Cerhan, James R.

Abstract Background: Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is a lymphoid malignancy with a strong genetic component. There are over 30 common single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with the risk of CLL. Moreover, in the InterLymph Subtypes Project a number of non-genetic exposures have been found to be associated with CLL, including family history (FH), height, history of atopic conditions, UV radiation, and farming exposures. However there has not been a study evaluating the joint effects among these genetic and non-genetic factors with CLL risk. Methods: Using the Mayo Clinic CLL case-control study of 587 newly diagnosed CLL cases and 790 controls, we performed analyses evaluating joint effects of genetic and non-genetic factors. For genetic effects, we computed a polygenetic risk score (PRS), a weighted averaged of the number of risk alleles across 34 SNPs, with the weights being the log of the odds ratio for each SNP. Exposure data was available for 65% of the cases and 79% of the controls. We evaluated individual and joint associations of FH of any hematological malignancy, total sun exposure categorized by quartiles based on the controls, ever living or working on a farm, any atopy, any allergies, asthma, height, and PRSs categorized by quintiles based on the controls. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: In our preliminary results, the frequency of CLL cases in the upper PRS quintile was 49% while in the lowest quintile only 5%. The PRS has a strong evidence of association with CLL (OR= 3.04, CI =2.20-4.20 for highest versus the middle quintile). When adjusting for PRS, we still found a positive association with FH for any hematological malignancy (OR = 1.90, CI = 1.25-2.88), FH of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (OR = 2.02, CI = 1.08-3.79), and FH of leukemia (OR = 1.73, CI = 0.98-3.07). When stratifying by FH, the upper quintile of the PRS had a 5.85-fold (CI = 1.69-20.3) increased risk of CLL relative to those in the middle quintile in the FH strata, and a 2.65-fold (CI = 1.75-4.01) increased risk in the non-FH strata. After adjusting for PRS, FH and age, there remained an inverse association with sun exposure in the highest quartile (hours per week) (OR = 0.49, CI = 0.31-0.79) and a positive association with height (per 10 cm change) (OR = 1.37, CI = 1.17-1.62), but there were no associations with atopy, any allergies, history of asthma, or farming. No statistical evidence of an interaction among the variables was observed. Conclusions: We found evidence of independent effects among the genetic and non-genetic factors with risk of CLL. Among these factors, the PRS had the largest effect size. Although we did not observe any statistical interactions, larger sample sizes are warranted to fully evaluate these effects on risk of CLL. We are currently increasing our sample size through collaboration with other research groups. Final results will be presented in the meeting. This abstract is also being presented as Poster A06. Citation Format: Geffen Kleinstern, Dennis Robinson, Tim G. Call, Mark Liebow, Silvia de Sanjosé, Yolanda Benavente, James R. Cerhan, Susan L. Slager. Association of environmental risk factors, family history, and polygenic risk scores with chronic lymphocytic leukemia. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference: Improving Cancer Risk Prediction for Prevention and Early Detection; Nov 16-19, 2016; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2017;26(5 Suppl):Abstract nr PR03.

Abstract This abstract is being presented as a short talk in the scientific program. A full abstract is printed in the Proffered Abstracts section (PR03) of the Conference Proceedings. Citation Format: Geffen Kleinstern, Dennis Robinson, Tim G. Call, Mark Liebow, Silvia de Sanjosé, Yolanda Benavente, James R. Cerhan, Susan L. Slager. Association of environmental risk factors, family history, and polygenic risk scores with chronic lymphocytic leukemia. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference: Improving Cancer Risk Prediction for Prevention and Early Detection; Nov 16-19, 2016; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2017;26(5 Suppl):Abstract nr A06.

Abstract Background: Different molecules within coffee may be pro-carcinogenic, while others may have anti-oxidant and anti-neoplastic effects. Hence, it can be hypothesized that coffee may have differing risk associations with specific colorectal cancer (CRC) subtypes. The aim of this study was to evaluate associations between coffee consumption and incident CRC overall, by anatomic subsite, and by molecularly defined tumor subtypes, in the population-based Iowa Women's Health Study (IWHS). Methods: IWHS participants, ages 55-69 years, provided dietary intake estimates using self-reported food frequency questionnaires at baseline (1986). From 35,216 women included the final analysis, 1298 developed CRC (673 with proximal CRC, 597 with distal CRC) through December 31, 2002 (end of the IWHS molecular epidemiology project study period). Archived, paraffin-embedded tissue specimens for 732 representative CRC cases were collected and analyzed to determine if coffee consumption (none or <1 cup/month, <1 cup/week, 1 cup/day, 2-3 cups/day and ≥4 cups/day) was associated with microsatellite instability (MSI-L/MSS or MSI-H), CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP-negative or CIMP-positive), BRAF mutation status (BRAF-wildtype or BRAF-mutated), KRAS mutation status (KRAS-wildtype and KRAS-mutated), p53 protein expression level (p53 absent, low or high) and estrogen receptor β protein expression level (ERβ absent, low or high). Multivariable Cox regression models were fit to estimate relative risks (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) with adjustment for age, smoking, alcohol use, diabetes, body mass index and waist-hip ratio, physical activity, estrogen use, dietary intake of fat, calcium, vitamin E, sucrose, red meat and methionine. P-values were not adjusted for multiple testing. Results: There was no significant difference in the risk of overall (RR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.85-1.29; Ptrend=0.50), proximal (RR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.68-1.21; Ptrend=0.57) or distal CRC (RR, 1.18; 95% CI, 0.86-1.64; Ptrend=0.19) in women who consumed ≥4 cups of coffee/day (caffeinated or decaffeinated), as compared to non-consumers. By CRC molecular subtypes for these same two exposure groups, women with ≥4 cups of coffee/day were more likely to develop ERβ-low CRC (RR, 2.98; 95% CI, 1.04-8.51; Ptrend=0.06), though no significant associations were observed for caffeinated or decaffeinated coffee specifically. In contrast, women who consumed ≥4 cups of decaffeinated coffee/day were less likely to develop MSI-L/MSS (RR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.36-0.92; Ptrend=0.04) and BRAF-WT (RR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.44-1.06; Ptrend=0.06) CRCs than non-consumers. Women who consumed ≥4 cups of caffeinated coffee/day were also less likely to develop p53-low CRCs (RR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.24-1.15; Ptrend=0.02). Null associations were observed between decaffeinated coffee consumption and risk of CIMP-, KRAS- and p53- defined CRC subtypes, as well as between caffeinated coffee consumption and risk of MSI-, BRAF-, CIMP- or KRAS-defined CRC subtypes. Conclusion: In this prospective cohort study of older women, though coffee consumption was not associated with risk of overall or site-specific CRC, unique associations were observed with molecularly defined CRC subtypes, supporting a need for further investigation of the potential pro- and anti-carcinogenic effects of coffee constituents on biologic targets involved in colorectal carcinogenesis. Citation Format: Siddharth Singh, Robert Vierkant, Lori Tillmans, Alice Wang, Daniel Weisenberger, Peter Laird, Maki Inoue-Choi, Andrea Mariani, Charles Lynch, Kristin Anderson, Amy French, Robert Haile, Lisa Harnack, John Potter, Susan Slager, Thomas Smyrk, Stephen Thibodeau, James Cerhan, Paul Limburg. Coffee consumption and colorectal cancer risk by molecularly defined subtypes in a prospective cohort study of older women. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Twelfth Annual AACR International Conference on Frontiers in Cancer Prevention Research; 2013 Oct 27-30; National Harbor, MD. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Can Prev Res 2013;6(11 Suppl): Abstract nr A44.

AbstractIndolent B‐cell lymphomas other than follicular lymphoma account for up to 10% of all B‐cell neoplasms. While they typically follow a slowly progressive course, some patients experience rapid progression and early mortality. Prognostic scoring systems have not been adopted, hindering the ability of clinicians or researchers to predict outcomes, or risk‐stratify patients during clinical trials. To address this, we evaluated the utility of existing prognostic indices and novel, early disease‐related outcomes, to predict subsequent long term survival. Baseline characteristics and outcomes data were generated from a longitudinal cohort study that prospectively enrolled 632 patients newly diagnosed with marginal zone lymphoma, lymphoplasmacytic lymphomas, or B‐cell lymphomas not otherwise specified, beginning in 2002. The International Prognostic Index (IPI), Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index (FLIPI), and MALT International prognostic index (MALT‐IPI) demonstrated c‐statistics that ranged from 0.593‐0.612 for event‐free survival (EFS), and 0.683‐0.714 for overall survival (OS). Patients who attained event‐free survival at 12 months (EFS12) experienced similar mortality to the US general population (standardized mortality ratio [SMR] 1.19; 95% CI 0.95‐1.46). Patients who did not attain EFS12 had subsequent worse morality (SMR 3.14 (95% CI 2.05‐4.59). The MALT‐IPI demonstrated utility in predicting subsequent long‐term outcomes among patients with non‐follicular indolent B‐cell lymphomas. This index should be used by clinicians giving guidance to patients at the time of initial diagnosis, and risk stratification during clinical studies. The divergent long‐term outcomes experienced by patients who do or do not attain EFS12 suggest there exists a subset of patients who harbor high‐risk disease. Future research efforts should focus on methods to identify these patients at the time of diagnosis, in order to enable risk‐tailored therapy.