (i.e., mono/oligoclonal) with lambda light chains. Long-term follow-up studies in VITT show a disconnect in the persistence of anti-PF4 antibodies, whereby ELISA-positive antibodies persist significantly longer than platelet-activating antibodies. The mechanistic basis of this is unclear and could be explained by a couple of hypotheses: (1) Epitope spreading where, with time, the specificity of platelet-activating anti-PF4 antibodies may “spread” to recognize only PF4 complexed to heparin vs. (2) Persistence of clonally restricted platelet-activating anti-PF4 antibodies which decrease in titers with time such that their levels are insufficient to crosslink platelet FcGRIIa and induce platelet activation. Methods: Acute, convalescent patient sera and affinity-purified anti-PF4 antibodies were evaluated in antigen-based, functional (platelet-activation-based), and mass spectrometry studies as previously described (Blood, 2022 Jul 7;140(1):73-77). The median time to last follow-up was 243 days after the acute episode (range: 114-664 days). Results: Follow-up samples were obtained from 6 VITT patients after Ad26.COV2.S vaccination. At last follow-up, anti-PF4 IgG antibodies reactive in PF4/polyanion ELISA were detected in the sera of 5/6 VITT patients. However, only one of these samples stimulated platelet activation in the PF4-dependent P-selectin expression assay (PEA; 199 days after acute presentation). Affinity-purified anti-PF4 antibodies were detected by ELISA in all follow-up samples and three of the six affinity-purified anti-PF4 antibody samples activated platelets in the PEA. Four of the six VITT patients demonstrated a monoclonal anti-PF4 antibody, while one each had a biclonal and triclonal profile. Five VITT patients produced IgG lambda light chain antibodies, while one produced an IgG kappa. All six VITT patients demonstrated synonymous anti-PF4 antibody profiles when comparing acute and follow-up antibody repertoires, without evidence of VITT patients producing new anti-PF4 antibodies after the acute episode. In all cases, levels of anti-PF4 antibodies were significantly lower in convalescent samples relative to acute samples. Given this data on the persistence of clonally-restricted VITT antibodies, samples from another VITT patient with thrombocytopenia (100-150,000/uL) persisting for more than three years were similarly evaluated. This patient, who experienced severe thrombosis after ChAdOx1 nCoV19 vaccination, demonstrated persistent ELISA and PEA positivity even three years after symptom onset but had not experienced breakthrough thrombosis while on anticoagulation therapy. Serum protein electrophoresis (SPEP) did not detect a monoclonal gammopathy. Anti-PF4 antibodies immuno-enriched from a sample obtained >2 years after acute presentation demonstrated a monoclonal profile. While non-availability of an acute sample for anti-PF4 antibody characterization precluded a firm determination of whether this “Long VITT” case represented a subset of monoclonal gammopathy of thrombotic significance (MGTS; Blood 2023 Apr 6;141(14):1772-1776; New Eng J Med 2024 Aug 8), the chronicity of thrombocytopenia, presence of a monoclonal anti-PF4 antibody and persistently positive anti-PF4 serology supports this diagnosis. Conclusions. Clonally-restricted VITT antibodies persist for months-years with no evidence for the production of novel anti-PF4 antibodies after the acute event. Decreased abundance of anti-PF4 antibodies leads to negative functional results with follow up samples. Some platelet-activating antibodies can persist for very long periods (>3 years) and mediate persistent thrombocytopenia, representing an SPEP-negative MGTS-like state. This study also demonstrates the first example of a VITT antibody with a kappa light chain. The requirement for anticoagulation in patients demonstrating ELISA-positive/functional test-negative results is not clear, but the persistence of mono/oligoclonal anti-PF4 antibodies raises the possibility for the upregulation of pathogenic antibody production in proinflammatory settings.

Abstract Background Hypergammaglobulinemia poses a challenge for identifying and quantitating monoclonal proteins (M-protein). The Increased polyclonal immunoglobulin background can lead to imprecise estimation of the M-protein when quantitated by serum protein electrophoresis (SPEP). This is especially true using the perpendicular drop method of peak integration. Hypergammaglobulinemia also makes it difficult to detect small M-proteins on immunofixation electrophoresis. Overestimation of M-protein concentration can lead to unnecessary follow-ups while missing small M-proteins can mask the underlying diagnosis for patients. In this study, we retrospectively evaluated the prevalence and concentration of M-protein within polyclonal hypergamma backgrounds using immunocapture matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass-spectrometry (MASS-FIX). Methods We retrospectively analyzed 47061 unique patients tested for SPEP and MASS-FIX in 2022 at Mayo Clinic. If a patient underwent multiple tests during this period, only the first result was included in the analysis. Polyclonal hypergammaglobulinemia was defined as a gamma fraction >1.7g/dL by SPEP. MASS-FIX was used to identify and isotype M-proteins. MASS-FIX was then combined with total immunoglobin quantitation (IgG, IgA or IgM) using nephelometry to quantify concentration of the M- protein using mathematical modeling (method currently under validation). Results Of the 47,061 unique patients, 24,796 were normal by SPEP (53%). M-spikes were present in 5,808 cases (12%). Hypogammaglobulinemia (gamma fraction < 0.5g/dL) in 2897 cases (6%). Small non-quantifiable M-proteins by SPEP were present in 8363 cases (18%). [JC2] There were 4222 hypergamma cases in the cohort (9%), without a quantitative M-spike on SPEP. Of these, 16.1% (680/4222) patients had an M-protein by MASS-FIX. When polyclonal hypergamma was the sole SPEP abnormality, 5.5% were MASS-FIX positive. However, when a small abnormality pattern was observed within the polyclonal hypergamma background on SPEP, 50% of patients were MASS-FIX positive. The most common isotype was IgG (27.2%), followed by IgM (10.2%), IgA (8.1%), and biclonal (3.7%), which is similar to overall isotype distribution in other backgrounds. Using quantitative MASS-FIX, we identified that 95% MASS-FIX positive small monoclonal proteins in polyclonal hypergamma are < 1 g/dL, which is the recommended limited of quantitation for M-protein using SPEP in setting of hypergammaglobulinemia. Conclusion Majority of polyclonal hypergammaglobulinemia cases (83.9%) do not have a monoclonal protein. MASS-FIX allows quantitation of small monoclonal proteins below the SPEP limit of quantitation, which can enhance our understanding of conditions which present with small M-proteins in a polyclonal hypergammaglobulinemia background. Small visual abnormalities within polyclonal hypergamma background on SPEP should be followed-up with immunofixation or MASS-FIX to confirm the presence or absence of M- proteins.