Unzeitig, Gary

Abstract Background: The Preoperative Endocrine Prognostic Index (PEPI) is a method to predict outcome after neoadjuvant endocrine therapy that integrates Ki67, estrogen receptor (ER) analysis and pathological stage from the surgical specimen (Ellis, JNCI 100:1380, 2008). We sought to further develop the PEPI for use in clinical trials by: a) establishing an efficient SOP for Ki67 analysis, b) determining the effect of simplifying the score by removing the ER component (modified "mPEPI") and c) independent validation of mPEPI in the ACOSOG (Alliance) Z1031 neoadjuvant aromatase inhibitor trial (Ellis, M, JCO 29:234, 2011). Methods: Ki-67 assay development focused on reproducing a 2.7% Ki-67 cut point (CP) required for PEPI. Ventana Image analysis (IA) to replace labor-intensive visual point counting (VPC) was assessed to increase scoring efficiency. Discordant scores led to a triage approach where cases with complex histological features that could not be resolved by IA were flagged for VPC. The Ki-67 scoring approach was preliminarily validated on T1/2 N0 cases from the P024 and POL trials (SABCS 2013, abstract P3-05-190). Models with and without ER suggested ER was dispensable. A locked SOP for mPEPI was subsequently applied to the Z1031A trial. The primary endpoint was time from the date of surgery to local, regional, or distant recurrence in the mPEPI-0 group (T1/2 N0, Ki67 <2.7%) versus the mPEPI>0 group. Results. mPEPI by IA was evaluated on 202 of 377 (53%) patients enrolled into Z1031A (6% of IA results were triaged to VPC). All patients have been followed a minimum of 2 years (median: 5 years; max: 7 years). Only 10 patients in the mPEPI-0 group (22.7%) received adjuvant chemotherapy, versus 78 in the mPEPI>0 group (49.4%). Time to breast cancer recurrence was decreased among those with mPEPI>0 status relative to those with mPEPI-0 status (log rank p=0.012). Only one disease event among 44 (2%) cases with mPEPI-0 was observed versus 26 of 158 cases with mPEPI>0 (16.5%) Conclusions. mPEPI-0 status can identify patients at low risk of relapse after neoadjuvant endocrine therapy: therefore mPEPI-0 status has operational characteristics similar to pCR after chemotherapy for ER-negative disease. mPEPI is undergoing prospective validation in the Alliance ALTERNATE trial that will assess whether Fulvestrant increases the mPEPI-0 rate and also will prospectively determine whether patients with mPEPI-0 status can safely be managed without adjuvant chemotherapy treatment. Citation Format: Souzan Sanati, Vera J Suman, Rodrigo Goncalves, Katherine DeSchryver, Cynthia X Ma, Jeremy Hoog, Erika Crouch, Michael Barnes, Gary Unzeitig, A Marilyn Leitch, Kelly K Hunt, Matthew J Ellis. Validation of the preoperative endocrine prognostic index in the ACOSOG (Alliance) Z1031 neoadjuvant aromatase inhibitor trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Seventh Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2014 Dec 9-13; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(9 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-11-13.

Abstract Neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (ET) in patients (pts) with locally advanced estrogen receptor positive (ER+) breast cancer (BC) improves breast conservation rate, and importantly offers an opportunity for individualized assessment of tumor responsiveness to ET to guide subsequent treatment. Previous neoadjuvant ET trials demonstrated that pathologic tumor size (pT), axillary lymph node status (N), and tumor Ki67 value at surgery predicted risk of relapse. Preoperative endocrine prognostic index (PEPI) was therefore developed to assign risk scores based on these factors. Modified PEPI 0, defined by pT1-2 N0 Ki67< 2.7%, was associated with extremely low risk of recurrence without adjuvant chemotherapy. In addition, high Ki67 post 2-4 weeks (wks) of neoadjuvant ET identified resistant tumors with poor outcome. ALTERNATE trial is a three-arm phase III neoadjuvant/adjuvant ET trial designed to achieve two primary objectives. The first is to prospectively validate that modified PEPI 0 predicts > 95% relapse-free survival (RFS). The second is to determine whether fulvestrant (F), or fulvestrant (F) plus anastrozole (A), is superior to A in inducing a higher rate of modified PEPI 0. Secondary objectives include assessing RFS for pts with endocrine resistant tumor, defined by Ki67 > 10% at 4 or 12 wk, disease progression, or modified PEPI non-0, and pathologic responses of resistant tumors to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Correlative studies include degrees of Ki67 suppression and ER level post treatment. In addition, ongoing research sequencing studies of DNA and RNA will be performed to contrast sensitive vs resistant tumors. During the first phase of the trial, 1200 pts are randomized 1:1:1 to the F, A or F/A. This provides an 82% chance, 1-sided alpha 0.025 chi-square test to detect at least 10% difference in modified PEPI 0 rate comparing F or F/A with A. While waiting for result of analysis, the A arm will continue for the 2nd phase enrollment. Only the F-containing arm(s) superior over A will be continued to the 2nd phase. During the 2nd phase, an additional 540 pts in each arm is estimated to obtain 317 pts with PEPI score 0. This will have a 90% chance, with a one-sided alpha=0.025 nonparametric Brookmeyer-Crowley type one sample survival test, rejecting that 5 year RFS rate is 95%. The maximum sample size is 2820 pts. Eligible pts include postmenopausal women with newly diagnosed clinical stage II or III ER+ (Allred score 6-8) HER2- BC. Tumor biopsy is required at baseline, 4 wk, and surgery for central Ki67 analysis. Treatment decision is individualized based on 4 wk Ki67 and modified PEPI score. Pts with Ki67 > 10% at 4 wk are switched to chemotherapy. Pts with a modified PEPI score of 0 are recommended not to receive chemotherapy, but continue the assigned ET for 1.5 years followed by 3 years of A. This trial is currently accruing pts through CTSU. This research is supported in part by NCI BIQSFP, and grants from Breast Cancer Research Foundation, Genentech, and the Investigator-Sponsored Study Program of AstraZeneca. The Clinical Trials.gov Identifier: NCT01953588. Citation Format: Cynthia X Ma, Vera Suman, A Marilyn Leitch, Souzan Sanati, Katherine DeSchryver, Gary W Unzeitig, Paul Haluska, Mark Watson, Olwen Hahn, Jo Anne Zujewski, Kelly Hunt, Eric P Winer, Cliff A Hudis, Matthew J Ellis. Alliance A011106: ALTernate approaches for clinical stage II or III Estrogen Receptor positive breast cancer NeoAdjuvant TrEatment (ALTERNATE) in postmenopausal women: A phase III study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Seventh Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2014 Dec 9-13; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(9 Suppl):Abstract nr OT2-1-04.

Abstract Background: Neoadjuvant aromatase inhibitor (AI) therapy would become a more acceptable alternative to chemotherapy if there was a way to identify AI-resistant cases early for triage to alternate systemic treatment. We therefore conducted a Phase 2 trial of post-menopausal patients with clinical stage 2 or 3 ER+ (Allred Score 6 to 8) breast cancer who were re-biopsied 2 to 4 weeks after initiating neoadjuvant AI therapy. If the tumor Ki67 level was > 10% (AI resistant) the patient was triaged to either chemotherapy or immediate surgery and if < 10% (AI sensitive) the patient completed 16 to 18 weeks of neoadjuvant AI treatment. Co-primary endpoints were: 1) to confirm that the pathological complete response (pCR) rate to standard NCCN chemotherapy in the AI resistant population is in the range of 20% (similar to ER− disease). This required the observation of least 4/35 pCRs; 2) whether patients were willing to accept a recommendation of no chemotherapy when the preoperative endocrine prognostic index score was zero (PEPI-0) (pStage 1 or 2A, Ki67<2.7% and ER+) since, according to the PEPI model, these patients have such a low relapse risk that chemotherapy is unlikely to be of value (Ellis, M JNCI 100:1380–8, 2008). Feasible was defined as <10% PEPI-0 cases receiving adjuvant chemotherapy. Secondary endpoints included a determination of the distribution of intrinsic subtypes in the AI sensitive and resistant groups (using a research use only assay). Results: 51 patients (21%) had 2 to 4 week Ki67>10%, of these 36 received chemotherapy per protocol (27) anthracycline (A) and taxane (T)-based, 7 T-based, 1 A-only based and 1 other (non-NCCN) regimen but only 2 patients had a pCR (5.5%). 194 patients (79%) had a Ki67 <10%, of these 176 had PEPI score information. 65 had a PEPI-0 (37%), of which 61 (94%) reported a treatment plan that did not include adjuvant chemotherapy. The AI resistant group had a significantly higher frequency of baseline high-risk intrinsic subtypes (LumB: 26, HER2-E: 2 versus LumA: 7) at baseline than the AI sensitive group (LumB: 40, HER2-E: 0 versus LumA: 66) Fishers exact test p = 7.16E−6. Additional molecular data will be presented at the meeting. Conclusion. A Ki67 value >10% at 2 to 4 weeks strongly enriches for high-risk molecular subtypes (mainly LumB) however standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy did not meet pre-assigned criteria for adequate Phase 2 activity in this group. Novel neoadjuvant approaches for AI resistant-disease defined by high on treatment Ki67 are therefore a high priority. Management of patients with excellent response to neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (PEPI-0) without adjuvant chemotherapy is feasible. The ALTERNATE trial will enroll over 2000 patients to establish a new standard of care for neoadjuvant treatment of ER+ HER2− disease based on these principles. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2012;72(24 Suppl):Abstract nr PD07-01.

Abstract Background: Estrogen receptors are over-expressed in around 70% of breast cancer cases. The genetic changes that occur during aromatase inhibitor (AI) treatment are not well understood and may differ depending upon the patient's response phenotype. Methods: We performed whole genome sequencing (WGS) of matched blood, pre-treatment, and post-treatment biopsy samples from 22 estrogen receptor positive breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant aromatase inhibitors. For 5 cases, we performed the whole genome sequencing (WGS) on patients’ matched normal, two pre AI-treatment, and two post AI-treatment DNA isolates from biopsy samples. We validated all putative coding and non-coding somatic mutations using deep sequencing. By comparing the validated somatic mutations from pre- and post- AI treatment biopsy samples, we were able to determine the alterations in the tumor genomes. In every case we defined the clonal architecture of each pair of pre-treatment and post-treatment biopsy samples by comparing the variant allele frequencies from thousands of validated somatic mutations. Results: Comparisons of the two pre AI-treatment biopsy samples from the same patient indicates that the variant allele frequencies of mutations showed high concordances in all 5 cases, 0.74 to 0.95 range of correlation coefficient. Only a small percentage of somatic mutations were detected in one pre-treatment sample and not the other (4.65% overall). In comparing the somatic variations between pre-treatment and matched post-treatment biopsy samples in 22 cases, we found that patients with good clinical response to AI treatment retained known driver mutations only in their pre-treatment tumors. Conversely, those patients with poor clinical response presented new driver mutations in their post-treatment samples. Furthermore, the variant allele frequency for most mutated genes decreased in post AI treatment samples for patients with good AI treatment response; on the contrary, the variant allele frequency increased for patients with poor clinical response. Conclusions: From WGS of matched normal, pre-treatment, and post-treatment biopsy samples, we identified new driver genes mutated in patients with poor clinical response, while patients with good clinical response had lost mutated driver genes in their post-treatment biopsy samples. The genetic landscape revealed by WGS of pre-treatment and post-treatment biopsy samples reveals mutational repertoires are remodeled by AI therapy. This finding suggests deep sequencing of AI treated samples will be necessary to reveal the complete complement of mutations present in a patient's tumor. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 103rd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2012 Mar 31-Apr 4; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2012;72(8 Suppl):Abstract nr LB-423. doi:1538-7445.AM2012-LB-423

Purpose Preoperative aromatase inhibitor (AI) treatment promotes breast-conserving surgery (BCS) for estrogen receptor (ER) –positive breast cancer. To study this treatment option, responses to three AIs were compared in a randomized phase II neoadjuvant trial designed to select agents for phase III investigations. Patients and Methods Three hundred seventy-seven postmenopausal women with clinical stage II to III ER-positive (Allred score 6-8) breast cancer were randomly assigned to receive neoadjuvant exemestane, letrozole, or anastrozole. The primary end point was clinical response. Secondary end points included BCS, Ki67 proliferation marker changes, the Preoperative Endocrine Prognostic Index (PEPI), and PAM50-based intrinsic subtype analysis. Results On the basis of clinical response rates, letrozole and anastrozole were selected for further investigation; however, no other differences in surgical outcome, PEPI score, or Ki67 suppression were detected. The BCS rate for mastectomy-only patients at presentation was 51%. PAM50 analysis identified AI-unresponsive nonluminal subtypes (human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 enriched or basal-like) in 3.3% of patients. Clinical response and surgical outcomes were similar in luminal A (LumA) versus luminal B tumors; however, a PEPI of 0 (best prognostic group) was highest in the LumA subset (27.1% v 10.7%; P = .004). Conclusion Neoadjuvant AI treatment markedly improved surgical outcomes. Ki67 and PEPI data demonstrated that the three agents tested are biologically equivalent and therefore likely to have similar adjuvant activities. LumA tumors were more likely to have favorable biomarker characteristics after treatment; however, occasional paradoxical increases in Ki67 (12% of tumors with > 5% increase after therapy) suggest treatment-resistant cells, present in some LumA tumors, can be detected by post-treatment profiling.