Kollmeyer, Thomas M.

Abstract Glioblastoma (GBM), IDH-wildtype (WT) is currently defined as an IDH-WT and H3-WT diffuse astrocytic glioma with molecular diagnostic features including whole +7/−10, TERT promoter (TERTp) mutation, and EGFR amplification and/or morphological diagnostic features such as necrosis and microvascular proliferation. To further understand the diversity of copy number signatures of GBM, IDHWT and evaluate the diagnostic utility of other recurrent copy number changes, we analyzed paired chromosomal microarray and next-generation sequencing mutational profiling data from 418 adult IDH-WT and H3-WT tumors with GBM morphological diagnostic features. The most common molecular features were TERTp mutations (85%), CDKN2A/B heterozygous/homozygous deletion (78%/66%), +7/-10 (63%), EGFR amplification (41%), +19 (36%), PTEN mutations (35%), partial -13 (33%), partial -14 (33%), +20 (32%), TP53 mutations (32%), and partial -22 (29%). At least one molecular diagnostic biomarker was present in 92% (n=385) of cases, and 29% (n=121) of cases had all three. The +7/-10 biomarker was the most frequent chromosomes 7/10 copy number change (68%, n=265). Other +7/-10 patterns were seen in 30% (n=125) of cases and included isolated +7 or -10, combinations of +7 and -10 with partial +7, partial -10 or 10 copy neutral loss of heterozygosity (cnLOH). Overall, 93% (390/418) of cases had whole and other chromosome 7/10 copy number changes. In comparison to tumors with +7/-10, tumors with other +7/-10 patterns were significantly enriched for partial 13 loss (Bonferroni adjusted p=0.04) but were not associated with significant difference in patient overall survival (p=0.30, 158/418 had available survival data). Our findings reiterate and expand the spectrum of copy number changes associated with GBM, IDH-WT. The similar overall survival rates between cases with the +7/-10 biomarker and those with other +7/-10 patterns suggest that other +7/-10 patterns may be functionally equivalent to +7/-10 and diagnostically relevant as a molecular diagnostic biomarker for this tumor type.

Abstract INTRODUCTION Prior to 2021, (classic) glioblastoma (GBM) required absence of IDH mutation and histologic features of hypercellularity, nuclear atypia, microvascular proliferation (MVP), and necrosis. Absence of histologic features can be a result of undersampling, with molecular, radiologic, and clinical features consistent with GBM. Accordingly, WHO 2021 defined molecular glioblastoma as diffuse glioma IDHwt, H3wt, with one or more of MVP, necrosis, TERT promoter mutation, EGFR gene amplification (EGFRamp), and/or +7/−10. We hypothesized that there is clinical and radiographic heterogeneity among tumors defined as molecular GBM. METHODS We identified 121 patients that met the criteria for molecular GBM. 121 Classic GBM, defined as IDHwt with hypercellularity, MVP or necrosis, were matched to molecular GBM cases by age, sex, and diagnosis date. All cases were reviewed for relevant histologic features and molecular features. Examined clinical variables included: first symptom, time from first symptom to date of pathological diagnosis, date of first MRI, tumor location, radiographic features of enhancement, diffusion or mass effect, time to progression and overall survival. Clinical, radiologic, and molecular features were compared between classic and molecular GBM. RESULTS Currently,160 cases have been reviewed. Preliminary results show that there is a longer time from first symptom to diagnosis for molecular GBM. Molecular GBM is significantly more likely to be discovered coincidentally, and without enhancement or radiographic necrosis. Classic GBM is significantly more likely to present with focal neurologic deficit as first symptom, regional mass effect on index imaging and have monosomy 10. CONCLUSION While pathologic undersampling accounts for a significant proportion of molecular GBM, our data suggest that there are significant clinical, radiographic, and outcome differences between classical and molecular GBM. Final analysis of the entire cohort will help better define this clinical spectrum.

Abstract BACKGROUND The diagnosis and management of patients with brain tumors currently uses WHO defined morphologic and molecular features. However, neuro-oncology practice in low resource settings relies on histomorphology. This study aims to reclassify glioma cases diagnosed in the Department of Anatomic and Molecular Pathology Lagos University Teaching Hospital using the 2021 WHO classification. METHODS Fifty-six cases of glioma diagnosed between 2013 to 2021 were evaluated. Morphologic diagnosis was reassessed. Five-micron sections were obtained for immunohistochemistry (IHC), and genetic testing (DNA and RNA); after manual macrodissection for tumor enrichment using 10μm sections. IHC for IDH1-R132H, ATRX, BRAFV600E, P53,Ki67, and H3K27M and OncoScan chromosomal microarray analysis were performed. NGS mutation/fusion analysis and EPIC methylation array profiling are in progress. RESULTS Of 56 cases evaluated, median age was 22 years (range=1-60 years); 71% were males. The initial morphologic diagnosis include 21 pilocytic astrocytoma, 11 glioblastoma, 9 ependymoma, 7 diffuse astrocytoma, 3 anaplastic astrocytoma, 2 high-grade gliomas, 1 oligodendroglioma, 1 diffuse midline glioma, and 1 pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma (PXA). Histomorphologic re-evaluation revealed discordant diagnosis in 29% (16/56) of cases. Of the 56 cases, 73% (41/56) had usable DNA yield and 38% (21/56) had DNA yield of ≥ 750ng. Chromosomal microarray analysis was completed for 50% (28/56) cases. The revised 2021 WHO diagnosis were: 5 glioblastoma, IDH-wildtype, 5 pilocytic astrocytoma, 4 glioma NEC, 3 posterior fossa ependymoma, group B, 3 PXAs, 3 astrocytoma, IDH-mutant, 2 pediatric low-grade glioma, 2 supratentorial ependymoma, ZFTA fusion-positive, 1 posterior fossa ependymoma, group A. In 71% (20/28) of cases, diagnosis was revised using the 2021 WHO criteria. CONCLUSION Most cases had usable DNA yield. Overall, hsitologic re-evaluation and molecular testing based on the 2021 WHO classification guidelines refined the diagnosis in 48% (27/56) of cases.

Abstract BACKGROUND The diagnosis and management of patients with brain tumors currently uses WHO defined morphologic and molecular features. However, neuro-oncology practice in low resource settings relies solely on histomorphology. This study aims to reclassify glioma cases diagnosed in the Department of Anatomic and Molecular Pathology Lagos University Teaching Hospital using the WHO 2021 classification. METHODS Fifty-six cases of glioma diagnosed between 2013 to 2021 were evaluated. Morphologic diagnosis was reassessed. Five-micron sections were obtained for immunohistochemistry (IHC), and genetic testing (DNA and RNA) after manual macrodissection for tumor enrichment used 10-µm sections. IHC for IDH1-R132H, ATRX, BRAF-V600E, p53, Ki67 and H3-K27M and Oncoscan chromosomal microarray analysis were performed. NGS mutation/fusion analysis and EPIC methylation array profiling are in progress. RESULTS Of the 56 cases evaluated, median age was 22 years (range, 1-60); 71% were male. The initial morphologic diagnoses included 21 pilocytic astrocytoma, 11 glioblastoma, 9 ependymoma, 7 diffuse astrocytoma, 3 anaplastic astrocytoma, 2 high-grade gliomas, 1 oligodendroglioma, 1 diffuse midline glioma, and 1 pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma (PXA). Histomorphologic re-evaluation revealed discordant diagnosis in 29% (16/56) of cases. Of the 56 cases, 73% (41/56) had usable DNA yield and 38% (21/56) had DNA yield of ≥750ng. Chromosomal microarray analysis was completed for 50% (28/56) cases. The revised WHO 2021 diagnosis was: 5 glioblastoma IDH-wildtype, 5 pilocytic astrocytoma, 4 glioma NEC, 3 posterior fossa ependymoma, group B, 3 PXA, 3 astrocytoma IDH-mutant, 2 pediatric low-grade gliomas, 2 supratentorial ependymoma, ZFTA fusion-positive, 1 posterior fossa ependymoma, group A. In 71% (20/28) of cases with molecular testing, diagnosis was revised using WHO 2021 criteria. CONCLUSION Most cases had usable DNA. Overall, histologic re-evaluation and molecular based on the WHO 2021 criteria refined the diagnosis in 48% (27/56) of cases.

The CRISPR-Cas9 system has enabled researchers to precisely modify/edit the sequence of a genome. A typical editing experiment consists of two steps: (1) editing cultured cells; (2) cell cloning and selection of clones with and without intended edit, presumed to be isogenic. The application of CRISPR-Cas9 system may result in off-target edits, whereas cloning will reveal culture-acquired mutations. We analyzed the extent of the former and the latter by whole genome sequencing in three experiments involving separate genomic loci and conducted by three independent laboratories. In all experiments we hardly found any off-target edits, whereas detecting hundreds to thousands of single nucleotide mutations unique to each clone after relatively short culture of 10–20 passages. Notably, clones also differed in copy number alterations (CNAs) that were several kb to several mb in size and represented the largest source of genomic divergence among clones. We suggest that screening of clones for mutations and CNAs acquired in culture is a necessary step to allow correct interpretation of DNA editing experiments. Furthermore, since culture associated mutations are inevitable, we propose that experiments involving derivation of clonal lines should compare a mix of multiple unedited lines and a mix of multiple edited lines.

Abstract BACKGROUND The topologically associated domain (TAD) on 8q24 surrounding MYC is important for many types of cancer. The region is also important in the formation of IDH-mutant glioma; the risk allele rs55705857 being associated with the development of these tumors. The rs55705857 risk allele significantly increased the formation of tumors in an IDH-mutant mouse model. Cerebral organoids have been found to recapitulate the early development of the brain. We hypothesized that the rs55705857 risk allele may alter the phenotype of cerebral organoids. METHODS Isogenic induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) were developed with (n=3) and without (n=2) the rs55705857 risk allele from the parental cell line PGP-1 (GM23338). These cells were cultured and differentiated into unpatterned cerebral organoids and observed throughout differentiation. Organoids were fixed, sectioned, and stained by H&E and immunofluorescence. RESULTS Organoids containing the risk allele were smaller throughout development, starting at the embryoid body stage and continuing up to over 75 days in culture, compared to two isogenic non-risk lines. At 4 weeks the risk allele containing organoids also contained a larger number of small rosette-like neuroepithelia, instead of the more continuous neuroepithelia observed in the non-risk allele organoids. At 75 days, the organoids with the risk allele maintained a larger proportion of Sox2 positive cells, which are enriched in the tight clusters of small cells with round nuclei. CONCLUSIONS The risk allele rs55705857 in the MYC TAD at 8q24 is altering the development of unpatterned cerebral organoids. This difference is visible as early as embryoid body development and persists through neuroepithelial development. Further studies of these differences may help our understanding of how rs55705857 accelerates IDH-mutant glioma development.

Abstract Diffuse hemispheric glioma, H3 G34-mutant (DHG_H3G34) is a novel tumor type in the 2021 WHO CNS classification. We describe a comprehensive sequencing and high-resolution genome-wide copy number analysis of a series of cases clinically tested by a single laboratory (2018-2022). Cases included tumors from 47 unique patients (1 reportedly recurrent) that had an H3-3A G34 mutation detected using an 187-gene mutation and fusion targeted neuro-oncology NGS panel (n=47). A subset (n=18) of cases was also tested Oncoscan chromosomal microarray. Median age at testing was 20 years (range, 12-50). H3-3A G34 mutations included G34R (n=44; 94%), G34V (n=2) and a novel G34E variant considered to be likely clinically relevant (n=1). All DHG_H3G34 were hemispheric tumors, and one tumor was multifocal with midline involvement. Concurrent mutations recurrently involved ATRX (n=38), TERT promoter (n=3; mutually exclusive with ATRX mutations), TP53 (n=43), PDGFRA (n=26), PTEN (n=5), NF1 (n=4, all patients over 20 years), PIK3CA (n=4) and CDKN2A (n=3). The single recurrent tumor also had an MSH6 mutation, and in addition to 3 other cases, had increased number of sequence variants suggestive of a high tumor mutational burden. A single case also showed an FGFR3::FAM184B (exon 17::exon 2) fusion. All cases with available chromosomal microarray data had unbalanced genomes with multiple chromosomal gains/losses, and regions of copy-neutral loss of heterozygosity. The most frequent recurrent (at least 50% of cases) abnormalities were losses involving 3q, 4q, 10q, 13q and 18q, and 17p copy-neutral loss of heterozygosity encompassing TP53 (all but one case had concomitant TP53 mutation), a pattern reminiscent of IDH-mutant astrocytomas. Oncogene amplifications (PDGFRA and PIK3CA) were detected in 3 (of 18) cases. CDKN2A/B deletion was observed in 8 cases (2 homozygous). In conclusion, we describe additional sequence and copy-number abnormalities in DHG_H3G34, expanding the spectrum of genetic changes associated with this novel tumor type.

Establishing causal links between inherited polymorphisms and cancer risk is challenging. Here, we focus on the single-nucleotide polymorphism rs55705857, which confers a sixfold greater risk of isocitrate dehydrogenase ( IDH) –mutant low-grade glioma (LGG). We reveal that rs55705857 itself is the causal variant and is associated with molecular pathways that drive LGG. Mechanistically, we show that rs55705857 resides within a brain-specific enhancer, where the risk allele disrupts OCT2/4 binding, allowing increased interaction with the Myc promoter and increased Myc expression. Mutating the orthologous mouse rs55705857 locus accelerated tumor development in an Idh1 R132H -driven LGG mouse model from 472 to 172 days and increased penetrance from 30% to 75%. Our work reveals mechanisms of the heritable predisposition to lethal glioma in ~40% of LGG patients.

Abstract Knowledge about inherited and acquired genetics of adult diffuse glioma has expanded significantly over the past decade. Genomewide association studies (GWAS) stratified by histologic subtype identified six germline variants that were associated specifically with glioblastoma (GBM) and 12 that were associated with lower grade glioma. A GWAS performed using the 2016 WHO criteria, stratifying patients by IDH mutation and 1p/19q codeletion (as well as TERT promoter mutation), discovered that many of the known variants are associated with specific WHO glioma subtypes. In addition, the GWAS stratified by molecular group identified two additional novel regions: variants in D2HGDH that were associated with tumors that had an IDH mutation and a variant near FAM20C that was associated with tumors that had both IDH mutation and 1p/19q codeletion. The results of these germline associations have been used to calculate polygenic risk scores, from which to estimate relative and absolute risk of overall glioma and risk of specific glioma subtypes. We will review the concept of polygenic risk models and their potential clinical utility, as well as discuss the published adult diffuse glioma polygenic risk models. To date, these prior genetic studies have been done on European populations. Using the published glioma polygenic risk model, we show that the genetic associations published to date do not generalize across genetic ancestries, demonstrating that genetic studies need to be done on more diverse populations.